Qiang Wang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 22, 2022 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jan 8, 2021 | H2H |
| Fiona Ferro | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 23, 2020 | H2H |
| Su-Wei Hsieh | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 1, 2021 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 9, 2021 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Johanna Konta H2H: 3-0 (incl. walkovers)
Qiang Wang vs Johanna Konta: 2–0 excluding walkovers; 3–0 including 1 walkover. Across 3 main-draw results including walkovers, Qiang Wang leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2019 Miami Open second round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H including walkovers
3
–
0
3 main-draw results
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | 6-4 6-0 | Johanna Konta | Match data | Mar 22, 2019* | R64 | Miami Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Qiang Wang | (w/o) | Johanna Konta | Match data | Oct 14, 2016* | R16 | Hong Kong Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Qiang Wang | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Johanna Konta | Match data | Jan 7, 2016* | R32 | Shenzhen | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,931 | 129 | 127 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 2,019 | 179 | 122 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Qiang Wang | Johanna Konta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,909 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #37 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,929 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2021 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,623 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Qiang Wang | Johanna Konta | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 2012 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2014 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 23 | 2015 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2014 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 24 | 2016 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2015 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 25 | 2017 | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2016 | 38 | 15 | 53 | 71.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 26 | 2018 | 32 | 15 | 47 | 68.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | 21 | 9 | 30 | 70.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% |
| 27 | 2019 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2018 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 28 | 2020 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| 29 | 2021 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2021 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% |
| 32 | 2024 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 103 | 89 | 192 | 53.6% | 21 | 27 | 48 | 43.8% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.2% | — | 109 | 72 | 181 | 60.2% | 24 | 24 | 48 | 50.0% | 46 | 26 | 72 | 63.9% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 239/257 of Qiang Wang's and 276/302 of Johanna Konta's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Qiang Wang | Johanna Konta | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2012 | 3/3 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 63.7% | 51.1% | 37.0% | 33.2% | 54.2% | 46.3% | 37.9% | 2011 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 64.9% | 57.1% | 52.9% | 45.5% | 41.7% | 55.7% | 43.8% |
| 21 | 2013 | 1/2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 69.4% | 59.3% | 57.7% | 37.5% | 26.3% | 58.8% | 47.6% | 2012 | 5/5 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 64.7% | 63.2% | 47.4% | 55.5% | 45.6% | 57.5% | 44.3% |
| 22 | 2014 | 2/3 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 56.4% | 70.6% | 54.4% | 81.8% | 42.4% | 62.7% | 49.1% | 2013 | 8/8 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 55.7% | 68.5% | 46.1% | 48.8% | 38.5% | 58.3% | 41.4% |
| 23 | 2015 | 10/18 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 64.1% | 59.0% | 45.4% | 48.0% | 33.2% | 53.6% | 37.0% | 2014 | 10/10 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 60.9% | 65.0% | 42.9% | 49.1% | 40.9% | 56.8% | 38.9% |
| 24 | 2016 | 18/22 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 63.0% | 62.4% | 44.4% | 53.3% | 46.6% | 55.9% | 41.6% | 2015 | 13/21 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 68.7% | 68.4% | 54.6% | 56.3% | 39.5% | 64.3% | 42.4% |
| 25 | 2017 | 43/43 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 63.1% | 63.9% | 50.5% | 55.7% | 49.0% | 58.9% | 46.3% | 2016 | 58/70 | 4.6 | 2.5 | 61.5% | 69.0% | 53.3% | 59.0% | 49.3% | 63.0% | 45.6% |
| 26 | 2018 | 57/58 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 62.4% | 65.2% | 48.8% | 52.5% | 49.8% | 59.1% | 47.4% | 2017 | 51/53 | 4.4 | 2.4 | 62.3% | 70.1% | 51.3% | 57.9% | 46.4% | 63.0% | 44.3% |
| 27 | 2019 | 40/41 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 61.7% | 63.9% | 49.5% | 56.1% | 52.1% | 58.0% | 43.6% | 2018 | 47/50 | 4.8 | 3.1 | 61.3% | 69.1% | 49.2% | 61.8% | 47.7% | 61.3% | 43.1% |
| 28 | 2020 | 13/13 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 60.2% | 63.2% | 53.7% | 51.1% | 44.2% | 59.4% | 43.6% | 2019 | 48/48 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 66.7% | 68.3% | 51.8% | 65.4% | 47.3% | 62.7% | 43.1% |
| 29 | 2021 | 22/24 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 58.5% | 60.7% | 44.5% | 53.9% | 39.5% | 53.9% | 43.9% | 2020 | 17/17 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 62.8% | 72.3% | 52.5% | 61.1% | 29.6% | 64.7% | 39.9% |
| 30 | 2022 | 26/26 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 63.8% | 61.7% | 47.7% | 53.8% | 50.2% | 56.6% | 42.6% | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 64.4% | 67.0% | 48.1% | 55.1% | 46.8% | 60.2% | 39.9% |
| 32 | 2024 | 4/4 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 61.2% | 54.3% | 27.9% | 38.6% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 239/257 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 62.2% | 63.0% | 48.1% | 53.5% | 47.8% | 57.3% | 44.4% | — | 276/302 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 63.0% | 68.8% | 51.0% | 59.4% | 45.6% | 62.2% | 43.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Qiang Wang | Johanna Konta | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 2012 | 1459 | 93.4 | -2.59 | -4.30 | 0.705 | 42.2% | +20 | — | — | 14.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.34 | 2011 | 1495 | 105.2 | -3.70 | +5.19 | 0.987 | 49.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.21 |
| 21 | 2013 | 1474 | 106.8 | +1.03 | +1.18 | 1.155 | 52.7% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.12 | 2012 | 1507 | 102.4 | -0.74 | -0.74 | 1.042 | 50.4% | +26 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.06 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1468 | 102.3 | -0.40 | -0.04 | 1.315 | 56.2% | +13 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.43 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.36 | 2013 | 1505 | 104.2 | +1.55 | -1.52 | 0.991 | 49.6% | +49 | — | +8 | 41.2% | -0.41 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.37 |
| 23 | 2015 | 1449 | 112.8 | -2.12 | -2.78 | 0.797 | 45.2% | +43 | — | — | 31.8% | -1.18 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.30 | 2014 | 1461 | 102.5 | +0.14 | -3.37 | 0.901 | 48.0% | +28 | — | +83 | 30.4% | -0.91 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.42 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1539 | 124.4 | +0.50 | 0.00 | 0.943 | 48.8% | +23 | -27 | — | 43.5% | -0.56 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.52 | 2015 | 1696 | 133.9 | +4.57 | +1.53 | 1.188 | 53.1% | -49 | — | -54 | 59.2% | +0.59 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.5 | -1.09 |
| 25 | 2017 | 1721 | 140.3 | +2.20 | +2.13 | 1.126 | 52.2% | +4 | -118 | — | 57.4% | +0.51 | 5–10 (33%) | 5–4 (56%) | 97.5 | -0.59 | 2016 | 1910 | 150.9 | +5.83 | +2.56 | 1.233 | 53.8% | +17 | -422 | -216 | 66.0% | +1.14 | 10–9 (53%) | 12–2 (86%) | 108.0 | +1.13 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1906 | 152.9 | +2.58 | +4.18 | 1.157 | 53.0% | +14 | -273 | — | 61.1% | +1.10 | 9–5 (64%) | 1–3 (25%) | 102.8 | -1.43 | 2017 | 1857 | 150.3 | +6.00 | +1.48 | 1.198 | 53.3% | +43 | -355 | +71 | 65.8% | +1.10 | 9–9 (50%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.2 | -0.38 |
| 27 | 2019 | 1793 | 132.7 | +1.42 | +0.89 | 1.038 | 50.7% | +55 | -204 | -179 | 55.6% | +0.16 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–2 (75%) | 101.2 | +1.10 | 2018 | 1817 | 150.2 | +4.37 | +0.73 | 1.111 | 52.1% | +26 | -300 | +80 | 54.5% | +0.58 | 5–9 (36%) | 5–5 (50%) | 93.7 | -0.82 |
| 28 | 2020 | 1766 | 129.1 | +2.56 | +1.23 | 1.073 | 51.4% | +32 | — | — | 53.3% | +0.03 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.7 | +0.36 | 2019 | 1929 | 148.1 | +5.43 | +0.52 | 1.156 | 52.9% | -74 | -89 | +12 | 62.2% | +0.99 | 12–3 (80%) | 6–8 (43%) | 109.0 | -2.51 |
| 29 | 2021 | 1714 | 121.2 | -1.69 | +0.38 | 0.952 | 48.9% | -23 | -55 | — | 44.1% | -0.42 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.4 | +0.25 | 2020 | 1828 | 136.4 | +4.38 | -1.78 | 1.131 | 51.1% | -18 | -16 | — | 50.0% | +0.16 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | 95.7 | +0.30 |
| 30 | 2022 | 1717 | 128.6 | +0.18 | +0.03 | 0.981 | 49.6% | +35 | — | -160 | 45.2% | -0.11 | 8–2 (80%) | 2–8 (20%) | 101.7 | -0.05 | 2021 | 1821 | 131.5 | +2.33 | -1.69 | 1.003 | 50.1% | -28 | -46 | +285 | 54.1% | +0.30 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–5 (17%) | 97.9 | +0.58 |
| 32 | 2024 | 1624 | 97.7 | -3.97 | -0.81 | 0.667 | 41.0% | +19 | — | — | 11.1% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1931 | 138.9 | +1.10 | +1.45 | 1.038 | 50.7% | +22 | -151 | -171 | 50.5% | +0.07 | 38–44 (46%) | 22–21 (51%) | 100.4 | -0.15 | — | 2020 | 150.1 | +4.68 | +0.72 | 1.142 | 52.4% | +5 | -193 | +18 | 59.0% | +0.73 | 44–47 (48%) | 38–36 (51%) | 98.3 | -0.72 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Johanna Konta
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venus Williams | 4 | 4 | 8 | May 17, 2019 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 6 | 1 | 7 | Aug 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 3, 2019 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 4, 2019 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 28, 2021 | H2H |