H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Qiang Wang vs Richel Hogenkamp H2H: 0-1

Richel Hogenkamp holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richel Hogenkamp leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richel Hogenkamp won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Richel Hogenkamp
The Netherlands Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richel Hogenkamp #123 6-4 6-4 Qiang Wang #110 Match data Jul 1, 2015* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Richel Hogenkamp #1,297 #94 654 1,581 14 28 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qiang Wang Richel Hogenkamp
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0 2012 1–1 50.0% #197 1,513 0 0
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0 2013 2–2 50.0% #213 1,524 0 0
22 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0 2014 1–1 50.0% #138 1,530 0 0
23 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0 2015 2–7 22.2% #132 1,495 0 0
24 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0 2016 3–3 50.0% #133 1,548 0 0
25 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0 2017 5–8 38.5% #106 1,537 0 0
26 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2 2018 0–5 0.0% #167 1,514 0 0
27 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2 2019 0–1 0.0% #195 1,478 0 0
28 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qiang Wang Richel Hogenkamp
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2014 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — 4 13 17 23.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 239/257 of Qiang Wang's and 40/42 of Richel Hogenkamp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qiang Wang Richel Hogenkamp
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9% 2012 2/2 2.0 8.5 48.8% 65.9% 48.9% 56.3% 43.2% 57.0% 36.8%
21 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6% 2013 3/4 1.0 6.3 57.2% 55.4% 46.8% 57.9% 78.0% 52.0% 45.5%
22 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1% 2014 2/2 1.5 5.5 64.9% 56.6% 37.3% 55.0% 65.3% 50.3% 48.5%
23 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0% 2015 8/9 0.9 3.1 59.2% 60.5% 48.0% 55.2% 51.4% 55.8% 34.4%
24 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6% 2016 6/6 0.8 4.8 55.6% 63.8% 49.0% 61.8% 57.0% 57.1% 45.2%
25 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3% 2017 13/13 1.8 2.9 59.1% 62.5% 49.4% 47.9% 42.7% 57.2% 39.2%
26 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4% 2018 5/5 1.0 4.0 55.4% 55.2% 40.6% 47.6% 31.3% 48.4% 34.0%
27 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6% 2019 1/1 0.0 4.0 61.5% 54.2% 43.3% 50.0% 42.9% 50.0% 43.3%
28 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4% — 40/42 1.3 4.1 57.8% 60.5% 47.0% 53.0% 49.0% 54.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qiang Wang Richel Hogenkamp
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34 2012 1513 105.3 +0.72 -1.37 0.857 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — -0.17
21 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12 2013 1525 101.1 -1.26 -0.60 0.947 49.5% — +62 — 44.4% -0.45 1–0 — — +0.05
22 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36 2014 1530 104.8 -1.97 -1.72 0.975 49.3% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01
23 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30 2015 1496 108.3 -1.68 -2.17 0.778 45.4% -26 +70 — 26.3% -1.68 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.22
24 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52 2016 1549 112.0 -0.08 +0.20 1.052 51.5% — — — 57.1% +0.50 0–2 — — -0.05
25 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59 2017 1538 106.6 +0.40 -2.44 0.917 48.4% -45 — +57 39.3% -0.64 1–1 0–2 — -0.12
26 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43 2018 1514 95.9 -2.74 -3.00 0.659 41.5% — +56 — 9.1% -3.36 0–1 0–2 — -0.20
27 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10 2019 1479 104.6 +0.93 +3.09 0.867 46.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.12
28 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36 2020 1482 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05 2022 1468 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15 — 1581 108.2 -0.69 -1.69 0.874 47.4% -39 +63 +57 35.9% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 0–8 (0%) 92.3 -1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.