H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Luksika Kumkhum H2H: 3-0
Qiang Wang holds a 3–0 lead over Luksika Kumkhum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Hiroshima fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
THA
Age 32
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2018* | Hiroshima | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 7-5 6-3 | Luksika Kumkhum | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2017* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-4 6-4 | Luksika Kumkhum | Match data |
| Mar 3, 2016* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-2 6-1 | Luksika Kumkhum | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Luksika Kumkhum | #1,145 | #66 | 884 | 1,656 | 21 | 37 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Luksika Kumkhum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #116 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #125 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #66 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #625 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |