H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alison Van Uytvanck vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-2

Qiang Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Alison Van Uytvanck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2022 Australian Open second round 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alison Van Uytvanck
Belgium Age 32 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #110 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 Alison Van Uytvanck #55 Match data Jan 20, 2022* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Qiang Wang #18 7-5 6-4 Alison Van Uytvanck #68 Match data Aug 29, 2019* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alison Van Uytvanck #229 #37 1,355 1,772 123 149 45.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Qiang Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–2 33.3% #287 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 2–1 66.7% #199 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 1–3 25.0% #112 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2014 10–17 37.0% #106 1,526 0 0 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0
21 2015 19–18 51.4% #44 1,647 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0
22 2016 4–13 23.5% #121 1,516 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0
23 2017 9–8 52.9% #76 1,634 0 1 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0
24 2018 19–22 46.3% #49 1,660 0 2 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0
25 2019 24–18 57.1% #47 1,736 0 4 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0
26 2020 7–11 38.9% #64 1,674 0 4 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2
27 2021 15–15 50.0% #58 1,772 0 5 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2
28 2022 9–13 40.9% #72 1,685 0 5 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2
29 2023 3–4 42.9% #344 1,687 0 5 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2
30 2024 0–4 0.0% #229 1,609 0 5 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Qiang Wang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 6 11 17 35.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2015 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2016 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2017 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2018 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 17 11 28 60.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2021 13 10 23 56.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
29 2023 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
30 2024 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 85 90 175 48.6% 22 34 56 39.3% 16 25 41 39.0% — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 250/272 of Alison Van Uytvanck's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Qiang Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 3/3 4.0 5.3 61.8% 66.5% 34.7% 49.3% 52.4% 54.4% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 4.3 2.0 59.4% 63.4% 49.6% 61.1% 31.4% 57.9% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 4/4 2.5 2.0 60.5% 56.2% 32.9% 46.0% 48.3% 50.4% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 27/27 2.8 1.9 60.8% 63.0% 51.0% 51.3% 46.0% 58.1% 40.9% 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9%
21 2015 23/37 4.4 2.2 58.9% 64.4% 48.6% 53.1% 49.1% 57.9% 36.7% 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6%
22 2016 17/17 4.3 3.5 56.8% 67.4% 44.6% 54.9% 47.7% 57.8% 38.5% 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1%
23 2017 14/17 4.9 2.8 55.4% 69.1% 53.4% 64.4% 41.5% 62.4% 41.1% 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0%
24 2018 39/41 4.2 2.6 62.4% 65.5% 48.1% 61.6% 44.8% 59.2% 42.5% 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6%
25 2019 42/42 3.2 2.0 64.8% 63.0% 47.3% 55.8% 46.2% 57.4% 44.5% 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3%
26 2020 18/18 3.0 2.2 62.3% 66.6% 46.1% 47.0% 40.8% 58.7% 41.1% 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4%
27 2021 27/30 2.6 1.9 60.0% 63.1% 45.0% 54.3% 52.1% 56.0% 44.7% 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6%
28 2022 22/22 2.7 2.5 58.2% 64.6% 48.0% 60.7% 42.8% 57.8% 43.0% 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6%
29 2023 7/7 4.9 2.1 60.8% 65.7% 40.3% 59.0% 60.3% 55.8% 40.6% 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9%
30 2024 4/4 2.0 1.8 61.9% 50.4% 34.4% 43.3% 51.0% 44.3% 40.5% 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5%
Career — 250/272 3.5 2.3 60.8% 64.4% 47.1% 55.7% 46.4% 57.7% 41.8% — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alison Van Uytvanck Qiang Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1511 108.0 -2.51 -2.37 0.928 48.7% — — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–2 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1555 103.7 +2.11 -1.71 0.894 47.9% — +51 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1524 90.5 -1.68 -1.92 0.831 45.8% — — — 25.0% -2.13 — 0–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1526 113.6 +1.00 -2.70 0.975 49.4% -8 +12 +42 43.3% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 92.5 +0.20 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34
21 2015 1647 123.7 +0.26 -3.01 0.870 47.5% -6 -88 -87 50.6% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 106.0 +0.57 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12
22 2016 1517 106.5 +0.03 -3.82 0.912 48.2% +32 — -45 36.6% -0.90 0–7 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 92.1 +0.27 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36
23 2017 1634 121.0 +2.65 -1.27 1.095 51.6% +11 -34 — 55.3% +0.42 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 +0.26 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30
24 2018 1661 129.7 +1.86 -0.17 1.042 50.6% -23 -93 -60 46.9% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 4–10 (29%) 97.5 -1.03 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52
25 2019 1736 130.4 +0.69 +0.82 1.044 50.9% -1 -93 -105 55.9% +0.33 9–4 (69%) 4–1 (80%) 107.5 +0.05 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59
26 2020 1674 126.9 +0.77 -1.27 0.995 49.6% +24 -57 — 46.3% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.2 +0.13 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43
27 2021 1772 134.7 -0.09 +1.01 1.015 50.6% +34 -271 -124 51.5% +0.36 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — -0.37 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10
28 2022 1685 128.7 +0.29 +0.04 1.018 50.4% -5 — +57 50.0% +0.19 0–8 (0%) 2–6 (25%) 86.9 +0.23 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36
29 2023 1687 120.1 -1.26 +0.60 0.919 48.7% -9 — — 50.0% -0.39 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.67 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25
30 2024 1609 96.6 -3.25 -1.92 0.727 42.6% — — — 11.1% -2.89 0–1 — — +0.23 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38
Career — 1772 129.8 +0.64 -0.86 0.987 49.7% +4 -70 -50 48.1% -0.02 39–53 (42%) 28–44 (39%) 92.0 +0.02 — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.