H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-0
Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2022 Nottingham third round 5-7 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2022* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |