H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Yafan Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2019 Miami Open fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | 7-5 6-4 | Yafan Wang | Match data | Mar 26, 2019* | R16 | Miami Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Qiang Wang | 6-3 7-5 | Yafan Wang | Match data | Sep 23, 2016 | Q1 | Wuhan Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yafan Wang | #422 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,802 | 72 | 90 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,931 | 129 | 127 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yafan Wang | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #116 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,623 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Yafan Wang | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 2014 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2018 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2016 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2019 | 22 | 14 | 36 | 61.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2017 | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2020 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 32 | 15 | 47 | 68.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2021 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2019 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2022 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 31 | 2025 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 63 | 69 | 132 | 47.7% | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | — | 103 | 89 | 192 | 53.6% | 21 | 27 | 48 | 43.8% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 153/162 of Yafan Wang's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Yafan Wang | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2014 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 59.7% | 64.6% | 43.3% | 56.5% | 66.7% | 56.0% | 41.3% | 2012 | 3/3 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 63.7% | 51.1% | 37.0% | 33.2% | 54.2% | 46.3% | 37.9% |
| 21 | 2015 | 1/4 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 63.8% | 50.0% | 41.2% | 28.6% | 25.0% | 46.8% | 34.7% | 2013 | 1/2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 69.4% | 59.3% | 57.7% | 37.5% | 26.3% | 58.8% | 47.6% |
| 22 | 2016 | 9/11 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 56.8% | 62.9% | 42.8% | 35.4% | 38.0% | 54.1% | 41.8% | 2014 | 2/3 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 56.4% | 70.6% | 54.4% | 81.8% | 42.4% | 62.7% | 49.1% |
| 23 | 2017 | 10/10 | 1.1 | 3.5 | 57.8% | 58.4% | 43.0% | 57.8% | 57.8% | 51.5% | 47.0% | 2015 | 10/18 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 64.1% | 59.0% | 45.4% | 48.0% | 33.2% | 53.6% | 37.0% |
| 24 | 2018 | 23/23 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 64.4% | 62.5% | 48.6% | 53.0% | 46.3% | 57.6% | 45.3% | 2016 | 18/22 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 63.0% | 62.4% | 44.4% | 53.3% | 46.6% | 55.9% | 41.6% |
| 25 | 2019 | 45/46 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 59.0% | 64.8% | 46.2% | 48.7% | 44.3% | 57.1% | 44.6% | 2017 | 43/43 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 63.1% | 63.9% | 50.5% | 55.7% | 49.0% | 58.9% | 46.3% |
| 26 | 2020 | 9/9 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 55.7% | 61.4% | 45.7% | 47.7% | 45.5% | 54.5% | 42.6% | 2018 | 57/58 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 62.4% | 65.2% | 48.8% | 52.5% | 49.8% | 59.1% | 47.4% |
| 27 | 2021 | 10/10 | 1.5 | 4.7 | 58.2% | 56.5% | 42.6% | 45.9% | 41.6% | 50.3% | 41.3% | 2019 | 40/41 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 61.7% | 63.9% | 49.5% | 56.1% | 52.1% | 58.0% | 43.6% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 13/13 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 60.2% | 63.2% | 53.7% | 51.1% | 44.2% | 59.4% | 43.6% |
| 29 | 2023 | 2/2 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 56.9% | 75.4% | 47.3% | 72.2% | 33.6% | 63.3% | 41.3% | 2021 | 22/24 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 58.5% | 60.7% | 44.5% | 53.9% | 39.5% | 53.9% | 43.9% |
| 30 | 2024 | 31/31 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 61.0% | 62.9% | 45.8% | 56.6% | 46.6% | 56.3% | 41.4% | 2022 | 26/26 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 63.8% | 61.7% | 47.7% | 53.8% | 50.2% | 56.6% | 42.6% |
| 31 | 2025 | 9/12 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 60.8% | 64.0% | 39.8% | 50.5% | 54.3% | 54.8% | 35.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4/4 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 61.2% | 54.3% | 27.9% | 38.6% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 36.5% |
| Career | — | 153/162 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 59.9% | 62.8% | 45.3% | 51.0% | 46.4% | 55.7% | 43.0% | — | 239/257 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 62.2% | 63.0% | 48.1% | 53.5% | 47.8% | 57.3% | 44.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Yafan Wang | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 2014 | 1549 | 108.9 | +0.74 | -0.59 | 0.938 | 49.0% | +23 | — | — | 60.0% | +0.30 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.08 | 2012 | 1459 | 93.4 | -2.59 | -4.30 | 0.705 | 42.2% | +20 | — | — | 14.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.34 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1547 | 110.0 | -0.18 | +0.18 | 0.652 | 40.6% | +23 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.86 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.60 | 2013 | 1474 | 106.8 | +1.03 | +1.18 | 1.155 | 52.7% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.12 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1534 | 105.6 | -1.38 | -0.88 | 0.910 | 47.4% | +5 | — | — | 32.0% | -0.84 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.89 | 2014 | 1468 | 102.3 | -0.40 | -0.04 | 1.315 | 56.2% | +13 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.43 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.36 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1542 | 112.4 | -2.61 | -0.87 | 0.969 | 49.5% | -4 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.19 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.58 | 2015 | 1449 | 112.8 | -2.12 | -2.78 | 0.797 | 45.2% | +43 | — | — | 31.8% | -1.18 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1620 | 128.2 | +0.80 | +1.73 | 1.069 | 51.3% | +35 | -66 | — | 47.1% | +0.20 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–5 (50%) | 98.7 | +0.42 | 2016 | 1539 | 124.4 | +0.50 | 0.00 | 0.943 | 48.8% | +23 | -27 | — | 43.5% | -0.56 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.52 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1723 | 137.5 | +0.52 | +1.84 | 1.042 | 50.7% | +39 | -253 | -98 | 50.0% | +0.15 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–6 (40%) | 100.9 | -1.32 | 2017 | 1721 | 140.3 | +2.20 | +2.13 | 1.126 | 52.2% | +4 | -118 | — | 57.4% | +0.51 | 5–10 (33%) | 5–4 (56%) | 97.5 | -0.59 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1667 | 112.2 | -0.43 | +0.38 | 0.936 | 48.6% | +16 | — | — | 36.4% | -0.59 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.9 | +0.03 | 2018 | 1906 | 152.9 | +2.58 | +4.18 | 1.157 | 53.0% | +14 | -273 | — | 61.1% | +1.10 | 9–5 (64%) | 1–3 (25%) | 102.8 | -1.43 |
| 27 | 2021 | 1497 | 99.0 | -3.37 | -2.01 | 0.830 | 45.7% | +87 | -116 | +97 | 24.0% | -1.88 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–0 | — | +0.73 | 2019 | 1793 | 132.7 | +1.42 | +0.89 | 1.038 | 50.7% | +55 | -204 | -179 | 55.6% | +0.16 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–2 (75%) | 101.2 | +1.10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1766 | 129.1 | +2.56 | +1.23 | 1.073 | 51.4% | +32 | — | — | 53.3% | +0.03 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.7 | +0.36 |
| 29 | 2023 | 1628 | 111.4 | -0.86 | +3.00 | 1.127 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.40 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.05 | 2021 | 1714 | 121.2 | -1.69 | +0.38 | 0.952 | 48.9% | -23 | -55 | — | 44.1% | -0.42 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.4 | +0.25 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1719 | 129.9 | +0.04 | -1.32 | 0.948 | 48.9% | +47 | -335 | -162 | 45.1% | -0.46 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–3 (57%) | 106.5 | -0.37 | 2022 | 1717 | 128.6 | +0.18 | +0.03 | 0.981 | 49.6% | +35 | — | -160 | 45.2% | -0.11 | 8–2 (80%) | 2–8 (20%) | 101.7 | -0.05 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1697 | 123.7 | -1.23 | -4.33 | 0.781 | 46.0% | +5 | — | — | 32.1% | -1.21 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–2 (33%) | 101.0 | -0.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1624 | 97.7 | -3.97 | -0.81 | 0.667 | 41.0% | +19 | — | — | 11.1% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.38 |
| Career | — | 1803 | 129.6 | -0.28 | +0.09 | 0.971 | 49.3% | +29 | -198 | -65 | 43.3% | -0.37 | 26–25 (51%) | 20–19 (51%) | 101.9 | -0.31 | — | 1931 | 138.9 | +1.10 | +1.45 | 1.038 | 50.7% | +22 | -151 | -171 | 50.5% | +0.07 | 38–44 (46%) | 22–21 (51%) | 100.4 | -0.15 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jul 3, 2024 | H2H |
| Peyton Stearns | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 21, 2024 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 15, 2024 | H2H |
| Sofia Kenin | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 8, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 22, 2022 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jan 8, 2021 | H2H |
| Fiona Ferro | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 23, 2020 | H2H |
| Su-Wei Hsieh | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 1, 2021 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 9, 2021 | H2H |