H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Alison Van Uytvanck H2H: 1-0
Saisai Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Alison Van Uytvanck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Saisai Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2017 US Open first round 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 32
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Alison Van Uytvanck | #229 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,765 | 119 | 147 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #199 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #106 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #121 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #76 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,713 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #344 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |