H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Su-Wei Hsieh vs Alison Van Uytvanck H2H: 1-2

Alison Van Uytvanck holds a 2–1 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alison Van Uytvanck leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Van Uytvanck won the 2021 Yarra Valley Classic first round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Alison Van Uytvanck
Belgium Age 32 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alison Van Uytvanck #65 6-2 6-0 Su-Wei Hsieh #68 Match data Feb 2, 2021* R64 Yarra Valley Classic WTA 500 Hard
Su-Wei Hsieh #171 7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 Alison Van Uytvanck #79 Match data Sep 18, 2014* R32 Guangzhou Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Alison Van Uytvanck #104 6-3 6-2 Su-Wei Hsieh #100 Match data Feb 27, 2014* R32 Florianopolis International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Alison Van Uytvanck #229 #37 1,355 1,772 123 149 45.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Alison Van Uytvanck
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–2 33.3% #287 1,510 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 2–1 66.7% #199 1,554 0 0
19 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #112 1,524 0 0
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0 2014 10–17 37.0% #106 1,526 0 0
21 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0 2015 19–18 51.4% #44 1,647 0 0
22 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0 2016 4–13 23.5% #121 1,516 0 0
23 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0 2017 9–8 52.9% #76 1,634 0 1
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0 2018 19–22 46.3% #49 1,660 0 2
25 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0 2019 24–18 57.1% #47 1,736 0 4
26 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2 2020 7–11 38.9% #64 1,674 0 4
27 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2 2021 15–15 50.0% #58 1,772 0 5
28 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2 2022 9–13 40.9% #72 1,685 0 5
29 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2 2023 3–4 42.9% #344 1,687 0 5
30 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2 2024 0–4 0.0% #229 1,609 0 5
31 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Alison Van Uytvanck
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 6 11 17 35.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
23 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2017 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 17 11 28 60.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2021 13 10 23 56.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2023 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
30 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2024 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6% — 85 90 175 48.6% 22 34 56 39.3% 16 25 41 39.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's and 250/272 of Alison Van Uytvanck's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Alison Van Uytvanck
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 4.0 5.3 61.8% 66.5% 34.7% 49.3% 52.4% 54.4% 42.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 4.3 2.0 59.4% 63.4% 49.6% 61.1% 31.4% 57.9% 37.7%
19 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9% 2013 4/4 2.5 2.0 60.5% 56.2% 32.9% 46.0% 48.3% 50.4% 41.2%
20 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5% 2014 27/27 2.8 1.9 60.8% 63.0% 51.0% 51.3% 46.0% 58.1% 40.9%
21 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9% 2015 23/37 4.4 2.2 58.9% 64.4% 48.6% 53.1% 49.1% 57.9% 36.7%
22 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4% 2016 17/17 4.3 3.5 56.8% 67.4% 44.6% 54.9% 47.7% 57.8% 38.5%
23 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1% 2017 14/17 4.9 2.8 55.4% 69.1% 53.4% 64.4% 41.5% 62.4% 41.1%
24 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8% 2018 39/41 4.2 2.6 62.4% 65.5% 48.1% 61.6% 44.8% 59.2% 42.5%
25 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5% 2019 42/42 3.2 2.0 64.8% 63.0% 47.3% 55.8% 46.2% 57.4% 44.5%
26 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7% 2020 18/18 3.0 2.2 62.3% 66.6% 46.1% 47.0% 40.8% 58.7% 41.1%
27 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3% 2021 27/30 2.6 1.9 60.0% 63.1% 45.0% 54.3% 52.1% 56.0% 44.7%
28 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3% 2022 22/22 2.7 2.5 58.2% 64.6% 48.0% 60.7% 42.8% 57.8% 43.0%
29 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7% 2023 7/7 4.9 2.1 60.8% 65.7% 40.3% 59.0% 60.3% 55.8% 40.6%
30 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3% 2024 4/4 2.0 1.8 61.9% 50.4% 34.4% 43.3% 51.0% 44.3% 40.5%
31 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5% — 250/272 3.5 2.3 60.8% 64.4% 47.1% 55.7% 46.4% 57.7% 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Alison Van Uytvanck
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1511 108.0 -2.51 -2.37 0.928 48.7% — — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–2 — -0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1555 103.7 +2.11 -1.71 0.894 47.9% — +51 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 — — +0.05
19 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2013 1524 90.5 -1.68 -1.92 0.831 45.8% — — — 25.0% -2.13 — 0–1 — +0.29
20 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03 2014 1526 113.6 +1.00 -2.70 0.975 49.4% -8 +12 +42 43.3% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.20
21 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 2015 1647 123.7 +0.26 -3.01 0.870 47.5% -6 -88 -87 50.6% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.57
22 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39 2016 1517 106.5 +0.03 -3.82 0.912 48.2% +32 — -45 36.6% -0.90 0–7 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.27
23 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39 2017 1634 121.0 +2.63 -1.28 1.095 51.6% +11 -34 — 55.3% +0.42 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.26
24 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03 2018 1661 129.7 +1.86 -0.17 1.042 50.6% -23 -93 -60 46.9% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 4–10 (29%) — -1.03
25 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 2019 1736 130.4 +0.69 +0.82 1.044 50.9% -1 -93 -105 55.9% +0.33 9–4 (69%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.05
26 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.40 2020 1674 126.9 +0.77 -1.27 0.995 49.6% +24 -57 — 46.3% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.13
27 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.23 2021 1772 134.7 -0.09 +1.01 1.015 50.6% +34 -271 -124 51.5% +0.36 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — -0.37
28 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.26 2022 1685 128.7 +0.29 +0.04 1.018 50.4% -5 — +57 50.0% +0.19 0–8 (0%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.23
29 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05 2023 1687 120.1 -1.26 +0.60 0.919 48.7% -9 — — 50.0% -0.39 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.67
30 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.11 2024 1609 96.6 -3.25 -1.92 0.727 42.6% — — — 11.1% -2.89 0–1 — — +0.23
31 2017 1601 109.3 -4.05 +0.79 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) — -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.42 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68 — 1772 129.8 +0.64 -0.86 0.987 49.7% +4 -70 -50 48.1% -0.02 39–53 (42%) 28–44 (39%) 92.0 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.