H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Qiang Wang vs Caroline Wozniacki H2H: 1-4

Caroline Wozniacki holds a 4–1 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Caroline Wozniacki leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Wozniacki won the 2018 China Open semifinal 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main-draw meetings
Caroline Wozniacki
Denmark Age 36 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Caroline Wozniacki #2 6-1 6-3 Qiang Wang #28 Match data Oct 6, 2018 SF China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Caroline Wozniacki #6 6-1 6-7(4) 6-1 Qiang Wang #55 Match data Oct 1, 2017 R64 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Caroline Wozniacki #22 6-3 7-5 Qiang Wang #73 Match data Oct 15, 2016* QF Hong Kong Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Caroline Wozniacki #11 7-5 6-0 Qiang Wang #113 Match data Oct 7, 2015* R32 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Qiang Wang #186 2-6 7-6(1) 6-1 Caroline Wozniacki #10 Match data Feb 28, 2013* R32 Kuala Lumpur International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Caroline Wozniacki #289 #1 10,255 2,154 620 275 69.3% 1 6 1 11 11 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qiang Wang Caroline Wozniacki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 0–2 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 4–4 50.0% #231 1,527 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2007 12–15 44.4% #60 1,555 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2008 53–20 72.6% #12 1,913 0 3
18 — — — — — — — 2009 66–25 72.5% #4 1,898 0 6
19 — — — — — — — 2010 63–17 78.8% #1 2,105 0 12
20 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0 2011 63–17 78.8% #1 1,988 0 18
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0 2012 50–21 70.4% #10 1,975 0 20
22 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0 2013 41–22 65.1% #10 1,906 0 21
23 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0 2014 49–19 72.1% #8 2,014 0 22
24 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0 2015 39–23 62.9% #17 1,817 0 23
25 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0 2016 34–18 65.4% #19 1,912 0 25
26 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2 2017 60–22 73.2% #3 2,004 0 27
27 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2 2018 41–17 70.7% #3 1,947 1 30
28 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2 2019 20–15 57.1% #38 1,845 1 30
29 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2 2020 5–2 71.4% #36 1,852 1 30
30 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2 2023 4–3 57.1% #249 1,862 1 30
33 — — — — — — — 2024 16–13 55.2% #70 1,845 1 30

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qiang Wang Caroline Wozniacki
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 42 13 55 76.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 35 18 53 66.0% 23 6 29 79.3% 8 1 9 88.9%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 45 9 54 83.3% 15 6 21 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 40 11 51 78.4% 20 5 25 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 42 14 56 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 34 14 48 70.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 42 15 57 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 26 17 43 60.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0%
25 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 31 14 45 68.9% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
26 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 41 14 55 74.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8%
27 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2018 26 12 38 68.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 1 7 85.7%
28 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — 2019 12 9 21 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2020 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
30 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2023 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
Career — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — 447 188 635 70.4% 111 59 170 65.3% 62 28 90 68.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 239/257 of Qiang Wang's and 788/893 of Caroline Wozniacki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qiang Wang Caroline Wozniacki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/8 2.7 2.3 65.7% 58.9% 51.0% 43.9% 42.3% 56.6% 49.3%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 18/27 1.1 3.2 67.3% 56.6% 40.0% 54.4% 45.4% 51.4% 41.8%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 63/73 2.1 2.1 65.9% 65.6% 50.8% 58.8% 54.4% 60.4% 49.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 86/91 2.0 1.7 68.9% 64.2% 50.0% 52.2% 49.6% 59.7% 48.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 71/80 1.8 1.9 68.9% 65.3% 50.2% 59.5% 50.1% 60.6% 48.1%
