H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Alison Van Uytvanck H2H: 1-1
Elise Mertens and Alison Van Uytvanck are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elise Mertens leads 1–0 on clay, while Alison Van Uytvanck leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alison Van Uytvanck won the 2022 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 32
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2022* | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Alison Van Uytvanck | 6-2 6-3 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| May 7, 2018 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Elise Mertens | 6-4 6-4 | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2017 | Miami | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Alison Van Uytvanck | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | Elise Mertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Alison Van Uytvanck | #229 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,765 | 119 | 147 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #199 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #106 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #121 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #76 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,713 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #344 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |