H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Timea Bacsinszky H2H: 1-0
Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Timea Bacsinszky in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Indian Wells first round 6-0 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2018* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-0 4-6 6-2 | Timea Bacsinszky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Timea Bacsinszky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |