H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 0-1
Yaroslava Shvedova holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yaroslava Shvedova won the 2016 US Open second round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Yaroslava Shvedova | 6-0 6-1 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yaroslava Shvedova | #1,136 | #25 | 1,860 | 1,751 | 141 | 175 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Yaroslava Shvedova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #92 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #204 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #65 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #289 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #434 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |