H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Qiang Wang vs Timea Bacsinszky H2H: 1-0

Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Timea Bacsinszky in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Indian Wells Open first round 6-0 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Timea Bacsinszky
Switzerland Age 37 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #55 6-0 4-6 6-2 Timea Bacsinszky #42 Match data Mar 9, 2018* R128 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Timea Bacsinszky #941 #9 3,157 1,935 163 141 53.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qiang Wang Timea Bacsinszky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #252 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–3 50.0% #124 1,541 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 13–16 44.8% #54 1,589 0 0
20 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0 2009 17–10 63.0% #53 1,739 0 1
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0 2010 19–21 47.5% #50 1,694 0 1
22 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0 2011 3–6 33.3% #247 1,663 0 1
23 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0 2012 2–6 25.0% #179 1,604 0 1
24 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #237 1,597 0 1
25 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0 2014 11–10 52.4% #48 1,678 0 1
26 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2 2015 37–14 72.5% #12 1,845 0 3
27 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2 2016 32–19 62.7% #15 1,758 0 4
28 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2 2017 15–9 62.5% #39 1,809 0 4
29 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2 2018 3–8 27.3% #191 1,721 0 4
30 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2 2019 6–10 37.5% #139 1,641 0 4
32 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qiang Wang Timea Bacsinszky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 12 21 42.9% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 24 9 33 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
27 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 4 3 7 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — — — — — 86 83 169 50.9% 66 44 110 60.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 239/257 of Qiang Wang's and 266/303 of Timea Bacsinszky's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qiang Wang Timea Bacsinszky
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/6 3.7 3.3 51.7% 77.8% 56.8% 87.9% 61.7% 67.9% 44.9%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/8 2.0 2.2 57.5% 63.2% 43.5% 44.1% 47.8% 54.5% 41.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 25/29 2.6 3.0 55.2% 62.1% 45.0% 45.3% 40.7% 54.5% 44.2%
20 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9% 2009 23/27 3.2 2.4 59.3% 64.1% 45.7% 57.5% 50.2% 56.6% 45.3%
21 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6% 2010 38/40 2.3 3.7 58.8% 61.1% 45.5% 58.0% 53.3% 54.4% 44.8%
22 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1% 2011 4/9 3.5 5.8 55.6% 62.9% 38.2% 59.9% 44.2% 51.9% 42.0%
23 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0% 2012 8/8 0.5 2.6 66.8% 50.8% 35.6% 37.0% 43.7% 45.9% 41.9%
24 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6% 2013 1/1 0.0 4.0 66.1% 51.2% 42.9% 44.4% 66.7% 48.4% 41.9%
25 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3% 2014 20/21 1.5 2.5 67.0% 62.6% 44.5% 56.6% 47.4% 56.7% 46.1%
26 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4% 2015 44/51 1.9 3.0 67.9% 63.4% 52.1% 51.8% 51.3% 59.8% 44.9%
27 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6% 2016 47/52 1.1 2.0 68.4% 62.2% 48.3% 52.0% 47.0% 57.6% 46.8%
28 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6% 2017 24/24 1.8 2.0 65.9% 62.6% 52.8% 52.0% 48.6% 59.5% 47.6%
29 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9% 2018 11/11 1.7 3.5 63.4% 61.9% 41.4% 50.7% 50.5% 54.6% 40.5%
30 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6% 2019 13/16 1.7 1.7 63.4% 59.2% 45.7% 48.6% 52.5% 54.3% 44.2%
32 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4% — 266/305 1.9 2.7 63.5% 62.1% 47.2% 52.7% 49.0% 56.5% 45.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qiang Wang Timea Bacsinszky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1485 103.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 0–1 — -0.11
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1542 116.2 +3.56 +1.88 1.400 57.0% +31 -31 — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — -0.37
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1522 115.5 -0.18 -0.57 0.907 47.9% — -4 — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.40
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1589 126.2 -0.62 +0.29 0.970 49.3% +20 -40 — 44.6% -0.45 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 -0.23
20 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34 2009 1740 124.9 +0.62 +0.51 1.044 51.0% -48 -88 — 56.7% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 105.7 +0.19
21 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12 2010 1694 127.2 -1.10 +1.16 0.983 49.6% -12 -15 — 46.6% -0.19 5–5 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 96.6 +1.27
22 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36 2011 1664 120.0 +0.92 +0.57 0.873 47.3% -9 — — 36.4% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.28
23 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30 2012 1604 100.6 -3.34 -1.85 0.775 43.6% +16 +53 — 25.0% -1.58 1–1 0–1 — -0.15
24 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52 2013 1597 104.4 -0.12 +0.61 0.812 45.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.32
25 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59 2014 1679 141.7 +1.87 +2.26 1.066 51.2% -13 +1 — 53.3% +0.42 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 94.6 -0.84
26 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43 2015 1845 146.1 +1.78 +3.78 1.118 52.2% -20 -75 -157 64.4% +0.91 16–4 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 109.4 -1.30
27 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10 2016 1759 141.7 +1.97 +2.62 1.105 52.1% -20 +159 -87 60.0% +0.77 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 104.1 +1.27
28 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36 2017 1809 137.6 +2.69 +3.09 1.176 53.2% -61 +141 -121 66.0% +1.45 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 -0.19
29 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25 2018 1722 119.2 -1.27 -1.05 0.891 47.5% -27 — — 34.6% -1.58 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 95.4 -0.52
30 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05 2019 1642 126.3 -1.44 +0.08 0.966 49.1% +23 +199 — 42.1% -0.50 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 94.1 -0.93
32 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15 — 1936 141.2 +0.69 +1.70 1.038 50.7% -15 +35 -124 52.4% +0.21 53–45 (54%) 19–33 (37%) 96.0 -0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.