H2H data updated: 2026-10-08 00:00 UTC

Belinda Bencic vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-1

Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Belinda Bencic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2022 Wimbledon first round 6-4 5-7 6-2.

Switzerland Age 29 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #140 6-4 5-7 6-2 Belinda Bencic #16 Match data Jun 29, 2022* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Belinda Bencic #12 #4 4,745 2,035 311 193 61.7% 0 1 2 0 7 0 10
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Belinda Bencic Qiang Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2012 0–1 0.0% #612 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2013 2–3 40.0% #184 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2014 18–17 51.4% #32 1,687 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2015 40–21 65.6% #14 1,916 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2016 18–21 46.2% #43 1,682 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2017 3–8 27.3% #98 1,684 0 2 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0
21 2018 14–14 50.0% #54 1,719 0 2 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0
22 2019 48–21 69.6% #8 1,919 0 4 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0
23 2020 7–7 50.0% #12 1,848 0 4 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0
24 2021 34–19 64.2% #23 1,902 0 5 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0
25 2022 38–19 66.7% #12 1,908 0 6 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0
26 2023 31–13 70.5% #17 1,925 0 8 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2
28 2025 36–16 69.2% #11 2,004 0 10 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2
29 2026 22–13 62.9% #12 1,956 0 10 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Belinda Bencic Qiang Wang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2013 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 10 9 19 52.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 23 12 35 65.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 14 3 17 82.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 14 16 30 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2019 30 12 42 71.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2020 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2021 24 11 35 68.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2022 19 12 31 61.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2023 24 10 34 70.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2025 28 11 39 71.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
29 2026 11 8 19 57.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 204 129 333 61.3% 53 39 92 57.6% 54 25 79 68.4% — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/508 of Belinda Bencic's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Belinda Bencic Qiang Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2012 1/1 1.0 2.0 60.0% 56.7% 25.0% 58.3% 33.3% 44.0% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2013 5/5 2.8 4.6 57.6% 63.2% 44.7% 31.0% 45.6% 55.2% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 30/35 2.7 3.4 58.2% 63.1% 42.2% 47.6% 46.5% 54.5% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 50/61 2.1 3.0 66.1% 65.0% 50.9% 49.8% 46.0% 60.1% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 35/39 2.2 4.9 60.9% 65.0% 43.9% 55.0% 39.1% 56.6% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 11/12 2.4 4.7 59.2% 64.6% 40.9% 52.1% 53.3% 55.3% 38.8% 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9%
21 2018 25/28 2.9 4.0 63.8% 64.7% 43.4% 54.8% 47.8% 57.2% 43.1% 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6%
22 2019 64/69 3.0 4.8 62.0% 68.6% 46.9% 51.4% 47.6% 60.3% 45.5% 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1%
23 2020 14/14 3.5 5.4 60.4% 65.1% 40.4% 47.6% 53.4% 55.5% 39.5% 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0%
24 2021 45/53 3.8 5.1 59.8% 70.6% 47.5% 57.7% 44.0% 61.4% 41.2% 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6%
25 2022 56/57 3.5 4.3 63.2% 70.8% 49.0% 62.0% 48.2% 62.7% 43.6% 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3%
26 2023 42/44 3.1 4.2 60.7% 70.3% 52.4% 54.1% 53.3% 63.2% 44.6% 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6%
28 2025 39/54 1.9 2.9 64.8% 67.0% 46.4% 55.6% 49.4% 59.7% 43.1% 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6%
29 2026 32/36 2.0 3.4 63.4% 67.7% 51.7% 57.3% 52.5% 62.1% 47.2% 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5%
Career — 449/508 2.8 4.1 62.2% 67.5% 47.3% 54.1% 47.7% 59.8% 43.2% — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Belinda Bencic Qiang Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2012 1498 109.0 +0.38 +1.75 0.665 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2013 1512 112.4 -1.40 -1.46 0.993 49.7% +35 — — 41.7% -0.08 1–1 — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2014 1687 133.0 -1.06 +0.66 0.968 49.4% -36 -88 -56 46.8% -0.19 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 103.6 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 1917 142.9 +1.98 +1.43 1.055 50.8% -43 -371 -32 61.7% +0.71 13–5 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 110.5 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 1682 132.7 +0.67 -2.42 0.916 48.4% +13 — +122 50.6% +0.01 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 98.8 +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 1684 116.5 +0.34 -2.98 0.868 47.5% +4 — — 33.3% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.56 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34
21 2018 1720 131.9 +0.41 +0.77 1.005 50.1% -15 — +137 50.8% -0.14 4–7 (36%) 6–3 (67%) 98.4 -0.88 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12
22 2019 1919 153.4 +3.67 +3.33 1.146 52.8% +7 -198 -22 63.7% +0.75 19–10 (66%) 11–3 (79%) 113.3 -0.19 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36
23 2020 1849 132.9 -0.10 -2.02 0.889 47.8% +28 — — 53.1% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 98.8 +0.36 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30
24 2021 1903 145.9 +4.09 -0.65 1.068 51.2% +31 -180 +37 57.6% +0.47 12–4 (75%) 8–1 (89%) 110.4 +2.66 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52
25 2022 1908 148.8 +4.85 +1.47 1.169 52.9% +16 -43 +29 62.3% +0.89 16–10 (62%) 8–9 (47%) 99.1 -0.23 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59
26 2023 1926 154.5 +5.48 +2.15 1.211 53.6% +23 -57 +17 65.6% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 9–5 (64%) 102.7 +0.65 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43
27 2024 1909 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10
28 2025 2004 160.1 +2.92 +0.83 1.069 51.4% +49 -160 +82 62.8% +0.71 14–6 (70%) 10–6 (63%) 106.3 -1.94 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36
29 2026 1956 156.1 +4.55 +3.76 1.244 54.3% +36 -35 +107 65.8% +1.13 4–8 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 94.7 +1.09 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38
Career — 2036 153.4 +2.84 +1.04 1.076 51.4% +11 -136 +29 58.8% +0.52 110–70 (61%) 79–48 (62%) 111.1 +0.16 — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.