Rankings as of: Dec 30, 1991

WTA 1991 Season Leaders & Rankings

Rankings, leaderboards, and performance stats by season.

Monica Seles finished 1991 at WTA No. 1 with 277 points.

Need custom historical filters? Search ranking weeks or search player seasons with the Advanced search tool.

Rankings Leaders

Ranking points, results, and season metrics for 1991.

340 players with >= 1 match

# Player Country Rank Points Wk +/− YTD Δ W L Win % Titles AORGWUSO Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD Set Win % Set Margin Pressure+ Schedule
1 Monica Seles USA 1 277 – ▲ 1 74 6 92.5% 10 W W — W 2,444 183.7 — — — 86.9% +3.17 105.2 -3.2
2 Steffi Graf GER 2 219 – ▼ 1 64 8 88.9% 7 QF SF W SF 2,420 177.1 — — — 86.8% +3.10 92.3 -1.0
3 Gabriela Sabatini ARG 3 200 – ▲ 2 62 11 84.9% 5 QF SF F QF 2,270 177.6 — — — 81.0% +2.46 110.2 -3.7
4 Martina Navratilova USA 4 191 – ▼ 1 53 9 85.5% 5 — — QF F 2,321 172.3 — — — 79.3% +2.24 101.2 -1.9
5 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario ESP 5 153 – ▲ 2 56 15 78.9% 1 SF F QF QF 2,167 175.0 — — — 75.0% +2.29 103.4 -3.5
6 Jennifer Capriati USA 6 142 – ▲ 2 39 11 78.0% 2 — R16 SF SF 2,193 172.3 — — — 73.6% +1.89 103.7 -2.2
7 Jana Novotna CZE 7 108 – ▲ 6 45 15 75.0% 2 F QF R64 R16 2,071 167.7 — — — 70.2% +1.55 100.2 -3.3
8 Mary Joe Fernandez USA 8 100 – ▼ 4 47 18 72.3% 0 SF QF SF R32 2,062 164.9 — — — 69.6% +1.53 97.9 -0.8
9 Conchita Martínez ESP 9 95 – ▲ 2 36 12 75.0% 3 — QF — QF 2,076 163.5 — — — 72.1% +1.48 99.7 -3.7
10 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere SUI 10 87 – ▼ 1 43 14 75.4% 3 R64 R64 — R16 2,027 159.1 — — — 72.7% +1.77 99.7 +1.3
11 Katerina Maleeva BUL 11 74 – ▼ 5 35 16 68.6% 1 QF R32 R16 R32 1,968 154.4 — — — 68.2% +1.44 87.8 +4.5
12 Zina Garrison USA 12 66 – ▼ 2 37 18 67.3% 0 R16 R128 QF R16 1,963 153.9 — — — 63.1% +0.89 98.7 +1.0
13 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 13 64 – ▲ 4 38 20 65.5% 0 — QF R16 R128 1,987 160.0 — — — 61.7% +0.77 102.2 -2.7
14 Anke Huber GER 14 62 – ▲ 23 30 13 69.8% 1 QF R32 R16 R64 1,959 161.7 — — — 67.0% +1.21 104.1 -1.0
15 Leila Meskhi GEO 15 61 – ▲ 4 30 14 68.2% 1 — R16 — R32 1,936 151.3 — — — 62.6% +0.74 105.3 +0.2
16 Judith Wiesner AUT 16 58 – ▲ 2 28 14 66.7% 0 — R128 R16 R16 1,962 155.9 — — — 61.1% +0.73 108.4 -2.1
17 Helena Sukova CZE 17 56 – ▼ 5 34 18 65.4% 1 R32 R64 R128 R32 1,958 153.8 — — — 63.2% +1.02 95.3 +0.7
18 Sabine Appelmans BEL 18 50 – ▲ 5 34 14 70.8% 2 R16 R16 R128 R128 1,873 150.3 — — — 69.9% +1.36 — +1.1
19 Lori Mcneil USA 19 45 – ▲ 31 39 21 65.0% 2 R32 R128 R32 R64 1,870 151.0 — — — 60.4% +0.77 104.2 -0.7
20 Julie Halard-Decugis FRA 20 44 – ▲ 20 44 23 65.7% 1 R64 R64 R64 R64 1,820 141.7 — — — 59.2% +0.73 112.4 +1.1
21 Natasha Zvereva BLR 21 44 – ▼ 7 29 18 61.7% 0 R16 R64 R64 R16 1,912 148.8 — — — 59.2% +0.55 106.2 -0.2
22 Gigi Fernandez USA 22 43 – ▲ 13 30 18 62.5% 1 R128 R64 R32 QF 1,808 133.9 — — — 57.7% +0.35 107.7 +1.4
23 Radomira Zrubakova SVK 23 39 – ▲ 35 33 20 62.3% 1 — R128 R64 R16 1,821 142.1 — — — 57.5% +0.46 107.8 -1.2
24 Laura Arraya PER 24 39 – ▼ 2 28 17 62.2% 0 R64 R64 QF R64 1,823 132.7 — — — 56.9% +0.19 105.5 +3.0
25 Barbara Paulus AUT 25 38 – ▼ 10 17 13 56.7% 0 R64 — — R64 1,846 140.0 — — — 53.8% +0.29 101.6 -1.0
26 Mary Pierce FRA 26 36 – ▲ 84 21 9 70.0% 1 — R32 — R32 1,785 146.7 — — — 66.7% +1.33 108.5 +1.1
27 Sandra Cecchini ITA 27 36 – ▼ 7 22 13 62.9% 1 — R16 R128 R64 1,773 131.6 — — — 61.3% +0.68 100.3 +2.0
28 Amy Frazier USA 28 36 – ▼ 12 25 18 58.1% 0 R16 — R16 R64 1,812 142.7 — — — 57.3% +0.55 96.5 +3.1
29 Helen Kelesi CAN 29 33 – ▼ 4 26 20 56.5% 0 — R32 R128 R64 1,715 141.4 — — — 54.7% +0.47 98.7 +0.8
30 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy NED 30 29 – ▲ 25 24 19 55.8% 1 R128 R128 R16 R64 1,799 143.8 — — — 54.0% +0.18 109.5 -1.7
31 Emanuela Zardo SUI 31 29 – ▲ 32 17 11 60.7% 1 R128 R64 R64 R64 1,714 136.8 — — — 58.1% +0.87 101.3 +0.1
32 Kimiko Date JPN 32 29 – ▲ 85 12 11 52.2% 0 R64 — R128 R64 1,724 132.7 — — — 52.7% +0.15 100.6 +0.7
33 Naoko Sawamatsu JPN 33 27 – ▼ 1 21 16 56.8% 0 R32 R16 R64 R64 1,723 133.2 — — — 55.4% +0.49 — +2.1
34 Andrea Strnadova CZE 34 27 – ▲ 108 23 18 56.1% 0 R32 R128 R32 R64 1,717 141.5 — — — 56.8% +0.26 98.6 +0.4
35 Yayuk Basuki INA 35 27 – ▲ 234 17 11 60.7% 1 — R128 R32 R64 1,673 135.5 — — — 57.1% +0.38 108.2 +0.1
36 Rachel Mcquillan AUS 36 26 – ▲ 8 26 20 56.5% 0 R16 R16 R128 R64 1,744 143.2 — — — 56.1% +0.50 102.3 -1.0
37 Pam Shriver USA 37 25 – ▲ 28 21 18 53.9% 0 R32 — R32 R32 1,823 146.6 — — — 56.0% +0.62 88.5 -2.3
38 Magdalena Maleeva BUL 38 25 – ▲ 38 17 15 53.1% 0 R16 R128 R128 R64 1,717 138.5 — — — 52.7% +0.09 101.2 -0.2
39 Regina Rajchrtova TCH 39 24 – ▲ 15 21 18 53.9% 0 R64 R32 R128 R16 1,736 134.8 — — — 52.3% -0.20 102.1 +0.1
40 Eva Sviglerova CZE 40 24 – ▲ 52 20 17 54.0% 1 R128 R128 R128 R32 1,674 134.2 — — — 51.8% +0.22 102.0 +0.1
41 Linda Wild USA 41 23 – ▲ 21 20 19 51.3% 0 R128 R32 R32 — 1,720 134.6 — — — 50.0% -0.26 107.4 -0.7
42 Debbie Graham USA 42 23 – ▲ 79 14 11 56.0% 0 — R32 R128 R64 1,685 138.0 — — — 56.6% +0.40 98.8 +1.0
43 Barbara Rittner GER 43 23 – ▲ 68 20 17 54.0% 0 R64 R128 R128 R32 1,708 130.4 — — — 52.9% +0.15 106.0 +1.0
44 Nicole Bradtke AUS 45 23 – ▶ 0 21 19 52.5% 0 R32 R64 R64 R128 1,759 142.2 — — — 50.5% +0.33 98.9 -2.1
45 Karine Quentrec FRA 47 23 – ▲ 54 15 13 53.6% 0 R64 R32 R64 — 1,713 124.9 — — — 48.5% -0.42 107.9 -1.6
46 Larisa Savchenko URS 48 22 – ▲ 22 19 16 54.3% 1 R64 R64 R64 R128 1,699 122.6 — — — 53.7% +0.02 99.3 +1.5
47 Manon Bollegraf NED 49 22 – ▼ 18 13 13 50.0% 0 R128 R128 R32 R128 1,717 129.2 — — — 51.8% -0.05 103.1 +0.2
48 Federica Bonsignori ITA 50 22 – ▲ 25 12 13 48.0% 0 — R64 R128 — 1,597 122.9 — — — 46.3% -0.33 95.8 +0.6
49 Carrie Cunningham USA 51 21 – ▲ 21 22 19 53.7% 0 R32 R32 R64 R128 1,678 136.6 — — — 54.4% +0.51 96.2 +0.7
50 Karina Habsudova SVK 54 21 – ▲ 71 14 15 48.3% 0 R16 R128 R64 R64 1,671 136.1 — — — 45.5% -0.32 109.6 -0.3
51 Ines Gorrochategui ARG 55 20 – ▲ 185 7 3 70.0% 0 — — — — 1,573 119.4 — — — 68.2% +0.77 — +1.0
52 Patty Fendick USA 56 20 – ▼ 13 16 18 47.1% 0 R128 R64 R64 R32 1,689 123.1 — — — 47.3% -0.30 98.7 +0.6
53 Ginger Helgeson USA 58 20 – ▲ 187 17 17 50.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,647 138.4 — — — 48.1% -0.22 106.2 -1.0
54 Sabine Hack GER 59 20 – ▼ 7 17 15 53.1% 1 R128 R64 — R128 1,677 129.4 — — — 59.0% +0.72 100.1 +1.3
55 Florencia Labat ARG 60 19 – ▲ 39 19 17 52.8% 0 — R64 — R32 1,671 134.2 — — — 48.8% -0.15 106.9 -0.6
56 Anne Minter AUS 61 19 – ▲ 29 19 21 47.5% 0 R128 R128 R16 R128 1,693 129.3 — — — 49.5% -0.25 95.8 -0.4
57 Jo Durie GBR 62 19 – ▲ 4 15 18 45.5% 0 R64 R128 R64 R16 1,708 132.3 — — — 45.5% -0.12 100.5 +1.0
58 Isabelle Demongeot FRA 63 18 – ▲ 18 13 14 48.1% 1 — R128 R128 — 1,683 123.3 — — — 52.5% -0.12 98.5 +0.5
59 Katia Piccolini ITA 64 18 – ▼ 15 10 10 50.0% 1 — R128 — R128 1,668 121.0 — — — 48.8% -0.26 102.5 +0.2
60 Akiko Kijimuta JPN 66 18 – ▼ 15 13 17 43.3% 0 R128 R64 R64 R128 1,623 124.7 — — — 44.6% -0.49 101.7 -1.0
61 Nicole Jagerman NED 67 18 – ▲ 1 10 11 47.6% 0 — R32 R64 R128 1,690 126.0 — — — 42.2% -0.56 102.7 -1.1
62 Amanda Coetzer RSA 68 17 – ▲ 12 15 19 44.1% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,685 139.7 — — — 44.6% -0.51 99.5 -1.8
63 Silvia Farina Elia ITA 69 17 – ▲ 127 9 9 50.0% 0 — R128 — R128 1,590 119.1 — — — 46.3% -0.46 — +0.6
64 Mercedes Paz ARG 71 17 – ▼ 38 19 23 45.2% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,683 124.3 — — — 45.2% -0.53 102.6 +1.5
65 Maya Kidowaki JPN 73 16 – ▲ 15 13 14 48.1% 0 R64 R32 R64 R128 1,640 120.5 — — — 45.2% -0.79 108.4 +0.1
66 Veronika Martinek GER 74 16 – ▼ 18 13 15 46.4% 0 R64 R64 R128 — 1,607 110.7 — — — 46.7% -0.45 103.2 +1.2
67 Bettina Fulco ARG 76 16 – ▲ 57 12 15 44.4% 0 — R32 R64 R64 1,621 127.2 — — — 47.5% -0.42 99.2 -0.9
68 Petra Schwarz AUT 78 16 – ▲ 67 9 9 50.0% 0 R128 — — R64 1,608 122.3 — — — 48.9% -0.28 105.5 -0.2
69 Claudia Porwik GER 80 15 – ▼ 51 14 20 41.2% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,644 123.9 — — — 42.7% -0.60 100.4 -1.3
70 Marketa Kochta GER 81 15 – ▲ 78 7 9 43.8% 0 R128 — — — 1,573 135.5 — — — 45.9% -0.35 100.3 -0.1
71 Elna Reinach RSA 82 15 – ▲ 14 15 22 40.5% 0 R128 R16 R128 R128 1,705 139.8 — — — 44.4% -0.41 99.3 -3.8
72 Natalia Medvedeva UKR 83 15 – ▼ 26 9 10 47.4% 0 R128 — — — 1,700 125.8 — — — 50.0% +0.14 98.1 +0.0
73 Chanda Rubin USA 84 15 – ▲ 443 8 6 57.1% 0 — — — R64 1,583 123.6 — — — 56.3% +0.37 102.4 +0.8
74 Claudia Kohde Kilsch GER 85 14 – ▼ 38 14 19 42.4% 0 R128 R64 R32 R128 1,681 120.9 — — — 46.8% -0.32 93.8 +0.5
75 Petra Langrova TCH 86 14 – ▼ 2 14 19 42.4% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,597 128.3 — — — 40.3% -0.51 101.3 +0.1
76 Halle Cioffi USA 87 14 – ▲ 26 14 17 45.2% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,649 132.0 — — — 49.3% -0.04 99.9 -1.2
77 Karin Kschwendt AUT 88 13 – ▲ 31 15 18 45.5% 0 R32 — R128 R128 1,569 131.4 — — — 49.3% -0.11 100.2 -0.7
78 Ann Grossman USA 89 13 – ▼ 41 12 19 38.7% 0 R128 R32 R64 R128 1,638 126.7 — — — 44.3% +0.06 91.9 +0.5
79 Rosalyn Fairbank USA 90 13 – ▼ 69 14 19 42.4% 0 R32 — R128 R128 1,637 127.7 — — — 46.1% -0.10 88.8 +1.1
80 Katrina Adams USA 91 13 – ▲ 166 7 7 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,571 124.7 — — — 44.1% -0.76 110.6 +0.4
81 Kristin Godridge HKG 92 13 – ▲ 37 15 17 46.9% 0 R128 R64 R128 R64 1,591 113.6 — — — 47.9% -0.48 100.4 +0.6
82 Laura Garrone ITA 93 13 – ▼ 26 10 14 41.7% 0 — R128 R32 R128 1,622 119.5 — — — 42.6% -0.87 100.5 -0.6
83 Linda Ferrando ITA 94 13 – ▼ 23 9 12 42.9% 0 — R128 R32 R128 1,655 121.2 — — — 42.6% -0.45 — -1.1
84 Audra Keller USA 95 13 – ▲ 3 10 16 38.5% 0 R128 R128 R64 R128 1,641 126.8 — — — 39.3% -0.79 101.2 -0.9
85 Petra Thoren FIN 96 13 – ▲ 86 11 15 42.3% 0 R128 R32 — R128 1,545 125.6 — — — 46.8% -0.16 93.6 +0.5
86 Elena Brioukhovets UKR 97 13 – ▼ 23 13 18 41.9% 0 R128 R32 R32 R64 1,634 126.7 — — — 41.8% -0.46 97.5 -0.7
87 Cristina Tessi ARG 98 12 – ▲ 4 14 19 42.4% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,543 121.3 — — — 41.7% -0.50 100.3 +1.2
88 Donna Faber USA 99 12 – ▼ 13 15 19 44.1% 0 R32 R128 R64 R64 1,593 109.9 — — — 41.3% -0.77 106.2 +1.6
89 Patricia Tarabini ARG 100 12 – ▼ 23 9 14 39.1% 0 R64 — — R128 1,653 128.2 — — — 41.7% -0.42 — -1.5
90 Robin White USA 101 12 – ▼ 32 7 14 33.3% 0 R128 — R64 R128 1,636 120.4 — — — 34.8% -1.02 99.1 +0.5
91 Shaun Stafford USA 102 12 – ▲ 41 10 17 37.0% 0 R32 R32 R128 R64 1,577 121.7 — — — 41.0% -0.70 99.4 -0.6
92 Catherine Tanvier FRA 104 12 – ▼ 13 7 10 41.2% 0 R16 R128 — — 1,603 113.4 — — — 40.5% -0.43 101.2 +0.6
93 Rika Hiraki JPN 105 11 – ▲ 141 8 8 50.0% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,544 126.7 — — — 48.6% 0.00 99.8 +0.9
94 Eugenia Maniokova RUS 107 11 – ▲ 145 6 10 37.5% 0 — — — R128 1,519 120.9 — — — 39.5% -0.50 99.5 +0.6
95 Sandrine Testud FRA 109 11 – ▲ 64 8 10 44.4% 0 — R128 — — 1,549 115.1 — — — 47.6% +0.14 100.2 +0.8
96 Erika De Lone USA 110 11 – ▲ 27 9 14 39.1% 0 R128 R128 R128 R64 1,558 128.6 — — — 40.4% -0.90 97.2 -0.4
97 Monique Javer GBR 112 11 – ▼ 6 10 17 37.0% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,582 133.9 — — — 44.3% -0.36 91.9 -0.2
98 Marion Maruska AUT 113 11 – ▲ 64 6 7 46.1% 0 — — — R128 1,505 103.0 — — — 44.4% -0.85 — +0.7
99 Gretchen Magers USA 114 11 – ▼ 78 10 15 40.0% 0 R64 — R128 R32 1,649 122.9 — — — 44.1% -0.27 90.1 +2.0
100 Catherine Suire FRA 115 11 – ▲ 68 8 10 44.4% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,592 120.8 — — — 46.3% -0.32 102.6 -0.1
101 Liz Smylie AUS 116 10 – ▼ 63 9 16 36.0% 0 R32 R128 R32 R128 1,612 115.0 — — — 37.9% -1.31 103.0 -0.3
102 Isabel Cueto GER 117 10 – ▼ 91 7 11 38.9% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,662 120.0 — — — 45.2% -0.19 91.6 +0.0
103 Mana Endo JPN 118 10 – ▲ 83 4 6 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,523 110.8 — — — 39.1% -0.96 — +0.7
104 Silke Frankl GER 119 10 – ▲ 44 7 11 38.9% 0 — — — R128 1,505 111.4 — — — 39.0% -0.88 — +0.5
105 Sara Gomer GBR 120 10 – ▼ 27 8 13 38.1% 0 R128 R128 R128 R32 1,660 134.5 — — — 40.4% -0.55 97.6 -1.1
106 Nathalie Herreman FRA 121 10 – ▼ 57 12 21 36.4% 0 R128 R128 R64 R32 1,618 118.4 — — — 38.7% -0.83 100.4 -0.1
107 Stephanie Rehe USA 123 10 – ▼ 64 5 12 29.4% 0 — R64 R128 — 1,768 119.9 — — — 37.5% -0.45 88.2 +0.0
108 Wiltrud Probst GER 126 9 – ▼ 88 9 18 33.3% 0 R64 R128 R32 R128 1,581 115.5 — — — 37.1% -0.81 96.0 -0.1
109 Samantha Smith GBR 127 9 – ▼ 5 3 11 21.4% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,496 107.3 — — — 31.3% -1.16 — +0.4
110 Petra Kamstra NED 128 9 – ▲ 71 6 8 42.9% 0 R32 — R128 — 1,531 112.2 — — — 46.2% -0.38 — +0.3
111 Dominique Monami BEL 129 9 – ▲ 86 4 5 44.4% 0 — — — R32 1,528 107.3 — — — 50.0% -0.19 — +0.8
112 Clare Wood GBR 130 9 – ▲ 19 6 13 31.6% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,496 107.6 — — — 34.1% -1.14 102.2 +0.4
113 Sandra Wasserman BEL 131 9 – ▼ 26 6 10 37.5% 0 R128 — — — 1,583 107.2 — — — 36.1% -1.03 101.4 +0.4
114 Rene Simpson CAN 132 9 – ▲ 47 5 9 35.7% 0 — — — R128 1,566 120.5 — — — 39.4% -0.70 — -0.3
115 Meike Babel GER 134 8 – ▲ 377 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 116.6 — — — 20.0% -2.20 — -0.1
116 Silke Meier GER 138 8 – ▼ 10 4 9 30.8% 0 R128 — — — 1,510 102.1 — — — 31.3% -1.13 — +0.6
117 Nadin Ercegovic CRO 140 8 – ▲ 193 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,520 112.0 — — — 44.4% +0.33 — +0.1
118 Heather Ludloff USA 141 8 – ▲ 70 3 5 37.5% 0 — — — — 1,502 120.4 — — — 35.0% -1.40 105.9 -0.4
119 Ann Henricksson USA 142 8 – ▼ 30 8 13 38.1% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,596 121.1 — — — 39.6% -0.50 98.7 +0.2
120 Nana Smith JPN 144 8 – ▼ 36 7 13 35.0% 0 R64 R128 R128 — 1,528 118.1 — — — 37.0% -0.87 — +0.6
121 Radka Bobkova CZE 145 8 – ▲ 84 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 107.7 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — -0.1
122 Miriam Oremans NED 149 7 – ▲ 36 3 9 25.0% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,472 101.8 — — — 29.6% -1.00 — +0.7
123 Katarzyna Nowak POL 150 7 – ▲ 14 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — R128 1,457 97.3 — — — 16.7% -2.83 — -0.1
124 Jessica Emmons USA 152 7 – ▲ 315 2 6 25.0% 0 — — — R128 1,497 108.8 — — — 30.0% -1.40 — -0.2
125 Stephanie Rottier NED 154 7 – ▲ 2 3 7 30.0% 0 R128 R128 — R128 1,504 106.4 — — — 36.8% -0.68 — +0.7
126 Csilla Cserepy SUI 155 7 – ▼ 61 5 10 33.3% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,487 96.8 — — — 36.4% -1.42 99.5 +1.7
127 Beverly Bowes USA 156 7 – ▼ 9 2 5 28.6% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,520 98.6 — — — 35.3% -1.35 — +0.3
128 Amanda Grunfeld GBR 158 7 – ▲ 167 1 3 25.0% 0 — — R64 — 1,445 110.1 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.1
129 Andrea Temesvari HUN 159 7 – ▼ 43 6 14 30.0% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,542 110.6 — — — 36.4% -1.34 92.0 +0.3
130 Nanne Dahlman FIN 161 6 – ▶ 0 4 6 40.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,522 105.1 — — — 34.8% -1.26 — +0.2
131 Tammy Whittington USA 162 6 – ▲ 139 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 96.5 — — — 44.4% -1.22 — +0.5
132 Meredith Mcgrath USA 164 6 – ▼ 136 4 6 40.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,679 124.7 — — — 44.0% -0.44 — +0.4
133 Cammy Macgregor USA 166 6 – ▼ 48 4 7 36.4% 0 R128 — — — 1,520 113.3 — — — 41.4% -0.34 100.9 +0.6
134 Els Callens BEL 168 6 – ▲ 182 1 1 50.0% 0 — — R64 — 1,509 97.7 — — — 40.0% -1.00 — +0.2
135 Kristine Kunce AUS 172 6 – ▲ 112 1 2 33.3% 0 — — R128 — 1,505 96.5 — — — 0.0% -3.75 — +0.1
136 Natalia Baudone ITA 179 6 – ▲ 46 0 4 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,464 96.6 — — — 20.0% -2.20 — -0.0
137 Andrea Leand USA 180 5 – ▼ 39 4 9 30.8% 0 R64 — R128 — 1,504 113.3 — — — 34.6% -1.46 — +0.5
138 Cathy Caverzasio SUI 181 5 – ▼ 140 4 12 25.0% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,601 115.1 — — — 31.6% -1.61 — -1.4
139 Rennae Stubbs AUS 182 5 – ▲ 35 1 5 16.7% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,459 103.1 — — — 23.1% -2.46 — -0.1
140 Kaoru Okamoto JPN 183 5 – ▼ 16 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,534 117.3 — — — 50.0% +0.38 — -0.2
141 Sarah Loosemore GBR 184 5 – ▼ 97 3 12 20.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,461 90.2 — — — 21.2% -1.91 — +1.7
142 Cecilia Dahlman SWE 189 5 – ▼ 106 6 18 25.0% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,490 103.6 — — — 26.5% -1.57 99.0 +1.0
143 Caroline Kuhlman USA 190 5 – ▲ 100 2 7 22.2% 0 — — — — 1,563 98.9 — — — 25.0% -1.40 — +0.1
144 Beate Reinstadler AUT 192 5 – ▼ 89 3 9 25.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,473 106.1 — — — 33.3% -1.56 99.0 +0.3
145 Louise Field AUS 193 5 – ▼ 67 3 14 17.6% 0 R128 — — — 1,435 97.6 — — — 21.6% -1.87 94.3 +0.8
146 Virginia Ruano Pascual ESP 194 5 – ▲ 111 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,500 99.8 — — — 44.4% -1.00 — +0.2
147 Alexandra Fusai FRA 195 5 – ▲ 79 0 2 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,464 99.1 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — +0.2
148 Maureen Drake CAN 198 5 – ▲ 11 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,451 96.1 — — — 30.0% -1.80 — +0.3
149 Christina Singer GER 199 5 – ▲ 286 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,434 95.3 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
150 Nicole Pratt AUS 201 5 – ▼ 14 1 7 12.5% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,469 104.6 — — — 17.6% -2.71 — -0.5
151 Eva Pfaff GER 203 5 – ▼ 50 1 10 9.1% 0 R64 — — R128 1,469 118.5 — — — 16.0% -2.28 97.6 -0.3
152 Sandra Dopfer AUT 210 5 – ▼ 78 3 8 27.3% 0 — R128 — — 1,515 101.5 — — — 22.7% -2.18 — -0.3
153 Irina Spirlea ROU 212 4 – ▲ 104 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 99.6 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — +0.1
154 Laura Golarsa ITA 213 4 – ▼ 152 3 13 18.8% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,546 105.1 — — — 27.8% -1.47 — +0.0
155 Jennifer Santrock USA 215 4 – ▼ 65 2 4 33.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,464 118.0 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.2
156 Jolene Watanabe USA 217 4 – ▲ 31 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,505 108.5 — — — 45.5% +0.09 — +0.6
157 Nicole Arendt USA 218 4 – ▲ 180 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — R128 1,523 110.9 — — — 42.9% -1.57 — -0.0
158 Ei Iida JPN 220 4 – ▲ 66 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,451 102.6 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.0
159 Claudine Toleafoa NZL 224 4 – ▼ 97 3 11 21.4% 0 R64 — R128 — 1,469 94.3 — — — 28.1% -2.16 — +0.5
160 Camille Benjamin USA 225 4 – ▼ 90 2 8 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,559 107.1 — — — 28.6% -1.90 — -0.2
161 Christina Papadaki GRE 228 4 – ▲ 321 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,502 106.8 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — -0.2
162 Jana Pospisilova CZE 230 4 – ▼ 65 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,515 96.2 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.3
163 Kristie Boogert NED 231 4 – ▲ 110 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 105.5 — — — 11.1% -1.89 — -0.2
164 Tatiana Ignatieva BLR 233 4 – ▲ 359 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 105.4 — — — 33.3% -1.78 — -0.1
165 Angelica Gavaldon MEX 242 3 – ▼ 196 1 6 14.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,556 107.9 — — — 23.5% -1.59 — -0.3
166 Sophie Amiach FRA 243 3 – ▼ 16 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,517 104.5 — — — 33.3% -0.50 — +0.4
167 Julie Shiflet USA 244 3 – ▲ 104 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 100.1 — — — 40.0% -1.10 — +0.4
168 Jill Hetherington CAN 245 3 – ▲ 4 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,475 101.6 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — -0.1
169 Nathalie Housset FRA 246 3 – ▼ 34 1 7 12.5% 0 — R128 — — 1,464 99.3 — — — 11.8% -2.94 — -0.6
170 Maider Laval FRA 248 3 – ▼ 109 2 7 22.2% 0 — R128 — — 1,473 96.1 — — — 30.0% -1.85 — +0.4
171 Stacey Schefflin USA 252 3 – ▼ 36 2 3 40.0% 0 R32 — — — 1,501 101.3 — — — 40.0% -0.90 — +0.7
172 Andrea Farley USA 253 3 – ▼ 40 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 111.8 — — — 60.0% +1.40 — +0.1
173 Lisa Raymond USA 257 3 – ▲ 80 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,510 107.5 — — — 57.1% +0.29 — +0.3
174 Maria Ekstrand SWE 262 3 – ▼ 65 1 2 33.3% 0 R64 — — — 1,472 110.7 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — +0.1
175 Pascale Etchemendy FRA 263 3 – ▼ 103 1 6 14.3% 0 — R128 — — 1,473 100.5 — — — 18.8% -1.75 — -0.2
176 Anna Smashnova ISR 264 3 – ▲ 318 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 99.4 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
177 Rossana De Los Ríos PAR 268 3 – ▲ 228 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 100.1 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.0
178 Kirrily Sharpe AUS 273 3 – ▼ 121 2 3 40.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,533 108.6 — — — 60.0% +0.40 — +0.2
179 Yone Kamio JPN 276 3 – ▼ 6 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 103.6 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — -0.1
180 Lubomira Bacheva BUL 289 2 – ▲ 207 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 101.3 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — -0.1
181 Elly Hakami USA 291 2 – ▼ 48 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,542 95.6 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
182 Elise Burgin USA 299 2 – ▼ 148 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — R128 1,527 99.7 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.2
183 Pilar Vasquez PER 306 2 – ▼ 152 1 10 9.1% 0 R128 — — — 1,408 98.9 — — — 16.0% -2.28 — +0.1
184 Sandra Cacic USA 310 2 – ▲ 274 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 95.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
185 Patty Oreilly USA 320 2 – ▲ 168 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,511 102.7 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — -0.2
186 Laura Lapi ITA 329 2 – ▼ 222 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,580 95.4 — — — 20.0% -2.30 — +0.4
187 Betsy Nagelsen USA 337 1 – ▼ 240 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,607 97.2 — — — 20.0% -2.40 — -0.0
188 Lindsay Davenport USA 348 2 – ▼ 14 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — R128 1,504 103.8 — — — 28.6% -1.71 — -0.0
189 Adriana Serra Zanetti ITA 349 1 – ▲ 178 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,499 102.1 — — — 50.0% +0.75 — +0.3
190 Rita Grande ITA 370 1 – ▲ 57 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,471 91.5 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
191 Sandra Birch USA 403 1 – ▲ 106 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,530 100.6 — — — 0.0% -4.75 — -0.2
192 Catherine Barclay AUS 404 1 – ▼ 116 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,487 94.0 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.1
193 Caroline Vis NED 428 1 – ▼ 225 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 98.3 — — — 0.0% -2.25 — +0.1
194 Masako Yanagi JPN 479 0 – ▼ 60 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,477 102.4 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
195 Kim Steinmetz USA 496 0 – ▼ 26 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,460 93.0 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
196 Julie Richardson NZL 556 0 – ▼ 420 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,504 101.0 — — — 0.0% -3.33 — -0.2
197 Kate Mcdonald AUS 589 0 – ▼ 365 0 2 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,486 103.5 — — — 0.0% -2.75 — -0.1
198 Joanne Moore GBR 668 0 – ▼ 20 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 98.9 — — — 0.0% -6.00 — -0.1
199 Catarina Lindqvist Ryan SWE — — – — 25 22 53.2% 1 R64 — R16 R64 1,715 132.5 — — — 53.5% +0.22 97.5 +3.9
200 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer USA — — – — 21 19 52.5% 0 — R128 R32 R128 1,739 132.5 — — — 48.9% -0.13 103.3 +1.0
201 Patricia Hy Boulais CAN — — – — 18 17 51.4% 0 R64 R64 R32 R32 1,704 141.1 — — — 50.0% +0.11 104.8 -0.5
202 Tami Whitlinger Jones USA — — – — 17 18 48.6% 0 R64 R16 R64 R128 1,682 133.2 — — — 49.4% -0.26 106.6 -0.1
203 Alexia Dechaume Balleret FRA — — – — 14 18 43.8% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,645 125.3 — — — 49.3% +0.04 — -0.5
204 Pascale Paradis Mangon FRA — — – — 13 14 48.1% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,629 128.1 — — — 50.8% +0.27 — +0.7
205 Mareen Louie Harper USA — — – — 12 16 42.9% 0 — — R64 R64 1,614 127.2 — — — 39.4% -0.53 105.2 +0.5
206 Raffaella Reggi Concato ITA — — – — 11 11 50.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,707 117.7 — — — 49.0% -0.35 101.6 +1.5
207 Susan Sloane Lundy USA — — – — 11 15 42.3% 0 — — R128 R128 1,652 118.9 — — — 46.3% -0.46 — +0.6
208 Mariaan De Swardt RSA — — – — 10 8 55.6% 0 — R64 R64 R64 1,649 132.5 — — — 52.5% +0.23 104.6 -0.5
209 Anne Smith USA — — – — 8 5 61.5% 0 R64 — — R64 1,821 132.5 — — — 60.7% +0.46 — +0.3
210 Noelle Van Lottum FRA — — – — 8 15 34.8% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,531 111.1 — — — 38.8% -0.80 — +0.3
211 Stacey Martin USA — — – — 8 15 34.8% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,552 114.5 — — — 38.3% -0.83 95.7 +0.5
212 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel USA — — – — 7 15 31.8% 0 R128 R64 R128 R64 1,589 119.7 — — — 36.7% -0.67 93.8 +0.9
213 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik SWE — — – — 6 12 33.3% 0 R128 R128 R32 R128 1,553 113.6 — — — 35.7% -0.98 99.8 -0.1
214 Tamaka Takagi JPN — — – — 6 10 37.5% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,518 111.9 — — — 39.0% -0.07 99.1 +0.9
215 Elena Pampoulova BUL — — – — 5 10 33.3% 0 — R128 R64 — 1,551 101.4 — — — 34.3% -1.17 95.7 +1.1
216 Kimberly Po Messerli USA — — – — 5 4 55.6% 0 — — — R32 1,568 120.4 — — — 56.5% -0.26 — -0.0
217 Lisa Bonder Kreiss USA — — – — 5 5 50.0% 0 — — R128 R128 1,637 118.4 — — — 50.0% -0.10 — +0.1
218 Mary Lou Piatek USA — — – — 5 8 38.5% 0 — — — — 1,629 119.4 — — — 41.4% -0.31 — -0.7
219 Catherine Mothes Jobkel FRA — — – — 4 9 30.8% 0 — R128 — R64 1,513 101.8 — — — 30.0% -1.80 — -0.0
220 Denisa Szabova SVK — — – — 4 6 40.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,516 113.6 — — — 47.8% -0.30 — +0.1
221 Luanne Spadea USA — — – — 4 3 57.1% 0 — — — — 1,498 103.5 — — — 50.0% -0.69 — +0.8
222 Nathalie Guerree Spitzer FRA — — – — 4 6 40.0% 0 R128 R64 — — 1,565 103.1 — — — 47.4% -0.47 — +0.2
223 Renata Baranski POL — — – — 4 15 21.1% 0 R128 R64 — R128 1,430 91.6 — — — 24.4% -1.90 93.1 +1.5
224 Sybille Niox Chateau FRA — — – — 4 5 44.4% 0 — R64 — R128 1,487 107.4 — — — 44.4% -0.50 — +0.3
225 Angelika Kanellopoulou GRE — — – — 3 5 37.5% 0 — R128 — — 1,549 109.2 — — — 38.9% -0.28 — +0.1
226 Anna Foldenyi Dicker HUN — — – — 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,515 106.6 — — — 50.0% -0.33 — +0.5
227 Belinda Cordwell NZL — — – — 3 7 30.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,575 105.0 — — — 39.1% -0.61 — +0.7
228 Katja Oeljeklaus GER — — – — 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — — 1,497 108.2 — — — 42.1% -0.42 — +0.6
229 Michelle Jaggard Lai AUS — — – — 3 6 33.3% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,524 117.5 — — — 36.8% -1.00 — -0.6
230 Misumi Miyauchi JPN — — – — 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — — 1,498 107.6 — — — 47.1% -0.47 — +0.6
231 Alysia May USA — — – — 2 7 22.2% 0 — — — — 1,471 118.6 — — — 29.4% -1.35 — -0.4
232 Angela Kerek GER — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,484 98.5 — — — 33.3% -1.08 — +0.5
233 Christelle Fauche SUI — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,527 110.4 — — — 44.4% -0.44 — -0.1
234 Francesca Romano ITA — — – — 2 11 15.4% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,483 103.0 — — — 20.0% -2.20 — -0.1
235 Ilana Berger ISR — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,518 108.1 — — — 44.4% -0.78 — +0.4
236 Jo Anne Faull AUS — — – — 2 7 22.2% 0 R128 — R64 — 1,485 99.4 — — — 28.6% -1.95 99.3 +0.8
237 Louise Allen USA — — – — 2 8 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,453 100.2 — — — 31.8% -1.54 — +0.8
238 Amy Jonsson NOR — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,479 103.0 — — — 37.5% -0.25 — +0.2
239 Andrea Vieira BRA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,496 98.3 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.1
240 Barbara Mulej SLO — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,501 101.8 — — — 42.9% -0.71 — 0.0
241 Celine Cohen SUI — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,478 93.3 — — — 18.2% -2.18 — -0.1
242 Claudia Chabalgoity BRA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,472 102.8 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — -0.1
243 Estefania Bottini ESP — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,504 102.5 — — — 50.0% -0.75 — -0.3
244 Lorenza Jachia ITA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 108.7 — — — 36.4% -0.73 — -0.2
245 Luciana Corsato Owsianka BRA — — – — 1 9 10.0% 0 — — — — 1,424 94.6 — — — 24.0% -2.20 — +0.3
246 Luciana Tella BRA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,512 95.3 — — — 40.0% -1.60 — +0.2
247 Neus Avila Bonastre ESP — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,480 104.3 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — +0.1
248 Pam Nelson USA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,502 107.5 — — — 25.0% -2.00 — -0.1
249 Rachel Ann Jensen USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,509 105.7 — — — 40.0% +0.40 — +0.0
250 Sabine Gerke GER — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,505 103.8 — — — 40.0% 0.00 — +0.1
251 Sabine Krein Auer GER — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,453 104.4 — — — 36.4% -1.18 — -0.3
252 Sandy Collins USA — — – — 1 5 16.7% 0 R128 — — — 1,405 104.6 — — — 21.4% -2.00 — +0.2
253 Shannan Mccarthy USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,514 106.5 — — — 28.6% -1.72 — -0.3
254 Stephanie Martin AUS — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,497 104.1 — — — 42.9% 0.00 — +0.2
255 Terri Oreilly USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,509 106.6 — — — 50.0% +0.75 — +0.1
256 Tine Scheuer Larsen DEN — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,571 101.3 — — — 100.0% +3.50 — +0.2
257 Agnese Gustmane LAT — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,472 96.4 — — — 20.0% -3.00 — -0.0
258 Agnes Zugasti FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 109.4 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — -0.3
259 Akemi Nishiya JPN — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,419 96.0 — — — 14.3% -2.14 — +0.2
260 Akiko Gooden USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,453 93.1 — — — 20.0% -2.40 — +0.2
261 Alice Nohacova TCH — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 106.8 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — -0.2
262 Amy Schwartz USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,448 96.1 — — — 20.0% -1.60 — +0.3
263 Ana Maria Segura Perez ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,500 101.0 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — -0.2
264 Andrea Muller GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 100.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.2
265 Anouschka Popp GER — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,479 102.9 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.0
266 Aranzazu Gallardo MEX — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 95.9 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
267 Barbara Griffiths GBR — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,483 106.9 — — — 0.0% -3.25 — -0.1
268 Barbara Navarro ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 98.9 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.1
269 Barbara Romano ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 94.1 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.2
270 Barbara Schett AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 101.2 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.1
271 Belinda Borneo GBR — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,393 101.3 — — — 20.0% -1.60 — +0.2
272 Carin Bakkum NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,427 98.6 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.0
273 Cathrine Instebo NOR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 — — — — — — — +0.2
274 Cristina Moros USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 100.6 — — — 33.3% -2.33 — 0.0
275 Cristina Salvi ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 105.3 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.2
276 Danielle Jones AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,497 100.3 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
277 Diedre Herman USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 100.1 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.0
278 Dorien Wamelink NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 102.1 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — -0.1
279 Eleni Rossides USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,466 96.2 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.0
280 Emiko Okagawa JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,458 97.1 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.2
281 Emilie Viqueira PUR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 94.3 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.0
282 Eugenia Birioukova AZE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,635 91.5 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
283 Federica Fortuni ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 97.9 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
284 Gabriela Mosca ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,433 98.1 — — — 33.3% -2.67 — +0.1
285 Heidi Sprung AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,438 104.8 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — -0.2
286 Hellas Ter Riet NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,427 99.1 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — -0.1
287 Hiromi Nagano JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 99.3 — — — 33.3% -2.33 — +0.2
288 Hu Na USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,541 98.5 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.2
289 Immaculada Varas Caro ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,464 95.1 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
290 Ingelise Driehuis NED — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,464 98.0 — — — 14.3% -2.00 — +0.0
291 Jane Taylor AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 93.1 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.2
292 Julie Exum USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 103.0 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.0
293 Julie Salmon GBR — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,350 100.6 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
294 Katharina Duell GER — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,399 93.5 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0.0
295 Kaye Marfini Hand GBR — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,495 93.8 — — — 20.0% -2.40 — +0.2
296 Keri Phebus USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 104.2 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — -0.1
297 Kristi Bastian USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 92.6 — — — 0.0% -6.00 — -0.2
298 Leona Laskova CZE — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,474 99.7 — — — 0.0% -2.88 — +0.4
299 Lisa Green USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 98.2 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.0
300 Louise Stacey AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,473 99.8 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.0
301 Lupita Novelo MEX — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 102.0 — — — 33.3% -2.67 — -0.1
302 Maite Martinez Perez ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 95.7 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.0
303 Maja Zivec Skulj GER — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,448 96.2 — — — 14.3% -2.43 — +0.3
304 Maria Lindstrom SWE — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,427 100.1 — — — 11.1% -2.78 — +0.0
305 Mariana Perez Roldan ARG — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,659 90.7 — — — 0.0% -3.67 — +0.1
306 Melanie Bernard CAN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 104.4 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — -0.1
307 Michele Wreem USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 96.2 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
308 Michelle Jackson Nobrega USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 100.7 — — — 0.0% -2.75 — -0.2
309 Miki Mizokuchi JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 99.0 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.0
310 Natalie Tschan SUI — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 100.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.0
311 Olivia Fery HKG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,474 98.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.0
312 Orawan Thampensri THA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 97.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
313 Pilar Perez ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 94.6 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.0
314 Rosie Casals USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,475 94.5 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.2
315 Sabine Lohmann GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 97.7 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
316 Sabrina Giusto BRA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 96.8 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.1
317 Sabrina Lucchi ITA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,463 99.4 — — — 25.0% -1.00 — +0.1
318 Sandra Reichel AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,467 94.7 — — — 33.3% -3.00 — +0.2
319 Sarah Bentley GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,487 100.5 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — +0.0
320 Shawna Martin USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,490 98.9 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.0
321 Silvia La Fratta ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 103.4 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.0
322 Silvia Ramon Cortes ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 101.8 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — -0.1
323 Sonya Jeyaseelan CAN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 100.9 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.0
324 Stephanie Reece USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 99.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.0
325 Suzanna Anggarkusuma INA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,457 93.5 — — — 20.0% -3.40 — +0.2
326 Suzanne Italiano CAN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 97.1 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
327 Svetlana Komleva MDA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 97.4 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.2
328 Tanja Hauschildt GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 96.6 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
329 Teri Whitlinger Jones USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 95.8 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
330 Tracey Morton Rodgers AUS — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,386 92.7 — — — 20.0% -2.00 — +0.4
331 Ulrike Priller AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,473 92.3 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
332 Valda Lake GBR — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,438 93.4 — — — 20.0% -2.80 — +0.3
333 Valerie Batut FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,506 102.8 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
334 Vanessa Menga BRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 95.6 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
335 Viktoria Milvidskaia RUS — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,455 93.1 — — — 0.0% -3.75 — -0.2
336 Virginia Humphreys Davies GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,493 100.4 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — -0.1
337 Virginie Paquet FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,477 93.9 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.1
338 Yael Segal ISR — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,478 102.3 — — — 0.0% -3.75 — -0.3
339 Yukie Koizumi JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,434 102.4 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
340 Zdenka Malkova CZE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 104.1 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.1

How to read these columns

Rank
For the current season, this is the latest ranking. For past seasons, this is the year-end ranking.
Points
Official ranking points from the selected ranking snapshot.
Wk +/−
Ranking change since the previous ranking snapshot.
YTD Δ
Ranking change since the start of the season.
Win %
Wins divided by total completed main-draw matches.
Elo
For the current season, this is the latest TennisDB Elo rating. For past seasons, this is year-end Elo.
P+
Scoreline performance adjusted for opponent strength on a 0-200 scale. 100 is average; a 10-point difference equals five expected-win percentage points.
Serve+
Estimated percentage points won on serve above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
Return+
Estimated percentage points won on return above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
PD
Return points won divided by opponents' return points won. 1.000 is even; above 1.000 is better.
Set Win %
Sets won divided by total completed sets in eligible scored matches.
Set Margin
Average per-set game margin from the player's perspective. Positive values mean winning sets by more games on average.
Pressure+
Opponent-adjusted deciding-set and tiebreak performance on a 0-200 scale; 100 is the pre-match surface-Elo expectation. Small samples are shrunk, at least three of each are required, and a deciding-set tiebreak counts only once.
Schedule
Expected wins added by opponent quality versus a typical player-season schedule. Positive means an easier schedule; negative means a tougher one. Career values are per 100 matches.

View the full tennis statistics glossary →

WTA Rankings Archive

Browse WTA rankings and season leader archives by year.

2020s
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020
2010s
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
2000s
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
1990s
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
1980s
1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980
1970s
1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970
1960s
1969 1968