H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 0-4
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 4–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2017 Miami second round 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2016 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-2 2-0 (ret.) | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2016* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-3 6-2 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Oct 16, 2015* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-1 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |