H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Alison Van Uytvanck vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-2
Qiang Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Alison Van Uytvanck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2022 Australian Open second round 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 32
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2022* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 7-5 6-4 | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Van Uytvanck | #229 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,765 | 119 | 147 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Alison Van Uytvanck | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #199 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #106 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #121 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #76 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #344 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |