Rankings as of: Dec 25, 1989

WTA 1989 Season Leaders & Rankings

Compare singles rankings, points, and season records. Choose a year to explore earlier standings.

Steffi Graf finished 1989 at WTA No. 1 with 300 points.

Need custom historical filters? Search ranking weeks or search player seasons with the Advanced search tool.

Rankings Leaders

Ranking points, results, and season metrics for 1989.

340 players with >= 1 match

# Player Country Rank Points Wk +/− YTD Δ W L Win % Titles AORGWUSO Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD Set Win % Set Margin Pressure+ Schedule
1 Steffi Graf GER 1 300 – ▶ 0 85 2 97.7% 14 W F W W 2,588 183.5 — — — 93.4% +3.80 102.4 -1.7
2 Martina Navratilova USA 2 208 – ▶ 0 68 8 89.5% 8 QF — F F 2,425 176.3 — — — 86.5% +2.82 98.0 -2.0
3 Gabriela Sabatini ARG 3 166 – ▲ 1 58 12 82.9% 4 SF R16 R64 SF 2,260 175.5 — — — 74.8% +2.16 102.9 -4.8
4 Zina Garrison USA 4 128 – ▲ 5 60 15 80.0% 3 QF R32 R64 SF 2,135 170.0 — — — 76.4% +2.14 101.5 +0.3
5 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario ESP 5 121 – ▲ 13 47 13 78.3% 2 — W QF QF 2,065 163.2 — — — 74.2% +1.91 108.7 -3.8
6 Monica Seles USA 6 117 – ▲ 79 33 9 78.6% 1 — SF R16 R16 2,005 170.6 — — — 75.8% +2.03 107.3 -0.3
7 Conchita Martínez ESP 7 87 – ▲ 33 35 9 79.5% 3 R64 QF — R16 1,928 154.3 — — — 77.2% +2.01 102.5 +1.3
8 Helena Sukova CZE 8 87 – ▼ 2 39 15 72.2% 1 F R64 R16 QF 2,037 158.2 — — — 67.5% +1.04 106.3 -1.4
9 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere SUI 9 84 – ▼ 2 34 13 72.3% 2 — QF — QF 2,019 154.6 — — — 69.0% +1.48 98.1 +1.3
10 Chris Evert USA 10 79 – ▼ 7 27 10 73.0% 0 — — SF QF 2,167 158.7 — — — 73.8% +1.59 93.3 -2.2
11 Jana Novotna CZE 11 72 – ▲ 34 45 17 72.6% 1 R32 QF R16 R64 1,964 163.4 — — — 72.3% +1.50 102.7 -1.5
12 Mary Joe Fernandez USA 12 71 – ▲ 3 32 15 68.1% 0 R32 SF R16 R128 1,985 162.5 — — — 63.2% +1.20 104.1 -2.8
13 Helen Kelesi CAN 13 52 – ▲ 6 36 18 66.7% 0 — QF R128 R128 1,872 151.2 — — — 64.5% +0.83 105.2 -1.8
14 Hana Mandlikova AUS 14 51 – ▲ 15 33 19 63.5% 0 R16 R128 R16 R32 1,946 155.2 — — — 57.5% +0.38 105.4 -3.5
15 Katerina Maleeva BUL 15 51 – ▼ 4 32 11 74.4% 3 — R16 — R64 1,924 137.9 — — — 69.5% +1.44 97.1 +2.4
16 Pam Shriver USA 18 46 – ▼ 13 24 14 63.2% 0 R32 — R32 R128 1,960 141.1 — — — 60.0% +0.72 92.2 +0.4
17 Laura Arraya PER 19 44 – ▲ 115 27 12 69.2% 2 — R64 R32 R64 1,882 136.9 — — — 65.2% +0.79 102.9 +0.2
18 Larisa Savchenko URS 20 43 – ▼ 4 24 16 60.0% 0 — R32 R128 R16 1,861 145.1 — — — 60.2% +0.39 94.3 -0.8
19 Rosalyn Fairbank USA 22 40 – ▲ 13 27 18 60.0% 0 — — QF R16 1,845 147.2 — — — 57.8% +0.54 101.7 -0.5
20 Gigi Fernandez USA 23 39 – ▲ 30 23 15 60.5% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,809 145.6 — — — 57.3% +0.71 103.4 -0.1
21 Barbara Paulus AUT 24 39 – ▲ 3 30 16 65.2% 0 — R64 — R16 1,835 142.8 — — — 58.0% +0.71 103.7 -1.6
22 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 25 38 – ▲ 1 32 19 62.8% 0 — R128 R128 R32 1,876 150.1 — — — 57.9% +0.68 106.8 -2.9
23 Sandra Cecchini ITA 26 38 – ▼ 6 28 15 65.1% 1 — R128 — R128 1,798 128.9 — — — 59.4% +0.59 99.8 +3.3
24 Natasha Zvereva BLR 27 38 – ▼ 19 23 17 57.5% 0 — R128 R32 R16 1,805 144.2 — — — 57.3% +0.91 91.9 +0.3
25 Isabel Cueto GER 28 36 – ▲ 3 24 12 66.7% 2 — R128 — R64 1,816 132.8 — — — 64.6% +1.01 98.8 +1.6
26 Gretchen Magers USA 29 36 – ▲ 13 40 24 62.5% 1 R128 R32 QF R64 1,891 149.5 — — — 58.3% +0.65 106.1 -2.0
27 Leila Meskhi GEO 30 35 – ▲ 16 21 14 60.0% 1 — R128 — R32 1,795 139.4 — — — 59.2% +0.57 108.0 -1.6
28 Patty Fendick USA 31 34 – ▼ 10 22 13 62.9% 1 R64 — R16 R32 1,762 138.7 — — — 62.3% +0.83 95.6 +2.2
29 Radomira Zrubakova SVK 32 33 – ▶ 0 22 13 62.9% 1 — R128 R128 R128 1,817 142.1 — — — 61.3% +0.67 105.6 -0.6
30 Amy Frazier USA 33 32 – ▲ 25 23 15 60.5% 1 R32 R128 R64 R128 1,717 128.7 — — — 56.5% +0.39 105.6 +1.5
31 Anne Minter AUS 34 32 – ▼ 11 27 17 61.4% 1 R64 R64 R32 R32 1,785 134.0 — — — 60.4% +0.72 98.4 +3.9
32 Judith Wiesner AUT 35 30 – ▼ 1 22 14 61.1% 1 R16 R128 R32 R128 1,736 132.1 — — — 61.0% +0.74 100.4 +3.3
33 Lori Mcneil USA 36 29 – ▼ 23 24 22 52.2% 1 R128 R64 R16 R128 1,760 134.8 — — — 52.0% +0.07 96.3 -0.3
34 Claudia Kohde Kilsch GER 37 29 – ▼ 25 16 13 55.2% 0 QF R128 R32 R128 1,852 145.1 — — — 50.7% +0.23 94.9 -0.6
35 Manon Bollegraf NED 38 28 – ▲ 128 21 15 58.3% 1 R32 R32 R128 R64 1,671 121.9 — — — 53.6% +0.16 110.9 +2.2
36 Regina Rajchrtova TCH 40 28 – ▲ 151 18 12 60.0% 0 — R128 R128 R16 1,704 133.6 — — — 55.4% +0.01 109.0 +0.6
37 Sylvia Hanika GER 41 28 – ▼ 24 18 14 56.2% 0 R128 R16 R128 R32 1,806 132.5 — — — 52.9% +0.26 103.4 +0.6
38 Andrea Temesvari HUN 43 27 – ▲ 147 18 15 54.5% 0 R32 R64 R128 R32 1,750 135.3 — — — 50.0% -0.01 102.1 -0.3
39 Linda Ferrando ITA 44 27 – ▲ 23 16 15 51.6% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,687 142.4 — — — 49.3% +0.27 100.6 -1.4
40 Betsy Nagelsen USA 45 25 – ▲ 67 18 15 54.5% 0 — — R128 R64 1,662 126.1 — — — 50.6% +0.04 105.8 +1.4
41 Isabelle Demongeot FRA 46 25 – ▼ 2 18 15 54.5% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,766 145.6 — — — 53.3% +0.31 101.0 -3.4
42 Bettina Fulco ARG 47 25 – ▼ 22 19 15 55.9% 0 — R64 — R128 1,740 135.4 — — — 51.9% +0.01 — -1.7
43 Terry Phelps USA 48 25 – ▲ 1 20 21 48.8% 0 R128 R128 R64 R32 1,721 143.0 — — — 50.5% -0.15 97.5 -1.9
44 Jenny Byrne AUS 49 24 – ▲ 67 14 16 46.7% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,599 142.8 — — — 47.1% -0.32 101.5 -0.3
45 Halle Cioffi USA 50 23 – ▼ 3 17 13 56.7% 0 R128 — — R32 1,710 128.2 — — — 52.7% +0.11 — +0.1
46 Shaun Stafford USA 51 23 – ▲ 69 17 15 53.1% 0 — R64 R32 R32 1,672 122.5 — — — 50.7% -0.26 109.8 +0.0
47 Ann Henricksson USA 53 21 – ▲ 17 18 21 46.1% 0 R128 — R64 R128 1,676 133.4 — — — 45.6% -0.20 99.5 +1.1
48 Ann Grossman USA 54 20 – ▼ 6 23 20 53.5% 0 R64 R16 R128 R64 1,736 136.3 — — — 52.5% +0.05 101.2 -1.3
49 Akiko Kijimuta JPN 55 20 – ▲ 58 11 11 50.0% 0 — R32 R128 R128 1,628 122.8 — — — 52.9% -0.33 — +0.5
50 Elna Reinach RSA 56 20 – ▼ 28 16 17 48.5% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,775 141.0 — — — 48.7% -0.08 100.3 -1.4
51 Cathy Caverzasio SUI 57 20 – ▲ 53 17 12 58.6% 0 R128 R64 — R64 1,693 130.6 — — — 58.0% +0.36 — +1.5
52 Laura Golarsa ITA 58 20 – ▲ 19 22 18 55.0% 0 R128 R32 QF R64 1,707 132.9 — — — 54.0% +0.19 101.3 +0.9
53 Donna Faber USA 59 19 – ▲ 72 19 19 50.0% 0 R16 R128 R32 R16 1,674 137.1 — — — 48.9% +0.16 100.4 +1.1
54 Patricia Tarabini ARG 60 19 – ▼ 23 18 17 51.4% 0 — R128 — R32 1,693 124.4 — — — 51.9% +0.15 96.9 +1.8
55 Nicole Bradtke AUS 61 18 – ▼ 28 16 17 48.5% 0 R16 R32 R32 R128 1,711 134.9 — — — 48.7% -0.16 104.6 +0.3
56 Elise Burgin USA 62 18 – ▲ 45 16 19 45.7% 0 R32 R64 R64 R64 1,700 132.5 — — — 47.6% -0.30 96.1 -1.2
57 Amanda Coetzer RSA 63 18 – ▲ 87 16 13 55.2% 0 — R16 R128 R128 1,674 132.8 — — — 56.3% +0.50 99.4 -0.3
58 Karine Quentrec FRA 64 18 – ▲ 78 12 11 52.2% 1 R128 R32 R64 R128 1,655 129.9 — — — 48.1% -0.20 — +0.2
59 Catherine Tanvier FRA 65 18 – ▲ 7 12 12 50.0% 0 R16 R64 R32 R128 1,674 141.1 — — — 50.9% +0.16 — -0.7
60 Liz Smylie AUS 66 18 – ▲ 116 21 22 48.8% 0 R128 R128 R32 R64 1,682 124.9 — — — 47.1% -0.16 101.1 +1.7
61 Natalia Medvedeva UKR 67 17 – ▲ 250 10 9 52.6% 0 — R32 — — 1,613 134.5 — — — 53.7% +0.44 98.2 -0.2
62 Etsuko Inoue JPN 68 17 – ▼ 18 15 18 45.5% 0 R128 — R128 R128 1,669 137.7 — — — 47.4% -0.14 96.6 -0.5
63 Sandra Wasserman BEL 69 17 – ▼ 7 18 17 51.4% 0 R64 R64 — R32 1,632 118.1 — — — 50.6% +0.13 96.1 +3.1
64 Jana Pospisilova CZE 71 17 – ▼ 20 14 16 46.7% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,680 133.1 — — — 46.4% -0.03 99.5 -1.3
65 Bettina Bunge GER 72 17 – ▲ 39 7 5 58.3% 0 — — — — 1,927 139.1 — — — 57.7% +0.77 99.1 -0.4
66 Sabine Hack GER 74 16 – ▲ 69 12 13 48.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,593 127.3 — — — 49.0% +0.43 99.2 +1.7
67 Claudia Porwik GER 75 16 – ▲ 8 19 18 51.4% 0 R64 R64 R64 R128 1,660 127.0 — — — 52.9% +0.09 97.4 +0.7
68 Florencia Labat ARG 77 16 – ▲ 215 8 8 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,546 111.0 — — — 47.4% -0.61 105.8 +1.5
69 Petra Langrova TCH 78 16 – ▲ 22 12 16 42.9% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,620 121.4 — — — 43.9% -0.59 102.8 +0.7
70 Rachel Mcquillan AUS 79 15 – ▲ 72 13 15 46.4% 0 R128 R128 — R128 1,628 133.6 — — — 52.3% +0.29 96.2 -0.1
71 Laura Lapi ITA 80 15 – ▲ 6 13 14 48.1% 0 — R64 — R128 1,627 130.0 — — — 50.8% -0.22 100.0 -0.6
72 Nicole Jagerman NED 82 14 – ▼ 11 13 15 46.4% 0 R128 R32 R128 R64 1,659 133.1 — — — 45.5% -0.17 104.0 +0.2
73 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy NED 83 14 – ▼ 47 15 22 40.5% 0 R16 R128 R128 R128 1,599 127.6 — — — 42.7% -0.39 96.4 +1.0
74 Katrina Adams USA 84 14 – ▲ 12 14 25 35.9% 0 R64 R128 R32 R128 1,573 119.6 — — — 38.0% -0.89 105.7 +0.1
75 Carrie Cunningham USA 85 14 – ▲ 52 7 12 36.8% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,535 110.3 — — — 40.0% -0.93 — +0.4
76 Laura Garrone ITA 87 14 – ▼ 22 14 17 45.2% 0 — — — R128 1,608 123.3 — — — 44.1% -0.31 100.9 +2.2
77 Robin White USA 88 14 – ▼ 50 9 15 37.5% 0 — R128 R64 R64 1,689 131.2 — — — 45.0% -0.12 89.5 -0.6
78 Wiltrud Probst GER 90 13 – ▼ 16 11 13 45.8% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,651 121.0 — — — 46.4% -0.36 104.4 +0.4
79 Mercedes Paz ARG 91 13 – ▼ 48 13 19 40.6% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,647 125.8 — — — 45.9% -0.22 94.4 +0.4
80 Camille Benjamin USA 92 13 – ▼ 1 14 20 41.2% 0 R32 R128 R128 R32 1,651 129.0 — — — 43.9% -0.34 92.9 -1.5
81 Meredith Mcgrath USA 93 13 – ▲ 307 6 10 37.5% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,517 113.1 — — — 34.4% -0.91 — +0.6
82 Cecilia Dahlman SWE 94 13 – ▲ 69 9 9 50.0% 1 R128 — — — 1,585 124.2 — — — 47.6% -0.36 100.9 +1.5
83 Cammy Macgregor USA 96 12 – ▲ 90 8 9 47.1% 0 R16 — R128 R64 1,577 119.9 — — — 43.9% -0.68 105.5 +0.5
84 Ronni Reis USA 98 12 – ▲ 5 10 16 38.5% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,594 126.3 — — — 41.7% -0.67 101.4 -0.9
85 Louise Field AUS 100 12 – ▲ 59 12 20 37.5% 0 R64 R128 R32 R128 1,542 115.0 — — — 38.9% -0.89 102.8 +0.2
86 Beverly Bowes USA 101 12 – ▼ 38 13 19 40.6% 0 R64 R128 R128 R64 1,618 121.7 — — — 43.6% -0.61 97.1 -0.0
87 Wendy White USA 102 12 – ▼ 36 9 16 36.0% 0 — — R128 R64 1,614 115.8 — — — 39.3% -0.82 100.6 +0.3
88 Nana Smith JPN 103 11 – ▲ 96 7 11 38.9% 0 — — — — 1,587 139.4 — — — 45.7% -0.22 98.4 -0.5
89 Eva Pfaff GER 104 11 – ▼ 29 12 23 34.3% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,587 119.7 — — — 36.3% -1.10 103.3 -0.5
90 Sabrina Goles YUG 105 11 – ▼ 46 11 17 39.3% 0 — R128 R128 R32 1,624 125.2 — — — 39.1% -0.50 95.0 -0.1
91 Barbara Potter USA 106 11 – ▼ 96 5 5 50.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,845 116.8 — — — 52.2% -0.09 96.3 +0.6
92 Federica Haumuller ARG 107 11 – ▲ 197 5 1 83.3% 1 — — — — 1,574 110.7 — — — 71.4% +1.57 — +1.3
93 Rene Simpson CAN 109 11 – ▲ 23 11 17 39.3% 0 R64 R32 R128 R128 1,619 123.1 — — — 39.0% -1.10 — -1.6
94 Monique Javer GBR 111 10 – ▼ 38 8 16 33.3% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,546 110.7 — — — 36.4% -1.05 98.8 +1.1
95 Kaoru Okamoto JPN 115 10 – ▲ 92 5 7 41.7% 1 — R128 R128 R128 1,508 102.8 — — — 42.3% -0.73 — +1.7
96 Janine Tremelling AUS 116 10 – ▲ 96 6 8 42.9% 0 — R16 R64 R128 1,614 117.3 — — — 44.4% -0.26 — -0.1
97 Jo Durie GBR 117 10 – ▼ 57 8 13 38.1% 0 R32 R128 — R128 1,621 126.1 — — — 41.3% -0.67 98.1 +0.3
98 Julie Halard-Decugis FRA 118 10 – ▼ 34 10 16 38.5% 0 R128 R128 R64 R64 1,625 118.2 — — — 39.7% -0.70 100.4 -0.4
99 Kimiko Date JPN 119 9 – ▲ 209 6 5 54.5% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,563 118.2 — — — 48.0% +0.24 — +1.2
100 Jill Hetherington CAN 122 9 – ▼ 32 8 17 32.0% 0 R64 — R128 R64 1,532 114.0 — — — 36.8% -0.89 97.3 +0.7
101 Sara Gomer GBR 124 8 – ▼ 72 7 12 36.8% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,638 114.1 — — — 43.5% -0.78 — -0.5
102 Eva Krapl SUI 125 8 – ▼ 16 8 13 38.1% 0 R64 — R128 R128 1,486 99.5 — — — 37.8% -0.89 106.3 +2.3
103 Sophie Amiach FRA 129 8 – ▲ 81 7 13 35.0% 0 — R32 R64 R64 1,555 119.2 — — — 35.4% -1.08 104.3 -0.6
104 Dianne Fromholtz AUS 131 8 – ▼ 75 6 10 37.5% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,677 121.0 — — — 43.6% -0.41 — -0.7
105 Beth Herr USA 132 8 – ▼ 34 9 14 39.1% 0 R128 R128 R128 R64 1,540 114.6 — — — 43.6% -0.47 — +1.5
106 Nathalie Herreman FRA 134 7 – ▼ 39 8 17 32.0% 0 R64 R128 R128 R64 1,568 127.3 — — — 36.4% -0.73 92.4 -0.6
107 Pascale Etchemendy FRA 136 7 – ▲ 65 4 6 40.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,479 104.3 — — — 34.8% -1.30 106.0 +0.9
108 Eva Sviglerova CZE 137 7 – ▲ 58 5 10 33.3% 0 R128 — R32 — 1,501 104.3 — — — 29.0% -1.29 102.8 +0.5
109 Maya Kidowaki JPN 138 7 – ▲ 107 2 6 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,465 98.5 — — — 33.3% -1.56 — +0.9
110 Catherine Suire FRA 139 7 – ▼ 11 6 11 35.3% 0 — R128 R64 — 1,577 115.5 — — — 39.0% -1.41 — -0.2
111 Iva Budarova TCH 141 7 – ▼ 37 7 14 33.3% 0 R128 R128 R64 — 1,560 109.4 — — — 36.2% -1.30 — +0.5
112 Emanuela Zardo SUI 142 7 – ▲ 141 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,449 99.4 — — — 14.3% -2.86 — +0.1
113 Federica Bonsignori ITA 143 7 – ▼ 42 4 10 28.6% 0 R64 — — — 1,463 102.7 — — — 34.4% -0.91 99.2 +1.6
114 Sabine Appelmans BEL 144 7 – ▲ 50 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — — 1,467 98.3 — — — 31.3% -0.50 — +0.9
115 Ann Devries BEL 145 6 – ▼ 67 5 11 31.2% 0 R128 R128 R64 R128 1,551 109.7 — — — 31.6% -0.76 100.2 +0.6
116 Karen Schimper RSA 147 6 – ▼ 54 5 10 33.3% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,588 124.2 — — — 33.3% -1.00 100.5 -1.9
117 Silke Meier GER 148 6 – ▼ 49 7 14 33.3% 0 R128 R64 R128 — 1,553 105.5 — — — 38.5% -0.92 96.0 +1.1
118 Andrea Farley USA 150 6 – ▲ 97 3 7 30.0% 0 R32 R64 — R128 1,504 108.3 — — — 37.5% -1.46 — -0.1
119 Andrea Leand USA 152 6 – ▲ 144 3 7 30.0% 0 — — — — 1,579 124.0 — — — 34.8% -1.13 98.0 +0.6
120 Petra Schwarz AUT 153 6 – ▲ 30 4 8 33.3% 0 — R128 — — 1,518 123.8 — — — 41.4% -0.38 — -0.0
121 Linda Wild USA 155 6 – ▲ 107 1 7 12.5% 0 — — — R128 1,457 103.5 — — — 17.6% -2.06 — -0.1
122 Audra Keller USA 157 6 – ▲ 161 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — — 1,538 121.7 — — — 46.7% -0.53 — -0.2
123 Veronika Martinek GER 160 5 – ▼ 43 2 9 18.2% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,459 95.1 — — — 17.4% -2.56 — +0.7
124 Maureen Drake CAN 163 5 – ▲ 112 3 5 37.5% 0 — — — — 1,505 108.3 — — — 38.9% -0.78 — +0.4
125 Heather Ludloff USA 164 5 – ▼ 38 4 9 30.8% 0 R64 — R128 — 1,468 103.5 — — — 35.5% -1.45 — +1.5
126 Petra Thoren FIN 166 5 – ▲ 168 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 101.6 — — — 38.5% -0.39 — +0.6
127 Laxmi Poruri USA 167 5 – ▲ 22 3 6 33.3% 0 R128 — — R64 1,536 111.4 — — — 35.0% -0.45 — +0.1
128 Kristine Kunce AUS 168 5 – ▲ 69 4 2 66.7% 0 — — R64 — 1,557 138.9 — — — 60.0% +1.27 — -0.2
129 Csilla Cserepy SUI 170 5 – ▲ 135 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 98.9 — — — 50.0% -0.25 — +0.5
130 Beate Reinstadler AUT 171 5 – ▲ 155 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,440 99.6 — — — 33.3% -0.83 — +0.4
131 Silvia Farina Elia ITA 172 5 – ▲ 32 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,522 107.1 — — — 46.7% -0.47 — +0.5
132 Kate Gompert USA 175 5 – ▲ 84 3 11 21.4% 0 — — — — 1,659 99.5 — — — 22.6% -1.94 99.6 -0.0
133 Maider Laval FRA 177 5 – ▲ 25 3 7 30.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,457 96.7 — — — 30.4% -1.61 — +0.9
134 Karin Kschwendt AUT 178 5 – ▲ 22 3 9 25.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,476 108.8 — — — 28.6% -1.21 99.1 +0.6
135 Katia Piccolini ITA 180 4 – ▲ 128 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,537 109.8 — — — 63.6% +0.73 — +0.7
136 Clare Wood GBR 181 4 – ▼ 46 3 12 20.0% 0 R128 — R64 — 1,472 105.0 — — — 32.4% -1.22 — +0.2
137 Andrea Holikova TCH 183 4 – ▼ 42 2 7 22.2% 0 — — — — 1,499 106.9 — — — 21.1% -2.37 — -0.2
138 Elena Brioukhovets UKR 184 4 – ▲ 204 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,518 108.0 — — — 50.0% +0.25 — -0.2
139 Silke Frankl GER 186 4 – ▼ 65 0 6 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,457 96.0 — — — 14.3% -2.71 — +0.2
140 Angelica Gavaldon MEX 191 4 – ▲ 72 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,501 104.0 — — — 35.7% -1.14 — +0.2
141 Jennifer Santrock USA 193 4 – ▼ 74 2 7 22.2% 0 R128 — — R128 1,466 99.2 — — — 22.2% -1.72 — +0.9
142 Pilar Vasquez PER 194 4 – ▼ 33 4 9 30.8% 0 R64 — — — 1,497 108.0 — — — 33.3% -1.07 — +0.6
143 Cristina Tessi ARG 195 4 – ▲ 35 3 5 37.5% 0 — — — — 1,489 104.1 — — — 41.2% -0.35 — +1.2
144 Amanda Grunfeld GBR 197 4 – ▲ 20 2 5 28.6% 0 — — R128 — 1,443 109.2 — — — 38.9% -0.67 — +0.6
145 Anke Huber GER 199 4 – ▲ 150 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,518 106.7 — — — 50.0% -0.34 — -0.2
146 Andrea Strnadova CZE 203 3 – ▲ 173 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 99.9 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
147 Sandra Birch USA 204 3 – ▲ 10 4 3 57.1% 0 — — — R128 1,545 113.9 — — — 62.5% +0.25 — +0.5
148 Sandra Dopfer AUT 208 3 – ▲ 76 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,507 107.0 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — -0.1
149 Masako Yanagi JPN 209 3 – ▼ 95 2 8 20.0% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,482 89.4 — — — 15.0% -2.70 — +0.6
150 Lea Antonoplis USA 210 3 – ▼ 71 3 7 30.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,447 110.4 — — — 33.3% -0.58 — +0.8
151 Maria Ekstrand SWE 211 3 – ▼ 5 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,474 100.9 — — — 27.3% -0.82 — +0.4
152 Jeri Ingram USA 214 3 – ▼ 18 2 4 33.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,492 110.0 — — — 35.7% -1.00 — +0.1
153 Marzia Grossi ITA 215 3 – ▲ 23 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,496 103.9 — — — 40.0% -0.80 — +0.2
154 Magdalena Maleeva BUL 216 3 – ▲ 66 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 109.9 — — — 30.0% -1.50 — -0.2
155 Claudine Toleafoa NZL 219 3 – ▲ 21 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,473 102.8 — — — 0.0% -2.75 — -0.2
156 Rennae Stubbs AUS 223 2 – ▲ 127 1 1 50.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,504 101.8 — — — 60.0% 0.00 — +0.3
157 Kathy Horvath USA 224 2 – ▼ 142 2 8 20.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,529 101.0 — — — 33.3% -1.38 95.4 +0.3
158 Pam Casale USA 225 2 – ▼ 56 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,547 93.6 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.2
159 Anne Hobbs GBR 231 2 – ▼ 1 2 7 22.2% 0 — — R32 — 1,610 99.5 — — — 30.4% -1.52 — +1.1
160 Ginger Helgeson USA 239 2 – ▲ 93 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 104.0 — — — 0.0% -2.75 — +0.0
161 Anne Meredith GBR 242 2 – ▲ 26 1 3 25.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,495 102.1 — — — 25.0% -1.50 — -0.1
162 Mary Pierce FRA 243 2 – ▲ 113 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,480 106.2 — — — 14.3% -2.43 — -0.3
163 Ei Iida JPN 250 2 – ▲ 6 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,457 113.6 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
164 Elizabeth Minter AUS 253 2 – ▼ 95 1 3 25.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,571 99.8 — — — 25.0% -2.13 — +0.3
165 Debbie Graham USA 256 2 – ▼ 118 2 4 33.3% 0 — — R128 — 1,512 95.5 — — — 33.3% -0.83 — +1.1
166 Julie Richardson NZL 257 2 – ▼ 155 1 7 12.5% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,507 105.8 — — — 21.1% -2.21 — +0.0
167 Melissa Gurney USA 260 2 – ▼ 163 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,561 96.1 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
168 Naoko Sawamatsu JPN 262 2 – ▼ 5 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,477 96.1 — — — 20.0% -2.20 — +0.3
169 Christina Singer GER 264 2 – ▼ 104 1 4 20.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,448 92.5 — — — 18.2% -2.36 — +0.8
170 Wendy Turnbull AUS 266 2 – ▼ 114 2 4 33.3% 0 R128 — R64 — 1,622 104.9 — — — 40.0% -0.70 — -0.1
171 Elly Hakami USA 270 2 – ▼ 202 1 11 8.3% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,565 119.2 — — — 25.8% -1.61 — -1.9
172 Samantha Smith GBR 274 1 – ▲ 6 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,494 97.5 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
173 Nanne Dahlman FIN 276 1 – ▲ 81 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,519 108.4 — — — 66.7% +1.17 — +0.5
174 Michelle Torres USA 277 1 – ▼ 185 1 8 11.1% 0 — R128 — — 1,535 110.3 — — — 23.8% -1.90 — -0.5
175 Sarah Loosemore GBR 284 1 – ▼ 131 1 1 50.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,513 114.1 — — — 50.0% +0.34 — -0.1
176 Katarzyna Nowak POL 285 1 – ▼ 25 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 97.8 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
177 Erika De Lone USA 298 1 – ▲ 68 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,472 91.8 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.4
178 Andrea Betzner GER 301 1 – ▼ 109 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,401 108.7 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.0
179 Marion Maruska AUT 339 1 – ▼ 40 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 97.4 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
180 Vicki Nelson USA 402 0 – ▼ 120 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,461 99.3 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.1
181 Olga Tsarbopoulou GRE 443 0 – ▼ 286 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,452 102.8 — — — 20.0% -2.20 — +0.0
182 Petra Huber AUT 444 0 – ▼ 267 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,515 100.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.2
183 Lisa Raymond USA 449 0 – ▼ 3 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,496 99.0 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — -0.2
184 Kim Steinmetz USA 478 0 – ▼ 345 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,471 98.2 — — — 20.0% -2.30 — -0.1
185 Candy Reynolds USA 485 0 – ▼ 235 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,421 93.3 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
186 Raffaella Reggi Concato ITA — — – — 39 22 63.9% 0 R16 R64 R32 R128 1,856 141.5 — — — 59.4% +0.69 107.5 +0.5
187 Catarina Lindqvist Ryan SWE — — – — 29 19 60.4% 0 QF R128 SF R128 1,784 144.8 — — — 58.3% +0.58 101.1 -0.1
188 Belinda Cordwell NZL — — – — 25 11 69.4% 1 SF — — — 1,753 136.5 — — — 68.4% +1.21 102.8 +2.8
189 Susan Sloane Lundy USA — — – — 20 15 57.1% 0 — R32 R64 R32 1,755 137.6 — — — 57.9% +0.67 94.8 -0.3
190 Jo Anne Faull AUS — — – — 18 18 50.0% 0 R128 R16 R16 R128 1,674 125.0 — — — 50.7% +0.15 104.5 -0.1
191 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel USA — — – — 16 15 51.6% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,788 141.3 — — — 50.0% -0.29 103.8 -4.2
192 Dianne Van Rensburg RSA — — – — 15 20 42.9% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,652 133.2 — — — 46.8% -0.52 93.7 -0.1
193 Angelika Kanellopoulou GRE — — – — 13 13 50.0% 0 — R64 — R64 1,621 120.2 — — — 52.4% +0.13 98.3 +1.6
194 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer USA — — – — 13 17 43.3% 0 R32 R64 — R128 1,592 120.0 — — — 44.1% -0.25 99.6 +2.3
195 Barbara Romano ITA — — – — 11 11 50.0% 0 — R128 — R128 1,582 129.4 — — — 48.1% +0.31 101.9 +0.7
196 Anne Smith USA — — – — 10 6 62.5% 0 — — — R64 1,851 140.5 — — — 58.3% +0.50 105.0 -0.1
197 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik SWE — — – — 10 14 41.7% 0 R64 R128 R64 — 1,611 115.5 — — — 44.3% -0.85 — +0.3
198 Stacey Martin USA — — – — 10 13 43.5% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,613 127.6 — — — 45.5% -0.33 — -0.2
199 Andrea Vieira BRA — — – — 9 11 45.0% 0 — R32 — R128 1,556 120.0 — — — 39.5% -0.72 — +0.2
200 Louise Allen USA — — – — 9 15 37.5% 0 R128 R128 R64 R128 1,561 114.0 — — — 43.1% -0.66 100.1 +0.1
201 Martina Pawlik GER — — – — 9 12 42.9% 0 R128 R32 R64 R128 1,533 103.3 — — — 46.8% -0.60 99.9 +2.2
202 Michelle Jaggard Lai AUS — — – — 9 16 36.0% 0 R32 R64 R128 — 1,499 106.7 — — — 37.9% -0.86 — +2.2
203 Neige Dias BRA — — – — 9 10 47.4% 0 — R32 — — 1,674 112.9 — — — 47.8% -0.46 101.3 +0.7
204 Hu Na USA — — – — 8 13 38.1% 0 — — R64 R128 1,578 119.7 — — — 39.6% -0.33 98.3 +0.3
205 Tine Scheuer Larsen DEN — — – — 8 12 40.0% 0 — R128 R64 R64 1,575 124.3 — — — 46.8% -0.17 96.6 -0.2
206 Mary Lou Piatek USA — — – — 7 15 31.8% 0 — — R128 R128 1,592 121.4 — — — 31.4% -1.65 107.3 -2.7
207 Renata Baranski POL — — – — 7 10 41.2% 0 R128 — — — 1,513 111.2 — — — 43.6% -0.38 — +1.3
208 Celine Cohen SUI — — – — 6 10 37.5% 0 R128 — — — 1,519 115.9 — — — 42.1% -0.68 — +0.4
209 Kimberly Kessaris USA — — – — 6 13 31.6% 0 R32 — R64 R128 1,467 108.0 — — — 33.3% -1.21 98.7 +1.3
210 Leigh Anne Eldredge USA — — – — 6 12 33.3% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,455 108.4 — — — 35.7% -1.07 — +1.4
211 Mareen Louie Harper USA — — – — 6 14 30.0% 0 — — R128 R128 1,576 117.4 — — — 32.0% -1.38 107.4 -1.3
212 Akemi Nishiya JPN — — – — 5 10 33.3% 0 R64 R128 R128 — 1,480 111.9 — — — 31.3% -1.63 — +0.7
213 Alexia Dechaume Balleret FRA — — – — 5 14 26.3% 0 R64 R64 — — 1,491 117.1 — — — 36.4% -1.11 92.8 +0.7
214 Carin Bakkum NED — — – — 5 10 33.3% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,441 97.9 — — — 32.3% -2.00 — +0.8
215 Leona Laskova CZE — — – — 5 5 50.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,548 107.6 — — — 50.0% +0.33 — +1.6
216 Molly Van Nostrand USA — — – — 5 12 29.4% 0 — — R128 R128 1,504 111.7 — — — 34.1% -1.19 — -0.2
217 Nathalie Guerree Spitzer FRA — — – — 5 10 33.3% 0 R32 R64 R128 — 1,536 103.4 — — — 38.2% -0.94 96.8 +1.0
218 Francesca Romano ITA — — – — 4 3 57.1% 0 — — — — 1,530 106.9 — — — 52.9% +0.47 102.8 +1.1
219 Iwona Kuczynska POL — — – — 4 11 26.7% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,525 107.2 — — — 32.3% -1.13 98.3 +0.3
220 Maria Christine Damas FRA — — – — 4 9 30.8% 0 R64 — — — 1,479 112.9 — — — 35.5% -1.03 — +0.3
221 Maria Lindstrom SWE — — – — 4 7 36.4% 0 R128 — — — 1,487 106.1 — — — 37.5% -1.00 — +0.7
222 Pascale Paradis Mangon FRA — — – — 4 10 28.6% 0 — — R128 R128 1,678 123.2 — — — 33.3% -0.97 — -1.1
223 Silvia La Fratta ITA — — – — 4 4 50.0% 0 — R16 — — 1,516 113.6 — — — 52.6% +0.32 — +0.9
224 Tami Whitlinger Jones USA — — – — 4 5 44.4% 0 — — — R32 1,525 121.8 — — — 52.4% +0.24 96.3 +0.5
225 Amy Schwartz USA — — – — 3 5 37.5% 0 — — — — 1,485 97.7 — — — 31.3% -2.06 — +0.7
226 Anna Ivan USA — — – — 3 10 23.1% 0 R128 — — — 1,551 103.5 — — — 34.4% -1.28 — +0.8
227 Carling Bassett Seguso CAN — — – — 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — R128 1,756 117.9 — — — 46.2% -0.77 — -0.8
228 Elena Pampoulova BUL — — – — 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — — 1,524 116.8 — — — 46.7% -0.40 — +0.4
229 Gisele Miro BRA — — – — 3 8 27.3% 0 R128 — R64 — 1,463 106.9 — — — 38.5% -0.77 — +0.7
230 Noelle Van Lottum FRA — — – — 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,533 105.8 — — — 53.3% +0.07 — +0.9
231 Adriana Villagran Reami ARG — — – — 2 12 14.3% 0 — R64 — — 1,445 94.3 — — — 22.6% -2.19 — +0.5
232 Andrea Tiezzi ARG — — – — 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,489 99.0 — — — 57.1% 0.00 — +0.5
233 Hellas Ter Riet NED — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,462 101.7 — — — 46.7% -0.20 — +0.9
234 Lisa Oneill AUS — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 R32 — — — 1,417 98.4 — — — 38.5% -1.77 — +0.6
235 Luciana Corsato Owsianka BRA — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,473 104.8 — — — 35.7% -1.43 — +0.3
236 Luciana Tella BRA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,509 107.3 — — — 44.4% -0.11 — +0.1
237 Robyn Field RSA — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,501 105.9 — — — 40.0% -0.40 — +0.6
238 Sandy Collins USA — — – — 2 8 20.0% 0 R128 — R128 R128 1,473 103.5 — — — 23.8% -1.71 — +0.4
239 Steffi Menning GER — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,468 100.6 — — — 30.8% -1.23 — +0.6
240 Tamaka Takagi JPN — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,488 100.3 — — — 30.8% -1.62 — +0.8
241 Yukie Koizumi JPN — — – — 2 6 25.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,447 100.7 — — — 26.3% -1.00 — +0.7
242 Anne Aallonen HKG — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,479 102.7 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.6
243 Anne Grousbeck USA — — – — 1 5 16.7% 0 — — — — 1,459 101.9 — — — 33.3% -0.93 — +0.1
244 Belinda Borneo GBR — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,438 103.8 — — — 28.6% -1.71 — +0.1
245 Bettina Diesner AUT — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 113.1 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.0
246 Catherine Mothes Jobkel FRA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,498 101.7 — — — 50.0% -0.50 — +0.1
247 Debbie Spence Nasim USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,558 101.4 — — — 66.7% +2.33 — +0.2
248 Emmanuelle Derly FRA — — – — 1 6 14.3% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,483 102.5 — — — 33.3% -1.28 95.4 -0.0
249 Karen Shin USA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 102.1 — — — 30.0% -0.80 — +0.2
250 Katharina Duell GER — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,435 103.7 — — — 37.5% -1.00 — 0.0
251 Kathrin Keil USA — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,536 97.2 — — — 25.0% -1.08 — +0.4
252 Linda Barnard RSA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,479 99.4 — — — 33.3% -0.50 — +0.5
253 Lisa Bonder Kreiss USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,626 98.2 — — — 37.5% -1.38 — +0.2
254 Lisa Green USA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 109.9 — — — 40.0% +0.60 — +0.4
255 Marie Christine Calleja FRA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,532 100.2 — — — 28.6% -2.00 — -0.0
256 Michaela Frimmelova TCH — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,489 99.4 — — — 42.9% -1.00 — +0.5
257 Naoko Kijimuta JPN — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,513 104.1 — — — 50.0% -0.25 — +0.2
258 Patricia Hy Boulais CAN — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,514 91.9 — — — 20.0% -2.30 — +0.3
259 Reeka Szikszay HUN — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,503 98.9 — — — 28.6% -2.14 — -0.0
260 Regina Marsikova CZE — — – — 1 6 14.3% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,541 97.0 — — — 14.3% -2.21 — +0.3
261 Sabrina Giusto BRA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,499 101.4 — — — 50.0% +1.00 — +0.4
262 Shawn Foltz USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,545 97.2 — — — 28.6% -2.00 — +0.2
263 Simona Isidori ITA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,510 103.1 — — — 50.0% -1.00 — +0.1
264 Sofie Albinus DEN — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 99.2 — — — 50.0% +0.17 — +0.5
265 Valda Lake GBR — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — R64 — 1,463 98.6 — — — 40.0% -0.80 — -0.1
266 Aida Khalatian ARM — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 102.1 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.2
267 Alison Scott AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,438 87.4 — — — 0.0% -6.00 — +0.2
268 Alix Creek USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 96.3 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
269 Alysia May USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 103.9 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — -0.1
270 Barbara Gerken USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,507 96.1 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.3
271 Carol Christian USA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,471 90.9 — — — 25.0% -1.88 — +0.7
272 Caroline Van Renterghem BEL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,479 103.3 — — — 0.0% -1.00 — -0.1
273 Caterina Nozzoli ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,449 101.3 — — — 33.3% -2.33 — -0.1
274 Catherine Bonnet FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,510 99.2 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.1
275 Christina Papadaki GRE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 99.8 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.1
276 Claudia Chabalgoity BRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,477 96.1 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.2
277 Corinne Bousmans BEL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 95.2 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
278 Denisa Szabova SVK — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,499 95.5 — — — 11.1% -3.55 — +0.1
279 Eleni Rossides USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 97.5 — — — 0.0% -1.50 — +0.3
280 Erda Crous RSA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 94.6 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.1
281 Erica Oneill USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 102.3 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.1
282 Eva Maria Schurhoff GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 100.9 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.0
283 Florence Gauvain FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 106.7 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.1
284 Gabriela Castro ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 106.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.2
285 Gabriela Mosca ARG — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,441 95.4 — — — 20.0% -2.60 — +0.3
286 Heidi Sprung AUT — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,457 84.2 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.2
287 Heike Thoms GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,504 98.7 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.1
288 Henrike Kadzidroga GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 98.6 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.2
289 Hester Witvoet NED — — – — 0 9 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,457 93.5 — — — 10.0% -2.70 — +0.6
290 Holyn Lord USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 98.6 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.0
291 Ilse De Ruysscher BEL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 98.9 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
292 Immaculada Varas Caro ESP — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,462 101.3 — — — 14.3% -2.14 — -0.0
293 Jackie Joseph USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 98.0 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.2
294 Jane Taylor AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,485 97.2 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.2
295 Jane Thomas USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,449 98.3 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
296 Janet Souto Garcia ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,459 94.7 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
297 Jennifer Fuchs USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,475 96.8 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
298 Jenny Whalen USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 97.3 — — — 33.3% -2.67 — +0.1
299 Jill Smoller USA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,447 97.4 — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0.0
300 Jo Louis GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,434 95.7 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0.0
301 Jonna Jonerup SWE — — – — 0 5 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,403 81.9 — — — 16.7% -2.75 — +1.0
302 Julie Salmon GBR — — – — 0 5 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,377 90.3 — — — 0.0% -3.60 — +0.5
303 Karim Strohmeier Merino PER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,466 96.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
304 Kathy Jordan USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,874 106.2 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.3
305 Kerry-Anne Guse AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,487 116.3 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.3
306 Kimberly Po Messerli USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 97.5 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.1
307 Lindsay Bartlett USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 100.2 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.0
308 Lisa Albano USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 103.2 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.2
309 Lisa Gould GBR — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,444 93.7 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
310 Lise Gregory RSA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,454 96.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.3
311 Louise Stacey AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,496 105.9 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.2
312 Maja Zivec Skulj GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 97.4 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.1
313 Mariaan De Swardt RSA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 105.7 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.3
314 Melissa Mazzotta USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 98.8 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.1
315 Michelle Bowrey AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,435 97.6 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.2
316 Natalia Biletskaia UKR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 96.9 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.0
317 Nicoletta Iaccarino ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 101.1 — — — 33.3% -2.33 — -0.2
318 Pamela Wallenfels GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 99.0 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.2
319 Patricia Miller URU — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 97.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
320 Patty Murren USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 108.4 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.2
321 Penny Barg USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,511 98.4 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
322 Renata Smekalova TCH — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 95.3 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
323 Rikki Gaddie RSA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,465 87.9 — — — 20.0% -4.20 — +0.5
324 Rita Cruz Lima BRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 96.8 — — — 33.3% -3.33 — +0.2
325 Rosa Bielsa Hierro ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 98.7 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — +0.2
326 Rosie Casals USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,499 89.7 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
327 Ruth Seeman NZL — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 96.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.0
328 Sabine Gerke GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 107.8 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — -0.2
329 Sabine Krein Auer GER — — – — 0 6 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,449 100.8 — — — 20.0% -2.53 — -0.0
330 Sally Mccann AUS — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,461 96.8 — — — 0.0% -2.25 — +0.2
331 Sandrine Jaquet SUI — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,435 95.8 — — — 14.3% -2.57 — +0.2
332 Sarah Bentley GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 104.6 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
333 Shi-Ting Wang TPE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,479 98.1 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
334 Simone Schilder NED — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,444 99.1 — — — 14.3% -2.00 — +0.2
335 Svetlana Krivencheva BUL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 97.8 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.0
336 Sybille Niox Chateau FRA — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,463 104.7 — — — 11.1% -3.11 — -0.2
337 Themis Zambrzycki BRA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,468 94.7 — — — 20.0% -1.80 — +0.5
338 Titia Wilmink NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 96.6 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
339 Tracey Morton Rodgers AUS — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,440 91.4 — — — 20.0% -3.20 — +0.4
340 Tracy Austin USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 2,081 101.4 — — — 20.0% -2.00 — -0.0

How to read these columns

Rank
For the current season, this is the latest ranking. For past seasons, this is the year-end ranking.
Points
Official ranking points from the selected ranking snapshot.
Wk +/−
Ranking change since the previous ranking snapshot.
YTD Δ
Ranking change since the start of the season.
Win %
Wins divided by total completed main-draw matches.
Elo
For the current season, this is the latest TennisDB Elo rating. For past seasons, this is year-end Elo.
P+
Scoreline performance adjusted for opponent strength on a 0-200 scale. 100 is average; a 10-point difference equals five expected-win percentage points.
Serve+
Estimated percentage points won on serve above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
Return+
Estimated percentage points won on return above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
PD
Return points won divided by opponents' return points won. 1.000 is even; above 1.000 is better.
Set Win %
Sets won divided by total completed sets in eligible scored matches.
Set Margin
Average per-set game margin from the player's perspective. Positive values mean winning sets by more games on average.
Pressure+
Opponent-adjusted deciding-set and tiebreak performance on a 0-200 scale; 100 is the pre-match surface-Elo expectation. Small samples are shrunk, at least three of each are required, and a deciding-set tiebreak counts only once.
Schedule
Expected wins added by opponent quality versus a typical player-season schedule. Positive means an easier schedule; negative means a tougher one. Career values are per 100 matches.

View the full tennis statistics glossary →

WTA Rankings Archive

Browse WTA rankings and season leader archives by year.

2020s
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020
2010s
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
2000s
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
1990s
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
1980s
1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980
1970s
1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970
1960s
1969 1968