H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC
Bernarda Pera vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-1
Bernarda Pera and Qiang Wang are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bernarda Pera leads 1–0 on clay, while Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernarda Pera won the 2019 Prague quarterfinal 6-0 6-7(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2019* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Bernarda Pera | 6-0 6-7(5) 6-3 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Bernarda Pera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernarda Pera | #314 | #27 | 1,519 | 1,836 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Bernarda Pera | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #62 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #71 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |