H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Andreea Mitu vs Garbiñe Muguruza H2H: 0-1
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 1–0 lead over Andreea Mitu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-2 6-2 | Andreea Mitu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreea Mitu | #537 | #68 | 820 | 1,551 | 11 | 27 | 28.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,061 | 311 | 180 | 63.3% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreea Mitu | Garbiñe Muguruza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,952 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #7 | 1,833 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,935 | 2 | 5 |
| 24 | 2016 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #212 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,816 | 2 | 7 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,941 | 2 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #3 | 2,004 | 2 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,777 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,724 | 2 | 10 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #537 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |