H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 04:30 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Christina Mchale H2H: 1-0
Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Hong Kong fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 7-5 6-1 | Christina Mchale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Christina Mchale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |