H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rebecca Peterson vs Shelby Rogers H2H: 1-1
Rebecca Peterson and Shelby Rogers are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rebecca Peterson leads 1–0 on clay, while Shelby Rogers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Peterson won the 2021 Roland Garros first round 6-7(3) 7-6(8) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 30
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Rebecca Peterson | 6-7(3) 7-6(8) 6-2 | Shelby Rogers | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2021* | Yarra Valley Classic | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Shelby Rogers | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | Rebecca Peterson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Peterson | #573 | #43 | 1,332 | 1,863 | 79 | 93 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Shelby Rogers | #437 | #30 | 1,698 | 1,875 | 126 | 138 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Peterson | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #55 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #630 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #149 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #341 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |