H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Yulia Putintseva vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-1
Yulia Putintseva and Qiang Wang are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yulia Putintseva leads 1–0 on clay, while Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Guangzhou final 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2018* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-1 6-2 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 1-6 7-5 6-4 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yulia Putintseva | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |