H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Qiang Wang vs Urszula Radwanska H2H: 0-1

Urszula Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Urszula Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Urszula Radwanska won the 2015 Guangzhou Open first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Urszula Radwanska
Poland Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Urszula Radwanska #91 6-3 6-2 Qiang Wang #111 Match data Sep 23, 2015* R32 Guangzhou Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Urszula Radwanska #493 #29 1,565 1,746 100 131 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qiang Wang Urszula Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #313 1,525 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2007 3–3 50.0% #252 1,539 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2008 3–6 33.3% #129 1,516 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2009 16–22 42.1% #70 1,555 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #193 1,551 0 0
20 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0 2011 10–11 47.6% #105 1,575 0 0
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0 2012 27–25 51.9% #31 1,710 0 0
22 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0 2013 21–23 47.7% #40 1,700 0 0
23 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0 2014 3–11 21.4% #179 1,594 0 0
24 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0 2015 12–15 44.4% #94 1,579 0 0
25 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0 2016 2–5 28.6% #257 1,531 0 0
26 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2 2021 0–4 0.0% #231 1,452 0 0
32 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qiang Wang Urszula Radwanska
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
22 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2021 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — — — — — 75 91 166 45.2% 9 23 32 28.1% 16 16 32 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 239/257 of Qiang Wang's and 200/226 of Urszula Radwanska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qiang Wang Urszula Radwanska
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/6 1.5 3.8 64.3% 55.8% 45.7% 50.0% 48.7% 52.4% 48.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 4/9 1.3 3.5 59.3% 56.9% 33.2% 47.1% 47.8% 47.0% 42.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 34/38 2.2 2.6 61.6% 60.4% 41.4% 49.8% 45.7% 53.2% 43.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 3/4 0.7 1.3 63.0% 52.2% 49.3% 55.6% 33.3% 51.5% 40.4%
20 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9% 2011 18/21 1.7 2.4 63.9% 59.7% 46.4% 47.9% 46.4% 54.8% 46.5%
21 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6% 2012 49/52 2.0 2.4 65.4% 60.6% 42.6% 50.7% 48.2% 54.2% 45.3%
22 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1% 2013 42/44 1.6 2.1 66.3% 56.2% 43.8% 49.5% 50.6% 52.1% 45.3%
23 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0% 2014 14/14 0.8 2.9 62.6% 54.9% 41.5% 37.6% 52.7% 49.8% 43.6%
24 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6% 2015 21/27 1.6 2.5 67.3% 57.1% 45.4% 46.9% 51.4% 52.9% 43.0%
25 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3% 2016 7/7 1.3 4.1 58.3% 52.7% 49.6% 30.9% 43.8% 51.8% 45.2%
26 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6% 2021 4/4 1.8 4.3 60.3% 51.2% 47.7% 51.6% 26.2% 49.9% 33.4%
32 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4% — 200/231 1.7 2.5 64.3% 58.0% 43.5% 48.0% 48.0% 52.8% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qiang Wang Urszula Radwanska
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1525 115.3 — — — — — +24 — 40.0% -0.70 — 0–1 — -0.64
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1539 110.6 -1.56 -0.20 1.009 50.0% +22 — — 57.1% +0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.39
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1517 107.6 -2.91 -0.90 0.806 45.0% +3 — — 40.0% -0.45 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.54
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1555 121.6 -1.78 -0.41 0.921 48.0% -11 -56 +108 42.5% -0.65 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 108.8 +0.15
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1552 113.9 +0.83 +2.32 0.833 46.6% -5 — — 25.0% -2.13 — — — -0.32
20 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34 2011 1575 116.1 -1.08 +0.22 1.028 50.6% +16 -91 — 48.1% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.3 +1.19
21 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12 2012 1710 130.1 -1.38 +2.06 0.990 49.6% -35 -192 -2 49.1% -0.05 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.60
22 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36 2013 1700 138.3 -2.18 +1.30 0.945 48.6% +10 -144 -15 44.9% -0.39 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 111.9 -1.35
23 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30 2014 1595 109.0 -3.72 -0.43 0.869 47.1% +59 -95 — 25.9% -1.56 0–3 (0%) — — -1.04
24 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52 2015 1579 115.7 -3.71 +0.71 0.914 47.8% +43 — +45 45.0% -0.53 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 102.8 -0.35
25 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59 2016 1532 111.4 -0.85 +0.76 0.939 48.4% +53 — — 42.9% -0.07 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.48
26 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43 2017 1519 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10 2018 1506 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36 2019 1484 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25 2020 1466 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05 2021 1453 105.6 -1.63 -4.19 0.666 42.3% +42 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.17
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1441 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38 2023 1428 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1441 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1426 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1432 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15 — 1747 127.6 -1.98 +0.73 0.940 48.6% +7 -111 +29 43.8% -0.43 31–31 (50%) 25–20 (56%) 106.1 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.