H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-1

Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Varvara Lepchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2015 China Open first round 6-2 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
United States Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #113 6-2 3-6 6-2 Varvara Lepchenko #43 Match data Oct 5, 2015 R64 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #181 #19 1,875 1,802 156 220 41.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Qiang Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,448 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,508 0 0 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0
26 2012 25–20 55.6% #21 1,712 0 0 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,606 0 0 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,753 0 0 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,637 0 0 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,608 0 0 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,705 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,631 0 0 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2
33 2019 2–10 16.7% #173 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–3 40.0% #181 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Qiang Wang
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 0 6 6 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2013 7 17 24 29.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2014 20 12 32 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 16 13 29 55.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
30 2016 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2017 10 13 23 43.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 131 226 42.0% 50 63 113 44.2% 11 25 36 30.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 343/373 of Varvara Lepchenko's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Qiang Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2006 6/8 0.8 4.0 64.2% 50.1% 45.8% 48.2% 45.8% 49.2% 39.0% 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9%
21 2007 11/12 1.6 3.0 70.2% 56.8% 37.3% 52.7% 47.3% 50.7% 37.1% 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6%
22 2008 3/6 1.3 2.0 63.0% 53.9% 56.6% 58.3% 16.7% 55.1% 31.7% 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1%
23 2009 15/17 1.2 2.5 70.0% 59.4% 49.2% 53.3% 49.4% 55.7% 41.6% 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0%
24 2010 13/14 2.8 2.8 63.9% 59.9% 45.7% 44.4% 44.4% 54.9% 41.7% 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6%
25 2011 17/18 2.0 3.6 66.2% 56.3% 43.0% 48.5% 48.8% 51.6% 43.0% 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3%
26 2012 42/45 2.6 3.0 63.3% 63.2% 48.3% 51.9% 50.2% 57.7% 41.5% 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4%
27 2013 37/41 2.0 3.3 65.0% 60.6% 45.5% 49.4% 42.0% 55.3% 42.4% 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6%
28 2014 43/46 1.9 2.9 67.1% 62.3% 47.9% 56.8% 47.8% 57.6% 44.8% 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6%
29 2015 31/39 2.2 2.8 69.3% 59.5% 51.1% 44.3% 43.0% 56.4% 40.3% 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9%
30 2016 32/32 2.6 2.9 64.5% 63.3% 45.7% 55.2% 43.4% 57.0% 42.0% 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6%
31 2017 38/38 2.1 2.4 69.9% 60.4% 48.5% 47.0% 50.2% 56.9% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 19/19 1.6 2.6 68.0% 58.5% 44.8% 56.1% 42.6% 53.9% 40.4% 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5%
33 2019 12/12 1.2 2.6 63.6% 58.2% 37.6% 50.1% 46.0% 50.8% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2/2 1.5 2.5 68.2% 52.0% 36.3% 51.9% 51.1% 47.2% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 8/8 1.9 2.0 66.5% 59.2% 44.8% 56.7% 35.9% 54.6% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 8/8 2.3 1.1 64.8% 61.3% 57.4% 54.5% 30.5% 59.9% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1/2 1.0 1.0 77.8% 62.5% 50.0% 60.0% 0.0% 59.7% 27.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 5/6 1.8 2.6 61.9% 65.6% 41.1% 54.4% 35.5% 56.1% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 343/377 2.0 2.8 66.5% 60.4% 46.7% 51.4% 45.2% 55.7% 41.3% — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Qiang Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1482 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1510 108.8 — — — — +23 — — 71.4% +1.43 0–1 1–0 — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1491 104.2 -2.19 -2.82 0.768 44.5% +4 — — 30.0% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.12 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34
21 2007 1452 106.5 -3.00 -3.30 0.753 44.4% +14 +82 — 27.6% -1.72 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.51 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12
22 2008 1449 99.7 -0.21 -4.92 0.705 44.7% +22 +58 — 33.3% -1.08 — — — +0.44 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36
23 2009 1456 112.8 +0.34 -2.03 0.939 48.7% -40 +79 — 37.5% -0.85 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.04 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30
24 2010 1470 112.5 -1.47 -1.40 0.925 48.1% -77 +74 — 41.9% -0.77 0–5 (0%) 2–0 — +0.15 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52
25 2011 1509 110.7 -2.49 +0.09 0.889 47.1% -86 +42 — 36.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 101.3 -0.38 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59
26 2012 1712 134.0 +1.37 -1.53 0.982 49.5% -96 -36 -106 55.4% +0.30 9–6 (60%) 8–8 (50%) 109.1 +1.09 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43
27 2013 1607 133.5 -0.39 -0.95 0.948 48.8% -50 +122 — 43.2% -0.48 6–11 (35%) 6–5 (55%) 100.0 +0.01 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10
28 2014 1754 139.8 +1.35 +1.85 1.057 51.0% -27 -11 -174 55.0% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 105.6 +0.56 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36
29 2015 1637 128.4 -0.98 -0.70 0.925 48.4% +64 -24 -123 44.7% -0.36 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 96.0 +1.03 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25
30 2016 1608 123.0 +0.49 -0.93 0.978 49.5% +29 +2 -112 46.1% -0.30 7–9 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.47 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05
31 2017 1706 124.1 +0.80 -2.00 0.932 48.5% -5 -69 -238 47.4% -0.55 8–11 (42%) 11–3 (79%) 103.5 -2.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1631 122.6 -1.36 -1.05 0.877 47.4% +16 -20 — 39.1% -1.02 2–6 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 96.5 -1.14 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38
33 2019 1523 100.7 -2.66 -3.16 0.762 44.4% +1 -2 — 23.1% -1.85 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1483 108.5 -2.16 -1.70 0.843 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1583 103.2 -1.31 -3.66 0.835 46.7% +24 -127 — 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.2 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1611 105.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1639 109.6 +0.88 -1.47 1.034 48.3% +66 — — 31.3% -1.19 1–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1606 101.7 +0.56 +1.40 0.687 44.5% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 1526 107.9 -0.55 -2.09 0.933 48.6% — +56 — 38.5% -0.54 2–1 (67%) — — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1803 125.9 -0.16 -1.09 0.933 48.5% -13 +21 -156 43.9% -0.47 60–81 (43%) 58–52 (53%) 102.3 +0.05 — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.