Rankings as of: Dec 30, 1996

WTA 1996 Season Leaders & Rankings

Rankings, leaderboards, and performance stats by season.

Steffi Graf finished 1996 at WTA No. 1 with 4,649 points.

Need custom historical filters? Search ranking weeks or search player seasons with the Advanced search tool.

Rankings Leaders

Ranking points, results, and season metrics for 1996.

281 players with >= 1 match

# Player Country Rank Points Wk +/− YTD Δ W L Win % Titles AORGWUSO Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD Set Win % Set Margin Pressure+ Schedule
1 Steffi Graf GER 1 4,649 – ▶ 0 51 4 92.7% 7 — W W W 2,475 176.2 — — — 89.5% +2.71 104.0 -1.1
2 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario ESP 2 3,668 – ▲ 1 57 17 77.0% 2 QF F F R16 2,117 172.0 — — — 71.5% +1.61 99.0 -1.5
3 Monica Seles USA 2 4,056 – ▼ 1 46 9 83.6% 5 W QF R64 F 2,344 176.3 — — — 83.5% +2.58 96.5 -0.4
4 Jana Novotna CZE 3 3,087 – ▲ 8 52 13 80.0% 4 — SF QF QF 2,226 173.1 — — — 72.9% +1.64 110.0 -2.9
5 Martina Hingis SUI 4 3,051 – ▲ 15 46 16 74.2% 2 QF R32 R16 SF 2,157 176.6 — — — 70.9% +1.71 106.0 -2.3
6 Conchita Martínez ESP 5 3,180 – ▼ 3 47 17 73.4% 2 QF SF R16 SF 2,066 172.1 — — — 70.6% +1.81 93.2 -0.9
7 Anke Huber GER 6 2,689 – ▲ 3 47 16 74.6% 3 F R16 R32 R128 2,031 160.5 — — — 66.2% +1.29 99.9 +2.8
8 Iva Majoli CRO 7 2,647 – ▲ 1 42 17 71.2% 2 QF QF — R128 2,038 166.9 — — — 65.7% +0.63 105.7 -1.4
9 Kimiko Date JPN 8 139 – ▼ 3 34 14 70.8% 2 R64 R16 SF R128 2,077 165.2 — — — 65.8% +1.32 97.0 -0.4
10 Lindsay Davenport USA 9 2,357 – ▲ 3 47 15 75.8% 3 R16 QF R64 R16 2,065 172.6 — — — 73.5% +1.73 100.5 -1.6
11 Barbara Paulus AUT 10 1,492 – ▲ 18 38 16 70.4% 1 R64 R32 — R32 1,868 151.5 — — — 67.2% +1.23 94.9 +0.4
12 Irina Spirlea ROU 10 1,748 – ▲ 11 36 20 64.3% 1 R64 R16 R64 R32 1,938 163.3 — — — 62.5% +1.04 104.9 +0.5
13 Karina Habsudova SVK 11 1,707 – ▲ 50 38 22 63.3% 0 R64 QF R128 R16 1,858 158.9 — — — 59.1% +0.66 106.8 -1.4
14 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy NED 12 1,559 – ▲ 1 37 19 66.1% 1 R16 R32 R32 R64 1,910 151.8 — — — 60.6% +0.51 99.9 +2.0
15 Amanda Coetzer RSA 14 1,484 – ▲ 4 32 21 60.4% 0 SF R16 R64 QF 1,855 161.7 — — — 60.2% +0.94 95.1 -0.8
16 Judith Wiesner AUT 15 1,451 – ▲ 8 36 23 61.0% 0 R128 R128 QF QF 1,922 154.0 — — — 59.8% +0.61 101.5 -2.4
17 Mary Joe Fernandez USA 16 1,212 – ▼ 6 30 17 63.8% 0 R16 R16 QF — 1,935 158.7 — — — 61.9% +1.09 103.3 -1.4
18 Chanda Rubin USA 17 1,187 – ▼ 2 20 9 69.0% 0 SF — — — 1,985 164.3 — — — 60.9% +0.84 106.7 -1.4
19 Elena Likhovtseva RUS 18 1,182 – ▲ 25 30 22 57.7% 0 R16 R32 R16 R32 1,816 147.2 — — — 52.0% +0.03 114.1 -1.0
20 Magdalena Maleeva BUL 19 1,126 – ▼ 13 20 16 55.6% 0 — R16 R64 R128 1,924 151.7 — — — 57.0% +0.65 92.7 -1.4
21 Julie Halard-Decugis FRA 20 1,111 – ▲ 28 28 10 73.7% 2 R32 R64 — — 1,856 152.1 — — — 69.0% +1.29 101.2 -0.3
22 Sabine Appelmans BEL 21 1,096 – ▲ 10 26 17 60.5% 1 R16 R32 R16 R128 1,832 145.6 — — — 62.1% +0.81 95.3 +0.6
23 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 22 1,001 – ▲ 3 30 22 57.7% 0 — R64 R32 R64 1,799 152.0 — — — 58.3% +0.73 97.2 -1.1
24 Mary Pierce FRA 24 913 – ▼ 20 18 12 60.0% 0 R64 R32 QF — 1,881 134.2 — — — 58.3% +0.64 98.2 +2.4
25 Meredith Mcgrath USA 26 898 – ▲ 33 19 9 67.9% 1 R128 R128 SF — 1,917 143.6 — — — 63.9% +0.89 105.3 -1.7
26 Lisa Raymond USA 27 895 – ▼ 7 23 19 54.8% 1 R128 R128 R64 R16 1,860 149.8 — — — 53.3% +0.25 101.3 -0.9
27 Ai Sugiyama JPN 28 814 – ▲ 16 24 19 55.8% 0 R32 R128 R16 R64 1,751 143.7 — — — 54.3% +0.29 99.1 +0.3
28 Linda Wild USA 29 810 – ▲ 26 22 16 57.9% 1 R64 R32 R32 QF 1,809 144.4 — — — 55.2% +0.55 101.6 +0.7
29 Yayuk Basuki INA 30 802 – ▼ 1 22 17 56.4% 0 R128 R32 R128 R128 1,853 142.3 — — — 53.7% +0.06 102.6 -0.8
30 Katarina Studenikova SVK 31 800 – ▲ 42 25 21 54.4% 0 R64 R128 R16 R128 1,717 136.1 — — — 53.9% +0.01 99.7 -0.5
31 Barbara Schett AUT 32 789 – ▲ 53 23 18 56.1% 1 R16 R128 R64 R64 1,759 146.4 — — — 54.6% +0.42 103.2 -1.4
32 Amy Frazier USA 33 773 – ▼ 17 20 16 55.6% 0 R128 R128 R16 R64 1,836 148.1 — — — 57.1% +0.57 97.6 +0.7
33 Silvia Farina Elia ITA 34 759 – ▲ 16 23 22 51.1% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,711 137.8 — — — 52.0% 0.00 105.7 -0.0
34 Helena Sukova CZE 35 734 – ▼ 9 17 16 51.5% 0 R32 R128 R64 R32 1,776 135.6 — — — 50.6% +0.28 97.0 +0.5
35 Jennifer Capriati USA 36 710 – ▲ 67 16 9 64.0% 0 — R128 — R128 2,078 163.0 — — — 64.0% +0.96 102.1 -1.4
36 Henrieta Nagyova SVK 37 686 – ▲ 92 20 12 62.5% 1 — R64 R128 R64 1,702 124.3 — — — 57.1% +0.41 108.7 +0.6
37 Naoko Sawamatsu JPN 38 676 – ▼ 21 19 17 52.8% 0 R16 R64 R32 R64 1,811 145.0 — — — 53.2% +0.02 97.8 -0.3
38 Asa Carlsson SWE 39 669 – ▲ 8 15 19 44.1% 0 R64 R128 R128 R16 1,738 141.8 — — — 45.7% -0.35 97.6 -1.3
39 Shi-Ting Wang TPE 40 651 – ▲ 16 26 16 61.9% 2 R64 R64 — R64 1,804 138.2 — — — 62.8% +0.70 96.0 +1.1
40 Sandrine Testud FRA 41 626 – ▼ 1 21 17 55.3% 0 R128 R32 R64 R16 1,774 140.4 — — — 54.7% +0.58 104.9 +1.0
41 Florencia Labat ARG 42 589 – ▲ 11 25 18 58.1% 0 R64 R128 R32 R64 1,771 142.8 — — — 57.0% +0.70 98.7 +0.2
42 Sabine Hack GER 43 577 – ▼ 5 19 15 55.9% 0 R64 R128 — R128 1,706 138.2 — — — 55.6% +0.71 96.8 -0.2
43 Laurence Courtois BEL 44 565 – ▲ 18 20 16 55.6% 0 R32 R64 R64 R64 1,697 120.0 — — — 50.0% -0.11 109.5 +1.2
44 Naoko Kijimuta JPN 45 527 – ▲ 35 17 18 48.6% 0 R128 R128 R128 R32 1,682 139.7 — — — 50.0% +0.20 100.8 -0.5
45 Miriam Oremans NED 46 525 – ▼ 5 17 18 48.6% 0 R128 R32 R64 R64 1,714 134.9 — — — 48.1% +0.09 100.2 +0.4
46 Barbara Rittner GER 47 512 – ▲ 2 12 16 42.9% 0 R64 R16 R128 R32 1,727 144.8 — — — 46.7% -0.05 — -1.3
47 Dominique Monami BEL 48 468 – ▲ 6 14 14 50.0% 1 R128 R128 R32 R128 1,698 137.0 — — — 52.5% +0.41 97.4 +0.1
48 Anne-Gaelle Sidot FRA 50 453 – ▲ 100 6 6 50.0% 0 — R128 R64 R32 1,597 133.0 — — — 51.7% +0.31 — +0.2
49 Els Callens BEL 51 450 – ▲ 38 13 12 52.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 R32 1,692 128.2 — — — 48.1% -0.30 103.8 +0.5
50 Gloria Pizzichini ITA 52 447 – ▲ 209 11 8 57.9% 1 — R32 R64 R128 1,600 127.9 — — — 55.8% +0.40 105.0 +0.6
51 Karin Kschwendt AUT 53 426 – ▲ 26 15 14 51.7% 0 R32 R128 R64 R64 1,658 133.2 — — — 47.7% -0.05 — -0.3
52 Mana Endo JPN 54 413 – ▲ 22 12 13 48.0% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,685 129.4 — — — 50.0% -0.33 — -0.3
53 Kristie Boogert NED 55 413 – ▼ 22 13 16 44.8% 0 R32 R64 R32 R64 1,711 132.3 — — — 47.9% -0.10 — -0.8
54 Gabriela Sabatini ARG 56 25 – ▼ 49 14 10 58.3% 0 R16 — — R32 1,958 159.9 — — — 58.8% +1.02 — -0.5
55 Natasha Zvereva BLR 57 386 – ▼ 43 13 13 50.0% 0 R128 R32 R64 R32 1,897 147.8 — — — 50.0% -0.02 94.9 -1.8
56 Petra Begerow GER 58 385 – ▼ 1 9 15 37.5% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,628 127.9 — — — 40.0% -0.93 — -0.6
57 Alexandra Fusai FRA 59 375 – ▲ 41 12 17 41.4% 0 R32 R64 R64 R64 1,554 117.4 — — — 39.7% -0.79 103.7 +1.1
58 Larisa Savchenko URS 61 362 – ▲ 33 11 14 44.0% 0 R128 R128 R32 R128 1,668 126.6 — — — 44.1% -0.59 — -1.6
59 Paola Suarez ARG 62 356 – ▲ 70 12 11 52.2% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,618 124.9 — — — 50.0% -0.08 102.1 +1.1
60 Patty Schnyder SUI 64 349 – ▲ 85 7 10 41.2% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,586 120.2 — — — 40.5% -0.76 105.4 -0.1
61 Anna Kournikova RUS 65 343 – ▲ 234 5 5 50.0% 0 — — — R16 1,593 131.7 — — — 50.0% 0.00 102.9 +0.2
62 Petra Langrova TCH 66 339 – ▲ 68 7 6 53.9% 0 — R32 — R32 1,626 114.6 — — — 53.3% +0.07 — +0.1
63 Ludmila Richterova CZE 67 334 – ▼ 3 9 15 37.5% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,621 129.4 — — — 40.7% -0.82 98.5 -0.2
64 Flora Perfetti ITA 69 331 – ▲ 50 10 9 52.6% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,563 117.4 — — — 51.1% +0.23 103.7 +0.6
65 Nana Smith JPN 70 331 – ▲ 52 13 13 50.0% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,601 121.7 — — — 47.7% -0.11 107.0 +1.2
66 Rita Grande ITA 71 327 – ▼ 1 10 16 38.5% 0 R32 R64 R128 R16 1,617 126.5 — — — 42.4% -0.41 94.9 +0.1
67 Ann Grossman USA 72 305 – ▲ 9 10 14 41.7% 0 R128 R32 R128 R64 1,665 130.2 — — — 42.9% -0.62 — -1.0
68 Jolene Watanabe USA 73 304 – ▲ 55 8 14 36.4% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,573 122.1 — — — 32.6% -1.32 96.7 -0.2
69 Stephanie De Ville BEL 74 302 – ▲ 182 6 5 54.5% 0 — — — R128 1,572 122.6 — — — 47.8% 0.00 101.0 -0.1
70 Tamarine Tanasugarn THA 75 299 – ▲ 144 9 5 64.3% 0 — — — — 1,610 124.2 — — — 64.3% +1.21 — +0.7
71 Janette Husarova SVK 76 295 – ▲ 28 12 14 46.1% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,544 112.8 — — — 51.7% -0.07 96.0 +1.7
72 Denisa Chladkova CZE 77 294 – ▲ 127 4 2 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,578 111.0 — — — 54.5% +0.09 — -0.3
73 Sandra Cacic USA 78 290 – ▲ 39 9 12 42.9% 1 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,569 120.7 — — — 43.5% -0.54 — -0.0
74 Nicole Arendt USA 79 287 – ▲ 33 9 11 45.0% 0 R32 R128 R32 R64 1,675 126.6 — — — 43.5% -0.28 102.1 +0.4
75 Sandra Cecchini ITA 80 279 – ▲ 25 10 10 50.0% 0 R128 R64 — R128 1,628 109.5 — — — 52.4% +0.05 — +1.6
76 Tatjana Jecmenica SRB 82 274 – ▲ 29 7 11 38.9% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,590 127.1 — — — 44.7% -0.42 105.2 +0.0
77 Lori Mcneil USA 83 274 – ▼ 51 8 14 36.4% 0 R64 — R32 R128 1,727 130.2 — — — 36.5% -0.65 96.5 -0.5
78 Nathalie Dechy FRA 84 273 – ▲ 168 6 11 35.3% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,500 112.9 — — — 38.5% -0.79 — +0.6
79 Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor FRA 85 272 – ▲ 3 12 12 50.0% 0 R128 R32 — R64 1,604 116.8 — — — 49.1% -0.17 101.4 +0.6
80 Radomira Zrubakova SVK 86 269 – ▶ 0 6 12 33.3% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,580 119.9 — — — 36.6% -1.10 — +0.4
81 Virginia Ruano Pascual ESP 87 267 – ▼ 29 9 16 36.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,578 126.8 — — — 41.5% -0.58 — -0.5
82 Natalia Medvedeva UKR 88 265 – ▲ 7 6 8 42.9% 0 — — R32 — 1,691 115.6 — — — 40.7% -0.81 — +0.1
83 Gala Leon Garcia ESP 89 264 – ▲ 50 5 11 31.2% 0 — R16 R128 R128 1,524 123.4 — — — 37.5% -0.93 — -0.2
84 Jana Kandarr GER 90 263 – ▼ 13 9 14 39.1% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,575 115.6 — — — 34.6% -1.48 107.9 -0.8
85 Francesca Lubiani ITA 91 263 – ▲ 77 5 10 33.3% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,516 122.1 — — — 34.4% -1.19 — -0.1
86 Sandra Dopfer AUT 93 259 – ▲ 54 10 10 50.0% 0 — — R128 R32 1,563 118.1 — — — 46.8% -0.19 102.8 +0.5
87 Nicole Bradtke AUS 94 256 – ▼ 59 6 11 35.3% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,708 125.5 — — — 43.2% -0.81 94.7 -0.5
88 Cristina Torrens Valero ESP 95 256 – ▲ 81 4 4 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,507 106.5 — — — 47.6% -0.52 — +0.2
89 Aleksandra Olsza POL 96 251 – ▲ 90 4 7 36.4% 0 — — R64 R64 1,559 117.4 — — — 37.5% -1.12 — -0.4
90 Catalina Cristea ROM 97 250 – ▲ 4 6 13 31.6% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,534 120.1 — — — 37.0% -0.93 — -0.7
91 Adriana Rikl Gersi CZE 99 244 – ▲ 112 4 3 57.1% 0 — — — — 1,543 113.7 — — — 57.1% +0.64 — +0.5
92 Ines Gorrochategui ARG 100 241 – ▼ 58 9 8 52.9% 0 — — R32 R32 1,801 121.6 — — — 53.8% -0.23 — +0.3
93 Sung-Hee Park KOR 101 239 – ▼ 33 8 16 33.3% 0 R64 R64 R64 R128 1,555 114.5 — — — 35.2% -1.04 102.2 +0.9
94 Yuka Yoshida JPN 102 238 – ▲ 95 7 5 58.3% 0 — — — — 1,559 107.4 — — — 48.0% -0.68 — +1.1
95 Rika Hiraki JPN 103 237 – ▲ 43 6 12 33.3% 0 R32 R128 R64 R128 1,510 111.5 — — — 36.8% -1.05 — +0.6
96 Andrea Glass GER 104 234 – ▲ 39 6 14 30.0% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,500 118.7 — — — 36.2% -0.89 — -0.2
97 Annabel Ellwood AUS 105 230 – ▲ 21 2 9 18.2% 0 R128 — R128 R64 1,472 113.7 — — — 24.0% -1.20 — +0.2
98 Silvija Talaja CRO 106 225 – ▲ 185 9 4 69.2% 0 — — — — 1,587 117.3 — — — 62.1% +0.86 — +0.4
99 Lindsay Lee-Waters USA 107 224 – ▼ 62 6 16 27.3% 0 R128 R128 — R128 1,576 122.3 — — — 35.2% -1.28 97.4 -0.3
100 Rennae Stubbs AUS 108 221 – ▼ 26 5 15 25.0% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,530 118.1 — — — 27.9% -1.60 97.1 +0.3
101 Nancy Feber BEL 109 219 – ▼ 13 6 12 33.3% 0 R64 R64 R32 — 1,513 113.7 — — — 45.5% -0.27 95.3 +1.8
102 Angeles Montolio ESP 110 212 – ▲ 57 4 9 30.8% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,530 117.1 — — — 36.7% -1.27 — -0.4
103 Laxmi Poruri USA 111 209 – ▲ 30 2 9 18.2% 0 R64 — — R128 1,478 111.8 — — — 28.6% -1.54 — -0.1
104 Gigi Fernandez USA 112 208 – ▼ 46 7 12 36.8% 0 R128 R128 R32 R128 1,687 129.4 — — — 40.0% -0.84 — -0.6
105 Wiltrud Probst GER 113 201 – ▲ 29 1 6 14.3% 0 — — — — 1,574 110.6 — — — 20.0% -2.60 — -0.3
106 Dally Randriantefy MAD 114 201 – ▼ 25 6 8 42.9% 0 R64 R64 R128 R32 1,550 118.2 — — — 46.9% -0.78 98.9 +0.5
107 Katrina Adams USA 115 196 – ▲ 10 7 10 41.2% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,555 119.5 — — — 43.9% -0.63 — -0.2
108 Lenka Cenkova CZE 116 195 – ▲ 67 5 3 62.5% 0 — — — — 1,542 122.6 — — — 66.7% +1.56 — +0.2
109 María Sánchez Lorenzo ESP 117 195 – ▲ 1 4 11 26.7% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,500 112.8 — — — 38.9% -0.81 — +0.5
110 Yone Kamio JPN 119 191 – ▼ 89 3 12 20.0% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,606 107.8 — — — 31.6% -1.47 95.2 +0.7
111 Miho Saeki JPN 120 190 – ▲ 101 3 7 30.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 103.2 — — — 31.8% -1.59 — +0.1
112 Corina Morariu USA 121 189 – ▲ 129 4 8 33.3% 0 — — R128 R128 1,496 111.1 — — — 30.8% -1.35 — -0.2
113 Debbie Graham USA 122 188 – ▲ 22 4 5 44.4% 0 — — — R64 1,607 118.4 — — — 42.9% +0.10 — +0.3
114 Emmanuelle Gagliardi SUI 123 187 – ▲ 111 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,504 108.4 — — — 62.5% +0.13 — -0.2
115 Mercedes Paz ARG 124 185 – ▲ 34 1 5 16.7% 0 — — R64 — 1,442 97.8 — — — 16.7% -2.67 — +0.0
116 Kyoko Nagatsuka JPN 125 185 – ▼ 89 4 15 21.1% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,545 103.2 — — — 26.7% -1.64 — -0.2
117 Joannette Kruger RSA 126 184 – ▼ 99 7 13 35.0% 0 R64 — R128 R128 1,625 111.8 — — — 36.6% -1.34 103.7 -0.4
118 Sandra Kleinova CZE 128 180 – ▼ 12 4 9 30.8% 0 R128 — — R128 1,533 112.6 — — — 33.3% -0.80 99.9 +0.4
119 Nanne Dahlman FIN 129 177 – ▼ 26 4 6 40.0% 0 R32 — — R64 1,489 107.5 — — — 42.9% -0.24 — +0.6
120 Jana Nejedly CAN 130 174 – ▼ 52 3 9 25.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,552 113.3 — — — 34.5% -1.14 95.3 -0.5
121 Erika De Lone USA 131 172 – ▼ 16 2 7 22.2% 0 R128 — — — 1,449 101.8 — — — 40.0% -0.80 — +0.3
122 Anna Smashnova ISR 132 172 – ▼ 60 4 11 26.7% 0 R64 R128 R128 — 1,562 121.4 — — — 32.4% -1.14 — -1.3
123 Bettina Fulco ARG 133 171 – ▲ 5 4 6 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,575 112.7 — — — 40.9% -0.41 — -0.3
124 Anne Kremer LUX 134 170 – ▲ 109 2 5 28.6% 0 — — R128 — 1,507 105.0 — — — 26.7% -1.47 — -0.1
125 Magdalena Grzybowska POL 135 166 – ▼ 51 3 13 18.8% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,476 106.6 — — — 27.0% -1.43 94.3 -0.3
126 Christina Singer GER 136 163 – ▼ 84 6 15 28.6% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,581 110.5 — — — 34.0% -1.20 — +0.1
127 Katarzyna Nowak POL 137 162 – ▼ 72 4 13 23.5% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,543 99.3 — — — 25.0% -2.33 — +0.5
128 Fabiola Zuluaga COL 138 159 – ▲ 137 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,465 96.0 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
129 Maria Vento-Kabchi VEN 139 158 – ▼ 37 1 6 14.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,504 101.6 — — — 20.0% -2.40 — -0.0
130 Mariana Diaz-Oliva ARG 140 157 – ▲ 55 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 100.0 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — +0.1
131 Samantha Smith GBR 141 156 – ▲ 163 1 4 20.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,510 113.9 — — — 27.3% -2.18 — -0.6
132 Lea Ghirardi FRA 142 156 – ▼ 44 4 9 30.8% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,505 112.3 — — — 28.6% -1.68 — -1.0
133 Veronika Martinek GER 143 155 – ▼ 46 4 13 23.5% 0 R128 R64 R128 — 1,489 102.6 — — — 25.0% -2.08 — +0.7
134 Radka Bobkova CZE 144 153 – ▼ 17 4 10 28.6% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,525 104.5 — — — 32.3% -1.68 — -0.1
135 Laura Golarsa ITA 145 152 – ▲ 11 1 8 11.1% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,468 102.9 — — — 15.0% -2.40 — +0.3
136 Melanie Schnell AUT 146 152 – ▼ 36 4 12 25.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,475 107.7 — — — 33.3% -1.03 95.3 +0.7
137 Tina Krizan SLO 147 150 – ▼ 26 3 8 27.3% 0 R64 — — R64 1,494 106.5 — — — 29.2% -1.54 — +0.3
138 Rene Simpson CAN 148 149 – ▲ 54 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,519 111.2 — — — 33.3% -1.25 — +0.1
139 Haruka Inoue JPN 149 149 – ▲ 229 3 5 37.5% 0 — — — — 1,478 102.7 — — — 37.5% -0.44 — +1.2
140 Lenka Nemeckova CZE 150 147 – ▼ 10 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,472 97.8 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.0
141 Kerry-Anne Guse AUS 151 147 – ▲ 50 1 5 16.7% 0 R128 — R64 — 1,449 103.7 — — — 23.1% -2.08 — -0.1
142 Claudia Porwik GER 153 144 – ▼ 23 4 5 44.4% 0 — R128 R64 — 1,563 110.4 — — — 55.0% +0.25 — +0.7
143 Marion Maruska AUT 154 143 – ▲ 20 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,431 100.0 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — +0.1
144 Jane Chi USA 155 142 – ▲ 152 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,496 97.2 — — — 40.0% -1.60 — +0.4
145 Kristina Brandi PUR 156 140 – ▲ 28 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,508 106.4 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.2
146 Meilen Tu USA 157 139 – ▼ 3 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,518 108.5 — — — 36.4% -0.64 — +0.2
147 Tatiana Panova RUS 159 136 – ▲ 14 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 103.8 — — — 50.0% -0.40 — +0.5
148 Christina Papadaki GRE 161 134 – ▲ 47 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,472 115.1 — — — 42.9% -1.00 — -0.1
149 Magui Serna ESP 164 132 – ▲ 163 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 103.4 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.1
150 Meghann Shaughnessy USA 165 131 – ▲ 155 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — R128 1,511 107.9 — — — 47.1% 0.00 — +0.7
151 Amelie Cocheteux FRA 166 128 – ▲ 52 0 2 0.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,468 94.6 — — — 0.0% -3.25 — +0.2
152 Sonya Jeyaseelan CAN 167 128 – ▲ 10 2 7 22.2% 0 R128 — — — 1,441 95.2 — — — 26.3% -1.89 — +0.7
153 Adriana Serra Zanetti ITA 168 126 – ▼ 97 3 15 16.7% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,530 118.4 — — — 18.4% -2.03 — -1.7
154 Olga Barabanschikova BLR 169 125 – ▲ 111 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 108.8 — — — 20.0% -1.40 — -0.1
155 Kristine Kunce AUS 170 123 – ▲ 37 3 3 50.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,576 107.4 — — — 42.9% +0.07 — -0.1
156 Caroline Dhenin FRA 171 122 – ▲ 46 1 2 33.3% 0 — R128 — — 1,494 108.4 — — — 28.6% -1.86 — -0.3
157 Sandra Kloesel GER 172 122 – ▲ 143 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 100.9 — — — 20.0% -2.40 — -0.1
158 Maureen Drake CAN 173 122 – ▼ 14 1 5 16.7% 0 — — R128 — 1,432 102.9 — — — 21.4% -1.71 — +0.0
159 Janet Lee TPE 175 120 – ▼ 11 0 2 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,513 120.7 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.5
160 Petra Schwarz AUT 176 119 – ▼ 62 1 6 14.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,539 112.9 — — — 23.5% -1.88 — -0.4
161 Natalia Baudone ITA 177 118 – ▼ 78 3 7 30.0% 0 R128 R128 R64 R64 1,625 108.7 — — — 30.4% -1.70 — +0.0
162 Amélie Mauresmo FRA 180 110 – ▲ 80 2 2 50.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,522 102.5 — — — 50.0% -0.20 — +0.0
163 Andrea Temesvari HUN 181 109 – ▼ 74 4 6 40.0% 0 R128 R64 — — 1,532 128.1 — — — 45.5% -0.36 — -0.4
164 Marketa Kochta GER 182 109 – ▼ 25 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 105.2 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.0
165 Rita Kuti-Kis HUN 183 107 – ▲ 580 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,527 104.4 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.3
166 Rachel Mcquillan AUS 186 104 – ▼ 119 2 10 16.7% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,563 118.6 — — — 25.9% -1.26 96.5 -0.3
167 Pam Shriver USA 189 100 – ▼ 66 4 9 30.8% 0 R128 — R64 R128 1,611 115.9 — — — 39.3% -0.79 — -0.3
168 Olga Lugina UKR 190 98 – ▼ 1 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 100.4 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — -0.1
169 Jing-Qian Yi CHN 191 96 – ▼ 116 3 10 23.1% 0 R128 R64 — R128 1,570 113.9 — — — 25.0% -2.29 — -1.2
170 Nicole Pratt AUS 194 96 – ▲ 11 0 2 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,433 100.4 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.0
171 Lilia Osterloh USA 195 95 – ▲ 141 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,518 110.9 — — — 50.0% +0.50 — -0.1
172 Elena Tatarkova UKR 196 93 – ▼ 11 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,517 100.4 — — — 55.6% -0.44 — +0.6
173 Fang Li CHN 199 91 – ▼ 91 3 5 37.5% 0 R128 — — — 1,591 112.9 — — — 38.1% -0.48 97.6 +0.3
174 Seda Noorlander NED 200 91 – ▼ 30 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,499 110.4 — — — 60.0% +0.60 — +0.1
175 Petra Kamstra NED 203 90 – ▼ 111 4 8 33.3% 0 — R64 R128 — 1,567 112.2 — — — 44.0% -0.48 — +0.4
176 Silke Meier GER 205 89 – ▼ 122 2 10 16.7% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,488 107.5 — — — 21.4% -2.00 — -0.3
177 Barbara Schwartz AUT 209 87 – ▲ 151 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,463 98.6 — — — 14.3% -1.57 — +0.1
178 Marlene Weingartner GER 211 85 – ▲ 37 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,471 99.6 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — 0.0
179 Liezel Huber USA 212 84 – ▲ 134 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 98.6 — — — 33.3% 0.00 — +0.2
180 Hila Rosen ISR 214 83 – ▲ 311 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 104.4 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.3
181 Young-Ja Choi KOR 215 83 – ▲ 90 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,502 109.4 — — — 28.6% -0.43 — +0.2
182 Venus Williams USA 216 83 – ▶ 0 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — — 1,570 134.2 — — — 46.7% +0.47 — -0.3
183 Angelica Gavaldon MEX 219 81 – ▼ 185 3 11 21.4% 0 R128 — R128 R128 1,593 116.6 — — — 25.8% -1.71 96.1 -0.1
184 Ines Heise GER 222 79 – ▲ 148 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 97.4 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.1
185 Claire Taylor GBR 223 78 – ▲ 162 1 2 33.3% 0 — — R64 — 1,499 95.5 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.2
186 Evgenia Kulikovskaya RUS 224 78 – ▲ 125 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,477 98.0 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.2
187 Rachel Viollet GBR 227 76 – ▲ 85 1 1 50.0% 0 — — R64 — 1,498 95.7 — — — 40.0% -1.00 — +0.1
188 Katerina Maleeva BUL 231 73 – ▲ 54 5 7 41.7% 0 — — — — 1,684 133.5 — — — 42.3% +0.15 — -0.4
189 Megan Miller GBR 236 71 – ▲ 51 1 2 33.3% 0 — — R128 — 1,478 102.9 — — — 37.5% -0.75 — +0.2
190 Trudi Musgrave AUS 239 70 – ▲ 55 1 2 33.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,492 101.1 — — — 37.5% -1.00 — +0.3
191 Isabelle Demongeot FRA 242 69 – ▼ 76 1 3 25.0% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,529 101.6 — — — 25.0% -1.88 — +0.1
192 Clare Wood GBR 244 68 – ▼ 64 0 6 0.0% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,493 97.4 — — — 7.7% -2.77 — -0.3
193 Mi-Ra Jeon KOR 246 68 – ▼ 23 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,487 102.5 — — — 37.5% -0.75 — +0.2
194 Stephanie Rottier NED 247 67 – ▼ 160 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,654 105.3 — — — 37.5% -0.62 — +0.0
195 Katalin Miskolczi HUN 251 65 – ▲ 101 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,516 105.8 — — — 50.0% -0.75 — -0.2
196 Patricia Wartusch AUT 257 63 – ▲ 161 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 94.4 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
197 Laura Garrone ITA 258 63 – ▼ 70 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,467 98.9 — — — 33.3% -0.56 — +0.5
198 Tzu-Ting Weng TPE 259 63 – ▲ 140 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,468 94.0 — — — 50.0% -1.50 — +0.3
199 Tara Snyder USA 262 59 – ▼ 47 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,474 102.3 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — -0.0
200 Adriana Barna GER 264 59 – ▲ 22 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 102.0 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — -0.1
201 Beate Reinstadler AUT 265 59 – ▼ 196 0 9 0.0% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,490 108.5 — — — 10.0% -2.35 — -0.2
202 Katarzyna Straczy POL 272 57 – ▲ 371 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,518 111.6 — — — 60.0% 0.00 — -0.3
203 Zina Garrison USA 273 57 – ▼ 251 1 10 9.1% 0 — — — R128 1,711 111.8 — — — 20.8% -1.50 — +0.2
204 Radka Pelikanova CZE 286 52 – ▼ 51 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 93.6 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.0
205 Katerina Kroupova CZE 291 50 – ▼ 139 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,503 104.6 — — — 20.0% -1.80 — -0.1
206 Saori Obata JPN 300 45 – ▲ 320 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 96.7 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — +0.3
207 Karen Cross GBR 305 43 – ▼ 78 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,451 95.9 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.0
208 Caroline Vis NED 322 40 – ▼ 123 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,431 110.6 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.2
209 Kristin Godridge HKG 335 38 – ▼ 242 1 5 16.7% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,545 105.5 — — — 26.7% -1.93 — -0.2
210 Giulia Casoni ITA 358 34 – ▲ 50 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 101.9 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.2
211 Alexandra Stevenson USA 371 32 – ▼ 23 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 104.1 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.1
212 Jeri Ingram USA 378 30 – ▲ 103 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,465 99.9 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.1
213 Shaun Stafford USA 388 29 – ▼ 297 1 6 14.3% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,586 108.0 — — — 18.8% -2.44 — -0.6
214 Benjamas Sangaram THA 395 28 – ▼ 45 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,453 97.3 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.1
215 Gail Biggs AUS 429 24 – ▼ 129 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,489 95.9 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
216 Kirrily Sharpe AUS 457 20 – ▼ 263 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,510 97.3 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
217 Antonella Serra Zanetti ITA 466 20 – ▲ 412 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 100.5 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.2
218 Natalia Egorova RUS 469 19 – ▼ 41 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,537 94.9 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
219 Selima Sfar TUN 502 17 – ▼ 163 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 107.3 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
220 Nadin Ercegovic CRO 658 8 – ▼ 434 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 97.8 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.1
221 Min Tang HKG 676 8 – ▼ 543 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,505 105.7 — — — 25.0% -1.00 — -0.1
222 Wynne Prakusya INA 755 5 – ▲ 20 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 98.9 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.1
223 Monique Javer GBR 779 5 – ▼ 150 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,506 94.0 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.0
224 Ginger Helgeson USA 792 5 – ▼ 668 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,721 92.9 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
225 Leila Meskhi GEO 838 4 – ▼ 690 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,746 89.2 — — — 0.0% -4.63 — -0.2
226 Claudine Toleafoa NZL 883 0 – ▼ 345 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,439 99.7 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.0
227 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie ROU — — – — 31 16 66.0% 3 R64 R64 R32 R128 1,845 133.4 — — — 59.3% +0.43 115.9 +0.1
228 Kimberly Po Messerli USA — — – — 20 13 60.6% 0 — — R64 R32 1,806 155.2 — — — 57.5% +0.44 — +0.4
229 Elena Makarova RUS — — – — 12 17 41.4% 0 R128 R32 R128 R128 1,681 130.3 — — — 44.1% -0.34 — -0.3
230 Patricia Hy Boulais CAN — — – — 10 16 38.5% 0 R128 R128 R16 R128 1,687 132.9 — — — 40.0% -0.73 98.0 -1.4
231 Tami Whitlinger Jones USA — — – — 10 13 43.5% 0 R32 R64 R128 R32 1,694 132.0 — — — 42.3% -0.48 103.6 -0.2
232 Anne Miller USA — — – — 9 12 42.9% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,612 136.3 — — — 45.7% -0.47 101.9 -0.7
233 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer USA — — – — 8 18 30.8% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,665 124.9 — — — 31.6% -1.28 — +0.4
234 Alexia Dechaume Balleret FRA — — – — 7 13 35.0% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,576 120.4 — — — 35.7% -1.19 100.2 -0.6
235 Mariaan De Swardt RSA — — – — 7 12 36.8% 0 R128 R128 R128 R64 1,679 137.7 — — — 38.1% -0.81 99.2 -0.8
236 Elena Pampoulova BUL — — – — 4 11 26.7% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,480 109.8 — — — 32.4% -1.18 — -0.5
237 Li Ling Chen CHN — — – — 4 4 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,576 125.1 — — — 50.0% -0.39 — -0.2
238 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel USA — — – — 3 8 27.3% 0 — — R128 R128 1,554 105.6 — — — 35.7% -0.93 94.7 +0.4
239 Denisa Szabova SVK — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 101.7 — — — 36.4% -1.64 — +0.0
240 Maria Jose Gaidano ARG — — – — 2 8 20.0% 0 R128 R128 — R64 1,501 99.1 — — — 28.6% -1.38 — +0.4
241 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik SWE — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 R128 — — — 1,526 113.8 — — — 33.3% -0.60 — +0.7
242 Kristina Triska SWE — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,521 114.7 — — — 50.0% -1.50 — -0.1
243 Li Li CHN — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,505 99.8 — — — 50.0% -1.25 — +0.1
244 Ludmilla Varmuza SMR — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,478 104.4 — — — 45.5% +0.27 — +0.2
245 Maja Zivec Skulj GER — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,468 103.4 — — — 50.0% +0.50 — +0.2
246 Melissa Mazzotta USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 100.3 — — — 50.0% +0.25 — +0.3
247 Siobhan Drake Brockman AUS — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,509 103.4 — — — 40.0% -0.60 — +0.1
248 Virag Csurgo HUN — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,510 110.5 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.1
249 Yuko Hosoki JPN — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 103.9 — — — 50.0% -1.00 — -0.0
250 Agustine Limanto INA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,468 89.4 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
251 Angela Lettiere USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,465 105.7 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — -0.1
252 Anique Snijders NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,462 96.9 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
253 Anna Bielen Zarska POL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 95.0 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
254 Barbara Mulej SLO — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 95.1 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.3
255 Catherine Mothes Jobkel FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,593 102.9 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.2
256 Christina Popescu CAN — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,480 102.8 — — — 20.0% -1.80 — +0.1
257 Cristina Salvi ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 96.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
258 Eny Sulistyowati INA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,467 96.2 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.2
259 Federica Fortuni ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,511 96.4 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.2
260 Gabriella Boschiero ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,479 103.4 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — +0.0
261 Hiroko Mochizuki JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,456 104.6 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — -0.2
262 Jane Taylor AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,459 100.2 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
263 Jill Craybas USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,488 98.3 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.1
264 Jing Jing Chen CHN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 99.6 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.0
265 Joanne Ward GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,472 96.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
266 Joelle Schad — — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 99.0 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.1
267 Julia Lutrova RUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,499 98.8 — — — 33.3% -3.00 — +0.0
268 Kaoru Shibata JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,446 97.8 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.1
269 Katarzyna Teodorowicz Lisowska POL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 99.6 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.1
270 Kazue Takuma JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,473 104.0 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.2
271 Melinda Petkes HUN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 93.4 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
272 Mirela Vladulescu GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 97.5 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.0
273 Niki Ninaus AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 91.1 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.2
274 Noelia Serra Djamdjean ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 97.0 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
275 Noelle Van Lottum FRA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,441 96.3 — — — 20.0% -2.80 — +0.1
276 Paula Hermida Velo ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 99.1 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.1
277 Petra Gaspar HUN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 97.3 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
278 Phorhathai Suksamran THA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 96.6 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
279 Reka Vidats HUN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,467 97.8 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
280 Rosabel Moyen LUX — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 102.9 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.2
281 Silvia Ramon Cortes ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,523 103.1 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.1

How to read these columns

Rank
For the current season, this is the latest ranking. For past seasons, this is the year-end ranking.
Points
Official ranking points from the selected ranking snapshot.
Wk +/−
Ranking change since the previous ranking snapshot.
YTD Δ
Ranking change since the start of the season.
Win %
Wins divided by total completed main-draw matches.
Elo
For the current season, this is the latest TennisDB Elo rating. For past seasons, this is year-end Elo.
P+
Scoreline performance adjusted for opponent strength on a 0-200 scale. 100 is average; a 10-point difference equals five expected-win percentage points.
Serve+
Estimated percentage points won on serve above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
Return+
Estimated percentage points won on return above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
PD
Return points won divided by opponents' return points won. 1.000 is even; above 1.000 is better.
Set Win %
Sets won divided by total completed sets in eligible scored matches.
Set Margin
Average per-set game margin from the player's perspective. Positive values mean winning sets by more games on average.
Pressure+
Opponent-adjusted deciding-set and tiebreak performance on a 0-200 scale; 100 is the pre-match surface-Elo expectation. Small samples are shrunk, at least three of each are required, and a deciding-set tiebreak counts only once.
Schedule
Expected wins added by opponent quality versus a typical player-season schedule. Positive means an easier schedule; negative means a tougher one. Career values are per 100 matches.

View the full tennis statistics glossary →

WTA Rankings Archive

Browse WTA rankings and season leader archives by year.

2020s
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020
2010s
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
2000s
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
1990s
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
1980s
1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980
1970s
1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970
1960s
1969 1968