H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Risa Ozaki H2H: 1-0
Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Risa Ozaki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2017 Strasbourg third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 32
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2017* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Qiang Wang | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Risa Ozaki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Risa Ozaki | #1,109 | #70 | 826 | 1,638 | 17 | 38 | 30.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Risa Ozaki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #155 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #118 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |