H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Urszula Radwanska H2H: 0-1
Urszula Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Urszula Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Urszula Radwanska won the 2015 Guangzhou third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2015* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Urszula Radwanska | 6-3 6-2 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Urszula Radwanska | #493 | #29 | 1,565 | 1,747 | 99 | 130 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Urszula Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #313 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #31 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #40 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #179 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #257 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |