H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Kurumi Nara H2H: 2-1
Qiang Wang holds a 2–1 lead over Kurumi Nara in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2017 Japan Women's Open Tennis fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2017* | Japan Women's Open Tennis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-2 6-3 | Kurumi Nara | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2016* | Kaohsiung | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kurumi Nara | 6-1 6-3 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2015* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 5-7 6-1 7-5 | Kurumi Nara | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Kurumi Nara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |