WTA 1983 Season Leaders & Rankings

Compare singles rankings, points, and season records. Choose a year to explore earlier standings.

Martina Navratilova finished 1983 at WTA No. 1.

Need custom historical filters? Search ranking weeks or search player seasons with the Advanced search tool.

Rankings Leaders

Ranking points, results, and season metrics for 1983.

285 players with >= 1 match

# Player Country Rank Points Wk +/− YTD Δ W L Win % Titles AORGWUSO Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD Set Win % Set Margin Pressure+ Schedule
1 Martina Navratilova USA 1 — – — 84 1 98.8% 16 W R16 W W 2,641 183.1 — — — 94.9% +3.91 105.4 -2.5
2 Chris Evert USA 2 — – — 59 11 84.3% 6 — W R32 F 2,403 176.6 — — — 79.9% +2.28 97.9 -4.4
3 Andrea Jaeger USA 3 — – — 50 18 73.5% 1 — SF F QF 2,105 170.2 — — — 70.7% +1.71 96.1 -4.2
4 Pam Shriver USA 4 — – — 52 15 77.6% 3 SF R32 R64 SF 2,164 167.9 — — — 73.1% +1.83 101.0 -4.9
5 Sylvia Hanika GER 5 — – — 47 22 68.1% 0 QF R32 R32 QF 1,970 163.0 — — — 63.4% +1.12 100.3 -2.1
6 Jo Durie GBR 6 — – — 47 18 72.3% 2 QF SF R32 SF 2,095 160.0 — — — 69.3% +1.31 104.6 -5.6
7 Bettina Bunge GER 7 — – — 26 11 70.3% 1 — R64 R128 — 2,010 158.7 — — — 69.6% +1.56 97.6 -2.0
8 Wendy Turnbull AUS 8 — – — 47 18 72.3% 1 QF — R16 R32 2,068 164.0 — — — 66.4% +1.32 100.7 -4.0
9 Tracy Austin USA 9 — – — 24 8 75.0% 0 — QF — — 2,189 159.8 — — — 76.5% +1.88 94.9 -1.8
10 Zina Garrison USA 10 — – — 38 18 67.9% 0 SF R128 R64 R16 1,991 154.7 — — — 65.0% +0.87 108.1 -2.2
11 Hana Mandlikova AUS — — – — 44 21 67.7% 0 R32 QF R16 QF 1,983 163.7 — — — 70.3% +1.45 95.7 -3.5
12 Kathy Jordan USA — — – — 44 22 66.7% 0 F R16 QF R16 2,010 155.7 — — — 62.3% +1.00 103.8 -2.1
13 Andrea Temesvari HUN — — – — 42 15 73.7% 3 — R16 R32 R32 1,990 163.1 — — — 75.4% +2.16 101.7 +1.6
14 Kathy Horvath USA — — – — 39 18 68.4% 2 — QF — R64 1,931 149.2 — — — 63.7% +0.74 109.3 +1.1
15 Alycia Moulton USA — — – — 37 23 61.7% 2 R16 R64 R128 R64 1,850 143.0 — — — 59.7% +0.46 104.8 -1.1
16 Carling Bassett Seguso CAN — — – — 35 21 62.5% 1 QF R128 R16 R32 1,833 140.5 — — — 59.8% +0.66 110.3 +0.2
17 Helena Sukova CZE — — – — 33 20 62.3% 0 R16 R16 R128 R32 1,908 149.5 — — — 59.7% +0.67 102.3 -2.6
18 Iva Budarova TCH — — – — 33 23 58.9% 0 R64 R32 R32 R64 1,738 136.1 — — — 58.1% +0.11 104.6 +0.0
19 Yvonne Vermaak RSA — — – — 33 26 55.9% 2 R64 R128 SF R64 1,755 138.2 — — — 55.4% +0.20 100.1 +1.1
20 Eva Pfaff GER — — – — 31 21 59.6% 0 R16 R128 R16 R128 1,857 145.5 — — — 57.1% +0.32 108.7 +1.0
21 Claudia Kohde Kilsch GER — — – — 29 20 59.2% 0 R16 R32 R16 R64 1,871 146.6 — — — 57.3% +0.57 100.9 -2.0
22 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel USA — — – — 29 17 63.0% 0 R64 R16 R16 R64 1,845 139.3 — — — 58.6% +0.96 99.3 +3.1
23 Barbara Potter USA — — – — 28 20 58.3% 0 R16 — QF R64 1,851 139.4 — — — 58.6% +0.77 93.0 +1.3
24 Virginia Ruzici ROU — — – — 27 17 61.4% 1 — R32 R16 R128 1,906 143.9 — — — 60.4% +0.91 98.3 +2.6
25 Lisa Bonder Kreiss USA — — – — 26 19 57.8% 2 — R32 R16 R16 1,885 141.9 — — — 55.0% +0.38 104.1 +1.8
26 Anne White USA — — – — 25 19 56.8% 0 R32 R32 R64 R16 1,754 133.8 — — — 54.5% +0.26 106.4 +0.4
27 Ivanna Madruga ARG — — – — 25 12 67.6% 0 — R16 — QF 1,882 143.8 — — — 65.9% +1.35 96.8 +0.6
28 Wendy White USA — — – — 25 21 54.4% 0 — R32 R32 R128 1,817 144.5 — — — 50.0% -0.02 106.1 -3.9
29 Bonnie Gadusek USA — — – — 24 15 61.5% 0 — R128 — R16 1,933 154.5 — — — 57.5% +0.78 107.8 -1.5
30 Rosalyn Fairbank USA — — – — 24 19 55.8% 1 R16 R128 R64 R128 1,919 136.8 — — — 53.1% +0.19 101.3 -2.2
31 Laura Arraya PER — — – — 23 23 50.0% 0 — R128 — R64 1,713 125.8 — — — 51.4% -0.24 95.2 +0.8
32 Mima Jausovec SLO — — – — 23 16 59.0% 0 — F R32 R32 1,874 144.0 — — — 58.4% +0.64 94.5 -2.7
33 Pam Casale USA — — – — 23 20 53.5% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,770 144.3 — — — 52.1% +0.47 102.6 -1.6
34 Billie Jean King USA — — – — 22 5 81.5% 2 R32 — SF — 2,058 156.0 — — — 79.3% +1.93 — -1.1
35 Camille Benjamin USA — — – — 22 25 46.8% 0 R32 R64 R32 R128 1,715 124.5 — — — 45.0% -0.65 107.6 -1.4
36 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere SUI — — – — 21 16 56.8% 0 — R32 R64 R32 1,789 136.5 — — — 57.1% +0.45 99.8 -0.8
37 Raffaella Reggi Concato ITA — — – — 21 20 51.2% 0 R64 R128 R64 R64 1,668 126.1 — — — 47.3% -0.21 109.6 -0.0
38 Kim Jones USA — — – — 20 14 58.8% 1 R64 — R128 R32 1,758 132.1 — — — 54.3% +0.41 108.3 +1.4
39 Liz Smylie AUS — — – — 20 14 58.8% 1 R32 R64 R128 R128 1,754 135.9 — — — 54.4% +0.25 104.5 +2.1
40 Beth Herr USA — — – — 19 18 51.4% 0 R64 R64 R64 R64 1,703 130.2 — — — 52.2% +0.27 101.7 +0.5
41 Anne Hobbs GBR — — – — 18 19 48.6% 1 R32 R16 R128 R128 1,751 128.9 — — — 47.7% -0.24 100.4 +0.4
42 Betsy Nagelsen USA — — – — 18 22 45.0% 0 R32 R128 R32 R128 1,693 127.0 — — — 46.3% -0.46 102.2 +0.9
43 Sue Barker GBR — — – — 18 20 47.4% 1 — — R128 — 1,751 133.0 — — — 48.9% -0.30 99.3 +0.3
44 Andrea Leand USA — — – — 17 18 48.6% 0 — R128 R32 R16 1,785 132.7 — — — 48.8% -0.18 99.5 -1.5
45 Catherine Tanvier FRA — — – — 17 16 51.5% 0 R16 R16 R128 R64 1,827 138.9 — — — 52.0% -0.11 104.3 -0.3
46 Etsuko Inoue JPN — — – — 17 15 53.1% 1 R64 R64 R128 R64 1,641 120.2 — — — 52.9% +0.06 — +1.5
47 Jennifer Mundel RSA — — – — 16 24 40.0% 1 R32 R128 QF R128 1,652 117.5 — — — 40.9% -0.57 101.4 +1.6
48 Marcella Mesker NED — — – — 16 19 45.7% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,708 136.3 — — — 48.1% -0.10 98.5 -2.9
49 Julie Harrington USA — — – — 15 16 48.4% 0 — R128 — R64 1,629 115.7 — — — 48.6% -0.35 103.6 +2.4
50 Michelle Torres USA — — – — 15 11 57.7% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,721 141.2 — — — 57.1% +0.71 99.2 -0.8
51 Petra Delhees Jauch SUI — — – — 15 15 50.0% 0 — R32 R64 R64 1,673 123.0 — — — 48.5% -0.05 101.7 +1.0
52 Sharon Walsh Pete USA — — – — 15 13 53.6% 0 R16 — R64 R128 1,787 131.0 — — — 50.8% +0.14 99.8 -1.2
53 Christiane Jolissaint SUI — — – — 14 12 53.9% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,697 135.8 — — — 54.2% +0.29 103.2 -0.6
54 Ann Kiyomura Hayashi USA — — – — 13 20 39.4% 0 R64 — R128 R64 1,717 131.1 — — — 42.0% -0.68 100.1 -1.6
55 Elise Burgin USA — — – — 13 9 59.1% 0 — — R64 R64 1,743 128.2 — — — 54.0% +0.10 — -0.9
56 Ginny Purdy USA — — – — 13 8 61.9% 1 — — — — 1,652 112.6 — — — 55.8% -0.12 105.1 +2.8
57 Lena Sandin SWE — — – — 13 18 41.9% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,628 109.3 — — — 44.3% -0.57 97.7 +2.7
58 Sandy Collins USA — — – — 13 20 39.4% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,684 124.3 — — — 40.8% -0.63 95.5 -0.2
59 Shelley Solomon USA — — – — 13 17 43.3% 0 R64 R128 — R64 1,612 110.6 — — — 44.3% -0.46 97.6 +1.6
60 Anne Minter AUS — — – — 12 23 34.3% 0 R32 R64 R32 R128 1,593 108.3 — — — 39.0% -0.73 95.1 +1.9
61 Catrin Jexell SWE — — – — 12 17 41.4% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,649 121.0 — — — 43.8% -0.38 96.3 +0.8
62 Corinne Vanier FRA — — – — 12 21 36.4% 0 R32 R64 R64 R128 1,603 109.0 — — — 37.3% -0.85 100.6 +0.2
63 Kim Sands USA — — – — 12 13 48.0% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,623 121.3 — — — 51.6% 0.00 99.7 +1.4
64 Leslie Allen USA — — – — 12 17 41.4% 0 — R128 R32 R128 1,776 130.2 — — — 43.9% -0.89 101.8 -0.9
65 Mary Lou Piatek USA — — – — 12 20 37.5% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,721 143.9 — — — 41.3% -0.43 91.3 -4.3
66 Anne Smith USA — — – — 11 9 55.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,899 140.2 — — — 51.1% +0.02 100.5 -2.3
67 Catherine Suire FRA — — – — 11 12 47.8% 0 R32 R128 R64 R32 1,628 116.9 — — — 44.4% -0.13 104.7 +0.9
68 Claudia Monteiro BRA — — – — 11 21 34.4% 0 R64 R128 R128 R64 1,550 107.9 — — — 36.5% -1.09 100.9 +2.1
69 Joanne Russell USA — — – — 11 11 50.0% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,800 134.4 — — — 49.0% -0.25 101.8 -2.3
70 Paula Smith USA — — – — 11 15 42.3% 0 R64 R32 R128 R128 1,591 111.3 — — — 39.3% -1.10 — +0.2
71 Pilar Vasquez PER — — – — 11 14 44.0% 0 — R128 — R16 1,612 111.1 — — — 44.1% -0.47 101.9 +3.4
72 Sabina Simmonds ITA — — – — 11 22 33.3% 1 — R128 R32 R64 1,608 110.2 — — — 38.5% -0.99 92.3 +1.9
73 Sherry Acker USA — — – — 11 15 42.3% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,619 119.1 — — — 39.3% -0.70 102.8 +0.1
74 Tina Mochizuki USA — — – — 11 13 45.8% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,602 110.0 — — — 45.0% -0.18 99.8 +2.2
75 Amy Holton USA — — – — 10 17 37.0% 0 — R32 R128 R128 1,508 107.1 — — — 39.3% -0.93 102.9 +1.8
76 Vicki Nelson USA — — – — 10 23 30.3% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,539 113.5 — — — 36.0% -0.92 92.9 +0.5
77 Virginia Wade GBR — — – — 10 9 52.6% 0 R32 R128 QF R64 1,788 124.6 — — — 48.9% -0.20 103.1 -0.6
78 Anna Maria Fernandez USA — — – — 9 21 30.0% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,545 106.9 — — — 33.8% -1.43 101.7 +1.1
79 Ann Henricksson USA — — – — 9 19 32.1% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,541 115.6 — — — 33.8% -0.85 101.4 +1.0
80 Dana Gilbert USA — — – — 9 21 30.0% 0 — R64 — R64 1,540 101.0 — — — 34.3% -1.46 — +1.5
81 Evonne Goolagong AUS — — – — 9 7 56.2% 0 — R32 — — 1,970 127.4 — — — 51.4% +0.14 — +0.0
82 Gretchen Magers USA — — – — 9 6 60.0% 1 — QF — R64 1,689 116.7 — — — 52.8% -0.08 — +0.8
83 Kate Latham USA — — – — 9 16 36.0% 1 — R128 R64 R128 1,624 115.1 — — — 40.3% -0.61 96.8 +0.8
84 Rosie Casals USA — — – — 9 12 42.9% 0 — — R32 R32 1,661 117.4 — — — 44.9% -0.27 — -0.3
85 Susan Mascarin USA — — – — 9 24 27.3% 0 — R64 — R128 1,551 112.6 — — — 30.0% -1.33 94.1 +0.0
86 Terry Holladay USA — — – — 9 8 52.9% 0 — — — R32 1,679 131.9 — — — 57.1% +0.28 — +1.2
87 Terry Phelps USA — — – — 9 15 37.5% 0 — R128 R128 R32 1,632 118.3 — — — 39.3% -0.75 — -0.6
88 Candy Reynolds USA — — – — 8 13 38.1% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,697 121.4 — — — 45.0% -0.08 98.5 -0.6
89 Lele Forood USA — — – — 8 16 33.3% 0 R32 R128 R128 R64 1,554 109.7 — — — 33.3% -1.32 99.8 +0.6
90 Nancy Yeargin USA — — – — 8 15 34.8% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,557 103.9 — — — 36.5% -1.13 101.6 +2.3
91 Pascale Paradis Mangon FRA — — – — 8 6 57.1% 1 R32 R128 — R16 1,597 124.9 — — — 54.5% +0.45 — +1.1
92 Susan Leo AUS — — – — 8 19 29.6% 0 R64 R128 R32 R128 1,531 107.8 — — — 30.5% -1.22 100.4 +0.7
93 Amanda Brown GBR — — – — 7 12 36.8% 1 R64 — R64 — 1,596 107.3 — — — 38.1% -0.79 99.6 +0.7
94 Dianne Fromholtz AUS — — – — 7 13 35.0% 0 — — R128 R128 1,691 131.0 — — — 42.6% -0.34 88.7 -0.6
95 Duk Hee Lee KOR — — – — 7 14 33.3% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,655 116.4 — — — 34.0% -1.34 100.4 -1.3
96 Heather Ludloff USA — — – — 7 15 31.8% 0 R64 — R128 R128 1,515 110.0 — — — 34.7% -1.10 101.0 +0.1
97 Jenny Klitch USA — — – — 7 19 26.9% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,498 104.6 — — — 30.5% -1.83 104.4 +0.2
98 Leigh Anne Thompson USA — — – — 7 17 29.2% 0 — R128 — R128 1,716 134.6 — — — 38.8% -0.96 — -2.2
99 Mareen Louie Harper USA — — – — 7 10 41.2% 0 — — — R64 1,672 132.3 — — — 42.9% -0.43 100.3 -0.9
100 Patricia Hy Boulais CAN — — – — 7 8 46.7% 0 — — R64 R32 1,546 117.6 — — — 46.9% +0.12 — +0.9
101 Annabel Croft GBR — — – — 6 7 46.1% 0 — — R128 R128 1,595 118.2 — — — 50.0% -0.07 — +0.9
102 Kate Gompert USA — — – — 6 3 66.7% 0 — — — R32 1,673 129.8 — — — 60.0% +0.60 — +0.1
103 Kim Steinmetz USA — — – — 6 15 28.6% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,548 112.2 — — — 34.8% -0.78 — +0.1
104 Lea Antonoplis USA — — – — 6 13 31.6% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,568 97.9 — — — 32.6% -1.30 — +0.5
105 Lori Mcneil USA — — – — 6 5 54.5% 0 R32 — — — 1,568 107.2 — — — 53.8% +0.19 — +1.1
106 Lucia Romanov ROU — — – — 6 18 25.0% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,597 101.9 — — — 29.6% -1.41 — +0.4
107 Marcela Skuherska TCH — — – — 6 15 28.6% 0 R64 R128 R128 R64 1,541 113.0 — — — 34.8% -1.09 — +0.9
108 Steffi Graf GER — — – — 6 7 46.1% 0 R64 R64 — — 1,546 109.1 — — — 48.1% -0.15 — +1.3
109 Barbara Gerken USA — — – — 5 4 55.6% 0 — — — R128 1,618 117.4 — — — 52.2% +0.91 — +1.0
110 Barbara Hallquist USA — — – — 5 16 23.8% 0 — — R64 R128 1,567 105.1 — — — 28.3% -1.37 93.9 +0.7
111 Beverly Mould RSA — — – — 5 6 45.5% 0 — R32 R128 — 1,600 117.3 — — — 47.8% -0.30 — +0.3
112 Chris Oneil AUS — — – — 5 15 25.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,526 99.9 — — — 27.3% -1.34 95.9 +0.8
113 Felicia Raschiatore USA — — – — 5 8 38.5% 0 — R64 — — 1,600 110.6 — — — 43.8% -0.25 — +1.0
114 Katerina Bohmova CZE — — – — 5 18 21.7% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,522 113.4 — — — 31.4% -1.43 — -0.2
115 Masako Yanagi JPN — — – — 5 3 62.5% 0 — — — — 1,603 105.1 — — — 50.0% -0.40 106.1 +0.5
116 Yvona Brzakova TCH — — – — 5 6 45.5% 0 — R32 R128 — 1,597 114.2 — — — 48.0% -0.44 — +0.7
117 Barbara Jordan USA — — – — 4 12 25.0% 0 R64 R128 R32 R128 1,535 105.4 — — — 30.6% -1.50 — +1.1
118 Catarina Lindqvist Ryan SWE — — – — 4 4 50.0% 0 — R64 R128 — 1,524 103.3 — — — 44.4% +0.06 — +0.4
119 Claudia Pasquale SUI — — – — 4 10 28.6% 0 — R64 R64 — 1,554 103.2 — — — 32.1% -1.11 — +1.1
120 Debbie Spence Nasim USA — — – — 4 2 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,565 107.6 — — — 61.5% +0.38 — +0.3
121 Elizabeth Minter AUS — — – — 4 5 44.4% 0 R64 — R128 — 1,584 104.7 — — — 47.8% -0.04 — +1.0
122 Gigi Fernandez USA — — – — 4 8 33.3% 0 R32 — — R128 1,524 107.0 — — — 38.7% -0.81 — +0.1
123 Micki Schillig USA — — – — 4 5 44.4% 0 — — R128 — 1,611 103.8 — — — 38.9% -0.50 — +1.1
124 Myriam Schropp GER — — – — 4 5 44.4% 0 — — R128 — 1,546 106.7 — — — 42.9% -0.52 — +0.6
125 Nathalie Herreman FRA — — – — 4 3 57.1% 0 — R32 — — 1,547 103.3 — — — 50.0% -0.31 — +0.6
126 Pam Teeguarden USA — — – — 4 6 40.0% 0 — R64 R128 R32 1,652 106.0 — — — 45.8% -0.13 96.0 +0.8
127 Patricia Medrado BRA — — – — 4 18 18.2% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,577 104.1 — — — 24.0% -1.80 94.8 +0.5
128 Petra Huber AUT — — – — 4 6 40.0% 0 — — — R128 1,596 121.3 — — — 45.8% -0.54 — +0.6
129 Barbara Rossi ITA — — – — 3 5 37.5% 0 — R64 — — 1,599 107.9 — — — 36.8% -0.79 101.4 +0.3
130 Barbi Bramblett USA — — – — 3 8 27.3% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,507 103.7 — — — 33.3% -1.26 97.6 +0.7
131 Bernadette Randall AUS — — – — 3 5 37.5% 1 R64 — R64 — 1,507 107.7 — — — 42.1% -0.05 96.9 +0.1
132 Beverly Bowes USA — — – — 3 6 33.3% 0 — — R128 R128 1,526 109.4 — — — 36.4% -1.36 101.4 -0.0
133 Elizabeth Jones USA — — – — 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,549 108.8 — — — 58.3% +1.17 — +0.9
134 Emilse Raponi Longo USA — — – — 3 7 30.0% 0 — R128 — R128 1,571 126.9 — — — 39.1% -0.91 96.0 -0.5
135 Jean Hepner USA — — – — 3 5 37.5% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,508 104.1 — — — 42.1% -0.79 — +0.7
136 Jill Davis USA — — – — 3 7 30.0% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,614 114.3 — — — 36.4% -0.59 — -0.6
137 Kaoru Okamoto JPN — — – — 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,473 101.5 — — — 53.3% 0.00 — +0.6
138 Kate Brasher GBR — — – — 3 5 37.5% 2 — R128 R128 — 1,612 104.4 — — — 35.0% -1.20 100.1 +0.3
139 Lilian Drescher SUI — — – — 3 8 27.3% 0 R64 — — R128 1,585 108.2 — — — 33.3% -1.14 — +0.4
140 Louise Allen USA — — – — 3 7 30.0% 0 — — — R64 1,706 117.8 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — -0.8
141 Marie Christine Calleja FRA — — – — 3 6 33.3% 0 R64 R128 — R128 1,508 99.9 — — — 25.0% -1.88 — +0.0
142 Molly Van Nostrand USA — — – — 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,517 107.4 — — — 58.3% +0.83 — +0.8
143 Renata Sasak YUG — — – — 3 8 27.3% 0 — R64 — R128 1,536 99.4 — — — 33.3% -1.17 — +0.7
144 Sara Gomer GBR — — – — 3 7 30.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,531 102.6 — — — 40.0% -0.92 97.8 +0.6
145 Sophie Amiach FRA — — – — 3 6 33.3% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,598 109.9 — — — 33.3% -1.05 — -0.1
146 Trey Lewis USA — — – — 3 7 30.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,476 100.5 — — — 39.1% -0.57 92.1 +0.7
147 Amanda Tobin AUS — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 R64 — R128 — 1,604 115.9 — — — 41.2% -0.24 — -0.6
148 Beth Norton USA — — – — 2 10 16.7% 0 R64 — — R128 1,524 96.9 — — — 27.6% -1.55 92.6 +1.2
149 Brenda Remilton AUS — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 — — R128 — 1,548 104.1 — — — 31.3% -0.44 — +0.7
150 Cathy Drury GBR — — – — 2 3 40.0% 1 — — R128 — 1,562 99.0 — — — 45.5% -0.45 — +1.2
151 Emiko Sakaguchi JPN — — – — 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,516 105.8 — — — 62.5% +1.38 — +0.4
152 Grace Kim USA — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — R32 1,592 116.1 — — — 30.8% -1.00 — -0.1
153 Hana Strachonova SUI — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 — R64 — — 1,608 111.6 — — — 29.4% -1.88 — -1.1
154 Jamie Golder USA — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,537 103.3 — — — 25.0% -2.13 — +0.1
155 Jo Louis GBR — — – — 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,527 103.2 — — — 57.1% -0.29 — +0.2
156 Kathleen Cummings USA — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — R32 1,643 105.4 — — — 36.4% -2.00 — -0.2
157 Kathy Obrien USA — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,509 102.4 — — — 41.2% -0.18 — +0.4
158 Laura Bernstein USA — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 R64 — R128 R64 1,519 101.2 — — — 31.3% -1.12 — +0.8
159 Lea Plchova TCH — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,733 115.4 — — — 36.4% -1.09 — -0.3
160 Maeve Quinlan USA — — – — 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,502 98.7 — — — 57.1% 0.00 — +0.8
161 Pam Whytcross AUS — — – — 2 8 20.0% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,487 102.6 — — — 29.2% -1.46 — +0.7
162 Rene Mentz RSA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 1 — — R64 — 1,522 107.7 — — — 44.4% -0.78 — -0.0
163 Rene Uys RSA — — – — 2 7 22.2% 0 — — — R128 1,610 106.3 — — — 41.7% -0.29 91.4 +0.3
164 Rina Einy GBR — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — R128 — 1,556 106.8 — — — 30.8% -1.69 — +0.1
165 Ronni Reis USA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,507 101.3 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.3
166 Sabrina Goles YUG — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — R64 — R64 1,508 109.0 — — — 40.0% -0.60 — +0.4
167 Shawn Foltz USA — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,519 106.7 — — — 45.5% -0.91 — -0.0
168 Stacy Margolin USA — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — — 1,519 103.4 — — — 37.5% -0.81 — +0.5
169 Susan Leach GBR — — – — 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,497 93.2 — — — 50.0% -1.00 — +0.6
170 Akiko Kijimuta JPN — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,491 95.5 — — — 28.6% -1.57 — +0.3
171 Andrea Tiezzi ARG — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,550 103.6 — — — 50.0% +0.25 — +0.5
172 Annette Gulley AUS — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,431 97.7 — — — 37.5% -1.00 — +0.2
173 Carol Christian USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,518 96.9 — — — 50.0% -2.25 — -0.1
174 Cecilia Fernandez Parker USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 1 — — — — 1,522 101.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.3
175 Cornelia Dries GER — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,546 98.9 — — — 22.2% -1.67 — +0.1
176 Debbie Robb USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,505 98.9 — — — 40.0% -1.20 — -0.1
177 Elena Eliseenko URS — — – — 1 0 100.0% 1 — — — — 1,525 102.0 — — — 100.0% +2.00 — +0.1
178 Elisabeth Ekblom SWE — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,509 101.9 — — — 30.0% -1.00 — +0.3
179 Florenta Mihai ROU — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,625 105.6 — — — 40.0% -1.80 — +0.1
180 Heidi Eisterlehner GER — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,552 103.0 — — — 50.0% -0.25 — +0.3
181 Helena Manset USA — — – — 1 5 16.7% 0 — — — — 1,485 97.8 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — +1.2
182 Helena Olsson SWE — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,528 99.1 — — — 50.0% -0.25 — +0.4
183 Helen Davis AUS — — – — 1 1 50.0% 1 — — — — 1,532 95.1 — — — 50.0% -1.00 — +0.3
184 Hu Na USA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 102.8 — — — 25.0% -1.13 — +0.3
185 Iwona Kuczynska POL — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,433 102.9 — — — 25.0% -1.25 — +0.3
186 Jane Forman USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — R128 1,494 101.3 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — +0.2
187 Jenny Langstaff GBR — — – — 1 1 50.0% 1 — — — — 1,516 100.4 — — — 60.0% +0.80 — +0.1
188 Jill Hetherington CAN — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,507 98.2 — — — 50.0% -0.67 — +0.4
189 Joy Tacon HKG — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,528 109.3 — — — 50.0% -0.75 — -0.1
190 Karen Huebner USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,514 97.4 — — — 50.0% -1.25 — +0.3
191 Kerry Reid AUS — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 2,037 109.4 — — — 40.0% -0.60 — -0.6
192 Marsha Bladel USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,479 102.2 — — — 60.0% +1.00 — +0.3
193 Michaela Pazderova TCH — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,576 102.2 — — — 30.0% -2.20 — -0.2
194 Nanette Schutte NED — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 104.2 — — — 22.2% -1.11 — +0.0
195 Nathalie Phan Thanh FRA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,517 109.2 — — — 60.0% -0.20 — +0.1
196 Nicola Lusty GBR — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,415 103.1 — — — 60.0% +0.60 — +0.2
197 Patty Fendick USA — — – — 1 8 11.1% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,430 95.2 — — — 27.3% -1.46 — +1.0
198 Petra Keppeler GER — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,506 106.2 — — — 40.0% -0.40 — +0.3
199 Phyllis Blackwell USA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — R128 1,593 96.0 — — — 22.2% -2.45 — -0.2
200 Rebecca Bryant AUS — — – — 1 0 100.0% 1 — — — — 1,515 101.0 — — — 66.7% +1.33 — +0.4
201 Renata Tomanova GER — — – — 1 8 11.1% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,597 97.2 — — — 21.1% -2.40 — +0.0
202 Rene Blount USA — — – — 1 6 14.3% 0 — R64 R128 — 1,472 96.3 — — — 18.8% -2.25 — +0.6
203 Robin Boss USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,515 103.4 — — — 40.0% -1.40 — +0.1
204 Robin White USA — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,493 101.3 — — — 30.8% -1.31 — +0.3
205 Sandra Cecchini ITA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 106.6 — — — 60.0% 0.00 — +0.2
206 Sheila Mcinerney USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,499 99.0 — — — 40.0% -0.80 — +0.3
207 Shelly Walpole GBR — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — R128 1,588 105.5 — — — 22.2% -2.67 — -0.1
208 Susan Rimes USA — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,447 104.5 — — — 30.8% -1.46 — +0.4
209 Suzie Mair GBR — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,499 99.3 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.5
210 Wendy Gilchrist AUS — — – — 1 0 100.0% 1 — — — — 1,522 95.2 — — — 66.7% 0.00 — +0.3
211 A Grant GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 95.6 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
212 Andrea Betzner GER — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,439 95.4 — — — 14.3% -2.72 — +0.1
213 Angela Walker CAN — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,500 96.5 — — — 0.0% -3.25 — +0.3
214 Ann Hulbert USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 103.6 — — — 20.0% -1.60 — -0.1
215 Ann Jones GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,924 91.5 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
216 Beatrice Guery FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,484 107.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
217 Berit Bjork SWE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,460 100.7 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.0
218 Betty Stove NED — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,631 88.3 — — — 0.0% -4.25 — +0.3
219 Brigitte Simon Glinel FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,616 98.6 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
220 Carina Karlsson SWE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,418 96.6 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
221 Caroline Hagey USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 94.6 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.2
222 Caroline Kuhlman USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,492 98.7 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0.0
223 Caryn Copeland Wilson USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,463 98.7 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
224 Cornelia Lechner GER — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,441 96.3 — — — 0.0% -3.25 — +0.1
225 Debbie Freeman AUS — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,472 98.3 — — — 20.0% -2.40 — +0.1
226 Deborah Jevans GBR — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,544 99.6 — — — 11.1% -2.67 — -0.1
227 Eileen Tell USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,519 98.1 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.4
228 Emiko Okagawa JPN — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,454 93.3 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.4
229 Frederique Thibault FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,520 99.4 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.2
230 G Von Domieux — — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,479 93.4 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.3
231 Heather Crowe USA — — – — 0 5 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,542 94.8 — — — 23.1% -1.23 — +0.1
232 Helene Pelletier CAN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,425 98.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.0
233 Helen Park KOR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,591 98.9 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
234 Helga Lutten GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,564 101.2 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — +0.3
235 Ingrid Bentzer SWE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,523 100.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.2
236 Isabelle Vernhes FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,515 102.6 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — -0.1
237 Isabelle Villiger SUI — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,583 — — — — — — — +0.3
238 Jane Preyer USA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,585 95.2 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.4
239 Jennifer Fuchs USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 99.0 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — +0.2
240 Jennifer Goodling USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,446 98.7 — — — 20.0% -1.60 — +0.0
241 Jenny Byrne AUS — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,477 95.3 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.0
242 Jenny Reeves GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 91.6 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.2
243 Jenny Walker AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,540 98.4 — — — 33.3% 0.00 — +0.4
244 Julie Salmon GBR — — – — 0 5 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,476 94.8 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.0
245 June Ferestein USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,531 95.1 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.0
246 J Wood GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 100.1 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.1
247 Karen Dewis CAN — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,412 89.5 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.2
248 Karen Smith AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,514 93.4 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.1
249 Karin Stampfli SUI — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,531 97.1 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
250 Kathrin Keil USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,634 108.6 — — — 33.3% -2.67 — -0.2
251 Kathy Holton USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 98.7 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.1
252 Kim Seddon RSA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,426 92.3 — — — 20.0% -2.80 — +0.4
253 Kim Staunton AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,496 101.4 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
254 Kristin Kinney USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,471 96.1 — — — 20.0% -2.20 — +0.2
255 Larisa Savchenko URS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,498 109.7 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — -0.2
256 Laura Dupont USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,592 108.1 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.3
257 Liliana Giussani ARG — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,611 106.6 — — — 20.0% -1.40 — -0.1
258 Linda Cassell AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,435 98.4 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.0
259 Linda Harley GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 96.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
260 Lisa Spain Short USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,467 96.8 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
261 Lori Kosten USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,463 90.6 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.0
262 Lucy Gordon USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,546 100.0 — — — 33.3% 0.00 — +0.3
263 Margaret Redfearn USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,519 96.9 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.2
264 Marianne Groat CAN — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,461 93.7 — — — 20.0% -2.40 — +0.3
265 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 100.4 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.0
266 Mary Ann Colville USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,387 96.3 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
267 M Davidson GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 91.5 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
268 Melissa Brown USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 98.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.2
269 Michelle Tyler GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,593 97.8 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.2
270 Naoko Sato JPN — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,467 93.8 — — — 11.1% -1.89 — +0.5
271 Natalia Leipus AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,479 99.0 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.4
272 Nerida Gregory AUS — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,485 96.7 — — — 0.0% -2.75 — +0.4
273 Paulette Moreno HKG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 96.9 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
274 Penny Barg USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 101.3 — — — 33.3% -1.17 — -0.1
275 Sally Reeves GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,426 98.0 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.1
276 Shelby Torrance USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,420 94.2 — — — 0.0% -3.75 — +0.1
277 Sonoe Yonezawa JPN — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 93.4 — — — 0.0% -3.75 — +0.1
278 Stephanie Rehe USA — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,472 101.2 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.1
279 Susan Burke USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 97.5 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
280 Susan Rollinson RSA — — – — 0 7 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,530 87.5 — — — 6.7% -3.13 — +0.2
281 Svetlana Cherneva RUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,501 98.7 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.1
282 Tracie Blumentritt USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 99.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
283 Ute Strakerjahn GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,439 94.8 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.2
284 Vicki Beggs USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,568 93.1 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.1
285 Vicki Marler AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,475 96.3 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1

How to read these columns

Rank
For the current season, this is the latest ranking. For past seasons, this is the year-end ranking.
Points
Official ranking points from the selected ranking snapshot.
Wk +/−
Ranking change since the previous ranking snapshot.
YTD Δ
Ranking change since the start of the season.
Win %
Wins divided by total completed main-draw matches.
Elo
For the current season, this is the latest TennisDB Elo rating. For past seasons, this is year-end Elo.
P+
Scoreline performance adjusted for opponent strength on a 0-200 scale. 100 is average; a 10-point difference equals five expected-win percentage points.
Serve+
Estimated percentage points won on serve above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
Return+
Estimated percentage points won on return above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
PD
Return points won divided by opponents' return points won. 1.000 is even; above 1.000 is better.
Set Win %
Sets won divided by total completed sets in eligible scored matches.
Set Margin
Average per-set game margin from the player's perspective. Positive values mean winning sets by more games on average.
Pressure+
Opponent-adjusted deciding-set and tiebreak performance on a 0-200 scale; 100 is the pre-match surface-Elo expectation. Small samples are shrunk, at least three of each are required, and a deciding-set tiebreak counts only once.
Schedule
Expected wins added by opponent quality versus a typical player-season schedule. Positive means an easier schedule; negative means a tougher one. Career values are per 100 matches.

View the full tennis statistics glossary →

WTA Rankings Archive

Browse WTA rankings and season leader archives by year.