20 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9% 2011 73/80 1.6 1.6 70.6% 65.6% 51.4% 58.1% 53.0% 61.5% 51.1%
21 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6% 2012 60/71 1.8 1.6 66.8% 63.6% 51.4% 59.5% 52.9% 59.4% 47.5%
22 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1% 2013 56/63 1.5 1.8 69.1% 62.5% 50.3% 59.3% 54.1% 58.9% 47.5%
23 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0% 2014 61/68 2.3 2.6 69.6% 66.0% 48.0% 58.7% 53.3% 60.4% 48.1%
24 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6% 2015 51/62 2.0 1.9 69.9% 65.3% 52.6% 50.4% 51.3% 61.5% 46.7%
25 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3% 2016 44/52 2.1 2.1 67.7% 66.5% 46.3% 57.0% 56.3% 59.9% 47.8%
26 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4% 2017 76/82 2.6 2.2 67.6% 65.7% 49.4% 56.8% 51.6% 60.2% 47.8%
27 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6% 2018 50/58 3.0 2.5 64.9% 68.0% 48.4% 52.5% 54.9% 61.2% 48.3%
28 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6% 2019 35/35 2.8 1.8 65.3% 63.2% 50.1% 51.6% 50.7% 58.5% 44.4%
29 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9% 2020 7/7 3.1 1.3 70.4% 68.7% 54.5% 63.1% 43.8% 64.8% 49.2%
30 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5% 2023 7/7 2.1 3.0 61.5% 67.5% 47.4% 57.7% 36.6% 59.6% 44.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 27/29 1.8 2.6 64.3% 65.3% 47.6% 55.5% 55.0% 59.1% 46.8%
Career — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4% — 788/895 2.1 2.0 67.9% 65.0% 49.7% 56.4% 52.2% 60.0% 47.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qiang Wang Caroline Wozniacki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1482 101.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — 0–1 — -0.25
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1527 119.1 +0.53 +0.91 1.137 52.5% +17 — — 47.1% -0.12 1–0 — — -0.46
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1556 117.2 -2.81 -1.82 0.860 46.7% +15 -35 — 46.0% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 7–1 (88%) 103.2 +0.40
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1914 154.8 +4.79 +4.70 1.241 54.7% -5 -303 -228 69.9% +1.69 9–5 (64%) 6–8 (43%) 104.7 -0.96
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1899 153.9 +3.97 +4.82 1.208 54.1% -27 -24 -64 69.4% +1.47 15–8 (65%) 11–7 (61%) 106.6 -0.77
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2105 166.0 +4.94 +4.76 1.219 54.3% +27 -204 -284 72.4% +1.70 18–4 (82%) 8–2 (80%) 113.4 +1.46
20 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34 2011 1988 162.1 +5.76 +7.01 1.328 56.0% +52 -9 -153 74.7% +1.90 11–7 (61%) 10–5 (67%) 101.2 +1.97
21 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12 2012 1976 156.2 +3.80 +4.12 1.171 53.6% +42 -42 -144 66.9% +1.29 15–9 (63%) 11–8 (58%) 100.8 +0.75
22 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36 2013 1906 152.3 +3.39 +3.53 1.156 53.3% +82 -137 -61 61.0% +1.06 9–9 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 92.0 +3.21
23 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30 2014 2014 163.0 +4.24 +5.25 1.216 54.2% +24 -280 -133 64.9% +1.45 16–6 (73%) 5–10 (33%) 100.3 -0.30
24 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52 2015 1818 153.2 +3.21 +4.72 1.211 54.0% +6 -9 +74 62.6% +1.23 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.2 -0.90
25 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59 2016 1912 146.8 +3.41 +3.91 1.191 53.8% +27 — -117 65.2% +1.25 8–7 (53%) 3–5 (38%) 96.7 -0.32
26 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43 2017 2004 161.0 +3.91 +4.92 1.202 54.0% +52 -146 -103 68.5% +1.56 17–8 (68%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 +0.13
27 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10 2018 1947 156.8 +4.39 +5.24 1.245 54.7% +6 -64 +24 67.7% +1.47 12–6 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 101.2 +0.11
28 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36 2019 1845 144.8 +1.89 +0.99 1.069 51.3% +47 -6 +118 60.8% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 5–2 (71%) 96.0 +0.87
29 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25 2020 1853 131.5 +2.36 +2.51 1.397 56.9% +35 — — 70.6% +1.71 1–2 (33%) — — +0.18
30 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38 2023 1863 134.9 +2.02 +2.05 1.110 51.8% +58 — — 56.3% +0.56 1–1 1–0 — -0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1845 140.8 +1.93 +2.73 1.145 53.0% +44 -42 +224 58.1% +0.77 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 +0.15
Career — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15 — 2154 160.9 +3.83 +4.42 1.199 53.9% +28 -90 -57 66.3% +1.33 153–96 (61%) 94–79 (54%) 104.3 +0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.