H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Elina Svitolina vs Qiang Wang H2H: 3-1
Elina Svitolina holds a 3–1 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Elina Svitolina leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Hong Kong quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 31
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2018* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-2 6-4 | Elina Svitolina | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Elina Svitolina | 6-4 6-4 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2018* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Elina Svitolina | 6-1 5-7 6-2 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2017* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elina Svitolina | 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | #10 | #3 | 6,085 | 2,143 | 429 | 227 | 65.4% | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 20 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elina Svitolina | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #45 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #6 | 1,942 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 1,983 | 0 | 13 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,963 | 0 | 13 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,900 | 0 | 16 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #240 | 1,765 | 0 | 16 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,886 | 0 | 17 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #23 | 1,906 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,980 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |