H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jil Teichmann vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-0
Jil Teichmann holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jil Teichmann leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2021 Adelaide fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2021* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jil Teichmann | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jil Teichmann | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |