Rankings as of: Dec 28, 1992

WTA 1992 Season Leaders & Rankings

Rankings, leaderboards, and performance stats by season.

Monica Seles finished 1992 at WTA No. 1 with 283 points.

Need custom historical filters? Search ranking weeks or search player seasons with the Advanced search tool.

Rankings Leaders

Ranking points, results, and season metrics for 1992.

320 players with >= 1 match

# Player Country Rank Points Wk +/− YTD Δ W L Win % Titles AORGWUSO Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD Set Win % Set Margin Pressure+ Schedule
1 Monica Seles USA 1 283 – ▶ 0 70 5 93.3% 10 W W F W 2,500 182.5 — — — 88.2% +3.24 107.7 -2.3
2 Steffi Graf GER 2 252 – ▶ 0 66 7 90.4% 8 — F W QF 2,434 179.0 — — — 82.0% +2.69 99.7 -1.9
3 Gabriela Sabatini ARG 3 192 – ▶ 0 65 12 84.4% 5 SF SF SF QF 2,294 179.7 — — — 80.4% +2.52 100.7 -3.7
4 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario ESP 4 177 – ▲ 1 63 16 79.8% 2 SF SF R64 F 2,283 179.5 — — — 75.6% +1.86 107.1 -6.9
5 Martina Navratilova USA 5 171 – ▼ 1 38 8 82.6% 4 — — SF R64 2,328 175.0 — — — 77.5% +2.13 98.4 -1.4
6 Mary Joe Fernandez USA 6 120 – ▲ 2 51 17 75.0% 0 F R32 R32 SF 2,121 171.9 — — — 69.4% +1.32 106.9 -2.0
7 Jennifer Capriati USA 7 98 – ▼ 1 35 11 76.1% 2 QF QF QF R32 2,204 166.4 — — — 70.8% +1.41 106.0 -3.1
8 Conchita Martínez ESP 8 96 – ▲ 1 47 17 73.4% 1 R16 QF R64 R128 2,057 170.3 — — — 70.6% +1.60 103.4 -3.1
9 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere SUI 9 81 – ▲ 1 34 13 72.3% 1 QF R32 R32 SF 1,998 152.0 — — — 67.0% +1.41 101.2 +2.3
10 Jana Novotna CZE 10 78 – ▼ 3 36 18 66.7% 0 R16 R16 R32 R128 2,080 166.9 — — — 65.2% +1.13 97.1 -2.2
11 Anke Huber GER 11 66 – ▲ 3 31 16 66.0% 0 QF R64 R32 R128 1,973 163.5 — — — 64.1% +1.16 102.2 -1.0
12 Helena Sukova CZE 12 66 – ▲ 5 39 16 70.9% 2 R32 — R32 R16 1,965 153.3 — — — 69.2% +1.42 96.8 +2.0
13 Mary Pierce FRA 13 64 – ▲ 13 32 10 76.2% 3 — R16 — R16 1,900 149.4 — — — 75.3% +2.01 100.2 +3.2
14 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 14 59 – ▼ 1 39 20 66.1% 0 — R16 QF R64 1,934 154.0 — — — 61.8% +0.83 102.0 -0.3
15 Lori Mcneil USA 15 58 – ▲ 5 37 20 64.9% 1 R128 R32 R32 R32 1,962 156.8 — — — 63.6% +0.94 96.7 -0.5
16 Katerina Maleeva BUL 16 57 – ▼ 5 31 19 62.0% 0 R16 R64 QF R32 1,897 153.5 — — — 60.4% +0.89 97.0 +4.1
17 Amanda Coetzer RSA 17 55 – ▲ 49 37 16 69.8% 0 — R32 — R32 1,865 153.9 — — — 64.1% +1.07 103.2 +1.0
18 Zina Garrison USA 18 54 – ▼ 6 36 20 64.3% 1 R16 — R16 R16 1,915 157.8 — — — 62.5% +0.84 97.2 +0.2
19 Amy Frazier USA 19 54 – ▲ 9 33 17 66.0% 1 QF R64 R16 R128 1,843 151.1 — — — 62.7% +0.93 105.5 +0.9
20 Magdalena Maleeva BUL 20 53 – ▲ 13 30 15 66.7% 1 R128 R32 R128 QF 1,926 159.6 — — — 66.0% +1.12 102.9 -1.1
21 Kimiko Date JPN 21 49 – ▲ 13 27 14 65.8% 1 R64 R16 R64 R64 1,853 155.6 — — — 60.9% +0.92 104.6 -0.7
22 Leila Meskhi GEO 22 46 – ▼ 7 26 16 61.9% 0 R16 R16 R128 R64 1,928 157.9 — — — 61.5% +1.16 96.9 -1.7
23 Natasha Zvereva BLR 23 42 – ▼ 2 34 20 63.0% 0 R64 QF QF R32 1,981 158.3 — — — 61.3% +0.90 102.4 -2.8
24 Naoko Sawamatsu JPN 24 41 – ▲ 13 23 13 63.9% 0 — R128 R16 R32 1,856 143.8 — — — 60.7% +0.42 104.0 -0.2
25 Judith Wiesner AUT 25 40 – ▼ 9 29 18 61.7% 1 R64 R32 R32 R64 1,911 147.1 — — — 57.7% +0.49 106.2 -0.1
26 Sabine Appelmans BEL 26 39 – ▼ 8 29 16 64.4% 1 R128 R64 R64 R16 1,895 145.1 — — — 61.0% +0.64 104.4 -0.4
27 Julie Halard-Decugis FRA 27 39 – ▼ 8 23 14 62.2% 1 R128 R32 R16 R64 1,819 144.0 — — — 57.1% +0.49 104.1 -1.8
28 Radomira Zrubakova SVK 28 36 – ▼ 3 30 19 61.2% 1 R128 R128 R64 R128 1,808 146.0 — — — 59.1% +0.78 97.2 -0.8
29 Barbara Rittner GER 29 35 – ▲ 15 25 16 61.0% 1 R64 R64 R32 R128 1,850 151.2 — — — 57.8% +0.43 103.8 -1.9
30 Pam Shriver USA 30 34 – ▲ 9 25 18 58.1% 0 R32 — R64 R64 1,857 156.5 — — — 56.4% +0.71 101.5 -2.5
31 Gigi Fernandez USA 32 33 – ▼ 10 22 16 57.9% 0 R128 — R16 R16 1,806 140.7 — — — 56.0% +0.52 105.7 +1.0
32 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy NED 33 33 – ▼ 3 31 21 59.6% 1 R128 R32 R128 R32 1,822 148.5 — — — 55.6% +0.34 105.5 -0.6
33 Sandra Cecchini ITA 34 32 – ▼ 7 24 16 60.0% 1 — R64 — R128 1,823 136.5 — — — 55.6% +0.29 107.8 +0.1
34 Sabine Hack GER 35 32 – ▲ 18 21 14 60.0% 0 R32 R16 R64 R32 1,777 140.5 — — — 57.9% +0.38 103.6 -0.4
35 Ann Grossman USA 36 32 – ▲ 52 23 17 57.5% 0 — R32 — R64 1,733 132.9 — — — 52.9% -0.03 108.7 +1.7
36 Andrea Strnadova CZE 37 30 – ▲ 3 25 18 58.1% 0 R32 R32 R64 R32 1,754 139.9 — — — 57.1% +0.58 104.6 +2.0
37 Rachel Mcquillan AUS 38 29 – ▼ 6 18 14 56.2% 0 R32 — R128 R32 1,742 134.0 — — — 57.7% +0.24 101.4 +0.6
38 Emanuela Zardo SUI 39 28 – ▼ 3 18 15 54.5% 0 R128 R64 — R64 1,740 131.9 — — — 51.4% -0.15 106.9 -0.3
39 Wiltrud Probst GER 40 26 – ▲ 88 16 13 55.2% 1 — R64 R128 — 1,707 141.5 — — — 54.0% +0.51 101.8 +0.1
40 Natalia Medvedeva UKR 41 26 – ▲ 54 20 16 55.6% 1 R128 R64 R64 R64 1,712 141.0 — — — 55.3% +0.62 96.0 -0.2
41 Patty Fendick USA 43 25 – ▲ 5 17 17 50.0% 0 R16 R128 R16 R128 1,778 141.8 — — — 51.9% +0.05 103.9 -0.9
42 Manon Bollegraf NED 44 25 – ▲ 3 11 10 52.4% 0 R128 QF R64 — 1,744 132.9 — — — 46.9% -0.29 — -0.3
43 Laura Arraya PER 45 24 – ▼ 21 20 19 51.3% 0 R64 R128 R32 R64 1,732 139.0 — — — 49.4% +0.06 97.6 +1.6
44 Rosalyn Fairbank USA 46 24 – ▲ 43 16 16 50.0% 0 R32 R64 R32 R64 1,726 133.0 — — — 51.5% -0.04 100.5 -1.5
45 Nicole Bradtke AUS 47 24 – ▼ 16 22 18 55.0% 1 R128 R128 R32 R64 1,710 137.2 — — — 57.0% +0.69 92.0 +0.7
46 Yayuk Basuki INA 48 24 – ▼ 10 18 15 54.5% 1 R32 — R16 R128 1,725 137.9 — — — 54.7% +0.35 — +1.6
47 Linda Wild USA 49 24 – ▲ 9 19 21 47.5% 0 R64 R64 R64 R128 1,732 139.7 — — — 47.8% -0.05 103.9 -1.5
48 Iva Majoli CRO 50 23 – ▲ 571 7 6 53.9% 0 — — — R64 1,624 131.4 — — — 50.0% -0.17 — -0.3
49 Debbie Graham USA 51 22 – ▼ 16 21 19 52.5% 0 R128 R128 R64 R128 1,728 136.9 — — — 51.6% +0.15 100.3 -1.2
50 Florencia Labat ARG 52 22 – ▲ 7 18 17 51.4% 0 R128 R128 R128 R16 1,729 132.2 — — — 50.6% +0.11 — +0.1
51 Shi-Ting Wang TPE 54 21 – ▲ 134 12 12 50.0% 0 — R128 — R128 1,604 131.1 — — — 50.9% +0.09 98.7 +0.9
52 Robin White USA 56 19 – ▲ 42 13 14 48.1% 1 R32 — R128 R32 1,622 126.4 — — — 47.6% -0.02 99.7 +1.7
53 Mana Endo JPN 57 19 – ▲ 28 14 11 56.0% 0 R128 R32 R32 — 1,649 131.7 — — — 57.4% +0.68 99.8 +1.1
54 Larisa Savchenko URS 58 19 – ▲ 7 18 19 48.6% 0 R16 R64 R128 R128 1,720 141.5 — — — 49.4% -0.16 96.8 -1.8
55 Jo Durie GBR 59 19 – ▲ 2 13 16 44.8% 0 R64 R32 R128 R128 1,688 130.7 — — — 50.0% -0.09 99.1 +0.4
56 Katerina Kroupova CZE 60 18 – ▲ 238 6 6 50.0% 0 — — R128 R128 1,567 112.4 — — — 46.2% -0.04 — +0.2
57 Veronika Martinek GER 61 18 – ▲ 9 12 13 48.0% 0 R128 R64 R128 — 1,652 129.4 — — — 46.4% -0.25 104.4 +0.5
58 Linda Ferrando ITA 62 17 – ▲ 31 11 13 45.8% 0 — R32 R128 R64 1,672 130.3 — — — 48.0% +0.32 — -0.7
59 Federica Bonsignori ITA 64 17 – ▼ 15 11 14 44.0% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,639 119.7 — — — 47.4% -0.44 — +0.0
60 Karina Habsudova SVK 66 17 – ▼ 12 9 14 39.1% 0 R64 R32 R128 R128 1,663 140.8 — — — 41.5% -0.74 102.0 -1.3
61 Nanne Dahlman FIN 67 16 – ▲ 102 11 12 47.8% 0 R64 R128 R64 R32 1,592 116.9 — — — 48.1% -0.14 99.1 +1.8
62 Shaun Stafford USA 68 16 – ▲ 37 9 12 42.9% 1 R128 R64 — R128 1,659 133.5 — — — 44.7% -0.40 103.7 -0.4
63 Andrea Temesvari HUN 70 16 – ▲ 49 11 12 47.8% 0 — — — R128 1,607 122.1 — — — 41.5% -0.70 106.9 +0.2
64 Ginger Helgeson USA 71 16 – ▼ 14 12 15 44.4% 0 R128 R64 R64 R64 1,648 128.8 — — — 48.5% -0.17 98.8 +0.3
65 Monique Javer GBR 72 16 – ▲ 42 13 18 41.9% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,561 122.7 — — — 44.8% -0.49 96.9 +1.1
66 Stephanie Rehe USA 74 14 – ▲ 50 9 13 40.9% 0 R64 — — R64 1,746 139.7 — — — 44.0% -0.42 92.1 -2.6
67 Lisa Raymond USA 75 14 – ▲ 183 7 6 53.9% 0 — — — R64 1,618 137.7 — — — 51.9% +0.15 — +0.4
68 Karin Kschwendt AUT 77 14 – ▲ 15 4 7 36.4% 0 — R64 R128 — 1,574 122.9 — — — 41.7% -0.58 — +0.1
69 Claudia Kohde Kilsch GER 78 14 – ▼ 4 11 14 44.0% 0 R64 R128 R64 — 1,646 122.3 — — — 42.9% -0.62 — -0.5
70 Silke Meier GER 80 14 – ▲ 60 10 13 43.5% 0 R128 R64 R128 R64 1,585 122.9 — — — 45.6% -0.18 — +1.1
71 Jenny Byrne AUS 81 14 – ▲ 57 11 18 37.9% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,569 121.9 — — — 40.9% -0.74 98.7 +0.4
72 Bettina Fulco ARG 83 13 – ▼ 8 12 17 41.4% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,622 118.8 — — — 40.0% -0.95 103.6 -0.2
73 Chanda Rubin USA 84 13 – ▼ 3 10 15 40.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 R16 1,616 121.6 — — — 40.7% -0.90 103.5 +0.3
74 Meike Babel GER 86 13 – ▲ 45 10 18 35.7% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,523 111.1 — — — 36.1% -1.25 106.5 +0.3
75 Eugenia Maniokova RUS 87 13 – ▲ 16 9 14 39.1% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,546 114.1 — — — 42.3% -0.63 99.5 +1.4
76 Carrie Cunningham USA 88 13 – ▼ 38 10 13 43.5% 0 R128 R128 R128 R16 1,695 136.0 — — — 42.6% -0.26 100.2 -0.8
77 Gloria Pizzichini ITA 89 13 – ▲ 162 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,525 108.0 — — — 41.7% -0.92 — -0.5
78 Ines Gorrochategui ARG 90 13 – ▼ 35 9 9 50.0% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,629 122.8 — — — 45.2% -0.57 104.7 +0.2
79 Stephanie Rottier NED 91 12 – ▲ 64 7 9 43.8% 0 — R128 — R128 1,568 124.1 — — — 46.9% -0.22 — +0.1
80 Rennae Stubbs AUS 92 12 – ▲ 93 10 13 43.5% 0 R64 R128 R64 — 1,532 118.9 — — — 50.0% -0.07 93.7 +2.0
81 Nadin Ercegovic CRO 94 12 – ▲ 47 7 9 43.8% 0 — — — R128 1,564 116.5 — — — 41.7% -0.75 104.7 +0.4
82 Halle Cioffi USA 95 12 – ▼ 9 10 16 38.5% 0 R64 R128 — R128 1,643 129.6 — — — 41.0% -0.77 99.4 -1.0
83 Joannette Kruger RSA 96 12 – ▲ 180 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,508 108.6 — — — 41.7% -1.00 — 0.0
84 Claudia Porwik GER 98 12 – ▼ 16 12 18 40.0% 0 R128 R128 R32 R32 1,605 119.1 — — — 43.3% -0.63 97.3 +1.9
85 Dominique Monami BEL 99 12 – ▲ 31 9 14 39.1% 0 R16 R128 R128 R64 1,550 121.2 — — — 39.6% -0.74 — +1.3
86 Caroline Kuhlman USA 100 12 – ▲ 95 7 9 43.8% 0 — R128 R128 R32 1,624 119.9 — — — 41.7% -0.69 — -0.3
87 Natalia Baudone ITA 101 12 – ▲ 77 7 9 43.8% 0 — — R128 R64 1,537 120.3 — — — 44.4% -0.67 — +0.4
88 Katia Piccolini ITA 102 11 – ▼ 40 2 10 16.7% 0 — R64 — — 1,549 88.8 — — — 21.4% -2.11 100.2 +0.5
89 Petra Thoren FIN 103 11 – ▼ 16 12 20 37.5% 0 R128 R64 R64 R128 1,524 114.2 — — — 42.1% -0.64 97.0 +0.6
90 Rene Simpson CAN 104 11 – ▲ 21 7 10 41.2% 0 R64 R128 R128 R64 1,603 127.1 — — — 43.2% -0.49 — -0.9
91 Catherine Tanvier FRA 105 11 – ▼ 3 6 7 46.1% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,613 106.1 — — — 42.9% -0.57 — +1.5
92 Sandrine Testud FRA 106 11 – ▲ 2 11 17 39.3% 0 R64 R64 R128 R64 1,568 120.4 — — — 42.2% -0.63 98.5 +0.2
93 Mercedes Paz ARG 107 11 – ▼ 38 10 19 34.5% 0 R128 R128 — R128 1,606 128.7 — — — 42.6% -0.54 91.7 -1.4
94 Flora Perfetti ITA 108 11 – ▲ 131 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — R128 1,515 104.7 — — — 47.1% -0.23 — +0.4
95 Elna Reinach RSA 109 11 – ▼ 31 10 17 37.0% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,654 132.3 — — — 36.2% -0.76 97.7 -1.3
96 Tessa Price RSA 110 10 – ▲ 114 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 98.9 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
97 Sandra Dopfer AUT 112 10 – ▲ 98 1 4 20.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,509 105.5 — — — 30.8% -1.54 98.3 -0.4
98 Beverly Bowes USA 113 10 – ▲ 44 3 8 27.3% 0 — R64 R128 — 1,510 111.3 — — — 32.0% -1.16 — -0.1
99 Katarzyna Nowak POL 114 10 – ▲ 37 6 11 35.3% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,507 109.5 — — — 35.9% -1.44 102.0 +0.7
100 Nicole Jagerman NED 115 10 – ▼ 43 9 14 39.1% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,632 128.5 — — — 42.0% -0.38 97.4 -0.2
101 Donna Faber USA 116 10 – ▼ 16 11 20 35.5% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,541 119.9 — — — 38.0% -0.77 97.6 +0.6
102 Silke Frankl GER 117 10 – ▼ 10 9 14 39.1% 0 R128 R64 R64 R128 1,557 108.4 — — — 34.7% -1.22 — -0.0
103 Nana Smith JPN 118 10 – ▲ 30 4 4 50.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,557 108.5 — — — 52.6% +0.32 — +1.0
104 Fang Li CHN 119 10 – ▲ 35 5 8 38.5% 0 R32 R128 R128 R64 1,543 119.3 — — — 39.3% -0.68 — +0.1
105 Kyoko Nagatsuka JPN 120 10 – ▲ 188 3 6 33.3% 0 — — — R128 1,508 115.6 — — — 35.0% -0.90 — +0.6
106 Jennifer Santrock USA 121 10 – ▲ 104 4 9 30.8% 0 — — R128 — 1,478 112.8 — — — 32.1% -1.00 — +0.3
107 Rika Hiraki JPN 122 9 – ▼ 13 8 15 34.8% 0 R128 R128 R32 — 1,570 120.5 — — — 34.6% -0.92 102.2 +0.8
108 Cecilia Dahlman SWE 123 9 – ▲ 66 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,497 105.9 — — — 40.0% -1.00 — +0.3
109 Nicole Arendt USA 124 9 – ▲ 92 4 4 50.0% 0 R64 — — R64 1,570 112.2 — — — 47.1% -0.47 — +0.3
110 Laura Golarsa ITA 125 9 – ▲ 88 5 10 33.3% 0 — — R128 R128 1,522 112.5 — — — 37.1% -1.20 — +0.7
111 Patricia Tarabini ARG 126 9 – ▼ 25 8 11 42.1% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,636 121.0 — — — 45.2% -0.43 — -0.1
112 Helen Kelesi CAN 128 9 – ▼ 99 7 13 35.0% 0 R128 — — R128 1,632 124.6 — — — 46.3% -0.12 94.8 -0.0
113 Miriam Oremans NED 130 9 – ▲ 5 8 12 40.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,531 111.4 — — — 38.6% -0.80 — +0.5
114 Alexandra Fusai FRA 131 9 – ▲ 66 4 10 28.6% 0 — R128 — R128 1,454 95.4 — — — 31.3% -1.28 — +1.0
115 Elena Brioukhovets UKR 132 9 – ▼ 35 7 12 36.8% 0 — R32 R128 — 1,602 120.0 — — — 41.9% -0.72 — +1.4
116 Yone Kamio JPN 133 9 – ▲ 145 3 4 42.9% 0 R128 — — — 1,521 102.8 — — — 37.5% -1.19 — +0.2
117 Petra Langrova TCH 134 8 – ▼ 50 8 14 36.4% 0 — R128 — — 1,561 116.3 — — — 40.4% -0.72 98.3 +0.3
118 Sandra Wasserman BEL 135 8 – ▼ 2 3 8 27.3% 0 — R32 — — 1,538 107.3 — — — 33.3% -1.13 — +0.4
119 Isabelle Demongeot FRA 136 8 – ▼ 72 7 17 29.2% 0 R128 R128 R64 R128 1,626 122.8 — — — 32.7% -0.90 96.6 -1.7
120 Virginia Ruano Pascual ESP 137 8 – ▲ 59 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — R128 1,493 108.5 — — — 20.0% -2.30 — -0.4
121 Kristin Godridge HKG 138 8 – ▼ 42 9 16 36.0% 0 R128 — R16 R128 1,569 113.3 — — — 37.0% -1.15 98.7 +0.8
122 Monique Kiene NED 141 7 – ▲ 52 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,530 108.7 — — — 57.1% 0.00 — +0.5
123 Angelica Gavaldon MEX 142 7 – ▲ 100 5 10 33.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,577 119.9 — — — 29.0% -1.29 100.5 -0.5
124 Katrina Adams USA 143 7 – ▼ 53 6 15 28.6% 0 R32 R128 R64 — 1,537 111.1 — — — 29.5% -1.59 96.5 +0.4
125 Ann Devries BEL 144 7 – ▲ 94 1 4 20.0% 0 R64 — R128 — 1,477 102.5 — — — 27.3% -1.27 — +0.6
126 Marketa Kochta GER 145 7 – ▼ 66 6 14 30.0% 0 R32 — — — 1,516 114.8 — — — 35.6% -0.71 93.1 +1.4
127 Radka Bobkova CZE 146 7 – ▶ 0 0 6 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,445 93.1 — — — 7.7% -3.69 — -0.3
128 Maya Kidowaki JPN 148 7 – ▼ 68 6 15 28.6% 0 R64 R64 R128 — 1,574 106.0 — — — 30.4% -1.70 — -0.5
129 Akiko Kijimuta JPN 149 7 – ▼ 31 5 13 27.8% 0 R128 R16 — — 1,579 121.1 — — — 32.6% -1.46 100.5 -0.1
130 Tina Krizan SLO 153 7 – ▲ 205 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,468 98.1 — — — 25.0% -2.25 — -0.0
131 Angelique Olivier FRA 155 7 – ▲ 206 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,484 97.1 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
132 Laura Garrone ITA 156 7 – ▼ 65 5 12 29.4% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,559 114.1 — — — 32.4% -1.19 101.6 -0.1
133 Julie Richardson NZL 157 7 – ▲ 399 1 8 11.1% 0 — — — — 1,459 107.6 — — — 19.0% -2.00 97.8 -0.2
134 Cristina Tessi ARG 159 7 – ▼ 46 4 8 33.3% 0 R128 R64 R64 — 1,538 114.0 — — — 37.0% -0.63 — +0.1
135 Lindsay Davenport USA 161 6 – ▲ 187 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — R64 1,512 119.7 — — — 31.3% -1.38 — -0.3
136 Joanne Limmer AUS 162 6 – ▲ 113 1 2 33.3% 0 R64 — — — 1,495 100.2 — — — 42.9% 0.00 — +0.4
137 Petra Schwarz AUT 164 6 – ▼ 81 4 12 25.0% 0 R64 — — R128 1,483 96.6 — — — 29.7% -1.32 96.8 +2.5
138 Nancy Feber BEL 165 6 – ▲ 462 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,502 100.0 — — — 50.0% -0.25 — +0.2
139 Elise Burgin USA 166 6 – ▲ 133 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — — 1,523 109.4 — — — 37.5% -1.50 — +0.2
140 Irina Spirlea ROU 167 6 – ▲ 45 0 4 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,453 107.3 — — — 14.3% -2.43 — -0.1
141 Kristie Boogert NED 168 6 – ▲ 63 1 4 20.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,450 100.6 — — — 27.3% -1.55 — +0.3
142 Louise Field AUS 170 6 – ▲ 22 5 9 35.7% 0 R64 — R128 — 1,449 98.4 — — — 38.9% -0.83 103.8 +1.3
143 Eva Sviglerova CZE 171 6 – ▼ 130 5 15 25.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,569 106.4 — — — 26.7% -2.07 — -0.3
144 Silvia Farina Elia ITA 172 6 – ▼ 105 5 10 33.3% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,578 112.3 — — — 33.3% -1.39 104.1 -0.4
145 Sara Gomer GBR 173 6 – ▼ 52 4 10 28.6% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,556 104.1 — — — 34.4% -1.06 94.9 +1.4
146 Erika De Lone USA 175 6 – ▼ 65 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,526 95.8 — — — 30.8% -2.08 — -0.1
147 Kristine Kunce AUS 177 6 – ▼ 7 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,515 103.1 — — — 60.0% +0.50 — +0.3
148 Clare Wood GBR 179 6 – ▼ 47 4 12 25.0% 0 R128 — R128 R64 1,485 108.0 — — — 31.6% -1.32 99.2 +0.4
149 Beate Reinstadler AUT 180 6 – ▲ 14 0 2 0.0% 0 — R128 — R128 1,459 104.2 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — -0.0
150 Amanda Grunfeld GBR 182 5 – ▼ 23 3 5 37.5% 0 — — R64 — 1,478 114.4 — — — 36.8% -1.26 — +0.2
151 Nathalie Herreman FRA 183 5 – ▼ 61 6 16 27.3% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,556 118.1 — — — 34.7% -1.06 — -0.3
152 Ai Sugiyama JPN 184 5 – ▲ 398 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,477 102.6 — — — 30.8% -1.31 — +0.3
153 Lubomira Bacheva BUL 185 5 – ▲ 103 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,488 110.8 — — — 38.5% -0.39 — +0.4
154 Nathalie Housset FRA 186 5 – ▲ 59 2 3 40.0% 0 R64 R64 — — 1,490 111.0 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.1
155 Tammy Whittington USA 187 5 – ▼ 27 3 5 37.5% 0 — — R64 R128 1,469 93.6 — — — 36.8% -1.26 — +1.4
156 Maureen Drake CAN 188 5 – ▲ 14 0 5 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,412 99.9 — — — 16.7% -2.25 — +0.1
157 Cammy Macgregor USA 198 5 – ▼ 35 2 6 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,515 116.8 — — — 33.3% -1.11 — -0.4
158 Asa Carlsson SWE 202 5 – ▲ 115 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 97.6 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
159 Nicole Pratt AUS 203 5 – ▼ 22 3 3 50.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,491 108.8 — — — 50.0% +0.83 — +0.7
160 Barbara Paulus AUT 209 4 – ▼ 186 4 8 33.3% 0 R128 — — R128 1,719 104.4 — — — 37.0% -1.19 — +0.1
161 Liz Smylie AUS 209 4 – ▼ 93 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,599 99.2 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.0
162 Regina Rajchrtova TCH 212 4 – ▼ 169 3 11 21.4% 0 R64 R128 R128 — 1,614 101.7 — — — 29.0% -1.52 96.5 -0.5
163 Catherine Suire FRA 213 4 – ▼ 98 3 10 23.1% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,533 103.0 — — — 25.8% -1.68 100.9 -0.0
164 Kirrily Sharpe AUS 217 4 – ▲ 122 2 1 66.7% 0 R32 — — — 1,560 110.1 — — — 66.7% +0.83 — +0.5
165 Jessica Emmons USA 218 4 – ▼ 65 2 8 20.0% 0 R64 — — R128 1,459 104.3 — — — 20.0% -2.00 — +0.3
166 Patty Oreilly USA 219 4 – ▲ 100 1 6 14.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,468 101.1 — — — 20.0% -1.93 — +0.3
167 Jolene Watanabe USA 220 4 – ▼ 3 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,499 104.0 — — — 42.9% -0.14 — +0.2
168 Kerry-Anne Guse AUS 223 4 – ▲ 33 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,470 98.3 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — +0.1
169 Jana Pospisilova CZE 225 4 – ▲ 5 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,518 99.3 — — — 40.0% -1.20 — +0.2
170 Kaoru Okamoto JPN 225 4 – ▼ 43 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,535 100.8 — — — 28.6% -2.00 — +0.3
171 Karine Quentrec FRA 227 4 – ▼ 181 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,696 — — — — — — — -0.1
172 Julie Shiflet USA 230 4 – ▲ 14 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 105.2 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.2
173 Els Callens BEL 231 4 – ▼ 66 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 94.9 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
174 Claudine Toleafoa NZL 232 4 – ▼ 9 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,465 99.6 — — — 33.3% -0.80 — +0.6
175 Marion Maruska AUT 234 4 – ▼ 123 0 4 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,460 97.5 — — — 27.3% -1.64 — +0.3
176 Christina Papadaki GRE 235 3 – ▼ 7 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,512 110.9 — — — 41.7% -1.42 — +0.3
177 Anna Smashnova ISR 236 3 – ▲ 29 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,489 98.0 — — — 37.5% -1.50 — +0.2
178 Sophie Amiach FRA 241 3 – ▲ 2 0 2 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,501 105.8 — — — 33.3% -0.50 — -0.1
179 Audra Keller USA 249 3 – ▼ 155 3 15 16.7% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,522 109.9 — — — 27.9% -1.81 95.2 -0.2
180 Camille Benjamin USA 251 3 – ▼ 25 1 5 16.7% 0 — — — R128 1,527 113.1 — — — 23.1% -2.54 — -0.3
181 Petra Begerow GER 258 3 – ▲ 354 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 113.4 — — — 0.0% -4.25 — -0.4
182 Ann Henricksson USA 272 2 – ▼ 129 0 6 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,525 101.7 — — — 20.0% -2.33 — -0.3
183 Jill Hetherington CAN 277 2 – ▼ 29 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,458 96.2 — — — 40.0% -1.10 — +0.6
184 Petra Kamstra NED 280 2 – ▼ 144 0 4 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,482 94.9 — — — 11.1% -2.89 — +0.3
185 Heather Ludloff USA 282 2 – ▼ 140 1 6 14.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,472 105.8 — — — 29.4% -1.47 — +0.0
186 Isabel Cueto GER 283 2 – ▼ 166 0 5 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,590 97.8 — — — 0.0% -3.67 — -0.2
187 Andrea Glass GER 287 2 – ▲ 261 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 98.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.2
188 Barbara Schett AUT 290 2 – ▲ 245 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 104.8 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.2
189 Petra Raclavska CZE 307 2 – ▲ 114 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,514 103.9 — — — 50.0% -0.75 — -0.1
190 Naoko Kijimuta JPN 315 2 – ▲ 126 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 99.7 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — +0.2
191 Pascale Etchemendy FRA 317 2 – ▼ 53 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,464 99.3 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.0
192 Samantha Smith GBR 353 1 – ▼ 224 1 2 33.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,502 104.1 — — — 37.5% -1.00 — +0.3
193 Ei Iida JPN 358 1 – ▼ 138 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,438 95.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
194 Gretchen Magers USA 390 1 – ▼ 270 0 5 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,591 98.0 — — — 9.1% -2.55 — -0.5
195 Betsy Nagelsen USA 418 1 – ▲ 44 1 5 16.7% 0 — — — — 1,561 105.4 — — — 26.7% -1.67 — +0.0
196 Eva Pfaff GER 420 1 – ▼ 221 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,459 103.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
197 Catalina Cristea ROM 430 1 – ▲ 139 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 104.8 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.2
198 Anne Minter AUS 443 1 – ▼ 383 0 6 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,578 94.3 — — — 14.3% -2.29 — +0.8
199 Sarah Loosemore GBR 447 1 – ▼ 264 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,439 97.6 — — — 20.0% -2.00 — +0.1
200 Vanessa Webb CAN 459 1 – ▲ 317 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 96.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
201 Benjamas Sangaram THA 538 0 – ▲ 160 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 93.3 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.2
202 Maria Vento-Kabchi VEN 551 0 – ▼ 15 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,496 102.3 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.2
203 Wendy White USA 567 0 – ▲ 77 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,552 96.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.0
204 Sonya Jeyaseelan CAN 759 0 – ▲ 21 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,472 91.5 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.1
205 Dally Randriantefy MAD 772 0 – ▲ 5 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 96.2 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.1
206 Meredith Mcgrath USA 780 0 – ▼ 618 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,657 94.3 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
207 Patricia Hy Boulais CAN — — – — 22 16 57.9% 0 R64 R16 R32 QF 1,876 155.6 — — — 56.3% +0.35 107.4 -1.8
208 Alexia Dechaume Balleret FRA — — – — 21 19 52.5% 0 R32 R128 R64 R128 1,733 139.7 — — — 52.2% +0.31 101.1 -1.0
209 Pascale Paradis Mangon FRA — — – — 21 17 55.3% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,728 133.8 — — — 54.5% +0.28 99.3 +1.1
210 Noelle Van Lottum FRA — — – — 17 20 46.0% 1 R64 R64 R128 R32 1,610 125.2 — — — 48.1% -0.30 101.6 +2.0
211 Catarina Lindqvist Ryan SWE — — – — 14 16 46.7% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,637 122.8 — — — 44.4% -0.27 105.9 +2.2
212 Kimberly Po Messerli USA — — – — 14 16 46.7% 0 R32 R128 R64 R32 1,654 127.7 — — — 45.6% -0.40 103.5 +1.0
213 Raffaella Reggi Concato ITA — — – — 14 12 53.9% 0 — R128 — — 1,723 128.2 — — — 52.5% -0.02 103.2 -0.1
214 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer USA — — – — 13 17 43.3% 0 R128 R128 R64 R128 1,697 133.3 — — — 48.5% 0.00 98.1 +0.3
215 Tami Whitlinger Jones USA — — – — 13 16 44.8% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,644 120.9 — — — 41.0% -0.59 102.8 -0.7
216 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel USA — — – — 10 15 40.0% 0 — R128 R64 R64 1,586 115.2 — — — 45.2% -0.50 92.9 +1.3
217 Louise Allen USA — — – — 10 14 41.7% 0 — R64 R64 R64 1,576 125.0 — — — 41.8% -0.80 103.6 -0.2
218 Mariaan De Swardt RSA — — – — 7 10 41.2% 0 — R64 R32 R128 1,589 110.1 — — — 44.2% -0.14 99.8 +1.5
219 Catherine Mothes Jobkel FRA — — – — 6 7 46.1% 0 — R128 — R128 1,557 111.2 — — — 42.4% -0.82 102.6 -0.1
220 Christelle Fauche SUI — — – — 5 9 35.7% 0 — — R128 R128 1,548 116.1 — — — 38.7% -0.97 — -0.8
221 Sybille Niox Chateau FRA — — – — 5 11 31.2% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,455 101.8 — — — 36.1% -1.19 98.3 +1.3
222 Shirli Ann Siddall GBR — — – — 4 4 50.0% 0 — — R64 — 1,525 104.9 — — — 47.1% -0.65 — +0.8
223 Denisa Szabova SVK — — – — 3 11 21.4% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,461 86.4 — — — 22.6% -2.39 — +0.7
224 Jo Anne Faull AUS — — – — 3 7 30.0% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,473 105.2 — — — 37.5% -1.33 — +0.4
225 Michelle Jaggard Lai AUS — — – — 3 4 42.9% 0 R64 — — — 1,555 114.2 — — — 37.5% -1.06 — -0.3
226 Misumi Miyauchi JPN — — – — 3 5 37.5% 0 — — — — 1,503 105.1 — — — 38.9% -1.50 — +0.2
227 Esmir Hoogendoorn NED — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,506 104.3 — — — 55.6% +0.33 — +0.5
228 Nathalie Guerree Spitzer FRA — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 — R128 — — 1,544 102.6 — — — 29.4% -1.47 — -0.3
229 Pam Nelson USA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,516 101.9 — — — 50.0% -0.50 — +0.4
230 Petra Holubova CZE — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,479 98.0 — — — 40.0% -1.07 — +0.6
231 Shannan Mccarthy USA — — – — 2 6 25.0% 0 — — — R128 1,492 103.7 — — — 27.8% -1.28 — +0.2
232 Stacey Martin USA — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — — 1,528 91.6 — — — 21.4% -2.36 — +0.3
233 Agnese Gustmane LAT — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,460 103.5 — — — 30.8% -0.92 — +0.3
234 Agnes Zugasti FRA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — R128 — — 1,503 106.8 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — -0.2
235 Angela Kerek GER — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 107.7 — — — 22.2% -2.89 — -0.3
236 Anna Foldenyi Dicker HUN — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,493 97.8 — — — 33.3% -1.44 — +0.4
237 Barbara Mulej SLO — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,478 101.9 — — — 27.3% -1.36 — +0.3
238 Carling Bassett Seguso CAN — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,729 109.6 — — — 22.2% -1.67 — -0.5
239 Caroline Wuillot BEL — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,486 97.7 — — — 28.6% -1.00 — +0.4
240 Cristina Salvi ITA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,499 100.1 — — — 28.6% -1.14 — -0.1
241 Eleni Rossides USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,462 103.7 — — — 33.3% -0.17 — +0.3
242 Francesca Romano ITA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,466 102.9 — — — 30.0% -0.10 — +0.2
243 Julia Jehs GER — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,510 99.8 — — — 50.0% +0.33 — -0.0
244 Kirsten Dreyer USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,502 100.7 — — — 40.0% -1.60 — -0.1
245 Lupita Novelo MEX — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,507 111.7 — — — 33.3% -2.17 — -0.3
246 Maja Zivec Skulj GER — — – — 1 6 14.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,422 105.8 — — — 29.4% -1.41 — +0.2
247 Mareen Louie Harper USA — — – — 1 7 12.5% 0 — — — — 1,545 105.4 — — — 25.0% -1.81 — -0.1
248 Mary Lou Piatek USA — — – — 1 8 11.1% 0 R128 — R128 R128 1,559 101.4 — — — 23.8% -2.00 — -0.4
249 Nicole London USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,513 106.5 — — — 50.0% -0.25 — +0.1
250 Sandy Collins USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,412 104.4 — — — 33.3% -0.83 — +0.2
251 Stella Sampras USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,493 97.1 — — — 37.5% -1.50 — +0.1
252 Su Jen Lai TPE — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,501 95.0 — — — 40.0% -1.40 — +0.3
253 Susan Sloane Lundy USA — — – — 1 7 12.5% 0 R128 — — R128 1,579 105.6 — — — 12.5% -2.63 — -0.3
254 Sylvie Sabas FRA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,494 105.7 — — — 33.3% -1.17 — -0.1
255 Tamaka Takagi JPN — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,505 99.6 — — — 30.0% -1.50 — +0.1
256 Viktoria Milvidskaia RUS — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — R64 1,449 106.6 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — +0.2
257 Zdenka Malkova CZE — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,488 94.5 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.2
258 Alysia May USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 107.8 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
259 Ana Maria Segura Perez ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 91.4 — — — 0.0% -6.00 — -0.0
260 Andrea Muller GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 97.8 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.0
261 Andrea Vieira BRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 105.4 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
262 Barbara Collet FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,493 97.7 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
263 Barbara Navarro ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 100.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
264 Chin Bee Khoo MAS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 90.7 — — — 0.0% -6.00 — -0.0
265 Christiane Hofmann GER — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,442 89.3 — — — 0.0% -4.25 — +0.4
266 Christine Oreilly USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 98.0 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.1
267 Claire Wegink NED — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,483 96.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.0
268 Colette Caple GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,496 99.1 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
269 Cristina Cavina ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 100.1 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — +0.1
270 Daphne Van De Zande BEL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 101.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
271 Dianne Van Rensburg RSA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,747 96.6 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.1
272 Diedre Herman USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 99.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
273 Elena Pampoulova BUL — — – — 0 6 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 98.2 — — — 14.3% -2.21 — -0.1
274 Elena Savoldi ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 97.2 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0.0
275 Emiko Okagawa JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,447 96.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
276 Emilie Viqueira PUR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,457 98.3 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
277 Estefania Bottini ESP — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 105.9 — — — 14.3% -2.43 — -0.5
278 Eva Bes Ostariz ESP — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,474 96.4 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
279 Gabriella Boschiero ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,475 99.8 — — — 0.0% -1.50 — +0.1
280 Gorana Matic CRO — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 95.9 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
281 Heidi Sprung AUT — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,416 96.6 — — — 0.0% -2.75 — +0.1
282 Heike Thoms GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 108.0 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.3
283 Hiromi Nagano JPN — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 108.3 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — -0.2
284 Holyn Lord USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 91.9 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
285 Ilana Berger ISR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,507 97.7 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0.0
286 Il Soon Kim KOR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,540 101.3 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.1
287 Julie Steven USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,490 98.6 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
288 Katharina Buche AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 99.4 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.1
289 Katja Oeljeklaus GER — — – — 0 9 0.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,414 91.6 — — — 10.0% -3.25 — +0.1
290 Kiyoko Yazawa JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,479 93.5 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.3
291 Leona Laskova CZE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,463 100.7 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — -0.0
292 Lihini Weerasuriya SRI — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 99.3 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0.0
293 Li Ling Chen CHN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 105.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.2
294 Louise Stacey AUS — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,455 96.2 — — — 20.0% -2.60 — +0.0
295 Maria Jose Gaidano ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 104.9 — — — 33.3% -2.33 — -0.2
296 Maria Lindstrom SWE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,424 97.9 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.1
297 Maria Luciana Reynares ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,478 99.4 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — +0.1
298 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik SWE — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,520 104.3 — — — 14.3% -2.57 — -0.3
299 Michelle Jackson Nobrega USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 103.3 — — — 20.0% -1.40 — +0.0
300 Miki Yokobori JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 101.6 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.0
301 Monica Guglielmi ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 95.6 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
302 Natacha Randriantefy MAD — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 98.9 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.1
303 Natalie Tschan SUI — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,466 96.8 — — — 20.0% -1.40 — +0.2
304 Nicole Hummel USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 96.5 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
305 Nike Dobrovits AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,474 97.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
306 Noelia Perez Penate ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,496 104.7 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
307 Paola Tampieri ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 104.1 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.2
308 Paulina Sepulveda — — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 103.2 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.0
309 Rachel Ann Jensen USA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 90.1 — — — 14.3% -3.00 — +0.2
310 Rene Collins — — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 98.0 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
311 Sabine Lohmann GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,477 94.7 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.2
312 Sandra Reichel AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,456 92.6 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
313 Sarah Bentley GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,486 100.0 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.2
314 Stephanie Reece USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 101.9 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.1
315 Svetlana Cherneva RUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,562 100.3 — — — 33.3% 0.00 — +0.1
316 Teri Whitlinger Jones USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 94.4 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.1
317 Tracey Morton Rodgers AUS — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,373 98.3 — — — 20.0% -2.00 — +0.0
318 Valda Lake GBR — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,406 97.9 — — — 25.0% -1.62 — +0.3
319 Virginia Humphreys Davies GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,477 94.6 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.2
320 Zuzana Nemsakova SVK — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 94.8 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.0

How to read these columns

Rank
For the current season, this is the latest ranking. For past seasons, this is the year-end ranking.
Points
Official ranking points from the selected ranking snapshot.
Wk +/−
Ranking change since the previous ranking snapshot.
YTD Δ
Ranking change since the start of the season.
Win %
Wins divided by total completed main-draw matches.
Elo
For the current season, this is the latest TennisDB Elo rating. For past seasons, this is year-end Elo.
P+
Scoreline performance adjusted for opponent strength on a 0-200 scale. 100 is average; a 10-point difference equals five expected-win percentage points.
Serve+
Estimated percentage points won on serve above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
Return+
Estimated percentage points won on return above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
PD
Return points won divided by opponents' return points won. 1.000 is even; above 1.000 is better.
Set Win %
Sets won divided by total completed sets in eligible scored matches.
Set Margin
Average per-set game margin from the player's perspective. Positive values mean winning sets by more games on average.
Pressure+
Opponent-adjusted deciding-set and tiebreak performance on a 0-200 scale; 100 is the pre-match surface-Elo expectation. Small samples are shrunk, at least three of each are required, and a deciding-set tiebreak counts only once.
Schedule
Expected wins added by opponent quality versus a typical player-season schedule. Positive means an easier schedule; negative means a tougher one. Career values are per 100 matches.

View the full tennis statistics glossary →

WTA Rankings Archive

Browse WTA rankings and season leader archives by year.

2020s
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020
2010s
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
2000s
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
1990s
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
1980s
1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980
1970s
1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970
1960s
1969 1968