H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 1-2
Su-Wei Hsieh holds a 2–1 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Su-Wei Hsieh leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2018 Australian Open first round 0-6 6-0 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 40
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Su-Wei Hsieh | 0-6 6-0 8-6 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2017* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 6-3 6-1 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2014* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Su-Wei Hsieh | 6-4 6-2 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Su-Wei Hsieh | #909 | #23 | 1,960 | 1,874 | 150 | 173 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Su-Wei Hsieh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #164 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #157 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #362 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #25 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #86 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #93 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #82 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #67 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #108 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |