H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-0
Katerina Siniakova holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katerina Siniakova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Katerina Siniakova won the 2019 Rome second round 1-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2019* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Katerina Siniakova | 1-6 7-5 6-4 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Katerina Siniakova | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |