Rankings as of: Dec 31, 1990

WTA 1990 Season Leaders & Rankings

Rankings, leaderboards, and performance stats by season.

Steffi Graf finished 1990 at WTA No. 1 with 278 points.

Need custom historical filters? Search ranking weeks or search player seasons with the Advanced search tool.

Rankings Leaders

Ranking points, results, and season metrics for 1990.

323 players with >= 1 match

# Player Country Rank Points Wk +/− YTD Δ W L Win % Titles AORGWUSO Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD Set Win % Set Margin Pressure+ Schedule
1 Steffi Graf GER 1 278 – ▶ 0 72 5 93.5% 10 W F SF F 2,512 178.9 — — — 89.0% +3.13 98.6 -0.4
2 Monica Seles USA 2 203 – ▲ 4 55 6 90.2% 9 — W QF R32 2,296 179.4 — — — 84.8% +2.78 110.0 -3.9
3 Martina Navratilova USA 3 199 – ▼ 1 52 7 88.1% 6 — — W R16 2,322 174.5 — — — 84.5% +2.88 94.9 -0.3
4 Mary Joe Fernandez USA 4 147 – ▲ 8 40 10 80.0% 2 F QF — SF 2,125 168.3 — — — 79.2% +2.17 107.8 +0.7
5 Gabriela Sabatini ARG 5 137 – ▼ 2 49 14 77.8% 2 R32 R16 SF W 2,233 175.3 — — — 74.1% +1.94 101.9 -3.2
6 Katerina Maleeva BUL 6 115 – ▲ 9 47 16 74.6% 1 QF QF QF R16 2,045 166.9 — — — 72.1% +1.66 105.6 -1.8
7 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario ESP 7 112 – ▼ 2 38 14 73.1% 2 — R64 R128 SF 2,080 165.6 — — — 70.1% +1.57 96.5 -4.2
8 Jennifer Capriati USA 8 103 – ▲ 17 37 11 77.1% 1 — SF R16 R16 1,962 165.3 — — — 73.8% +1.71 108.9 -1.2
9 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere SUI 9 103 – ▶ 0 42 16 72.4% 0 — QF R128 QF 2,068 173.2 — — — 68.5% +1.77 103.3 -2.8
10 Zina Garrison USA 10 100 – ▼ 6 48 18 72.7% 1 QF R128 F QF 2,041 161.7 — — — 68.5% +1.50 95.8 -1.7
11 Conchita Martínez ESP 11 98 – ▼ 4 38 10 79.2% 3 — QF — R32 2,061 158.8 — — — 75.7% +1.82 105.9 -1.3
12 Natasha Zvereva BLR 12 77 – ▲ 15 38 15 71.7% 2 R64 R16 QF R64 1,953 156.8 — — — 65.8% +1.03 106.3 -0.9
13 Jana Novotna CZE 13 77 – ▼ 2 40 16 71.4% 1 R32 SF QF QF 2,017 161.3 — — — 69.2% +1.75 91.7 -0.6
14 Helena Sukova CZE 14 77 – ▼ 6 41 17 70.7% 0 SF — R16 R16 2,024 160.0 — — — 64.7% +0.88 106.6 -0.5
15 Barbara Paulus AUT 15 69 – ▲ 9 32 14 69.6% 1 R16 — R128 R16 1,895 143.9 — — — 63.7% +0.76 103.5 +1.2
16 Amy Frazier USA 16 64 – ▲ 17 31 14 68.9% 1 R128 — R32 R128 1,891 153.8 — — — 63.3% +0.94 102.4 -1.4
17 Judith Wiesner AUT 17 62 – ▲ 18 41 19 68.3% 0 R64 R32 R16 R16 1,845 152.4 — — — 64.7% +1.10 105.5 -0.7
18 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 18 60 – ▲ 7 46 20 69.7% 1 — R16 R16 R16 1,962 157.1 — — — 63.2% +0.99 104.4 -0.2
19 Leila Meskhi GEO 19 53 – ▲ 11 38 14 73.1% 2 R32 R32 R128 QF 1,928 151.0 — — — 66.4% +1.63 102.3 +1.1
20 Sandra Cecchini ITA 20 41 – ▲ 6 26 14 65.0% 1 — R32 R128 R64 1,814 140.5 — — — 60.0% +0.83 103.3 +0.8
21 Laura Arraya PER 21 35 – ▼ 2 26 19 57.8% 0 — R16 R32 R32 1,821 141.9 — — — 55.4% +0.46 98.6 +0.4
22 Sabine Appelmans BEL 22 35 – ▲ 122 21 12 63.6% 0 R32 R128 — R32 1,679 133.0 — — — 59.2% +0.76 103.2 +2.9
23 Rosalyn Fairbank USA 24 33 – ▼ 2 26 20 56.5% 0 R32 R128 R64 R64 1,787 137.3 — — — 51.9% +0.13 108.9 +0.6
24 Helen Kelesi CAN 25 33 – ▼ 12 23 17 57.5% 0 R32 R64 R128 R64 1,784 139.7 — — — 60.0% +0.68 93.8 +0.7
25 Isabel Cueto GER 26 33 – ▲ 2 23 14 62.2% 1 — R32 — — 1,799 139.4 — — — 60.2% +0.75 97.0 -0.9
26 Meredith Mcgrath USA 28 30 – ▲ 65 15 12 55.6% 0 — — R64 R128 1,708 138.3 — — — 54.1% +0.34 104.9 -0.5
27 Claudia Porwik GER 29 29 – ▲ 46 18 17 51.4% 0 SF — R128 R128 1,667 133.5 — — — 52.5% +0.25 99.4 +1.0
28 Naoko Sawamatsu JPN 31 28 – ▲ 231 14 6 70.0% 1 — R64 R128 R64 1,669 124.7 — — — 62.5% +0.77 110.2 +1.8
29 Hana Mandlikova AUS 31 35 – ▼ 17 8 9 47.1% 0 R32 — R64 — 1,810 125.0 — — — 51.4% +0.19 — +0.3
30 Mercedes Paz ARG 32 28 – ▲ 59 25 20 55.6% 1 — R16 R128 R128 1,775 143.2 — — — 54.3% +0.15 101.6 -2.4
31 Manon Bollegraf NED 33 28 – ▲ 5 20 16 55.6% 0 R64 R128 R128 R64 1,722 141.1 — — — 60.8% +0.47 102.5 -1.0
32 Gretchen Magers USA 35 28 – ▼ 6 22 19 53.7% 0 — R128 R32 R128 1,771 138.9 — — — 53.2% +0.10 102.8 -1.0
33 Gigi Fernandez USA 36 28 – ▼ 13 18 14 56.2% 0 R16 — R64 R128 1,764 137.4 — — — 57.5% +0.63 95.2 +0.4
34 Anke Huber GER 37 26 – ▲ 162 14 9 60.9% 1 R32 — R64 R128 1,708 138.4 — — — 57.7% +0.90 101.7 -0.1
35 Rachel Mcquillan AUS 39 26 – ▲ 40 27 21 56.2% 0 R16 R128 R64 R64 1,710 138.1 — — — 55.5% +0.15 108.8 -1.4
36 Wiltrud Probst GER 40 25 – ▲ 50 19 14 57.6% 1 R128 R16 R128 R64 1,706 126.7 — — — 55.1% +0.37 — +1.7
37 Julie Halard-Decugis FRA 41 24 – ▲ 77 20 16 55.6% 0 R32 R32 R64 R64 1,707 138.4 — — — 52.9% +0.32 102.8 -1.9
38 Patty Fendick USA 42 24 – ▼ 11 16 15 51.6% 0 QF — R16 R32 1,739 136.0 — — — 54.8% +0.16 103.1 +0.1
39 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy NED 43 23 – ▲ 40 18 17 51.4% 0 R64 R64 R16 R128 1,676 128.3 — — — 51.9% -0.08 95.5 +0.1
40 Cathy Caverzasio SUI 44 23 – ▲ 13 19 14 57.6% 0 — R64 — R128 1,688 129.9 — — — 58.0% +0.57 97.6 +1.9
41 Sabine Hack GER 45 22 – ▲ 29 16 13 55.2% 0 — R64 — R128 1,626 127.7 — — — 59.1% +0.62 92.0 +1.8
42 Claudia Kohde Kilsch GER 46 22 – ▼ 9 17 16 51.5% 1 R128 R64 R32 — 1,791 135.8 — — — 50.6% +0.34 95.8 -1.4
43 Katia Piccolini ITA 47 22 – ▲ 133 14 9 60.9% 0 — R128 R128 R32 1,667 127.8 — — — 61.1% +0.63 100.8 +1.4
44 Nicole Bradtke AUS 49 21 – ▲ 12 21 20 51.2% 0 R64 R16 R64 R128 1,757 145.1 — — — 52.6% +0.22 97.9 -2.6
45 Ann Grossman USA 50 21 – ▲ 4 23 22 51.1% 0 R128 R16 R64 R32 1,748 136.3 — — — 51.0% +0.02 — -1.5
46 Angelica Gavaldon MEX 51 21 – ▲ 140 16 16 50.0% 0 QF R128 R32 R64 1,601 123.4 — — — 48.0% -0.39 105.8 +1.1
47 Lori Mcneil USA 52 21 – ▼ 16 17 20 46.0% 0 R128 R128 R32 R64 1,695 134.9 — — — 48.2% -0.08 90.4 -0.8
48 Liz Smylie AUS 53 20 – ▲ 13 15 16 48.4% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,665 124.3 — — — 47.1% -0.23 101.1 +0.6
49 Veronika Martinek GER 54 19 – ▲ 106 11 9 55.0% 1 — — R128 — 1,591 115.1 — — — 53.2% 0.00 104.6 +1.2
50 Regina Rajchrtova TCH 55 19 – ▼ 15 14 15 48.3% 0 R128 R64 R64 R128 1,692 125.1 — — — 46.5% -0.30 102.0 -0.0
51 Natalia Medvedeva UKR 56 19 – ▲ 11 15 16 48.4% 1 R64 R64 R128 R64 1,699 117.8 — — — 50.7% -0.39 101.4 +0.8
52 Radomira Zrubakova SVK 57 19 – ▼ 25 16 18 47.1% 0 R128 R32 R128 R64 1,726 127.9 — — — 46.6% -0.18 — -0.2
53 Stephanie Rehe USA 58 18 – ▲ 49 7 6 53.9% 0 — — — — 1,972 150.4 — — — 48.4% -0.35 — -2.6
54 Robin White USA 59 18 – ▲ 29 15 15 50.0% 0 R128 — R32 R32 1,710 133.3 — — — 50.0% -0.01 100.1 -0.0
55 Laura Golarsa ITA 61 18 – ▼ 3 14 16 46.7% 0 R128 — R128 R128 1,689 132.5 — — — 46.8% -0.02 94.9 -1.4
56 Nathalie Herreman FRA 62 18 – ▲ 72 19 20 48.7% 0 R128 R32 R16 R128 1,683 140.3 — — — 48.3% -0.24 103.4 -1.7
57 Emanuela Zardo SUI 63 18 – ▲ 79 13 12 52.0% 0 R128 R128 — R64 1,593 122.2 — — — 50.9% +0.26 102.9 +0.7
58 Jo Durie GBR 64 17 – ▲ 53 13 13 50.0% 0 R64 — R128 R128 1,673 130.7 — — — 51.7% +0.48 93.4 +0.0
59 Laura Garrone ITA 65 17 – ▲ 22 14 15 48.3% 0 — R128 R64 R64 1,609 114.2 — — — 47.8% +0.03 97.1 +1.5
60 Pam Shriver USA 66 17 – ▼ 48 8 5 61.5% 0 R32 — — — 1,915 136.1 — — — 58.6% +0.83 — +0.4
61 Linda Ferrando ITA 67 17 – ▼ 23 14 17 45.2% 0 — R64 R128 R16 1,651 129.9 — — — 47.9% +0.03 96.5 +0.7
62 Nicole Jagerman NED 68 17 – ▲ 14 12 13 48.0% 0 R32 R128 R64 — 1,698 130.7 — — — 49.1% -0.57 — -1.7
63 Etsuko Inoue JPN 70 16 – ▼ 2 13 13 50.0% 0 R64 — R128 — 1,661 128.5 — — — 49.2% -0.24 104.2 -0.1
64 Carrie Cunningham USA 70 16 – ▲ 15 10 13 43.5% 0 R128 — R64 R64 1,620 130.8 — — — 40.0% -0.56 — -1.0
65 Magdalena Maleeva BUL 72 16 – ▲ 144 12 10 54.5% 0 — R32 R64 R128 1,654 130.9 — — — 52.2% +0.11 — -0.0
66 Elena Brioukhovets UKR 73 16 – ▲ 111 9 6 60.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,609 117.3 — — — 58.8% +0.59 — +1.4
67 Patricia Tarabini ARG 74 15 – ▼ 14 12 16 42.9% 0 — R32 — R128 1,659 126.4 — — — 47.5% -0.25 97.7 -0.2
68 Amanda Coetzer RSA 76 15 – ▼ 13 16 19 45.7% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,662 126.6 — — — 44.4% -0.53 102.4 -1.0
69 Federica Bonsignori ITA 77 15 – ▲ 66 10 8 55.6% 1 R128 — — R128 1,574 111.2 — — — 52.2% -0.04 103.6 +1.1
70 Isabelle Demongeot FRA 78 15 – ▼ 32 15 17 46.9% 0 R32 R128 R128 R64 1,687 134.0 — — — 43.5% -0.58 103.7 -2.0
71 Kimiko Date JPN 79 14 – ▲ 40 10 7 58.8% 0 R16 — R64 R64 1,665 128.2 — — — 57.1% +0.40 — -0.0
72 Petra Langrova TCH 80 14 – ▼ 2 12 15 44.4% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,616 124.6 — — — 47.6% -0.25 94.6 -0.1
73 Cecilia Dahlman SWE 82 14 – ▲ 12 16 20 44.4% 1 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,639 129.0 — — — 46.3% -0.49 104.5 +0.3
74 Donna Faber USA 84 14 – ▼ 25 15 18 45.5% 0 R16 R64 R64 R128 1,630 115.4 — — — 43.1% -0.68 — +0.9
75 Sarah Loosemore GBR 85 14 – ▲ 199 12 14 46.1% 0 R32 R128 R64 — 1,573 118.9 — — — 47.4% -0.02 96.6 +1.5
76 Linda Wild USA 86 13 – ▲ 69 9 12 42.9% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,554 123.6 — — — 43.2% -0.52 104.4 -0.3
77 Anne Minter AUS 88 13 – ▼ 54 17 22 43.6% 0 R128 R64 R32 R128 1,695 126.1 — — — 46.0% -0.08 95.0 +0.7
78 Eva Sviglerova CZE 89 13 – ▲ 48 11 13 45.8% 0 R128 R32 R128 R128 1,569 122.4 — — — 44.0% -0.28 — +0.2
79 Elna Reinach RSA 90 13 – ▼ 34 12 18 40.0% 0 — R128 R32 R32 1,714 130.7 — — — 44.4% -0.33 95.9 -0.6
80 Larisa Savchenko URS 91 13 – ▼ 71 13 18 41.9% 0 R128 R64 R64 R32 1,706 132.7 — — — 43.7% -0.39 97.9 -0.2
81 Sara Gomer GBR 92 13 – ▲ 32 6 8 42.9% 0 R128 — R64 — 1,635 113.1 — — — 42.4% -0.48 99.2 +0.8
82 Maya Kidowaki JPN 93 13 – ▲ 45 11 13 45.8% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,551 123.7 — — — 49.1% -0.24 98.9 +0.8
83 Csilla Cserepy SUI 94 13 – ▲ 76 6 7 46.1% 0 R128 — — R64 1,536 112.8 — — — 43.3% -0.47 — +0.4
84 Betsy Nagelsen USA 96 12 – ▼ 51 8 12 40.0% 0 — R128 R32 — 1,639 115.0 — — — 40.0% -0.60 100.0 +0.1
85 Terry Phelps USA 97 12 – ▼ 49 12 17 41.4% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,643 118.3 — — — 40.6% -0.86 102.9 -0.3
86 Audra Keller USA 98 12 – ▲ 59 13 18 41.9% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,610 120.6 — — — 41.8% -0.88 100.8 -0.1
87 Catherine Tanvier FRA 99 12 – ▼ 34 9 11 45.0% 0 R16 R128 R32 — 1,657 111.6 — — — 45.0% -0.43 — +0.7
88 Florencia Labat ARG 100 12 – ▼ 23 12 18 40.0% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,572 118.7 — — — 42.5% -0.55 104.5 +1.1
89 Beate Reinstadler AUT 102 12 – ▲ 69 9 12 42.9% 0 R64 R128 — R128 1,501 115.1 — — — 42.9% -0.35 — +1.4
90 Sandra Wasserman BEL 103 11 – ▼ 34 12 17 41.4% 0 R32 R128 R128 R64 1,607 122.9 — — — 44.1% -0.71 98.4 -0.6
91 Monique Javer GBR 104 11 – ▲ 7 12 17 41.4% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,572 121.6 — — — 43.8% -0.53 100.2 +1.6
92 Laura Lapi ITA 105 11 – ▼ 25 10 13 43.5% 0 — R32 R128 R128 1,639 130.3 — — — 42.6% -0.64 101.9 -1.8
93 Mary Pierce FRA 107 11 – ▲ 136 6 7 46.1% 0 — R64 — — 1,543 134.3 — — — 48.3% +0.52 — +0.2
94 Karine Quentrec FRA 108 11 – ▼ 44 10 17 37.0% 0 R128 R128 R64 R128 1,643 116.5 — — — 41.3% -0.76 101.4 -2.6
95 Barbara Rittner GER 110 11 – ▲ 239 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,557 121.6 — — — 36.4% -1.18 — -0.4
96 Halle Cioffi USA 111 11 – ▼ 61 9 14 39.1% 0 R64 — — R32 1,655 131.1 — — — 43.4% -0.70 96.4 -0.3
97 Nana Smith JPN 113 11 – ▼ 10 9 16 36.0% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,541 113.3 — — — 38.9% -0.89 96.2 +1.1
98 Ann Henricksson USA 114 10 – ▼ 61 11 19 36.7% 0 R64 — R16 R128 1,628 118.2 — — — 37.1% -1.06 103.2 -1.1
99 Akiko Kijimuta JPN 115 10 – ▼ 60 4 11 26.7% 0 R128 — — R128 1,580 113.9 — — — 26.5% -1.65 102.3 -0.3
100 Karin Kschwendt AUT 116 10 – ▲ 62 6 9 40.0% 0 R128 — R32 R64 1,499 116.8 — — — 41.7% -0.22 100.3 +1.1
101 Andrea Temesvari HUN 117 10 – ▼ 74 8 19 29.6% 0 R64 R32 R128 R128 1,611 121.4 — — — 34.5% -1.48 98.1 +0.2
102 Cammy Macgregor USA 119 9 – ▼ 23 8 16 33.3% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,518 107.0 — — — 38.2% -1.11 97.7 +1.0
103 Kristin Godridge HKG 120 9 – ▲ 221 9 14 39.1% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,543 112.5 — — — 38.2% -0.93 102.7 +0.1
104 Debbie Graham USA 121 9 – ▲ 135 5 4 55.6% 0 — — — R64 1,581 122.4 — — — 52.4% -0.52 — -0.3
105 Samantha Smith GBR 122 9 – ▲ 152 8 12 40.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,559 119.1 — — — 38.3% -1.13 — -0.2
106 Sylvia Hanika GER 123 9 – ▼ 82 7 10 41.2% 0 — R64 — R64 1,702 116.6 — — — 50.0% -0.35 — +0.8
107 Karina Habsudova SVK 124 9 – ▲ 352 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,536 111.6 — — — 71.4% +0.71 — +0.1
108 Louise Field AUS 125 8 – ▼ 25 9 17 34.6% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,522 107.8 — — — 41.9% -0.52 — +1.5
109 Claudine Toleafoa NZL 126 8 – ▲ 93 9 10 47.4% 0 — — — — 1,533 113.0 — — — 47.7% -0.43 101.3 +1.2
110 Cristina Tessi ARG 127 8 – ▲ 68 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — — 1,508 107.8 — — — 40.0% -0.80 — +0.4
111 Sandra Dopfer AUT 130 8 – ▲ 78 4 5 44.4% 0 — — — — 1,531 108.1 — — — 42.1% -0.32 — +0.4
112 Bettina Fulco ARG 131 8 – ▼ 84 9 21 30.0% 0 — R128 — R128 1,567 119.5 — — — 33.3% -1.33 99.4 -1.4
113 Silke Meier GER 132 8 – ▲ 16 6 13 31.6% 0 R64 R128 R128 R32 1,529 108.7 — — — 30.8% -1.31 96.9 -0.1
114 Camille Benjamin USA 136 7 – ▼ 44 10 18 35.7% 0 R128 R32 R64 R64 1,620 116.6 — — — 32.2% -1.46 103.5 -1.6
115 Julie Richardson NZL 137 7 – ▲ 120 5 7 41.7% 0 — — — — 1,528 104.3 — — — 44.0% -0.60 — +0.9
116 Erika De Lone USA 138 7 – ▲ 160 4 6 40.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,502 119.2 — — — 42.9% -0.95 — +0.4
117 Maider Laval FRA 140 7 – ▲ 37 4 4 50.0% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,509 107.9 — — — 47.1% -0.35 — +0.4
118 Andrea Leand USA 142 7 – ▲ 10 6 15 28.6% 0 R64 — R32 R128 1,516 111.0 — — — 29.2% -1.79 — +0.8
119 Andrea Strnadova CZE 143 7 – ▲ 60 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — — 1,525 110.2 — — — 50.0% -0.81 — -0.2
120 Petra Schwarz AUT 144 7 – ▲ 9 4 6 40.0% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,527 107.0 — — — 39.1% -0.65 — +0.3
121 Clare Wood GBR 146 7 – ▲ 35 5 11 31.2% 0 R128 — R128 R64 1,482 120.2 — — — 40.5% -0.57 — +1.0
122 Beverly Bowes USA 147 6 – ▼ 46 5 13 27.8% 0 R128 R128 — R128 1,536 112.4 — — — 34.8% -0.67 95.7 +0.2
123 Elise Burgin USA 149 6 – ▼ 87 7 19 26.9% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,569 112.5 — — — 32.8% -1.49 97.2 -1.7
124 Shaun Stafford USA 150 6 – ▼ 99 6 18 25.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 R32 1,589 119.2 — — — 30.9% -1.22 — -1.6
125 Pilar Vasquez PER 151 6 – ▲ 43 5 10 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,473 96.8 — — — 36.4% -1.06 100.4 +1.7
126 Eva Pfaff GER 152 6 – ▼ 48 3 12 20.0% 0 R128 — R64 — 1,522 111.5 — — — 33.3% -1.19 — +0.4
127 Jennifer Santrock USA 153 6 – ▲ 40 3 9 25.0% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,459 109.0 — — — 28.6% -1.71 — -0.1
128 Wendy White USA 154 6 – ▼ 52 3 9 25.0% 0 — — R128 R128 1,566 104.6 — — — 25.0% -1.68 102.1 -0.1
129 Stephanie Rottier NED 156 6 – ▲ 365 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,534 109.8 — — — 66.7% +0.50 — +0.1
130 Kirrily Sharpe AUS 159 5 – ▲ 311 3 4 42.9% 0 R64 R32 — — 1,531 108.2 — — — 43.8% -1.00 — -0.0
131 Silke Frankl GER 160 5 – ▲ 26 3 5 37.5% 0 — — — — 1,478 108.6 — — — 47.4% -0.37 — +0.1
132 Katarzyna Nowak POL 161 5 – ▲ 124 0 3 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,451 98.5 — — — 14.3% -1.29 — +0.2
133 Pascale Etchemendy FRA 163 5 – ▼ 27 5 8 38.5% 0 R128 R64 R64 — 1,513 114.1 — — — 38.7% -0.29 99.4 +0.1
134 Kaoru Okamoto JPN 165 5 – ▼ 50 3 6 33.3% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,496 100.2 — — — 31.6% -1.11 — +0.8
135 Jana Pospisilova CZE 166 5 – ▼ 95 4 14 22.2% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,534 98.6 — — — 23.7% -1.89 — -0.2
136 Sandrine Testud FRA 170 5 – ▲ 95 0 2 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,484 99.3 — — — 20.0% -2.40 — -0.2
137 Marketa Kochta GER 174 5 – ▲ 282 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 109.0 — — — 14.3% -1.57 — -0.5
138 Nanne Dahlman FIN 175 4 – ▲ 101 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,504 103.3 — — — 25.0% -1.25 — -0.1
139 Marion Maruska AUT 177 4 – ▲ 162 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,457 92.4 — — — 30.0% -2.30 — +0.3
140 Rene Simpson CAN 180 4 – ▼ 71 2 8 20.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,563 111.0 — — — 30.4% -1.61 — -0.3
141 Petra Thoren FIN 183 4 – ▼ 17 3 11 21.4% 0 R64 — — — 1,442 104.7 — — — 25.8% -1.90 — +0.6
142 Miriam Oremans NED 185 4 – ▲ 158 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,519 110.3 — — — 40.0% -0.60 — -0.1
143 Iva Budarova TCH 186 4 – ▼ 45 3 7 30.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,535 102.8 — — — 33.3% -1.71 — +0.1
144 Catherine Suire FRA 189 4 – ▼ 50 3 7 30.0% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,546 110.0 — — — 30.0% -1.10 — +0.7
145 Silvia Farina Elia ITA 194 4 – ▼ 22 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,527 110.3 — — — 45.5% +0.09 — -0.2
146 Maria Ekstrand SWE 195 4 – ▲ 16 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,467 100.2 — — — 25.0% -1.50 — +0.1
147 Petra Kamstra NED 198 3 – ▲ 328 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 99.4 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.1
148 Nicole Pratt AUS 201 3 – ▲ 216 1 1 50.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,497 96.6 — — — 40.0% -0.20 — +0.6
149 Eva Krapl SUI 202 3 – ▼ 77 2 9 18.2% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,403 88.5 — — — 28.0% -1.72 — +1.6
150 Rennae Stubbs AUS 203 3 – ▲ 20 1 5 16.7% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,472 100.0 — — — 26.7% -1.27 — +0.1
151 Ann Devries BEL 204 3 – ▼ 59 2 7 22.2% 0 R128 — R32 — 1,513 103.7 — — — 37.5% -1.44 — +0.3
152 Sabrina Goles YUG 205 3 – ▼ 100 2 8 20.0% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,548 103.7 — — — 19.0% -2.24 — -0.0
153 Kathy Jordan USA 207 3 – ▲ 80 2 6 25.0% 0 — — R128 R128 1,791 109.8 — — — 30.0% -1.60 — -1.4
154 Maureen Drake CAN 209 3 – ▼ 46 1 5 16.7% 0 R128 — — R128 1,463 106.0 — — — 26.7% -1.87 — +0.6
155 Andrea Farley USA 212 3 – ▼ 62 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — R128 1,486 109.1 — — — 40.0% +0.10 — +0.4
156 Caroline Vis NED 213 3 – ▲ 55 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,507 103.9 — — — 42.9% -1.57 — -0.1
157 Janine Tremelling AUS 214 3 – ▼ 98 2 6 25.0% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,590 112.1 — — — 30.0% -1.60 — -0.7
158 Heather Ludloff USA 219 3 – ▼ 55 2 6 25.0% 0 R128 — R64 — 1,456 97.4 — — — 26.3% -1.79 — +0.4
159 Natalia Baudone ITA 224 3 – ▲ 82 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,501 102.9 — — — 60.0% +0.80 — +0.2
160 Kate Mcdonald AUS 226 3 – ▲ 128 1 2 33.3% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,501 109.8 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — -0.2
161 Sophie Amiach FRA 227 3 – ▼ 98 2 6 25.0% 0 — R64 R128 — 1,529 102.1 — — — 22.2% -2.67 — -0.1
162 Ines Gorrochategui ARG 240 2 – ▲ 124 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 97.5 — — — 33.3% -2.33 — +0.2
163 Elly Hakami USA 244 2 – ▲ 26 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,561 105.6 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.3
164 Ginger Helgeson USA 246 2 – ▼ 7 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,498 100.1 — — — 28.6% -2.00 — -0.3
165 Jill Hetherington CAN 247 2 – ▼ 125 1 6 14.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,482 97.6 — — — 25.0% -1.63 — +0.4
166 Rika Hiraki JPN 248 2 – ▼ 59 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,451 94.5 — — — 0.0% -3.25 — +0.4
167 Katrina Adams USA 256 2 – ▼ 172 1 11 8.3% 0 R128 — R128 R128 1,470 103.4 — — — 21.4% -1.64 92.7 +0.2
168 Eugenia Maniokova RUS 274 2 – ▼ 26 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 95.9 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
169 Alexandra Fusai FRA 275 2 – ▲ 252 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 101.2 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.1
170 Kristine Kunce AUS 279 1 – ▼ 111 0 4 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,505 94.7 — — — 11.1% -3.11 — +0.2
171 Caroline Kuhlman USA 291 1 – ▲ 184 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,628 103.3 — — — 50.0% -0.75 — -0.0
172 Federica Haumuller ARG 294 1 – ▼ 187 1 9 10.0% 0 — R128 — R128 1,478 108.3 — — — 24.0% -1.32 95.0 +0.4
173 Kate Gompert USA 301 1 – ▼ 126 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,621 106.2 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.2
174 Tammy Whittington USA 302 1 – ▲ 11 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 97.9 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.1
175 Dianne Fromholtz AUS 306 1 – ▼ 175 0 2 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,633 101.9 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — +0.2
176 Virginia Ruano Pascual ESP 307 1 – ▲ 172 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 96.3 — — — 33.3% -3.00 — +0.2
177 Lisa Raymond USA 336 1 – ▲ 113 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,480 94.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
178 Kerry-Anne Guse AUS 360 1 – ▲ 182 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 89.4 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.2
179 Beth Herr USA 373 1 – ▼ 241 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,518 101.1 — — — 20.0% -2.20 — -0.2
180 Anne Meredith GBR 397 0 – ▼ 155 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,465 97.9 — — — 20.0% -1.40 — +0.3
181 Laxmi Poruri USA 416 0 – ▼ 249 0 2 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,505 95.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.3
182 Karen Schimper RSA 470 0 – ▼ 323 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,563 98.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.0
183 Ronni Reis USA 474 0 – ▼ 376 0 4 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,525 92.9 — — — 11.1% -2.55 — +0.5
184 Chanda Rubin USA 526 0 – ▲ 30 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,489 99.2 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
185 Jenny Byrne AUS 546 0 – ▼ 497 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,551 93.6 — — — 0.0% -3.88 — -0.3
186 Pam Casale USA 554 0 – ▼ 329 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,525 90.6 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.2
187 Jeri Ingram USA 581 0 – ▼ 367 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 99.7 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.0
188 Olga Tsarbopoulou GRE 593 0 – ▼ 150 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,440 97.6 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.1
189 Lea Antonoplis USA 599 0 – ▼ 389 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,430 95.5 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.2
190 Raffaella Reggi Concato ITA — — – — 31 16 66.0% 1 R16 R64 R128 R32 1,816 142.9 — — — 61.5% +0.89 100.3 +0.4
191 Dianne Van Rensburg RSA — — – — 23 16 59.0% 1 R16 R64 R64 R32 1,769 142.6 — — — 56.0% +0.38 104.0 -0.2
192 Susan Sloane Lundy USA — — – — 22 16 57.9% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,781 135.7 — — — 56.5% +0.31 99.8 -0.6
193 Catarina Lindqvist Ryan SWE — — – — 19 16 54.3% 1 — R128 R128 R128 1,726 134.9 — — — 55.6% +0.40 95.7 +2.9
194 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer USA — — – — 18 18 50.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,745 136.3 — — — 51.7% +0.10 103.1 -0.7
195 Anne Smith USA — — – — 16 14 53.3% 0 — — R64 — 1,827 147.1 — — — 53.7% +0.49 98.2 -1.2
196 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel USA — — – — 15 18 45.5% 0 R64 R128 R128 R64 1,697 132.2 — — — 44.7% -0.36 101.6 +0.1
197 Alexia Dechaume Balleret FRA — — – — 13 11 54.2% 0 R64 R128 R32 R64 1,600 116.0 — — — 51.7% -0.12 108.0 +1.4
198 Tami Whitlinger Jones USA — — – — 12 16 42.9% 0 R32 R128 R64 R128 1,576 126.7 — — — 43.9% -0.17 96.8 +0.8
199 Belinda Cordwell NZL — — – — 11 14 44.0% 0 — — R128 R64 1,641 107.3 — — — 42.6% -0.77 103.1 +2.1
200 Elena Pampoulova BUL — — – — 11 13 45.8% 0 R64 R64 — R128 1,609 122.0 — — — 42.3% -0.88 110.8 -0.8
201 Stacey Martin USA — — – — 11 18 37.9% 0 R128 R32 — R128 1,575 118.2 — — — 42.6% -0.47 97.9 +0.1
202 Mareen Louie Harper USA — — – — 10 15 40.0% 0 — — R128 R128 1,590 128.4 — — — 45.8% -0.14 94.5 +0.3
203 Mary Lou Piatek USA — — – — 8 11 42.1% 0 — — R128 R128 1,611 125.3 — — — 43.9% -0.63 — -0.4
204 Angelika Kanellopoulou GRE — — – — 7 12 36.8% 0 — R128 — R128 1,552 103.5 — — — 38.6% -0.75 99.6 +0.8
205 Hu Na USA — — – — 7 12 36.8% 0 — R64 R128 — 1,560 108.7 — — — 41.9% -0.47 96.9 +0.8
206 Maria Strandlund Tomsvik SWE — — – — 7 16 30.4% 0 — R64 R128 R32 1,588 112.6 — — — 32.7% -1.00 99.0 -0.9
207 Patricia Hy Boulais CAN — — – — 7 7 50.0% 0 — R128 — R64 1,573 118.5 — — — 51.7% +0.41 — +0.7
208 Francesca Romano ITA — — – — 6 6 50.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,558 104.2 — — — 46.2% -0.65 — +0.8
209 Michelle Jaggard Lai AUS — — – — 6 12 33.3% 0 R128 R64 — — 1,505 109.2 — — — 27.8% -1.64 — -0.2
210 Renata Baranski POL — — – — 6 14 30.0% 0 — — R128 R128 1,514 108.3 — — — 36.2% -1.57 — +0.2
211 Andrea Vieira BRA — — – — 5 15 25.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,502 110.0 — — — 27.9% -1.42 — -0.4
212 Catherine Mothes Jobkel FRA — — – — 5 5 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,517 106.7 — — — 50.0% +0.09 — +1.0
213 Luciana Corsato Owsianka BRA — — – — 5 7 41.7% 0 — R128 — — 1,501 105.9 — — — 44.8% -0.66 — +0.8
214 Barbara Romano ITA — — – — 4 12 25.0% 0 — R64 R128 — 1,509 104.1 — — — 33.3% -0.90 96.1 +0.3
215 Jo Anne Faull AUS — — – — 4 16 20.0% 0 R128 R128 R32 — 1,539 97.4 — — — 23.8% -1.98 — +0.3
216 Nathalie Guerree Spitzer FRA — — – — 4 7 36.4% 0 — R128 — — 1,566 121.0 — — — 32.0% -1.04 — -0.3
217 Silvia La Fratta ITA — — – — 4 8 33.3% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,498 92.6 — — — 31.0% -1.90 105.5 +0.4
218 Carling Bassett Seguso CAN — — – — 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,760 124.8 — — — 50.0% +0.07 — -0.2
219 Celine Cohen SUI — — – — 3 8 27.3% 0 R128 R32 — — 1,496 105.6 — — — 37.0% -1.44 — +0.3
220 Noelle Van Lottum FRA — — – — 3 2 60.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,580 116.6 — — — 60.0% -0.10 — +0.1
221 Pascale Paradis Mangon FRA — — – — 3 9 25.0% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,591 108.4 — — — 32.3% -1.03 97.2 +0.1
222 Tamaka Takagi JPN — — – — 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,521 111.6 — — — 42.9% -0.64 — +0.2
223 Akiko Gooden USA — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,481 96.7 — — — 38.5% -1.08 — +0.8
224 Claudia Chabalgoity BRA — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,473 98.1 — — — 38.5% -1.54 — +0.3
225 Hellas Ter Riet NED — — – — 2 8 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,432 104.9 — — — 27.3% -1.32 — +0.1
226 Leona Laskova CZE — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — — 1,528 100.0 — — — 33.3% -1.61 99.6 -0.3
227 Louise Allen USA — — – — 2 9 18.2% 0 R128 — — — 1,492 106.1 — — — 21.7% -1.39 — +0.6
228 Martina Pawlik GER — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,500 95.3 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.7
229 Sabrina Giusto BRA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,515 104.3 — — — 50.0% +0.20 — +0.1
230 Tine Scheuer Larsen DEN — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,560 111.7 — — — 40.0% -0.40 — +0.1
231 Yukie Koizumi JPN — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,440 88.9 — — — 28.6% -2.00 — +0.8
232 Ana Maria Segura Perez ESP — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,508 103.9 — — — 40.0% -0.60 — +0.0
233 Anne White USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,659 111.9 — — — 33.3% -2.17 — +0.0
234 Carin Bakkum NED — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,440 99.3 — — — 25.0% -1.25 — +0.1
235 Danielle Jones AUS — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,503 100.0 — — — 40.0% -0.60 — +0.2
236 Denisa Szabova SVK — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 105.7 — — — 25.0% -2.09 — -0.5
237 Eleni Rossides USA — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — R128 1,475 101.1 — — — 25.0% -2.17 — +0.2
238 Gisele Miro BRA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,468 104.0 — — — 50.0% +1.50 — +0.2
239 Immaculada Varas Caro ESP — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 105.2 — — — 50.0% -1.00 — -0.2
240 Julia Apostoli GRE — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,527 96.7 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.3
241 Julie Salmon GBR — — – — 1 6 14.3% 0 — — R128 — 1,363 102.1 — — — 23.5% -1.71 — +0.2
242 Kathy May USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,705 99.6 — — — 40.0% -0.40 — +0.1
243 Kaye Marfini Hand GBR — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,523 110.6 — — — 50.0% -1.50 — -0.1
244 Lindsay Bartlett USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 97.1 — — — 40.0% -0.40 — +0.3
245 Lisa Bonder Kreiss USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,620 109.4 — — — 42.9% -0.71 — -0.2
246 Lisa Green USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 104.0 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.1
247 Lisa Oneill AUS — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,426 104.8 — — — 44.4% -0.56 — +0.1
248 Luanne Spadea USA — — – — 1 6 14.3% 0 — — — — 1,453 99.2 — — — 20.0% -2.53 — +0.1
249 Michelle Bowrey AUS — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,443 101.0 — — — 40.0% +0.40 — +0.2
250 Robyn Field RSA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,494 100.7 — — — 33.3% -1.22 — +0.1
251 Sandy Collins USA — — – — 1 9 10.0% 0 — — — R128 1,421 95.6 — — — 17.4% -2.65 — +0.2
252 Tracey Morton Rodgers AUS — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,428 107.7 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — +0.3
253 Ulrike Priller AUT — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 97.1 — — — 30.0% -2.10 — -0.1
254 Valerie Batut FRA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,514 101.1 — — — 40.0% -1.80 — -0.2
255 Adriana Villagran Reami ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,432 94.0 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
256 Agnese Gustmane LAT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 104.1 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — -0.2
257 Akemi Nishiya JPN — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,450 101.2 — — — 11.1% -2.89 — -0.1
258 Alice Nohacova TCH — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 104.3 — — — 33.3% -3.67 — -0.2
259 Alysia May USA — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,467 106.7 — — — 0.0% -3.25 — -0.3
260 Amy Schwartz USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 106.4 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.3
261 Andrea Tiezzi ARG — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,454 99.6 — — — 0.0% -3.13 — -0.3
262 Angela Kerek GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 107.3 — — — 0.0% -1.50 — -0.3
263 Anna Ivan USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,524 94.5 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
264 Annika Narbe SWE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,480 98.7 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.0
265 Belinda Borneo GBR — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,409 96.8 — — — 25.0% -1.50 — +0.3
266 Caterina Nozzoli ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,437 97.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
267 Christiane Hofmann GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 92.1 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
268 Elena Makarova RUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 98.0 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
269 Emiko Okagawa JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,474 94.3 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
270 Emmanuelle Derly FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 99.4 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.0
271 Estefania Bottini ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 96.0 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0.0
272 Eva Maria Schurhoff GER — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,466 101.3 — — — 20.0% -0.40 — +0.2
273 Gabriela Castro ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,477 101.7 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.3
274 Heidi Sprung AUT — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,440 105.6 — — — 20.0% -0.20 — -0.1
275 Heike Thoms GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 98.9 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
276 Henrike Kadzidroga GER — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,442 96.9 — — — 25.0% -1.38 — +0.3
277 Holyn Lord USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 98.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.0
278 Jana Strnadova CZE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 99.1 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.0
279 Jennifer Mundel RSA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,505 102.8 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.2
280 Jillian Muller SUI — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 94.5 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
281 Jill Smoller USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,432 98.6 — — — 0.0% -3.75 — +0.0
282 Jorgelina Moreno ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 93.8 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.0
283 Justine Hodder AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,496 98.6 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.2
284 Karen Shin USA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,457 102.6 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.1
285 Katharina Duell GER — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,416 102.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
286 Katja Oeljeklaus GER — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 101.8 — — — 20.0% -1.00 — +0.1
287 Katrina Greenman USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 97.3 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
288 Kimberly Kessaris USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,457 96.6 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
289 Linley Tanner USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 98.6 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
290 Lise Gregory RSA — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,426 98.9 — — — 0.0% -3.13 — -0.1
291 Lorenza Jachia ITA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 100.1 — — — 0.0% -1.50 — +0.0
292 Louise Stacey AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,479 98.2 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.3
293 Luciana Della Casa BRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 100.2 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — +0.0
294 Magdalena Feistel POL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 94.6 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.3
295 Maria Lindstrom SWE — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,460 96.2 — — — 20.0% -3.00 — +0.1
296 Maria Luciana Reynares ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 90.8 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.0
297 Mary Norwood USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,480 95.2 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.0
298 Misumi Miyauchi JPN — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 102.9 — — — 20.0% -1.40 — +0.0
299 Natalia Biletskaia UKR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,474 95.0 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
300 Neus Avila Bonastre ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 96.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.0
301 Nicoletta Iaccarino ITA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,480 103.3 — — — 20.0% -2.80 — -0.1
302 Nike Dobrovits AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 98.3 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.1
303 Niurka Sodupe USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,526 98.1 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.2
304 Olivia Fery HKG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 97.2 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
305 Paulette Moreno HKG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,455 95.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
306 Penny Barg USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,501 91.6 — — — 0.0% -6.00 — -0.1
307 Petra Schmitt HUN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 96.1 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
308 Pilar Perez ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 93.5 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0.0
309 Rosa Bielsa Hierro ESP — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,439 96.2 — — — 14.3% -1.86 — -0.0
310 Rosie Casals USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 100.4 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.0
311 Sandra Reichel AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 90.9 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.1
312 Shawn Foltz USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,511 91.9 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.2
313 Shelley Bartlett USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 93.7 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.1
314 Simone Schilder NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,428 95.9 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
315 Sofia Prazeres POR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 98.9 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.0
316 Steffi Menning GER — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,448 110.3 — — — 14.3% -2.43 — -0.1
317 Suzanne Italiano CAN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 98.4 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
318 Sybille Niox Chateau FRA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,451 98.8 — — — 20.0% -2.00 — -0.3
319 Sylvie Sabas FRA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,485 109.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
320 Tania Couto POR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 97.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0.0
321 Themis Zambrzycki BRA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,443 91.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
322 Viktoria Milvidskaia RUS — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 110.0 — — — 0.0% -2.25 — -0.3
323 Yael Segal ISR — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 97.6 — — — 0.0% -4.75 — -0.2

How to read these columns

Rank
For the current season, this is the latest ranking. For past seasons, this is the year-end ranking.
Points
Official ranking points from the selected ranking snapshot.
Wk +/−
Ranking change since the previous ranking snapshot.
YTD Δ
Ranking change since the start of the season.
Win %
Wins divided by total completed main-draw matches.
Elo
For the current season, this is the latest TennisDB Elo rating. For past seasons, this is year-end Elo.
P+
Scoreline performance adjusted for opponent strength on a 0-200 scale. 100 is average; a 10-point difference equals five expected-win percentage points.
Serve+
Estimated percentage points won on serve above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
Return+
Estimated percentage points won on return above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
PD
Return points won divided by opponents' return points won. 1.000 is even; above 1.000 is better.
Set Win %
Sets won divided by total completed sets in eligible scored matches.
Set Margin
Average per-set game margin from the player's perspective. Positive values mean winning sets by more games on average.
Pressure+
Opponent-adjusted deciding-set and tiebreak performance on a 0-200 scale; 100 is the pre-match surface-Elo expectation. Small samples are shrunk, at least three of each are required, and a deciding-set tiebreak counts only once.
Schedule
Expected wins added by opponent quality versus a typical player-season schedule. Positive means an easier schedule; negative means a tougher one. Career values are per 100 matches.

View the full tennis statistics glossary →

WTA Rankings Archive

Browse WTA rankings and season leader archives by year.

2020s
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020
2010s
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
2000s
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
1990s
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
1980s
1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980
1970s
1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970
1960s
1969 1968