H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Qiang Wang vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 1-0

Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Guangzhou Open semifinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Petkovic
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #41 6-2 6-2 Andrea Petkovic #85 Match data Sep 22, 2018* SF Guangzhou Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,988 279 228 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qiang Wang Andrea Petkovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0
20 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,614 0 1
22 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,787 0 1
23 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,973 0 2
24 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,855 0 2
25 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,801 0 2
26 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,828 0 5
27 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,689 0 6
28 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2 2016 19–20 48.7% #55 1,694 0 6
29 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2 2017 12–21 36.4% #99 1,648 0 6
30 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2 2018 16–14 53.3% #64 1,725 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,716 0 6
32 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,700 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,729 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,708 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qiang Wang Andrea Petkovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 21 14 35 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 33 10 43 76.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 12 9 21 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 15 14 29 51.7% 19 5 24 79.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2015 19 18 37 51.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2017 10 12 22 45.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 13 9 22 59.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 10 11 21 47.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2020 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — — — — — 170 142 312 54.5% 79 57 136 58.1% 24 26 50 48.0% 6 3 9 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 239/257 of Qiang Wang's and 452/505 of Andrea Petkovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qiang Wang Andrea Petkovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/6 1.7 2.3 72.7% 59.0% 67.8% 57.1% 38.9% 60.9% 42.0%
20 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6% 2009 18/19 3.1 2.5 64.4% 64.3% 48.7% 51.8% 45.7% 58.4% 46.5%
22 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1% 2010 53/57 3.9 2.8 63.6% 62.9% 48.4% 58.6% 46.9% 57.5% 44.4%
23 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0% 2011 56/67 2.2 2.1 70.0% 62.7% 50.3% 56.4% 50.6% 59.0% 48.2%
24 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6% 2012 18/18 1.1 1.9 74.6% 57.5% 48.1% 47.6% 43.6% 55.2% 46.9%
25 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3% 2013 32/33 2.2 3.2 66.8% 63.7% 47.7% 55.2% 53.4% 58.3% 47.2%
26 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4% 2014 52/61 1.8 2.7 68.3% 61.4% 46.8% 48.8% 51.1% 56.9% 46.4%
27 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6% 2015 40/54 1.6 3.1 66.0% 61.4% 50.5% 51.1% 49.4% 57.6% 45.3%
28 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6% 2016 38/39 1.9 3.9 64.0% 62.4% 44.9% 48.5% 47.6% 56.1% 45.2%
29 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9% 2017 29/33 0.5 3.3 69.4% 56.2% 42.3% 48.1% 42.0% 52.1% 46.1%
30 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6% 2018 26/30 1.4 3.8 66.1% 60.2% 47.0% 58.6% 47.7% 55.6% 44.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 35/35 2.0 3.9 63.0% 60.8% 44.2% 50.1% 44.5% 54.7% 43.1%
32 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5% 2020 1/1 2.0 6.0 63.5% 54.5% 15.8% 14.3% 50.0% 40.4% 39.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 32/32 2.5 3.8 64.5% 60.6% 47.6% 49.0% 50.7% 56.0% 44.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 19/20 2.7 3.5 64.9% 61.1% 44.2% 49.2% 42.7% 55.3% 39.5%
Career — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4% — 452/507 2.1 3.1 66.5% 61.4% 47.3% 52.2% 48.0% 56.6% 45.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qiang Wang Andrea Petkovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1497 107.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.31
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1503 107.1 +1.50 +0.78 1.075 51.4% +9 +35 — 35.7% -0.50 1–1 — — +0.06
20 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34 2008 1501 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.24
21 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12 2009 1614 128.0 +1.55 +1.69 1.118 52.5% -54 +32 — 55.0% +0.52 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.67
22 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36 2010 1788 148.0 +2.10 +1.40 1.046 50.9% -23 -95 -103 54.8% +0.44 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 106.9 -2.09
23 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30 2011 1974 155.4 +3.70 +4.59 1.176 53.6% -8 -117 -298 67.6% +1.21 14–6 (70%) 6–5 (55%) 107.7 +0.95
24 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52 2012 1855 137.0 +0.30 +1.98 1.047 50.8% +13 — — 51.3% +0.38 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -1.34
25 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59 2013 1802 138.0 +2.53 +2.59 1.133 52.5% +13 +56 — 56.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 -1.81
26 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43 2014 1828 145.1 +0.94 +2.73 1.076 51.6% -34 +124 -137 59.4% +0.64 14–7 (67%) 8–7 (53%) 104.6 +0.56
27 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10 2015 1690 138.2 -0.26 +3.30 1.069 51.5% +6 +218 +14 52.9% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 5–8 (38%) 95.7 +3.27
28 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36 2016 1695 134.5 0.00 +1.98 1.029 50.5% +17 +124 +6 52.3% +0.25 6–8 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 +0.16
29 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25 2017 1649 122.9 -3.25 +1.84 0.962 49.0% +30 +25 +34 40.8% -0.36 5–9 (36%) 3–1 (75%) 94.0 +0.52
30 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05 2018 1725 133.1 -0.84 +0.44 1.000 50.1% +4 -68 — 52.9% +0.19 6–4 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 102.8 -0.49
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1716 128.9 -1.22 -0.16 0.950 49.1% -1 -46 -56 48.0% -0.12 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.2 -0.57
32 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38 2020 1700 98.6 -0.48 +2.36 0.665 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.03
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1730 129.0 -0.07 +1.75 1.016 50.4% -44 +70 -86 47.8% -0.01 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -2.21
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1709 124.6 -1.01 -1.99 0.884 47.5% -28 +78 -115 45.2% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -1.76
Career — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15 — 1989 144.1 +0.65 +2.02 1.047 51.0% -6 +34 -75 54.0% +0.36 91–79 (54%) 53–55 (49%) 102.0 -0.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.