H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Qiang Wang vs Johanna Larsson H2H: 0-1

Johanna Larsson holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Johanna Larsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johanna Larsson won the 2015 Japan Women's Open first round 0-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Johanna Larsson
Sweden Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Johanna Larsson #62 0-6 6-3 6-3 Qiang Wang #112 Match data Sep 17, 2015* R32 Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Johanna Larsson #236 #45 1,230 1,733 153 178 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qiang Wang Johanna Larsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #389 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #177 1,509 0 0
20 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #172 1,492 0 0
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% #69 1,555 0 0
22 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0 2011 19–18 51.4% #59 1,666 0 0
23 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0 2012 14–19 42.4% #73 1,624 0 0
24 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0 2013 13–16 44.8% #84 1,624 0 0
25 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0 2014 7–15 31.8% #70 1,596 0 0
26 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2 2015 25–19 56.8% #56 1,668 0 1
27 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2 2016 29–25 53.7% #50 1,707 0 1
28 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2 2017 15–21 41.7% #80 1,623 0 1
29 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2 2018 17–18 48.6% #75 1,599 0 2
30 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2 2019 3–13 18.8% #217 1,557 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #236 1,543 0 2
32 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qiang Wang Johanna Larsson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 6 11 17 35.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 16 13 29 55.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2016 19 15 34 55.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 7 11 18 38.9% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 1 7 8 12.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — — — — — 78 100 178 43.8% 72 62 134 53.7% 3 15 18 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 239/257 of Qiang Wang's and 295/330 of Johanna Larsson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qiang Wang Johanna Larsson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 3.0 2.5 44.9% 79.7% 47.8% 53.3% 12.5% 62.4% 34.1%
20 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9% 2009 2/2 3.0 5.0 52.5% 63.7% 45.6% 41.9% 45.5% 55.2% 41.4%
21 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6% 2010 16/18 3.0 2.8 60.5% 67.0% 45.2% 65.3% 43.3% 58.2% 42.3%
22 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1% 2011 32/37 1.8 3.3 61.4% 59.4% 44.9% 49.2% 48.7% 53.7% 43.6%
23 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0% 2012 30/33 2.2 3.4 59.5% 58.3% 45.2% 49.6% 46.8% 52.6% 41.5%
24 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6% 2013 24/29 2.0 3.0 63.8% 61.0% 44.1% 51.3% 37.7% 55.0% 39.5%
25 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3% 2014 18/22 1.5 3.3 71.1% 56.8% 43.4% 47.0% 43.4% 53.0% 40.0%
26 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4% 2015 30/44 1.5 2.9 69.7% 59.8% 54.4% 50.8% 52.3% 57.9% 43.3%
27 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6% 2016 53/55 2.3 3.6 63.4% 60.9% 45.5% 49.9% 47.1% 55.3% 43.8%
28 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6% 2017 36/36 1.4 3.5 67.2% 59.2% 43.0% 50.3% 38.8% 53.9% 41.3%
29 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9% 2018 35/35 1.8 3.8 62.2% 60.7% 45.9% 50.0% 41.9% 55.0% 42.7%
30 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6% 2019 16/16 1.5 3.2 64.3% 55.9% 42.5% 50.7% 41.2% 51.1% 34.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 0.0 3.0 65.0% 42.3% 35.7% 50.0% 0.0% 40.0% 30.4%
32 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4% — 295/332 1.9 3.3 64.0% 60.0% 45.6% 50.7% 44.2% 54.7% 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qiang Wang Johanna Larsson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1503 104.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.17 1–1 — — +0.16
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1510 100.9 +0.29 -1.15 0.907 46.1% — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 1–0 — +0.06
20 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34 2009 1493 103.2 -0.43 -1.92 0.925 48.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
21 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12 2010 1555 121.7 +0.59 -1.39 1.013 50.2% +38 -47 — 47.1% -0.15 0–2 2–3 (40%) — +0.25
22 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36 2011 1666 118.5 -1.99 -0.93 0.942 48.7% -78 -7 -63 48.2% -0.27 8–3 (73%) 5–6 (45%) 107.7 -0.99
23 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30 2012 1625 112.1 -1.63 -2.02 0.876 47.3% -42 +36 — 39.1% -1.07 4–5 (44%) 5–1 (83%) 101.4 +0.21
24 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52 2013 1624 121.5 -0.43 -2.79 0.877 47.2% -56 +95 — 42.4% -0.42 6–2 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 102.4 -1.47
25 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59 2014 1596 123.3 -2.35 -1.81 0.853 46.6% -12 +47 — 32.7% -0.78 3–2 (60%) 1–6 (14%) 98.3 -1.78
26 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43 2015 1668 125.8 -0.89 +0.77 1.028 50.4% -9 +58 -181 54.9% +0.21 3–4 (43%) 8–5 (62%) 101.5 +0.01
27 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10 2016 1708 126.0 -0.78 +0.26 0.982 49.7% +5 +2 — 54.4% -0.04 9–10 (47%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -0.87
28 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36 2017 1624 122.5 -2.11 -1.71 0.896 47.6% +12 +71 — 43.2% -0.48 6–5 (55%) 5–7 (42%) 100.9 -0.48
29 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25 2018 1600 119.2 -1.77 -0.96 0.947 48.7% -13 +94 -110 47.0% -0.55 8–7 (53%) 9–1 (90%) 111.4 -1.03
30 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05 2019 1558 102.9 -3.75 -5.03 0.710 43.5% -46 +116 — 18.8% -2.53 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -1.07
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1544 90.5 +0.79 -0.26 0.507 34.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.14
32 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15 — 1733 124.4 -1.43 -1.21 0.922 48.2% -15 +46 -113 45.3% -0.47 49–44 (53%) 42–38 (53%) 106.7 -2.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.