Rankings as of: Dec 25, 1995

WTA 1995 Season Leaders & Rankings

Rankings, leaderboards, and performance stats by season.

Steffi Graf finished 1995 at WTA No. 1 with 393 points.

Need custom historical filters? Search ranking weeks or search player seasons with the Advanced search tool.

Rankings Leaders

Ranking points, results, and season metrics for 1995.

320 players with >= 1 match

# Player Country Rank Points Wk +/− YTD Δ W L Win % Titles AORGWUSO Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD Set Win % Set Margin Pressure+ Schedule
1 Steffi Graf GER 1 393 – ▶ 0 48 2 96.0% 9 — W W W 2,464 178.3 — — — 87.4% +2.78 102.0 -1.6
2 Monica Seles USA 1 — – ▶ 0 11 1 91.7% 1 — — — F 2,488 169.9 — — — 92.0% +3.80 — -0.6
3 Conchita Martínez ESP 2 255 – ▲ 1 57 10 85.1% 6 SF SF SF SF 2,182 174.1 — — — 77.9% +2.36 106.8 -1.3
4 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario ESP 3 228 – ▼ 1 47 13 78.3% 2 F F F R16 2,167 167.9 — — — 73.5% +1.92 99.2 -1.1
5 Kimiko Date JPN 4 165 – ▲ 4 39 12 76.5% 1 R32 SF QF R16 2,029 160.2 — — — 71.6% +1.43 104.6 -2.2
6 Mary Pierce FRA 5 159 – ▶ 0 35 14 71.4% 2 W R16 R64 R32 2,007 168.6 — — — 72.1% +1.78 94.5 +1.1
7 Magdalena Maleeva BUL 6 149 – ▲ 4 37 12 75.5% 3 R128 R64 — R64 2,047 157.5 — — — 67.6% +1.06 107.8 -0.6
8 Gabriela Sabatini ARG 7 147 – ▶ 0 41 16 71.9% 1 R128 QF QF SF 2,063 172.1 — — — 71.5% +1.92 88.1 +0.3
9 Mary Joe Fernandez USA 8 136 – ▲ 5 29 11 72.5% 2 R16 R128 QF QF 2,039 159.3 — — — 64.8% +1.11 107.6 -0.5
10 Iva Majoli CRO 9 135 – ▲ 3 29 12 70.7% 2 — QF R128 R128 2,045 165.8 — — — 66.7% +1.21 107.5 -0.0
11 Anke Huber GER 10 129 – ▲ 1 41 15 73.2% 1 R16 R16 R16 R16 2,082 168.0 — — — 66.2% +1.32 103.3 -1.8
12 Jana Novotna CZE 11 125 – ▼ 7 30 12 71.4% 1 R16 R32 SF QF 2,031 157.0 — — — 66.3% +1.14 95.1 -0.2
13 Lindsay Davenport USA 12 112 – ▼ 6 31 14 68.9% 1 QF R16 R16 R64 1,964 155.1 — — — 64.4% +1.21 100.2 +0.8
14 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy NED 13 99 – ▲ 1 37 15 71.2% 2 R16 R64 QF QF 1,971 149.3 — — — 64.5% +0.82 104.4 +1.4
15 Natasha Zvereva BLR 14 93 – ▼ 5 31 17 64.6% 0 QF R128 R32 R16 1,970 161.0 — — — 59.5% +0.80 100.5 -0.2
16 Chanda Rubin USA 15 91 – ▲ 7 38 19 66.7% 0 R64 QF R32 R16 1,934 157.2 — — — 64.6% +1.22 103.9 +0.0
17 Martina Hingis SUI 16 70 – ▲ 70 18 12 60.0% 0 R64 R32 R128 R16 1,825 156.2 — — — 54.1% +0.20 111.3 -2.2
18 Naoko Sawamatsu JPN 17 69 – ▲ 8 22 13 62.9% 0 QF R32 R32 R32 1,847 150.6 — — — 58.6% +0.48 103.1 +1.1
19 Amy Frazier USA 18 66 – ▼ 3 26 15 63.4% 1 R32 R32 R64 QF 1,876 148.4 — — — 62.6% +0.87 99.3 +0.4
20 Amanda Coetzer RSA 19 62 – ▼ 2 31 22 58.5% 0 R32 R64 R64 R128 1,907 160.6 — — — 53.3% +0.22 103.6 -2.4
21 Lisa Raymond USA 20 59 – ▲ 23 25 16 61.0% 0 R32 — R16 R64 1,812 147.9 — — — 56.0% +0.40 107.8 +0.6
22 Irina Spirlea ROU 21 59 – ▲ 21 36 19 65.5% 1 R16 R32 R32 R128 1,823 148.4 — — — 63.2% +1.06 102.5 +1.6
23 Zina Garrison USA 22 57 – ▲ 1 25 16 61.0% 1 R32 R128 R32 R16 1,868 147.9 — — — 61.2% +0.83 91.6 +1.4
24 Barbara Paulus AUT 23 55 – ▲ 84 21 7 75.0% 2 R16 R128 R64 R64 1,798 130.3 — — — 67.2% +1.11 110.4 +2.6
25 Yayuk Basuki INA 24 55 – ▲ 4 18 12 60.0% 0 R32 R128 R16 R128 1,848 147.4 — — — 57.4% +0.21 105.2 -1.4
26 Judith Wiesner AUT 25 55 – ▼ 1 28 14 66.7% 1 R32 R128 R32 R128 1,915 149.4 — — — 61.8% +1.24 92.9 -1.1
27 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 27 53 – ▲ 7 27 19 58.7% 1 — R32 R32 R32 1,845 146.3 — — — 57.1% +0.38 98.3 -1.3
28 Yone Kamio JPN 28 50 – ▲ 51 22 13 62.9% 0 R32 R128 R32 R32 1,739 137.1 — — — 56.6% +0.34 109.7 +0.6
29 Helena Sukova CZE 29 49 – ▼ 8 18 15 54.5% 0 R64 R128 R64 R64 1,819 144.1 — — — 53.9% +0.05 105.6 -0.1
30 Joannette Kruger RSA 30 48 – ▲ 48 19 15 55.9% 1 R64 R64 R128 R64 1,726 133.4 — — — 54.5% +0.18 101.5 +0.8
31 Sabine Appelmans BEL 31 44 – ▼ 5 24 17 58.5% 1 R32 R32 R128 R32 1,809 140.0 — — — 57.6% +0.37 99.8 -0.9
32 Meike Babel GER 32 42 – ▲ 13 14 10 58.3% 0 R32 R64 R64 — 1,751 137.0 — — — 59.3% +0.56 100.5 -2.0
33 Lori Mcneil USA 34 41 – ▼ 18 19 19 50.0% 0 R32 R128 R128 R64 1,804 142.2 — — — 53.8% +0.38 91.4 -0.3
34 Kristie Boogert NED 35 40 – ▲ 17 22 16 57.9% 0 R32 R64 R32 R128 1,751 145.9 — — — 55.7% +0.67 103.9 -0.0
35 Angelica Gavaldon MEX 36 40 – ▲ 82 17 17 50.0% 0 QF R128 R32 R32 1,677 132.9 — — — 48.6% -0.23 106.9 +0.3
36 Nicole Bradtke AUS 37 40 – ▲ 115 21 15 58.3% 1 R64 R128 R16 R128 1,785 146.5 — — — 57.1% +0.64 101.7 -2.6
37 Ines Gorrochategui ARG 38 39 – ▼ 19 16 12 57.1% 0 — R128 R16 R64 1,824 129.2 — — — 52.6% -0.05 104.4 -0.3
38 Kyoko Nagatsuka JPN 39 37 – ▲ 35 16 13 55.2% 0 R16 R16 R64 R128 1,663 131.2 — — — 53.6% +0.25 101.1 +1.0
39 Sabine Hack GER 40 36 – ▼ 22 20 16 55.6% 1 R128 R128 — R64 1,729 134.7 — — — 55.0% +0.44 96.1 +0.8
40 Sandrine Testud FRA 41 35 – ▲ 39 19 16 54.3% 0 R32 R64 R64 R32 1,736 138.2 — — — 55.1% +0.24 99.9 -0.9
41 Miriam Oremans NED 42 35 – ▲ 5 19 18 51.4% 0 R64 R64 R32 R128 1,768 143.9 — — — 50.0% +0.10 104.5 -0.9
42 Dominique Monami BEL 43 33 – ▲ 90 12 9 57.1% 0 — R64 R64 R64 1,680 130.2 — — — 59.5% +0.60 — +0.1
43 Shi-Ting Wang TPE 44 33 – ▼ 3 17 9 65.4% 1 R128 R32 — — 1,775 128.1 — — — 62.3% +1.00 — +1.6
44 Elena Likhovtseva RUS 45 31 – ▲ 16 18 18 50.0% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,715 139.9 — — — 48.1% -0.27 102.0 -1.0
45 Ai Sugiyama JPN 46 31 – ▲ 25 16 17 48.5% 0 R128 R16 R128 R64 1,665 135.9 — — — 49.3% +0.23 101.9 +0.3
46 Lindsay Lee-Waters USA 47 31 – ▲ 258 13 11 54.2% 0 — — R64 R64 1,683 134.4 — — — 50.0% +0.08 — -0.8
47 Asa Carlsson SWE 49 30 – ▲ 20 22 19 53.7% 0 R128 R128 R128 R64 1,748 136.0 — — — 53.1% -0.17 104.2 -0.9
48 Julie Halard-Decugis FRA 50 30 – ▼ 30 19 15 55.9% 1 R128 R32 R128 R64 1,770 131.9 — — — 55.1% +0.33 97.1 +0.6
49 Barbara Rittner GER 51 30 – ▼ 12 17 17 50.0% 0 R128 R128 — R128 1,729 138.0 — — — 53.9% +0.47 96.7 -0.3
50 Silvia Farina Elia ITA 52 30 – ▼ 1 18 16 52.9% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,649 125.3 — — — 52.1% +0.49 92.8 +0.8
51 Christina Singer GER 54 29 – ▲ 22 17 16 51.5% 0 R64 R64 R32 R64 1,708 128.0 — — — 50.0% -0.33 104.9 -0.6
52 Florencia Labat ARG 55 29 – ▼ 18 16 13 55.2% 0 R128 R32 R64 R32 1,780 133.7 — — — 50.8% +0.17 — -0.3
53 Karina Habsudova SVK 56 29 – ▼ 26 14 13 51.9% 0 R16 R64 R128 R128 1,732 138.3 — — — 54.1% +0.26 98.2 -0.4
54 Patty Fendick USA 57 28 – ▼ 8 13 13 50.0% 0 R64 R64 R128 — 1,690 135.9 — — — 51.7% +0.02 101.2 -0.5
55 Linda Wild USA 58 28 – ▼ 10 17 13 56.7% 2 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,758 128.9 — — — 58.0% +0.57 96.1 +1.4
56 Katarzyna Nowak POL 59 28 – ▲ 34 10 11 47.6% 0 — R32 — R128 1,608 119.3 — — — 47.8% -0.63 102.3 +0.2
57 Petra Begerow GER 60 28 – ▲ 36 8 13 38.1% 0 R128 R64 R128 — 1,582 128.4 — — — 41.5% -0.46 — +0.8
58 Virginia Ruano Pascual ESP 61 28 – ▲ 109 11 13 45.8% 0 — QF R128 R128 1,562 122.2 — — — 44.9% -0.47 101.8 +0.7
59 Meredith Mcgrath USA 62 27 – ▼ 24 11 15 42.3% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,742 142.5 — — — 49.1% +0.21 — -0.7
60 Laurence Courtois BEL 64 26 – ▲ 40 14 14 50.0% 0 R64 R64 R64 R128 1,624 121.6 — — — 50.0% -0.24 105.7 +0.3
61 Gigi Fernandez USA 65 25 – ▼ 34 11 13 45.8% 0 R128 — R128 R32 1,739 124.8 — — — 50.9% -0.33 98.5 -0.3
62 Beate Reinstadler AUT 66 25 – ▲ 24 9 12 42.9% 0 R64 R32 R64 R128 1,592 124.0 — — — 44.0% -0.64 100.9 -0.3
63 Ludmila Richterova CZE 67 24 – ▲ 47 17 16 51.5% 1 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,642 123.4 — — — 48.0% -0.44 105.8 -1.1
64 Anna Smashnova ISR 68 24 – ▼ 22 8 12 40.0% 0 R32 R16 R128 R128 1,577 118.0 — — — 42.9% -0.38 97.0 +1.8
65 Rachel Mcquillan AUS 69 23 – ▼ 9 13 16 44.8% 0 R128 R128 R64 R128 1,667 136.0 — — — 46.9% -0.33 99.7 -0.8
66 Sung-Hee Park KOR 70 23 – ▲ 30 11 11 50.0% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,596 123.2 — — — 52.1% -0.25 — +1.1
67 Adriana Serra Zanetti ITA 71 22 – ▲ 35 9 12 42.9% 0 — R16 — R128 1,585 119.0 — — — 41.3% -0.87 — +0.2
68 Rita Grande ITA 72 21 – ▲ 73 10 11 47.6% 0 — — — R64 1,591 131.2 — — — 47.1% +0.26 100.8 +0.3
69 Magdalena Grzybowska POL 73 20 – ▲ 374 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,514 108.7 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.5
70 Katarina Studenikova SVK 74 20 – ▲ 43 8 11 42.1% 0 R128 R128 R128 R16 1,604 122.3 — — — 41.9% -0.77 — -0.5
71 Petra Kamstra NED 76 20 – ▲ 81 7 5 58.3% 0 — — R16 R128 1,576 124.1 — — — 55.6% +0.70 103.4 +0.1
72 Jing-Qian Yi CHN 77 20 – ▲ 292 8 4 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,584 116.4 — — — 59.3% +0.89 103.6 +1.1
73 Mana Endo JPN 78 20 – ▼ 51 11 14 44.0% 0 R128 R128 R64 R64 1,729 126.4 — — — 43.1% -0.45 103.3 -0.8
74 Natalia Medvedeva UKR 79 19 – ▼ 23 9 12 42.9% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,694 122.1 — — — 42.9% -0.67 — -1.6
75 Veronika Martinek GER 80 19 – ▲ 5 8 10 44.4% 0 R64 R32 R128 R128 1,579 110.5 — — — 45.9% -0.70 — +0.4
76 Jana Kandarr GER 81 19 – ▲ 231 7 10 41.2% 0 — — R64 R128 1,559 124.3 — — — 42.1% -0.71 — -0.5
77 Jana Nejedly CAN 82 19 – ▲ 56 11 12 47.8% 0 — — R64 R128 1,580 127.6 — — — 49.1% +0.02 — -0.7
78 Barbara Schett AUT 83 19 – ▲ 16 8 10 44.4% 0 R128 R128 — R128 1,584 128.8 — — — 46.3% +0.24 96.2 -0.7
79 Stephanie Rottier NED 84 18 – ▲ 10 11 13 45.8% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,672 121.3 — — — 47.2% -0.21 99.8 -1.1
80 Karin Kschwendt AUT 85 18 – ▲ 13 10 13 43.5% 0 R128 R128 R128 R64 1,605 119.9 — — — 41.7% -0.38 — -0.3
81 Maria Vento-Kabchi VEN 86 18 – ▲ 79 5 8 38.5% 0 — — R128 R128 1,551 125.8 — — — 47.1% -0.09 96.2 -0.0
82 Naoko Kijimuta JPN 87 18 – ▲ 68 6 6 50.0% 0 R128 — — R64 1,556 125.1 — — — 48.3% +0.31 — +0.3
83 Ann Grossman USA 88 18 – ▼ 52 12 19 38.7% 0 R128 R64 R64 R32 1,681 123.7 — — — 40.8% -0.46 92.7 +0.3
84 Rennae Stubbs AUS 89 18 – ▲ 123 7 9 43.8% 0 — — R64 R128 1,557 121.5 — — — 43.6% -0.56 104.2 +0.0
85 Andrea Temesvari HUN 90 17 – ▲ 42 6 8 42.9% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,485 104.6 — — — 43.8% -0.38 100.7 +1.7
86 Silke Meier GER 91 17 – ▲ 21 10 14 41.7% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,533 112.4 — — — 42.4% -0.52 101.7 +1.1
87 Radomira Zrubakova SVK 92 17 – ▼ 17 8 12 40.0% 0 R64 R128 R32 R64 1,621 116.1 — — — 38.1% -1.02 — +0.3
88 Fang Li CHN 93 17 – ▼ 27 9 8 52.9% 0 R128 — — R128 1,622 122.6 — — — 55.3% +0.32 — +0.3
89 Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor FRA 94 17 – ▲ 27 7 12 36.8% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,499 114.1 — — — 41.3% -0.57 — +1.8
90 Els Callens BEL 95 17 – ▲ 14 8 11 42.1% 0 R128 R64 — R128 1,551 116.0 — — — 45.2% -0.24 — +0.6
91 Dally Randriantefy MAD 95 17 – ▲ 140 3 6 33.3% 0 R32 — — R128 1,499 112.8 — — — 36.8% -1.21 — +0.4
92 Shaun Stafford USA 97 17 – ▼ 43 13 20 39.4% 0 R64 R128 R32 R128 1,640 125.6 — — — 42.0% -0.90 98.1 +0.1
93 Kristin Godridge HKG 98 17 – ▲ 96 10 8 55.6% 0 R64 — — — 1,582 116.3 — — — 52.3% +0.18 101.6 +0.7
94 Larisa Savchenko URS 99 17 – ▼ 59 11 20 35.5% 0 R128 R128 R64 R64 1,650 126.3 — — — 39.1% -0.65 99.9 +0.4
95 Tatjana Jecmenica SRB 100 16 – ▲ 71 6 6 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,569 125.2 — — — 46.4% -0.61 — -0.7
96 Nancy Feber BEL 101 16 – ▲ 22 9 12 42.9% 0 — R64 R32 R128 1,549 117.2 — — — 45.8% -0.15 — +0.4
97 Janette Husarova SVK 102 16 – ▲ 42 1 5 16.7% 0 — — — — 1,477 101.2 — — — 23.1% -1.92 — -0.1
98 Lea Ghirardi FRA 103 16 – ▲ 37 7 13 35.0% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,483 102.7 — — — 34.0% -1.53 — +1.4
99 Natalia Baudone ITA 104 16 – ▼ 9 8 12 40.0% 0 R128 R32 R128 R32 1,662 125.1 — — — 45.7% -0.43 92.4 -0.2
100 Alexandra Fusai FRA 105 16 – ▼ 14 6 12 33.3% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,540 107.2 — — — 36.4% -0.82 — +0.6
101 Catalina Cristea ROM 106 15 – ▲ 82 5 10 33.3% 0 — R32 — R128 1,518 114.8 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — -0.4
102 Nanne Dahlman FIN 107 15 – ▲ 86 4 11 26.7% 0 — — — — 1,471 98.8 — — — 29.0% -1.65 — +0.6
103 Sandra Cecchini ITA 108 15 – ▼ 76 9 14 39.1% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,661 113.4 — — — 40.7% -0.54 95.9 +0.3
104 Elna Reinach RSA 109 15 – ▼ 36 10 15 40.0% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,665 126.3 — — — 39.3% -0.46 102.1 -1.6
105 Pam Shriver USA 110 15 – ▼ 48 7 11 38.9% 0 R128 — R128 R64 1,649 116.2 — — — 38.1% -0.64 101.7 +0.3
106 Ginger Helgeson USA 111 14 – ▼ 82 8 7 53.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,772 137.3 — — — 60.0% +0.67 — -0.6
107 Sandra Kleinova CZE 112 14 – ▲ 362 6 2 75.0% 0 — — — — 1,587 115.8 — — — 65.0% +1.10 — +0.6
108 Sandra Cacic USA 114 14 – ▼ 61 7 12 36.8% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,602 122.7 — — — 40.9% -0.23 — -0.0
109 Melanie Schnell AUT 115 14 – ▲ 89 4 5 44.4% 0 — — R64 R64 1,545 119.7 — — — 42.9% -0.19 — -0.2
110 Katrina Adams USA 116 14 – ▲ 27 3 8 27.3% 0 — — R128 R32 1,507 111.9 — — — 30.8% -1.54 — +0.3
111 Nicole Arendt USA 117 14 – ▼ 45 11 15 42.3% 0 R128 R128 R128 R32 1,666 123.1 — — — 43.9% -0.58 101.3 -1.6
112 Petra Schwarz AUT 119 14 – ▼ 60 7 13 35.0% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,579 108.2 — — — 36.2% -1.13 — -0.1
113 Flora Perfetti ITA 120 14 – ▲ 38 3 7 30.0% 0 — — R128 R128 1,458 119.3 — — — 36.4% -0.86 — -0.3
114 Henrieta Nagyova SVK 121 14 – ▲ 206 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,509 107.1 — — — 50.0% +0.50 — -0.0
115 Paola Suarez ARG 122 13 – ▼ 9 2 6 25.0% 0 — R64 — R128 1,522 118.6 — — — 28.6% -0.86 — -0.1
116 Min Tang HKG 123 13 – ▲ 85 6 8 42.9% 0 — R128 — R128 1,533 115.2 — — — 47.1% -0.56 100.5 -0.2
117 Erika De Lone USA 124 13 – ▲ 75 4 9 30.8% 0 — R128 — R64 1,482 128.5 — — — 37.9% -0.69 — -0.9
118 María Sánchez Lorenzo ESP 125 13 – ▲ 5 4 6 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,554 118.0 — — — 39.1% -1.39 102.5 -0.5
119 Tina Krizan SLO 127 13 – ▼ 7 9 13 40.9% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,532 112.2 — — — 41.7% -0.83 — -0.6
120 Nana Smith JPN 128 13 – ▼ 71 7 13 35.0% 0 R128 — R128 R128 1,544 112.9 — — — 40.8% -0.65 98.5 +0.7
121 Annabel Ellwood AUS 129 12 – ▲ 61 4 6 40.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,523 110.9 — — — 40.9% -0.91 — -0.1
122 Radka Bobkova CZE 130 12 – ▼ 46 8 15 34.8% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,558 113.1 — — — 39.2% -0.98 96.2 +0.2
123 Debbie Graham USA 131 12 – ▼ 64 4 12 25.0% 0 R128 R64 R128 — 1,598 119.1 — — — 37.1% -0.69 90.6 -0.2
124 Jolene Watanabe USA 132 12 – ▼ 31 9 16 36.0% 0 R128 R32 R128 R64 1,517 107.5 — — — 36.8% -0.68 100.2 +1.9
125 Claudia Porwik GER 133 11 – ▲ 146 4 7 36.4% 0 — — R128 — 1,551 111.6 — — — 44.4% +0.07 95.2 -0.1
126 Audra Keller USA 134 11 – ▲ 26 4 12 25.0% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,468 112.8 — — — 31.6% -1.29 96.4 -0.6
127 Gala Leon Garcia ESP 135 11 – ▲ 202 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 105.6 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.2
128 Lenka Nemeckova CZE 136 11 – ▲ 112 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,484 100.2 — — — 37.5% -0.13 — +0.4
129 Petra Langrova TCH 137 11 – ▼ 32 7 10 41.2% 0 R128 — — — 1,571 110.3 — — — 40.5% -0.51 — -0.1
130 Leila Meskhi GEO 141 11 – ▼ 108 5 2 71.4% 1 R128 — — — 1,832 120.0 — — — 73.3% +1.87 98.8 +0.2
131 Bettina Fulco ARG 142 11 – ▼ 55 6 9 40.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,577 113.5 — — — 41.9% -0.97 — -0.6
132 Patty Schnyder SUI 143 11 – ▲ 547 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,526 112.0 — — — 40.0% -1.40 — -0.1
133 Laxmi Poruri USA 145 10 – ▲ 50 7 9 43.8% 0 — — — R128 1,523 112.1 — — — 41.0% -0.85 106.2 -0.0
134 Wiltrud Probst GER 146 10 – ▼ 78 7 11 38.9% 0 R64 R128 R128 — 1,617 117.8 — — — 38.9% -0.95 — -0.1
135 Laura Golarsa ITA 149 10 – ▼ 38 5 10 33.3% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,551 111.8 — — — 39.4% -0.45 94.1 +0.1
136 Tatiana Ignatieva BLR 150 10 – ▼ 34 4 9 30.8% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,502 107.7 — — — 35.5% -1.61 — +0.8
137 Rika Hiraki JPN 152 10 – ▲ 34 4 7 36.4% 0 R128 — — — 1,524 113.7 — — — 41.7% -0.96 — -0.6
138 Sandra Dopfer AUT 153 10 – ▼ 64 0 7 0.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,468 97.6 — — — 14.3% -2.57 — -0.5
139 Manon Bollegraf NED 156 9 – ▼ 48 2 7 22.2% 0 R64 — — R64 1,479 101.8 — — — 34.8% -1.17 97.3 +0.4
140 Katerina Kroupova CZE 158 9 – ▲ 21 3 5 37.5% 0 R128 — — — 1,524 104.8 — — — 40.0% -0.95 — +0.5
141 Marzia Grossi ITA 159 9 – ▲ 42 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,493 99.9 — — — 44.4% -0.89 — -0.1
142 Isabelle Demongeot FRA 160 9 – ▼ 31 5 9 35.7% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,546 116.6 — — — 38.7% -0.45 — -0.0
143 Meilen Tu USA 161 9 – ▼ 2 3 10 23.1% 0 — — — — 1,506 118.5 — — — 33.3% -0.47 91.1 -0.0
144 Marketa Kochta GER 163 9 – ▼ 82 3 11 21.4% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,493 104.4 — — — 30.3% -1.64 97.3 +0.7
145 Mercedes Paz ARG 164 9 – ▼ 25 4 8 33.3% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,451 102.8 — — — 36.0% -0.72 — +0.8
146 Maureen Drake CAN 165 9 – ▲ 4 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,455 122.0 — — — 42.9% -0.14 — -0.2
147 Eugenia Maniokova RUS 166 9 – ▼ 51 3 7 30.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,504 108.5 — — — 33.3% -1.38 — -0.0
148 Janet Lee TPE 169 8 – ▲ 100 4 7 36.4% 0 — — — R64 1,519 101.0 — — — 28.6% -2.14 — -0.0
149 Angeles Montolio ESP 172 8 – ▼ 70 3 4 42.9% 0 R128 — — — 1,523 116.5 — — — 47.1% -0.82 — -0.1
150 Francesca Lubiani ITA 173 8 – ▲ 151 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — — 1,490 105.3 — — — 31.3% -1.25 — -0.2
151 Aleksandra Olsza POL 176 8 – ▲ 326 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,530 109.3 — — — 52.9% +0.35 — +0.0
152 Tatiana Panova RUS 179 8 – ▼ 38 1 6 14.3% 0 — — — — 1,485 100.7 — — — 23.5% -2.41 — -0.7
153 Emanuela Zardo SUI 181 7 – ▼ 93 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,542 100.6 — — — 0.0% -2.83 — -0.2
154 Karin Miller USA 182 7 – ▲ 60 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,510 97.5 — — — 40.0% -1.20 — -0.0
155 Cristina Torrens Valero ESP 183 7 – ▼ 36 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,466 95.5 — — — 27.3% -1.73 — +0.1
156 Sonya Jeyaseelan CAN 184 7 – ▼ 21 1 7 12.5% 0 — — — — 1,476 107.9 — — — 22.2% -1.89 — -0.5
157 Clare Wood GBR 187 7 – ▼ 50 3 9 25.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,543 108.0 — — — 25.0% -1.50 — -0.5
158 Rene Simpson CAN 189 7 – ▼ 36 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,537 104.1 — — — 37.5% -0.50 — -0.3
159 Denisa Chladkova CZE 190 7 – ▲ 573 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,507 99.1 — — — 50.0% -1.50 — +0.1
160 Kristina Brandi PUR 191 7 – ▲ 80 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,499 102.4 — — — 28.6% -1.29 — -0.2
161 Elena Tatarkova UKR 192 7 – ▲ 48 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — — 1,505 103.3 — — — 30.8% -1.85 — -0.0
162 Laura Garrone ITA 194 7 – ▼ 28 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — — 1,492 97.8 — — — 31.3% -1.50 — +0.3
163 Olga Lugina UKR 195 6 – ▲ 80 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 100.2 — — — 45.5% +0.09 94.6 +0.2
164 Kirrily Sharpe AUS 199 6 – ▲ 4 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,516 100.5 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.1
165 Yuka Yoshida JPN 201 6 – ▲ 5 1 5 16.7% 0 R128 — — — 1,486 112.3 — — — 21.4% -1.71 — -0.2
166 Tara Snyder USA 204 6 – ▲ 477 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 98.5 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.1
167 Venus Williams USA 205 6 – ▲ 108 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,561 123.9 — — — 36.4% -0.36 — -0.3
168 Caroline Vis NED 207 6 – ▼ 88 1 6 14.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,432 113.2 — — — 25.0% -1.56 — -0.3
169 Kerry-Anne Guse AUS 209 6 – ▼ 32 2 4 33.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,458 103.3 — — — 33.3% -0.93 — +0.2
170 Caroline Dhenin FRA 210 6 – ▲ 48 0 2 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,481 101.2 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.1
171 Petra Thoren FIN 211 6 – ▲ 36 0 2 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,461 96.7 — — — 20.0% -2.80 — +0.1
172 Tamarine Tanasugarn THA 213 6 – ▲ 13 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — — 1,479 101.3 — — — 29.4% -1.53 100.8 +0.3
173 Nicole Pratt AUS 214 6 – ▲ 9 0 2 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,451 97.0 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
174 Nicole Jagerman NED 215 6 – ▼ 79 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,608 114.4 — — — 50.0% +0.75 — -0.4
175 Mi-Ra Jeon KOR 216 6 – ▲ 77 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 101.8 — — — 50.0% -0.60 — +0.4
176 Nadin Ercegovic CRO 218 5 – ▼ 3 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,507 103.6 — — — 33.3% -1.34 — -0.1
177 Alena Vaskova CZE 220 5 – ▲ 98 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,475 99.2 — — — 33.3% -1.84 — +0.0
178 Kristine Kunce AUS 221 5 – ▼ 166 4 13 23.5% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,547 97.1 — — — 27.5% -1.70 — +0.8
179 Radka Pelikanova CZE 222 5 – ▲ 210 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,506 101.0 — — — 60.0% +0.20 — +0.1
180 Amelie Cocheteux FRA 228 5 – ▲ 450 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,489 99.1 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — +0.1
181 Emmanuelle Gagliardi SUI 229 5 – ▲ 121 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,465 97.2 — — — 25.0% -2.25 — +0.0
182 Vanessa Webb CAN 230 5 – ▲ 32 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,475 106.5 — — — 20.0% -2.20 — -0.1
183 Marlene Weingartner GER 231 5 – ▲ 175 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,480 101.2 — — — 27.3% -1.82 — +0.1
184 Federica Bonsignori ITA 232 5 – ▼ 22 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,516 97.3 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
185 Miho Saeki JPN 234 5 – ▲ 219 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,480 98.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
186 Corina Morariu USA 235 5 – ▲ 384 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 93.3 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
187 Nathalie Dechy FRA 237 5 – ▲ 158 0 2 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,481 98.2 — — — 20.0% -2.40 — -0.0
188 Yvette Basting NED 239 5 – ▼ 108 1 7 12.5% 0 R128 — — — 1,456 103.4 — — — 22.2% -2.06 — -0.2
189 Karen Cross GBR 241 5 – ▲ 73 2 4 33.3% 0 — — R128 — 1,465 103.2 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.3
190 Anne Kremer LUX 242 5 – ▲ 14 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,516 108.3 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — -0.1
191 Tessa Price RSA 247 4 – ▼ 112 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,475 104.0 — — — 40.0% 0.00 — -0.1
192 Amélie Mauresmo FRA 250 4 – ▲ 547 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,488 98.9 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.1
193 Larissa Schaerer PAR 258 4 – ▼ 97 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 98.4 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
194 Eun-Ha Kim KOR 259 4 – ▲ 179 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 100.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
195 Elly Hakami USA 260 4 – ▼ 110 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,503 97.3 — — — 14.3% -2.86 — +0.1
196 Rosalyn Fairbank USA 261 4 – ▲ 537 2 8 20.0% 0 — — R64 — 1,598 97.0 — — — 15.8% -2.47 — +0.1
197 Gloria Pizzichini ITA 271 4 – ▼ 33 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,495 99.8 — — — 0.0% -1.50 — +0.2
198 Megan Miller GBR 274 4 – ▲ 206 1 3 25.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,483 96.6 — — — 25.0% -2.50 — +0.2
199 Silvija Talaja CRO 280 3 – ▼ 30 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,456 101.4 — — — 14.3% -2.57 — -0.1
200 Anna Kournikova RUS 289 3 – ▲ 5 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,513 106.8 — — — 40.0% -0.40 — -0.1
201 Fabiola Zuluaga COL 290 3 – ▲ 95 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,480 101.2 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
202 Jo Durie GBR 292 3 – ▲ 55 1 3 25.0% 0 — — R64 — 1,548 107.6 — — — 40.0% -0.60 — -0.2
203 Elena Brioukhovets UKR 293 3 – ▼ 165 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,543 100.3 — — — 50.0% -0.25 — +0.4
204 Samantha Smith GBR 294 3 – ▲ 62 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 103.0 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.1
205 Katerina Maleeva BUL 302 3 – ▼ 267 1 11 8.3% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,678 110.1 — — — 17.9% -2.39 — -0.6
206 Rachel Viollet GBR 304 3 – ▲ 209 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 100.6 — — — 33.3% 0.00 — +0.1
207 Ei Iida JPN 311 3 – ▼ 29 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,468 104.0 — — — 66.7% +0.17 — -0.0
208 Eva Martincova CZE 315 3 – ▼ 153 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,430 100.0 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.2
209 Alice Canepa ITA 322 3 – ▲ 108 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,510 110.8 — — — 50.0% +0.75 — -0.1
210 Patricia Tarabini ARG 324 3 – ▼ 221 1 6 14.3% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,517 95.0 — — — 14.3% -2.36 — +0.5
211 Keri Phebus USA 325 3 – ▲ 249 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — R64 1,484 108.9 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — +0.1
212 Maja Palaversic CRO 333 2 – ▼ 166 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 98.6 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.1
213 Evgenia Kulikovskaya RUS 338 2 – ▲ 165 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 100.7 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.2
214 Amelie Castera FRA 341 2 – ▼ 46 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 97.6 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — -0.1
215 Amanda Wainwright GBR 359 2 – ▲ 9 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,467 107.8 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
216 Haruka Inoue JPN 361 2 – ▲ 461 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 101.8 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.0
217 Benjamas Sangaram THA 366 2 – ▲ 295 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,467 88.2 — — — 33.3% -2.50 — +0.5
218 Nathalie Herreman FRA 386 2 – ▼ 206 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,580 100.9 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.2
219 Joanne Moore GBR 387 2 – ▲ 18 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 99.1 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — -0.0
220 Giulia Casoni ITA 398 2 – ▲ 198 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 98.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.0
221 Julie Pullin GBR 407 1 – ▼ 142 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,503 99.1 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
222 Tzu-Ting Weng TPE 414 1 – ▲ 386 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,464 97.2 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
223 Silke Frankl GER 421 1 – ▼ 344 0 9 0.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,490 92.1 — — — 0.0% -4.33 — -0.4
224 Sophie Amiach FRA 446 1 – ▼ 214 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,459 106.5 — — — 20.0% -2.80 — -0.1
225 Romana Tedjakusuma INA 468 1 – ▼ 320 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,508 103.7 — — — 50.0% +1.75 — +0.2
226 Linda Ferrando ITA 474 1 – ▼ 391 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,623 97.4 — — — 33.3% -3.33 — +0.1
227 Marijana Kovacevic CRO 626 0 – ▲ 164 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 101.4 — — — 33.3% +0.33 — +0.1
228 Tatiana Poutchek BLR 734 0 – ▲ 49 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 99.2 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.1
229 Caroline Kuhlman USA 745 0 – ▼ 653 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,566 100.0 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
230 Jenny Byrne AUS 823 0 – ▼ 642 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,458 90.1 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
231 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer USA — — – — 20 18 52.6% 0 SF R128 R128 R64 1,787 149.0 — — — 54.1% +0.31 101.2 +0.1
232 Tami Whitlinger Jones USA — — – — 19 18 51.4% 0 R64 R64 R32 R128 1,700 136.6 — — — 53.8% +0.30 96.8 -1.2
233 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie ROU — — – — 17 16 51.5% 0 R64 R16 R128 R128 1,663 135.9 — — — 51.9% +0.39 102.1 +1.0
234 Elena Makarova RUS — — – — 15 14 51.7% 0 R32 R128 R64 R32 1,750 140.3 — — — 51.5% +0.06 100.7 -1.9
235 Patricia Hy Boulais CAN — — – — 11 14 44.0% 0 R128 R64 R64 R32 1,691 125.6 — — — 50.0% -0.18 93.7 +0.1
236 Mariaan De Swardt RSA — — – — 10 10 50.0% 0 R128 R64 R16 R128 1,702 135.4 — — — 53.2% -0.13 102.8 +0.8
237 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik SWE — — – — 8 13 38.1% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,545 114.4 — — — 40.8% -0.86 — -1.0
238 Alexia Dechaume Balleret FRA — — – — 6 15 28.6% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,585 113.1 — — — 22.5% -1.58 — -0.5
239 Maria Jose Gaidano ARG — — – — 5 7 41.7% 0 — R64 — R32 1,553 120.5 — — — 42.3% -0.65 — +0.1
240 Silvia Ramon Cortes ESP — — – — 5 5 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,532 117.5 — — — 44.4% -0.89 — -0.4
241 Kimberly Po Messerli USA — — – — 4 13 23.5% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,609 120.0 — — — 29.7% -1.11 93.6 +0.2
242 Li Ling Chen CHN — — – — 4 4 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,524 102.0 — — — 47.1% -0.06 — +0.6
243 Anne Miller USA — — – — 3 7 30.0% 0 R128 — — R64 1,493 115.1 — — — 28.6% -1.33 — -0.3
244 Denisa Szabova SVK — — – — 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 107.3 — — — 53.8% -0.15 — +0.4
245 Kim De Weille NED — — – — 3 7 30.0% 0 — — — — 1,463 96.2 — — — 33.3% -1.25 — +0.2
246 Nino Louarsabishvili GEO — — – — 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,517 115.1 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.1
247 Julie Steven USA — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,505 106.5 — — — 42.9% -0.86 — -0.6
248 Neus Avila Bonastre ESP — — – — 2 8 20.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,465 102.4 — — — 29.2% -1.50 96.6 +0.0
249 Andrea Vieira BRA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,466 100.1 — — — 33.3% -1.83 — -0.0
250 Barbara Mulej SLO — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,497 109.9 — — — 42.9% 0.00 — -0.3
251 Catherine Mothes Jobkel FRA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,597 101.8 — — — 50.0% -1.00 — -0.2
252 Eleni Rossides USA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,434 105.5 — — — 33.3% 0.00 — +0.3
253 Federica Fortuni ITA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,516 109.4 — — — 33.3% -1.17 — +0.0
254 Gabriella Boschiero ITA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 101.3 — — — 50.0% -1.50 — +0.1
255 Hiromi Nagano JPN — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,423 96.4 — — — 18.2% -1.64 — +0.2
256 Jing Jing Chen CHN — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,508 98.1 — — — 40.0% -1.20 — +0.0
257 Julia Lutrova RUS — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,512 96.2 — — — 40.0% -1.00 — -0.1
258 Kaoru Shibata JPN — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,459 95.6 — — — 18.2% -2.27 — +0.1
259 Katharina Buche AUT — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 105.1 — — — 60.0% +1.40 — +0.4
260 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — R128 1,609 114.1 — — — 40.0% -1.60 — -0.6
261 Li Li CHN — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 101.8 — — — 50.0% +1.00 — +0.4
262 Louise Pleming AUS — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,489 94.0 — — — 28.6% -2.14 — +0.3
263 Ludmilla Varmuza SMR — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,493 99.2 — — — 33.3% -0.83 — +0.2
264 Maja Zivec Skulj GER — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,464 98.5 — — — 28.6% -1.28 — -0.1
265 Mariam Ramon Climent ESP — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,513 108.4 — — — 40.0% +0.20 — +0.1
266 Misumi Miyauchi JPN — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 96.2 — — — 18.2% -2.27 — +0.1
267 Natalia Soetrisno INA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,465 98.9 — — — 42.9% -0.57 — +0.3
268 Noelle Van Lottum FRA — — – — 1 9 10.0% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,465 92.1 — — — 11.1% -3.06 — +0.6
269 Olga Ivanova RUS — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 99.8 — — — 40.0% 0.00 — +0.4
270 Sandra Waechtershauser GER — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,525 104.7 — — — 50.0% -1.00 — -0.3
271 Siobhan Drake Brockman AUS — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,497 104.0 — — — 30.0% -2.00 — -0.2
272 Virag Csurgo HUN — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,502 100.8 — — — 42.9% -1.43 — -0.2
273 Virginie Buisson FRA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,513 99.5 — — — 40.0% -0.80 — +0.1
274 Agustine Limanto INA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 96.2 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
275 Angela Kerek GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,456 96.7 — — — 33.3% -3.00 — +0.1
276 Angela Lettiere USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 97.1 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.2
277 Anique Snijders NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 96.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
278 Anna Klim AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 100.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.2
279 Anne Sophie Bittighoffer FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 92.6 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.2
280 Anori Fukuda JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 86.9 — — — 0.0% -6.00 — +0.2
281 Audrey Sidot FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,485 96.6 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
282 Brie Rippner USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,482 94.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.3
283 Dianne Van Rensburg RSA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,672 96.4 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.0
284 Elena Pampoulova BUL — — – — 0 10 0.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,477 100.4 — — — 13.0% -2.70 96.0 -0.5
285 Elena Savoldi ITA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,522 96.2 — — — 0.0% -4.25 — -0.1
286 Eny Sulistyowati INA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 96.0 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.0
287 Eva Melicharova CZE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 96.6 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.0
288 Geraldine Dondit SUI — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 102.1 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.1
289 Helena Vildova CZE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 107.1 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — -0.1
290 Hiroko Mochizuki JPN — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,460 104.2 — — — 0.0% -3.75 — -0.5
291 Hye Jin Park KOR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 98.1 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.0
292 Il Soon Kim KOR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,527 — — — — — — — -0.1
293 Iwalani Mccalla JAM — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 99.6 — — — 20.0% -0.60 — +0.2
294 Jana Lubasova CZE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 95.9 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
295 Jane Taylor AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,462 98.1 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — +0.2
296 Ju Yeon Choi KOR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 96.2 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.2
297 Kazue Takuma JPN — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,477 97.6 — — — 20.0% -2.80 — +0.1
298 Keiko Ishida JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 94.7 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — 0.0
299 Lizzy Jelfs GBR — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,466 90.7 — — — 0.0% -3.67 — +0.1
300 Luciana Tella BRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 96.6 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.0
301 Maaike Koutstaal NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 100.6 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.2
302 Maja Muric CRO — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 109.1 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.3
303 Maria Veronica Widyadharma INA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 94.6 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
304 Melanie Bernard CAN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 97.4 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.2
305 Mimma Chernovita INA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,466 99.1 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.0
306 Pam Nelson USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,507 100.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.0
307 Patricia Rogulski SVK — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 97.4 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.2
308 Paula Cabezas ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 102.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.2
309 Petra Winzenholler GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,467 97.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
310 Reka Vidats HUN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,473 97.0 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.0
311 Rosa Maria Perez ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 101.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.0
312 Sandra Reichel AUT — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,433 87.7 — — — 0.0% -5.25 — +0.1
313 Shirli Ann Siddall GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,513 97.9 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
314 Sofia Prazeres POR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,471 95.7 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
315 Stephanie Halsell USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 99.8 — — — 20.0% -1.80 — -0.1
316 Stephanie Reece USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,442 98.7 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.0
317 Suvimol Duangchan THA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,474 100.1 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.0
318 Svetlana Komleva MDA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,466 101.6 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — -0.1
319 Veronica Stele ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,479 99.0 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.2
320 Yuko Hosoki JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 97.2 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1

How to read these columns

Rank
For the current season, this is the latest ranking. For past seasons, this is the year-end ranking.
Points
Official ranking points from the selected ranking snapshot.
Wk +/−
Ranking change since the previous ranking snapshot.
YTD Δ
Ranking change since the start of the season.
Win %
Wins divided by total completed main-draw matches.
Elo
For the current season, this is the latest TennisDB Elo rating. For past seasons, this is year-end Elo.
P+
Scoreline performance adjusted for opponent strength on a 0-200 scale. 100 is average; a 10-point difference equals five expected-win percentage points.
Serve+
Estimated percentage points won on serve above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
Return+
Estimated percentage points won on return above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
PD
Return points won divided by opponents' return points won. 1.000 is even; above 1.000 is better.
Set Win %
Sets won divided by total completed sets in eligible scored matches.
Set Margin
Average per-set game margin from the player's perspective. Positive values mean winning sets by more games on average.
Pressure+
Opponent-adjusted deciding-set and tiebreak performance on a 0-200 scale; 100 is the pre-match surface-Elo expectation. Small samples are shrunk, at least three of each are required, and a deciding-set tiebreak counts only once.
Schedule
Expected wins added by opponent quality versus a typical player-season schedule. Positive means an easier schedule; negative means a tougher one. Career values are per 100 matches.

View the full tennis statistics glossary →

WTA Rankings Archive

Browse WTA rankings and season leader archives by year.

2020s
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020
2010s
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
2000s
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
1990s
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
1980s
1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980
1970s
1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970
1960s
1969 1968