H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-0

Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2022 Nottingham Open first round 5-7 6-4 6-3.

Brazil Age 30 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Beatriz Haddad Maia #48 5-7 6-4 6-3 Qiang Wang #146 Match data Jun 9, 2022* R32 Nottingham Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Beatriz Haddad Maia #154 #10 3,194 1,939 148 136 52.1% 0 0 1 1 2 4
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Qiang Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2013 1–1 50.0% #299 1,501 0 0
18 2014 0–2 0.0% #239 1,475 0 0
19 2015 3–2 60.0% #246 1,508 0 0
20 2016 0–3 0.0% #174 1,459 0 0 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0
21 2017 14–12 53.8% #71 1,658 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0
22 2018 5–9 35.7% #183 1,579 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0
23 2019 7–5 58.3% #121 1,671 0 0 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0
24 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0
25 2021 2–2 50.0% #83 1,635 0 0 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0
26 2022 34–21 61.8% #15 1,829 0 2 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2
27 2023 32–21 60.4% #11 1,894 0 3 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2
28 2024 34–25 57.6% #17 1,889 0 4 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2
29 2025 16–22 42.1% #58 1,768 0 4 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2
30 2026 0–11 0.0% #154 1,536 0 4 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2
32 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Qiang Wang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2013 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2015 3 2 5 60.0%
20 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 3 3 0.0%
21 2017 8 6 14 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2018 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2019 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2021 2 2 4 50.0% 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2022 19 16 35 54.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 13 2 15 86.7% 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2023 18 14 32 56.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2024 24 16 40 60.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 2020 7 6 13 53.8%
29 2025 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5%
30 2026 0 7 7 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 88 88 176 50.0% 34 32 66 51.5% 26 16 42 61.9% 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 267/284 of Beatriz Haddad Maia's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Qiang Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2013 2/2 1.5 2.0 67.4% 65.8% 49.0% 81.8% 62.7% 60.5% 47.8% —/—
18 2014 2/2 1.0 2.5 67.9% 54.9% 17.6% 48.8% 31.3% 43.0% 37.4% —/—
19 2015 5/5 3.4 1.8 59.9% 67.9% 55.8% 51.8% 41.6% 62.9% 50.2% —/—
20 2016 3/3 1.3 7.3 58.4% 58.0% 29.2% 44.6% 40.3% 45.7% 36.2% 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9%
21 2017 26/26 1.6 3.6 68.1% 65.7% 47.9% 57.3% 43.6% 60.1% 42.2% 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6%
22 2018 14/14 1.7 4.2 65.1% 63.5% 40.5% 38.9% 52.0% 55.5% 40.0% 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1%
23 2019 12/12 2.1 4.9 72.9% 65.6% 47.3% 68.8% 38.1% 60.3% 42.3% 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0%
24 —/— 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6%
25 2021 4/4 1.5 2.5 62.1% 57.5% 39.1% 50.8% 48.2% 50.3% 44.4% 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3%
26 2022 51/55 2.9 4.1 64.9% 67.4% 46.8% 57.2% 43.8% 60.3% 41.5% 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4%
27 2023 52/53 2.2 2.9 69.4% 63.5% 49.6% 54.2% 45.7% 59.4% 42.7% 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6%
28 2024 57/59 2.2 3.4 64.0% 66.5% 47.2% 56.4% 50.9% 59.4% 43.3% 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6%
29 2025 28/38 2.2 5.0 64.6% 62.1% 43.4% 51.9% 39.3% 55.3% 41.1% 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9%
30 2026 11/11 0.9 5.5 63.2% 56.8% 30.5% 41.9% 35.3% 47.5% 38.7% 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6%
32 —/— 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5%
Career 267/284 2.2 3.8 66.0% 64.7% 45.9% 54.6% 45.1% 58.2% 42.1% 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Qiang Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2013 1501 105.4 -1.64 -0.18 1.211 55.0% 60.0% +1.80 0–1 0–1 +0.23
18 2014 1475 92.2 -4.60 -4.21 0.656 40.4% 0.0% -3.75 +0.07
19 2015 1509 112.3 +3.07 +1.80 1.352 55.7% +60 66.7% +1.33 1–0 1–1 +0.11
20 2016 1460 88.8 -3.89 -3.72 0.667 40.8% 14.3% -3.00 0–1 0–1 +0.37 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 14.3% -3.00 0–1 +0.34
21 2017 1658 123.3 +3.22 -1.30 1.058 51.2% -37 -29 -31 55.0% +0.32 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 95.7 -0.58 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 -0.12
22 2018 1579 120.0 -0.85 -2.40 0.899 47.7% +10 41.4% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 -0.26 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 42.9% -0.43 0–1 +0.36
23 2019 1672 123.2 +2.60 -1.74 1.063 51.7% -10 -26 58.6% +0.72 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 97.0 0.00 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 +0.30
24 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 -0.52
25 2021 1635 117.7 -2.24 +2.12 0.893 47.8% +29 55.6% -0.33 0–1 +0.14 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59
26 2022 1830 142.7 +2.95 -0.63 1.044 50.8% -55 -59 +126 53.6% +0.22 16–7 (70%) 9–2 (82%) 112.2 +0.02 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43
27 2023 1895 151.9 +3.13 +0.69 1.052 50.8% -30 +20 +20 55.7% +0.41 16–8 (67%) 15–11 (58%) 107.1 -0.54 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10
28 2024 1889 148.0 +2.61 +0.61 1.067 51.4% +4 -23 +13 57.3% +0.50 10–9 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 101.7 +1.85 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36
29 2025 1768 129.5 -1.12 -1.17 0.918 48.1% -32 +50 +113 44.6% -0.42 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 95.9 +1.81 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25
30 2026 1536 108.1 -5.44 -3.77 0.737 43.0% +44 +132 15.4% -2.46 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.5 +0.23 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05
32 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 11.1% -3.00 0–1 -0.38
Career 1939 140.7 +1.71 -0.47 1.009 50.1% -20 +8 +75 51.2% +0.07 56–52 (52%) 47–38 (55%) 101.6 +1.22 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.