H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Qiang Wang vs Mandy Minella H2H: 1-1

Qiang Wang and Mandy Minella are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on clay, while Mandy Minella leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2019 Prague Open second round 6-1 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Mandy Minella
Luxembourg Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #16 6-1 4-6 6-4 Mandy Minella #100 Match data May 2, 2019* R16 Prague Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Mandy Minella #82 6-2 5-7 6-3 Qiang Wang #259 Match data Jul 26, 2012* R32 Baku International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mandy Minella #787 #66 955 1,646 58 100 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qiang Wang Mandy Minella
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–2 0.0% #249 1,477 0 0
20 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #330 1,474 0 0
23 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #243 1,465 0 0
24 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0 2010 2–2 50.0% #136 1,504 0 0
25 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0 2011 2–6 25.0% #110 1,472 0 0
26 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2 2012 11–14 44.0% #77 1,515 0 0
27 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2 2013 12–18 40.0% #106 1,530 0 0
28 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2 2014 1–5 16.7% #181 1,496 0 0
29 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2 2015 1–5 16.7% #168 1,449 0 0
30 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2 2016 8–7 53.3% #105 1,557 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2017 9–13 40.9% #143 1,576 0 1
32 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2 2018 7–7 50.0% #103 1,615 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2019 3–11 21.4% #141 1,548 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #170 1,535 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2021 2–7 22.2% #262 1,537 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qiang Wang Mandy Minella
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 4 9 13 30.8% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — 27 55 82 32.9% 30 37 67 44.8% 1 8 9 11.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 239/257 of Qiang Wang's and 144/156 of Mandy Minella's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qiang Wang Mandy Minella
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1% 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 56.6% 43.3% 34.8% 45.5% 100.0% 39.6% 17.2%
23 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0% 2009 1/1 1.0 4.0 54.3% 56.0% 45.2% 27.3% 50.0% 51.1% 46.7%
24 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6% 2010 4/4 0.3 3.5 61.3% 63.2% 47.1% 58.6% 26.0% 57.1% 41.4%
25 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3% 2011 6/8 2.2 3.2 56.2% 63.3% 39.8% 58.7% 52.7% 52.9% 38.1%
26 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4% 2012 24/25 1.7 3.1 60.8% 57.7% 41.7% 55.6% 49.8% 51.6% 41.9%
27 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6% 2013 25/30 2.3 2.3 61.6% 61.4% 45.2% 47.9% 50.5% 55.0% 42.2%
28 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6% 2014 4/6 3.3 3.3 59.6% 59.0% 46.7% 53.7% 55.3% 54.5% 42.7%
29 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9% 2015 4/6 1.0 1.5 75.9% 52.7% 50.0% 42.1% 44.0% 52.2% 43.0%
30 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6% 2016 15/15 2.1 2.9 63.0% 62.2% 46.3% 52.9% 50.1% 56.2% 43.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 22/22 2.9 1.7 61.2% 61.3% 43.0% 50.3% 53.3% 54.0% 39.7%
32 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5% 2018 14/14 1.9 1.8 64.2% 60.6% 46.1% 59.5% 53.6% 55.3% 43.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 14/14 1.9 2.1 66.3% 58.8% 46.3% 42.2% 40.4% 54.7% 39.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 14.0 2.0 56.1% 78.3% 36.1% 80.0% 0.0% 59.8% 32.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 9/9 4.9 1.8 59.9% 55.3% 41.5% 39.1% 53.5% 49.9% 43.6%
Career — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4% — 144/158 2.3 2.4 62.1% 59.9% 44.2% 50.9% 49.6% 53.9% 41.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qiang Wang Mandy Minella
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.08
20 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36 2008 1474 104.0 +0.43 -0.56 0.286 31.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.25
23 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30 2009 1466 100.5 +0.41 -1.66 0.954 48.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.07
24 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52 2010 1504 115.0 +0.56 +1.62 0.965 49.2% +11 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16
25 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59 2011 1473 100.2 -1.79 -2.50 0.809 46.5% +18 — — 33.3% -1.24 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.53
26 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43 2012 1515 104.1 -2.82 -1.73 0.865 47.1% +13 +39 — 41.7% -0.78 7–3 (70%) 2–4 (33%) 103.3 +1.92
27 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10 2013 1530 114.7 -0.44 -1.67 0.939 48.7% -27 +47 — 40.3% -0.65 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 104.1 +0.65
28 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36 2014 1497 105.8 -1.89 -0.14 0.938 48.7% -22 — — 23.1% -1.46 0–1 — — -0.11
29 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25 2015 1449 99.2 -1.50 -0.06 0.898 47.4% — +69 — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — +0.30
30 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05 2016 1557 110.4 -0.20 -0.12 0.990 50.0% -122 +110 — 51.6% -0.06 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.48
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1577 112.5 -1.48 -2.69 0.863 47.2% -14 +86 -35 43.1% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) 104.7 +0.14
32 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38 2018 1616 112.5 -0.68 -0.84 0.978 49.8% -45 +52 — 46.4% -0.18 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1549 114.7 -0.94 -2.06 0.869 47.0% -39 +79 — 32.4% -1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1536 101.2 -3.10 +0.34 0.804 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1537 108.6 -3.18 -1.37 0.870 46.8% -39 +69 — 29.4% -1.06 0–1 0–1 — +0.05
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1500 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15 — 1646 113.9 -1.32 -1.45 0.899 47.9% -22 +64 -35 38.8% -0.81 25–30 (45%) 16–16 (50%) 102.2 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.