H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 1-0
Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Guangzhou semifinal 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2018* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-2 6-2 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Andrea Petkovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |