Rankings as of: Dec 30, 1985

WTA 1985 Season Leaders & Rankings

Compare singles rankings, points, and season records. Choose a year to explore earlier standings.

Martina Navratilova finished 1985 at WTA No. 1.

Need custom historical filters? Search ranking weeks or search player seasons with the Advanced search tool.

Rankings Leaders

Ranking points, results, and season metrics for 1985.

331 players with >= 1 match

# Player Country Rank Points Wk +/− YTD Δ W L Win % Titles AORGWUSO Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD Set Win % Set Margin Pressure+ Schedule
1 Martina Navratilova USA 1 — – ▶ 0 84 5 94.4% 12 W F W F 2,597 177.7 — — — 90.1% +3.06 101.4 -2.0
2 Chris Evert USA 2 — – ▶ 0 78 8 90.7% 10 F W F SF 2,434 176.7 — — — 86.0% +2.88 98.7 -3.9
3 Hana Mandlikova AUS 3 — – ▲ 2 53 14 79.1% 3 SF QF R32 W 2,211 170.8 — — — 75.0% +1.78 109.1 -5.4
4 Gretchen Magers USA 3 — – — 1 5 16.7% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,644 103.2 — — — 16.7% -2.17 — -0.3
5 Pam Shriver USA 4 — – ▶ 0 54 13 80.6% 4 R16 — QF QF 2,119 161.3 — — — 75.7% +1.82 101.9 -0.5
6 Claudia Kohde Kilsch GER 5 — – ▲ 2 49 19 72.1% 1 SF SF R64 QF 2,118 168.8 — — — 67.3% +1.34 101.3 -5.5
7 Steffi Graf GER 6 — – ▲ 18 40 13 75.5% 0 — R16 R16 SF 2,039 163.2 — — — 69.6% +1.45 110.8 -2.9
8 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere SUI 7 — – ▼ 1 46 18 71.9% 1 QF QF R16 R16 2,075 161.5 — — — 70.6% +1.90 99.5 -0.4
9 Zina Garrison USA 8 — – ▲ 1 51 18 73.9% 2 QF R64 SF QF 2,033 160.3 — — — 67.7% +1.56 96.5 +0.8
10 Helena Sukova CZE 9 — – ▼ 1 54 21 72.0% 0 QF R64 QF QF 2,029 162.5 — — — 68.7% +1.34 101.9 -3.4
11 Bonnie Gadusek USA 10 — – — 45 12 79.0% 4 — R16 R64 R32 2,047 157.2 — — — 76.6% +1.90 98.1 +0.2
12 Gabriela Sabatini ARG 12 — – ▲ 60 48 18 72.7% 1 — SF R32 R128 1,947 156.7 — — — 69.6% +1.39 110.0 +0.9
13 Andrea Temesvari HUN 16 — – ▼ 2 18 12 60.0% 1 — R128 R64 R64 1,849 136.5 — — — 61.5% +0.86 95.7 +1.4
14 Stephanie Rehe USA 18 — – — 23 12 65.7% 2 — — R32 R128 1,805 137.7 — — — 66.2% +1.22 96.2 +1.0
15 Jo Durie GBR 26 — – ▼ 1 17 19 47.2% 0 R16 R128 R16 R128 1,800 133.4 — — — 48.8% +0.06 96.7 -1.4
16 Katerina Maleeva BUL 28 — – ▲ 63 30 20 60.0% 2 R16 R32 R128 R128 1,814 134.1 — — — 58.3% +0.36 101.9 -0.0
17 Robin White USA 32 — – ▲ 68 25 18 58.1% 1 R32 — R32 R16 1,763 139.4 — — — 55.8% +0.51 106.8 +0.3
18 Rosalyn Fairbank USA 38 — – ▼ 6 28 23 54.9% 0 R64 R16 R64 R128 1,806 136.9 — — — 51.3% +0.09 109.3 -1.7
19 Catherine Tanvier FRA 39 — – ▼ 8 18 16 52.9% 0 — R32 R16 R128 1,775 132.0 — — — 54.3% +0.26 98.4 -0.5
20 Liz Smylie AUS 43 — – ▼ 3 16 19 45.7% 0 R32 — R16 R128 1,730 128.2 — — — 47.1% -0.38 99.5 -0.3
21 Helen Kelesi CAN 48 — – — 15 15 50.0% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,642 120.7 — — — 48.0% -0.51 106.9 +0.8
22 Sandra Cecchini ITA 49 — – ▶ 0 22 19 53.7% 1 — QF R64 R32 1,747 132.3 — — — 51.1% -0.19 109.7 +0.7
23 Larisa Savchenko URS 55 — – ▲ 79 15 17 46.9% 0 — R128 R32 — 1,673 126.1 — — — 44.2% -0.31 104.0 -0.4
24 Camille Benjamin USA 62 — – ▼ 28 22 29 43.1% 0 R64 R64 R64 R32 1,629 116.9 — — — 44.6% -0.60 102.2 +2.7
25 Laura Arraya PER 63 — – ▼ 28 17 21 44.7% 0 — R64 — R128 1,691 125.0 — — — 45.1% -0.27 99.8 +1.9
26 Gigi Fernandez USA 64 — – ▼ 36 9 18 33.3% 0 R32 — — R128 1,655 131.7 — — — 36.7% -1.17 102.0 -1.7
27 Caroline Kuhlman USA 68 — – — 9 4 69.2% 0 — — — R32 1,614 127.6 — — — 61.3% +1.13 106.2 +0.7
28 Patty Fendick USA 83 — – ▲ 34 6 8 42.9% 0 — — R32 R128 1,551 125.3 — — — 47.1% -0.09 — +0.3
29 Lori Mcneil USA 93 — – ▼ 3 13 23 36.1% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,587 118.5 — — — 39.2% -0.85 96.4 -0.2
30 Mary Joe Fernandez USA 99 — – — 5 6 45.5% 0 — R128 — R64 1,554 130.1 — — — 50.0% +0.04 — -0.5
31 Catherine Suire FRA 104 — – ▲ 9 6 11 35.3% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,604 117.2 — — — 34.2% -1.29 103.0 -0.7
32 Louise Field AUS 106 — – ▲ 142 4 6 40.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,517 115.3 — — — 42.9% -0.86 — +0.3
33 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 112 — – ▲ 158 3 3 50.0% 0 — R32 — — 1,539 107.2 — — — 46.7% 0.00 101.7 +0.2
34 Mercedes Paz ARG 115 — – ▲ 172 7 11 38.9% 1 — R128 R128 R64 1,526 110.8 — — — 40.9% -0.66 — +0.8
35 Sophie Amiach FRA 121 — – ▼ 45 5 15 25.0% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,532 102.6 — — — 33.3% -1.58 96.1 +1.9
36 Jenny Byrne AUS 132 — – ▲ 5 4 7 36.4% 0 R64 — R32 — 1,491 109.9 — — — 40.7% -0.59 98.2 +0.9
37 Isabelle Demongeot FRA 135 — – ▲ 22 4 7 36.4% 0 — R128 R32 R128 1,520 106.0 — — — 36.4% -0.95 — +0.8
38 Julie Richardson NZL 145 — – ▲ 89 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,505 109.5 — — — 45.5% +0.09 — +0.5
39 Nicole Bradtke AUS 147 — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 R32 — — — 1,507 116.5 — — — 33.3% -0.83 — +0.2
40 Silke Meier GER 164 — – ▲ 47 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,511 104.5 — — — 46.2% +0.15 — +0.3
41 Laura Golarsa ITA 166 — – — 5 1 83.3% 1 — — — — 1,563 114.0 — — — 78.6% +1.93 — +0.5
42 Akiko Kijimuta JPN 172 — – ▲ 24 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,502 100.9 — — — 54.5% -0.36 — +0.9
43 Elna Reinach RSA 205 — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,494 101.9 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.2
44 Linda Ferrando ITA 221 — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,502 98.7 — — — 50.0% -0.50 — +0.6
45 Bettina Fulco ARG 248 — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 96.2 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.0
46 Cecilia Dahlman SWE 297 — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 96.1 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.2
47 Clare Wood GBR 304 — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,491 101.0 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0.0
48 Catarina Lindqvist Ryan SWE — — – — 44 18 71.0% 1 QF R64 R128 R16 1,975 162.1 — — — 67.9% +1.41 105.1 -2.3
49 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel USA — — – — 41 16 71.9% 1 — R32 SF R128 1,976 159.0 — — — 70.6% +1.53 105.7 -3.0
50 Wendy Turnbull AUS — — – — 36 18 66.7% 0 R16 — R32 R16 1,961 150.0 — — — 65.3% +1.14 92.9 +1.3
51 Barbara Potter USA — — – — 31 16 66.0% 1 R32 R128 QF R64 1,900 142.6 — — — 61.9% +0.74 102.4 +0.0
52 Carling Bassett Seguso CAN — — – — 30 17 63.8% 0 — R16 R64 R16 1,881 145.4 — — — 61.3% +0.77 96.5 +2.1
53 Elise Burgin USA — — – — 29 23 55.8% 0 R64 R64 R32 R32 1,773 137.6 — — — 51.7% +0.03 106.3 -1.5
54 Mareen Louie Harper USA — — – — 29 18 61.7% 1 — — R64 R128 1,777 143.9 — — — 58.5% +0.41 101.8 -0.2
55 Kathy Jordan USA — — – — 28 15 65.1% 0 — — R64 R16 1,979 155.5 — — — 59.8% +1.02 104.9 -2.9
56 Virginia Ruzici ROU — — – — 27 19 58.7% 1 — R128 R64 R128 1,786 140.6 — — — 57.4% +0.63 102.6 -0.1
57 Raffaella Reggi Concato ITA — — – — 26 19 57.8% 1 — R16 — R64 1,783 138.5 — — — 54.2% +0.26 102.7 +0.4
58 Bettina Bunge GER — — – — 25 17 59.5% 0 R64 R32 R32 R128 1,846 154.1 — — — 61.1% +1.04 96.3 -2.9
59 Debbie Spence Nasim USA — — – — 25 19 56.8% 0 — R16 — R128 1,777 141.5 — — — 54.7% +0.34 103.0 -1.6
60 Terry Phelps USA — — – — 25 22 53.2% 0 — QF R64 R32 1,785 137.1 — — — 53.7% +0.21 101.4 -0.1
61 Pam Casale USA — — – — 24 20 54.5% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,815 137.8 — — — 53.1% +0.34 98.8 -1.0
62 Annabel Croft GBR — — – — 23 20 53.5% 1 R64 R128 R128 R64 1,762 133.3 — — — 50.5% +0.20 105.5 +0.8
63 Kathy Horvath USA — — – — 23 16 59.0% 2 — R32 — R128 1,776 138.1 — — — 55.8% +0.24 104.1 -0.7
64 Susan Mascarin USA — — – — 22 22 50.0% 0 — R32 R64 R128 1,731 133.3 — — — 51.5% -0.04 99.9 -2.2
65 Sylvia Hanika GER — — – — 22 16 57.9% 0 — R16 R64 R32 1,868 147.5 — — — 59.5% +0.67 99.6 -2.5
66 Anne Minter AUS — — – — 21 25 45.6% 0 R64 R64 R64 R64 1,700 129.4 — — — 43.7% -0.49 106.0 -1.8
67 Sabrina Goles YUG — — – — 21 20 51.2% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,692 134.7 — — — 51.6% +0.16 96.6 -0.8
68 Alycia Moulton USA — — – — 20 18 52.6% 0 R64 — R32 R16 1,743 133.9 — — — 53.7% +0.54 95.9 +0.7
69 Carina Karlsson SWE — — – — 20 21 48.8% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,671 128.5 — — — 45.7% -0.30 106.2 -0.4
70 Iva Budarova TCH — — – — 19 23 45.2% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,726 124.5 — — — 46.5% -0.41 95.6 +0.2
71 Ann Henricksson USA — — – — 18 22 45.0% 0 R16 R64 R64 R32 1,698 132.0 — — — 47.9% -0.26 101.0 +1.4
72 Lilian Drescher SUI — — – — 18 16 52.9% 0 — R128 R64 R64 1,687 130.6 — — — 56.2% +0.60 92.4 +1.2
73 Pascale Paradis Mangon FRA — — – — 18 20 47.4% 0 R64 R64 R16 R128 1,732 132.1 — — — 46.3% -0.15 101.1 -1.1
74 Beth Herr USA — — – — 17 23 42.5% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,630 116.3 — — — 41.3% -0.46 107.3 +1.5
75 Christiane Jolissaint SUI — — – — 17 18 48.6% 0 R32 R32 R128 R128 1,719 124.9 — — — 49.4% -0.11 100.9 -0.8
76 Dianne Fromholtz AUS — — – — 17 17 50.0% 0 R16 R128 R64 R128 1,794 143.9 — — — 47.2% +0.17 — -2.3
77 Grace Kim USA — — – — 17 25 40.5% 0 — R64 R128 R32 1,694 125.4 — — — 43.4% -0.79 101.5 -0.7
78 Lisa Bonder Kreiss USA — — – — 17 22 43.6% 0 R32 R64 R128 R64 1,797 146.3 — — — 41.9% -0.55 101.4 -1.8
79 Vicki Nelson USA — — – — 17 22 43.6% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,594 130.3 — — — 45.9% -0.15 95.3 +1.6
80 Tine Scheuer Larsen DEN — — – — 16 17 48.5% 0 — R16 R128 R128 1,677 130.1 — — — 52.2% +0.35 95.3 -0.3
81 Betsy Nagelsen USA — — – — 14 12 53.9% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,714 129.7 — — — 54.2% +0.36 — +1.1
82 Lea Antonoplis USA — — – — 14 21 40.0% 0 R64 — R128 R128 1,571 120.2 — — — 41.3% -0.55 102.7 +2.2
83 Mary Lou Piatek USA — — – — 14 18 43.8% 0 — — R128 R64 1,678 113.9 — — — 43.1% -0.61 100.7 +2.0
84 Angelika Kanellopoulou GRE — — – — 13 13 50.0% 0 — R32 — R128 1,630 128.7 — — — 52.4% +0.21 98.8 +1.0
85 Anne Hobbs GBR — — – — 13 12 52.0% 1 R16 R128 R64 R32 1,777 134.0 — — — 51.9% -0.06 — -0.2
86 Etsuko Inoue JPN — — – — 13 21 38.2% 0 R32 R128 R64 R128 1,633 117.7 — — — 41.3% -0.66 96.4 +0.5
87 Kim Jones USA — — – — 13 18 41.9% 0 — — R128 R128 1,725 135.7 — — — 43.7% -0.72 102.6 -1.5
88 Adriana Villagran Reami ARG — — – — 12 18 40.0% 0 — R32 R64 R64 1,559 105.9 — — — 43.1% -0.86 101.4 +1.7
89 Andrea Holikova TCH — — – — 12 11 52.2% 0 R64 R64 R64 R32 1,640 119.0 — — — 49.1% -0.11 105.3 +0.4
90 Anne White USA — — – — 12 11 52.2% 0 — R32 R128 R32 1,802 137.0 — — — 51.0% 0.00 103.1 -0.5
91 Regina Marsikova CZE — — – — 12 16 42.9% 0 R64 — — R64 1,764 131.6 — — — 49.2% -0.07 94.5 -2.2
92 Barbara Gerken USA — — – — 11 22 33.3% 0 R64 — R64 R128 1,577 123.0 — — — 38.9% -0.56 96.8 +0.9
93 Kate Gompert USA — — – — 11 8 57.9% 0 — — R128 R16 1,724 135.6 — — — 60.0% +0.80 — +1.3
94 Marcella Mesker NED — — – — 11 20 35.5% 0 R64 R128 R32 R128 1,660 121.2 — — — 39.2% -0.95 97.7 -1.0
95 Petra Delhees Jauch SUI — — – — 11 9 55.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,705 132.5 — — — 56.5% +0.17 — -1.2
96 Anne Smith USA — — – — 10 4 71.4% 1 — R128 R16 — 1,901 131.2 — — — 64.5% +0.90 — -1.4
97 Michelle Torres USA — — – — 10 15 40.0% 0 — R128 — R32 1,704 112.2 — — — 42.1% -0.65 98.0 +1.2
98 Petra Huber AUT — — – — 10 15 40.0% 0 — — — R64 1,631 127.1 — — — 40.4% -0.21 100.6 +0.2
99 Petra Keppeler GER — — – — 10 9 52.6% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,608 117.5 — — — 51.2% -0.32 — +0.5
100 Sara Gomer GBR — — – — 10 15 40.0% 0 R32 R128 R64 R128 1,568 117.7 — — — 42.9% -0.46 98.6 +1.6
101 Amy Holton USA — — – — 9 16 36.0% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,554 109.0 — — — 37.7% -1.28 104.9 +0.3
102 Belinda Cordwell NZL — — – — 9 9 50.0% 0 R64 — — R32 1,582 128.0 — — — 51.2% +0.24 100.2 +0.7
103 Eva Pfaff GER — — – — 9 11 45.0% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,739 120.9 — — — 46.3% -0.29 — +0.7
104 Jane Forman USA — — – — 9 6 60.0% 1 — — — — 1,562 107.4 — — — 58.1% +0.13 — +0.2
105 Jenny Klitch USA — — – — 9 18 33.3% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,590 99.7 — — — 35.0% -1.58 101.6 +0.9
106 Karolina Karlsson SWE — — – — 9 3 75.0% 1 — — — — 1,582 125.1 — — — 76.9% +2.12 — +0.9
107 Katerina Bohmova CZE — — – — 9 14 39.1% 0 R32 R64 R128 R64 1,570 113.5 — — — 44.8% -0.67 99.1 +1.3
108 Linda Gates USA — — – — 9 9 50.0% 0 R64 — — R32 1,580 120.0 — — — 48.8% +0.09 — +1.2
109 Lisa Spain Short USA — — – — 9 21 30.0% 0 R64 R64 R128 R64 1,512 116.3 — — — 34.3% -0.99 96.8 +1.4
110 Maria Lindstrom SWE — — – — 9 5 64.3% 1 — — — R128 1,561 119.1 — — — 64.7% +1.06 — +1.2
111 Melissa Gurney USA — — – — 9 12 42.9% 0 — — R64 R128 1,629 129.6 — — — 48.9% -0.04 — +0.1
112 Mima Jausovec SLO — — – — 9 12 42.9% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,695 127.7 — — — 45.8% -0.33 94.8 -0.6
113 Molly Van Nostrand USA — — – — 9 11 45.0% 0 R64 — QF R64 1,625 138.6 — — — 46.7% -0.60 99.9 -0.3
114 Myriam Schropp GER — — – — 9 19 32.1% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,545 104.8 — — — 32.3% -1.39 — +1.3
115 Terry Holladay USA — — – — 9 16 36.0% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,609 119.2 — — — 40.7% -0.75 98.1 +0.4
116 Cecilia Fernandez Parker USA — — – — 8 7 53.3% 0 — — — — 1,550 115.5 — — — 53.1% +0.34 — +0.9
117 Helena Dahlstrom SWE — — – — 8 5 61.5% 0 — — — — 1,550 107.9 — — — 58.6% +0.79 — +0.7
118 Janine Tremelling AUS — — – — 8 15 34.8% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,575 132.8 — — — 39.2% -0.65 96.8 -0.5
119 Kristin Kinney USA — — – — 8 14 36.4% 0 — — R128 — 1,510 115.1 — — — 39.6% -1.02 — +1.1
120 Patricia Medrado BRA — — – — 8 14 36.4% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,542 114.5 — — — 39.1% -0.22 — +0.8
121 Sharon Walsh Pete USA — — – — 8 17 32.0% 0 R64 — R128 R128 1,623 115.8 — — — 32.1% -1.32 103.9 +0.3
122 Wendy White USA — — – — 8 16 33.3% 0 — R128 R32 R128 1,608 111.8 — — — 34.5% -1.05 99.4 +1.0
123 Yvonne Vermaak RSA — — – — 8 21 27.6% 0 — — R64 R128 1,605 125.4 — — — 37.7% -0.97 — -0.9
124 Joanne Russell USA — — – — 7 20 25.9% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,613 112.1 — — — 26.3% -1.05 95.4 +0.1
125 Marcela Skuherska TCH — — – — 7 18 28.0% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,532 104.1 — — — 26.8% -1.77 — -0.3
126 Monica Lundqvist SWE — — – — 7 4 63.6% 0 — — — — 1,550 118.2 — — — 62.5% +1.33 — +0.0
127 Olga Votavova TCH — — – — 7 3 70.0% 0 — — — — 1,566 118.1 — — — 69.6% +1.78 — +1.3
128 Rene Uys RSA — — – — 7 14 33.3% 0 — R128 R16 R128 1,614 117.0 — — — 36.0% -1.12 104.3 -0.0
129 Virginia Wade GBR — — – — 7 9 43.8% 0 R32 R64 R32 — 1,712 118.6 — — — 44.4% -0.72 100.6 -0.5
130 Beverly Bowes USA — — – — 6 6 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,526 113.9 — — — 50.0% +0.12 — +0.4
131 Candy Reynolds USA — — – — 6 9 40.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,606 107.9 — — — 44.4% -0.56 98.0 +1.4
132 Dee Ann Hansel USA — — – — 6 4 60.0% 0 R64 — — — 1,527 118.4 — — — 54.5% +0.14 — -0.2
133 Elizabeth Minter AUS — — – — 6 19 24.0% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,536 102.4 — — — 28.8% -1.46 98.5 +0.7
134 Emilse Raponi Longo USA — — – — 6 14 30.0% 0 — R64 — R128 1,504 102.4 — — — 39.1% -0.70 89.0 +2.1
135 Eva Krapl SUI — — – — 6 4 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,535 108.4 — — — 57.1% +0.33 — +0.3
136 Federica Bonsignori ITA — — – — 6 7 46.1% 0 — R128 — — 1,498 111.1 — — — 48.3% +0.14 — +0.8
137 Ginny Purdy USA — — – — 6 11 35.3% 0 — R128 — — 1,532 95.6 — — — 35.9% -1.26 100.3 +1.1
138 Halle Cioffi USA — — – — 6 2 75.0% 0 — — — — 1,550 107.3 — — — 63.2% +1.11 — +0.5
139 Hu Na USA — — – — 6 9 40.0% 0 R64 — R32 R64 1,537 121.1 — — — 43.8% -0.75 — +0.4
140 Isabel Cueto GER — — – — 6 9 40.0% 0 — R32 — R64 1,520 110.4 — — — 44.4% -0.39 97.3 +1.6
141 Leigh Anne Thompson USA — — – — 6 11 35.3% 0 — — — R32 1,594 115.4 — — — 36.8% -0.66 — +0.2
142 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer USA — — – — 6 3 66.7% 1 — — — R64 1,541 112.3 — — — 63.2% +0.89 — +0.4
143 Neige Dias BRA — — – — 6 12 33.3% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,528 114.6 — — — 28.9% -1.66 105.9 -0.6
144 Shawn Foltz USA — — – — 6 14 30.0% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,548 121.1 — — — 34.0% -1.17 101.2 -1.2
145 Amanda Brown GBR — — – — 5 13 27.8% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,578 109.5 — — — 29.3% -1.41 — -0.1
146 Andrea Betzner GER — — – — 5 8 38.5% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,484 106.3 — — — 37.5% -0.22 101.1 +1.1
147 Andrea Jaeger USA — — – — 5 5 50.0% 0 — R64 — R64 1,940 112.8 — — — 47.6% -0.76 — -0.5
148 Anna Ivan USA — — – — 5 5 50.0% 0 — — — R128 1,572 124.6 — — — 52.0% +0.16 — +0.5
149 Laura Bernstein USA — — – — 5 7 41.7% 0 — R128 — — 1,500 108.2 — — — 51.7% +0.34 — +0.5
150 Laura Garrone ITA — — – — 5 5 50.0% 0 — R32 — R64 1,530 112.1 — — — 50.0% +0.09 — +1.3
151 Micki Schillig USA — — – — 5 6 45.5% 0 — — — — 1,520 95.3 — — — 40.0% -0.80 — +0.8
152 Sabine Hack GER — — – — 5 1 83.3% 1 — — — — 1,559 112.1 — — — 83.3% +2.42 — +0.6
153 Tina Mochizuki USA — — – — 5 12 29.4% 0 — R128 — — 1,475 106.8 — — — 27.8% -1.78 100.1 +1.0
154 Cammy Macgregor USA — — – — 4 3 57.1% 0 — — — — 1,509 98.3 — — — 60.0% +0.13 — +0.3
155 Caterina Nozzoli ITA — — – — 4 3 57.1% 0 — — — — 1,518 103.5 — — — 52.9% +0.12 — +0.6
156 Cheryl Jones USA — — – — 4 3 57.1% 0 — — — — 1,512 105.3 — — — 55.6% +0.50 99.2 +0.3
157 Elisabeth Ekblom SWE — — – — 4 4 50.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,512 96.7 — — — 44.4% -0.44 — +0.4
158 Gabriela Dinu FRG — — – — 4 3 57.1% 0 — R32 — — 1,594 105.2 — — — 47.1% -0.06 104.6 +0.5
159 Hana Fukarkova TCH — — – — 4 1 80.0% 0 — — — — 1,540 107.6 — — — 72.7% +1.09 — +0.0
160 Kathleen Cummings USA — — – — 4 12 25.0% 0 — R128 R64 — 1,504 99.6 — — — 25.0% -2.09 — +1.8
161 Marie Christine Calleja FRA — — – — 4 8 33.3% 0 — R32 — — 1,568 119.1 — — — 29.6% -1.48 — -0.3
162 Masako Yanagi JPN — — – — 4 12 25.0% 0 R32 R128 R128 — 1,522 110.2 — — — 32.4% -1.05 93.6 +0.8
163 Susan Rimes USA — — – — 4 6 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,436 100.1 — — — 46.2% -0.35 — +0.5
164 Svetlana Cherneva RUS — — – — 4 3 57.1% 0 — — — — 1,607 120.9 — — — 50.0% +0.28 — -0.2
165 Amanda Tobin AUS — — – — 3 5 37.5% 0 R16 — — — 1,561 124.3 — — — 45.0% +0.05 — -0.2
166 Annette Gulley AUS — — – — 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,454 102.2 — — — 60.0% +0.70 — +0.5
167 Beverly Mould RSA — — – — 3 12 20.0% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,537 101.3 — — — 25.7% -1.51 97.7 +0.9
168 Carin Anderholm SWE — — – — 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — — 1,507 104.8 — — — 42.9% -1.00 — +0.1
169 Catrin Jexell SWE — — – — 3 8 27.3% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,491 107.7 — — — 32.0% -0.96 — +0.8
170 Claudia Monteiro BRA — — – — 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,565 114.0 — — — 58.3% +0.75 — +0.2
171 Jennifer Mundel RSA — — – — 3 7 30.0% 0 — R64 — R128 1,568 111.1 — — — 30.4% -1.35 — +0.0
172 Kate Latham USA — — – — 3 1 75.0% 0 — — — — 1,527 102.8 — — — 60.0% +0.40 — +0.1
173 Kim Sands USA — — – — 3 8 27.3% 0 — R64 — — 1,546 110.1 — — — 33.3% -1.26 — +0.2
174 Kirsten Dreyer USA — — – — 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — — 1,485 96.1 — — — 37.5% -0.31 — +0.6
175 Lea Plchova TCH — — – — 3 6 33.3% 0 — — R64 — 1,657 108.2 — — — 35.0% -0.70 — +0.1
176 Michaela Washington USA — — – — 3 8 27.3% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,552 101.7 — — — 28.0% -1.96 — +0.2
177 Nathalie Herreman FRA — — – — 3 6 33.3% 0 — R64 — — 1,542 100.6 — — — 40.0% -1.30 — +0.9
178 Patty Oreilly USA — — – — 3 1 75.0% 0 — — — — 1,528 105.6 — — — 66.7% +1.55 — +0.2
179 Rina Einy GBR — — – — 3 4 42.9% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,504 96.9 — — — 43.8% -1.00 — +1.1
180 Amy Schwartz USA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,499 92.1 — — — 44.4% -1.33 — +0.0
181 Andrea Tiezzi ARG — — – — 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,558 102.3 — — — 57.1% +0.57 — +0.1
182 Anna Maria Fernandez USA — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — R128 1,474 101.5 — — — 29.4% -0.88 99.4 +0.9
183 Barbara Jordan USA — — – — 2 6 25.0% 0 — — R128 R128 1,489 92.3 — — — 23.5% -1.94 — +1.2
184 Beth Norton USA — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 R64 — — — 1,499 97.3 — — — 26.7% -1.87 — +1.0
185 Caryn Copeland Wilson USA — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,447 102.3 — — — 40.0% +0.10 — +0.7
186 Cecille Calmette FRA — — – — 2 1 66.7% 0 — R32 — — 1,542 110.0 — — — 66.7% +0.17 — +0.1
187 Corinne Vanier FRA — — – — 2 13 13.3% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,492 105.0 — — — 18.8% -2.25 — -0.4
188 Cornelia Lechner GER — — – — 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,464 104.9 — — — 66.7% +1.50 — +0.1
189 Daniela Moise ROU — — – — 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,512 101.7 — — — 62.5% +0.75 — +0.1
190 Eleni Rossides USA — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — R128 1,507 119.2 — — — 40.0% -0.90 — -0.1
191 Ellen Walliser FRA — — – — 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,521 101.0 — — — 66.7% 0.00 — -0.1
192 Heather Ludloff USA — — – — 2 12 14.3% 0 — — R128 — 1,488 104.4 — — — 22.6% -2.29 100.2 +0.5
193 Jane Holdren USA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,522 101.6 — — — 50.0% -1.25 — +0.1
194 Jane Young CAN — — – — 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — R64 1,491 100.2 — — — 33.3% -1.60 — +0.5
195 Jean Hepner USA — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,456 104.2 — — — 45.5% +0.09 — -0.1
196 Linda Lewis USA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,591 93.4 — — — 28.6% -2.00 — +0.0
197 Marianne Groat CAN — — – — 2 6 25.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,462 102.2 — — — 33.3% -1.56 — -0.0
198 Mariela Mendez MEX — — – — 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,522 99.2 — — — 57.1% 0.00 — +0.4
199 Melissa Brown USA — — – — 2 8 20.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,480 95.3 — — — 38.5% -0.89 92.5 +1.2
200 Penny Barg USA — — – — 2 7 22.2% 0 — R64 — — 1,493 106.0 — — — 27.3% -1.64 — -0.3
201 Sabina Simmonds ITA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,578 117.8 — — — 50.0% -0.50 — -0.8
202 Adriana Velcheva BUL — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 96.7 — — — 40.0% -0.80 — +0.1
203 Andrea Leand USA — — – — 1 5 16.7% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,681 93.5 — — — 16.7% -2.92 — +0.6
204 Anna Karin Olsson SWE — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 100.0 — — — 36.4% -0.18 — +0.3
205 Anneli Bjork SWE — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,469 99.2 — — — 50.0% -0.38 — +0.2
206 Barbara Pollet AUT — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,462 98.8 — — — 50.0% -0.67 — +0.4
207 Birgitta Lindstrom FIN — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,587 102.2 — — — 50.0% +0.50 — +0.5
208 Christina Rozwadowski BRA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,474 98.8 — — — 50.0% -0.75 — +0.0
209 Colleen Carney AUS — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,471 102.3 — — — 27.3% -1.45 — +0.1
210 Csilla Cserepy SUI — — – — 1 10 9.1% 0 — — — — 1,427 99.3 — — — 25.0% -2.08 — +0.5
211 Dagmar Schafer GER — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,513 106.1 — — — 40.0% -0.80 — +0.1
212 Dora Rangelova BUL — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 100.4 — — — 50.0% +0.25 — +0.1
213 Eileen Tell USA — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,497 107.2 — — — 20.0% -1.40 — +0.5
214 Elena Eliseenko URS — — – — 1 6 14.3% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,492 93.3 — — — 14.3% -2.64 — +0.5
215 Elizabeth Galphin USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,500 101.8 — — — 50.0% +0.50 — +0.0
216 Emiko Okagawa JPN — — – — 1 8 11.1% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,437 95.8 — — — 15.0% -2.70 — -0.0
217 Emmanuelle Derly FRA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — R64 — — 1,504 99.8 — — — 28.6% -2.57 — -0.2
218 Helena Manset USA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,456 92.7 — — — 25.0% -2.00 — +0.1
219 Helena Olsson SWE — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,526 102.2 — — — 50.0% +0.75 — -0.0
220 Heliane Steden MEX — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,511 97.5 — — — 37.5% -0.38 — -0.2
221 Holly Danforth USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,501 103.5 — — — 60.0% +0.60 — -0.1
222 Jamie Golder USA — — – — 1 6 14.3% 0 — R128 — — 1,523 97.3 — — — 20.0% -2.27 — +0.4
223 Jennifer Goodling USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,436 94.8 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.0
224 Jennifer Prah USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,484 101.4 — — — 44.4% +0.22 — -0.0
225 Joy Cummings USA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,472 96.0 — — — 36.4% -1.36 — +0.1
226 Karin Stampfli SUI — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 103.0 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.3
227 Kay Mcdaniel USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,479 96.2 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.0
228 Kerry Reid AUS — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,996 100.1 — — — 50.0% -1.25 — -0.3
229 Leslie Allen USA — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — R64 1,554 99.8 — — — 20.0% -2.80 — -0.2
230 Linda Howell USA — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 100.8 — — — 27.3% -1.55 — +0.6
231 Lisa Oneill AUS — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 98.5 — — — 40.0% -0.60 — +0.2
232 Luciana Corsato Owsianka BRA — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,421 94.0 — — — 20.0% -1.60 — +0.3
233 Maeve Quinlan USA — — – — 1 5 16.7% 0 — R128 — — 1,484 92.0 — — — 15.4% -2.38 — +1.0
234 Michelle Parun NZL — — – — 1 5 16.7% 0 — — — — 1,444 88.4 — — — 15.4% -2.39 — +0.3
235 Milusa Dosedelova CZE — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,502 101.0 — — — 50.0% -0.25 — -0.1
236 Nathalie Phan Thanh FRA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,499 95.7 — — — 28.6% -1.86 — +0.1
237 Niurka Sodupe USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,515 102.7 — — — 50.0% -0.50 — +0.0
238 Paula Smith USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,553 105.5 — — — 50.0% -0.50 — +0.0
239 Pilar Vasquez PER — — – — 1 12 7.7% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,438 95.2 — — — 20.0% -2.73 — +0.4
240 Rebecca Bryant AUS — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 R32 — — — 1,493 105.8 — — — 30.0% -1.70 — 0.0
241 Renata Sasak YUG — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,531 108.0 — — — 40.0% -0.10 — +0.2
242 Renata Tomanova GER — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,569 101.2 — — — 42.9% -0.43 — +0.0
243 Rene Blount USA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,461 102.7 — — — 30.0% -1.60 — +0.0
244 Ronni Reis USA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,463 97.3 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.3
245 Rosie Casals USA — — – — 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — R64 1,573 92.4 — — — 11.1% -2.78 — +0.3
246 Sally Reeves GBR — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — R64 — 1,427 103.7 — — — 30.0% -1.30 — 0.0
247 Sandy Collins USA — — – — 1 9 10.0% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,508 99.3 — — — 18.2% -2.36 — +0.7
248 Shelley Aguero USA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,482 100.9 — — — 33.3% -0.50 — +0.1
249 Stephanie Faulkner AUS — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,503 101.9 — — — 50.0% +0.67 — +0.5
250 Susanne Schmid SUI — — – — 1 6 14.3% 0 — R128 — — 1,475 97.4 — — — 25.0% -2.00 — -0.4
251 Tashiko Takagi JPN — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 93.1 — — — 50.0% -1.25 — +0.1
252 Vicki Marler AUS — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,474 103.1 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — -0.4
253 Wendy Wood USA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 105.8 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.1
254 Akemi Nishiya JPN — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,438 92.7 — — — 20.0% -2.00 — +0.1
255 Ana Almansa ESP — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,453 94.0 — — — 0.0% -3.25 — +0.1
256 Andrea Pesak AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,401 93.6 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.1
257 Anne Winston USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 92.3 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.1
258 Ann Hulbert USA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,460 103.5 — — — 14.3% -1.86 — +0.1
259 Annika Karlsson SWE — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,454 91.7 — — — 14.3% -3.00 — +0.1
260 Barbi Bramblett USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,480 95.4 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
261 Brenda Perry NZL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 91.5 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — 0.0
262 Carin Bakkum NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 95.6 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.3
263 Carol Watson USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,413 93.4 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
264 Celine Cohen SUI — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 93.2 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.1
265 Cynthia Macgregor USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 90.5 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
266 Diana Moskova BUL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 96.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0.0
267 Diane Farrell USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 94.0 — — — 0.0% -3.75 — -0.0
268 Elena Guerra ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 97.8 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
269 Elizabeth Evans USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 97.2 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.1
270 Evonne Goolagong AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,940 94.9 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
271 Gabriela Mosca ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 95.7 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.1
272 Heather Crowe USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,530 101.3 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
273 Helene Pelletier CAN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,404 94.7 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
274 Ilonka Leyten NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 97.4 — — — 33.3% -2.33 — +0.0
275 Ingrid Vlach AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 97.6 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.0
276 Isabelle Crudo FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,458 94.1 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
277 Iwona Kuczynska POL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,432 109.1 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — -0.2
278 Jackie Masters AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 95.5 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0.0
279 Jaime Kaplan USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,468 99.5 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.0
280 Jan Blackstad USA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,399 92.4 — — — 14.3% -2.00 — +0.1
281 Jill Hetherington CAN — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,522 106.3 — — — 20.0% -1.20 — -0.2
282 Jo Louis GBR — — – — 0 5 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,454 81.9 — — — 9.1% -3.45 — +0.3
283 Joy Tacon HKG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,526 103.3 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.2
284 Judith Wiesner AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 100.4 — — — 33.3% -3.00 — -0.1
285 Julie Salmon GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,485 97.2 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
286 Kaoru Okamoto JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,449 92.5 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.0
287 Karen Dewis CAN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,408 95.2 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
288 Karen Huebner USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 93.2 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.2
289 Karen Smith AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 94.9 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
290 Karin Moos NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,451 98.2 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
291 Kate Brasher GBR — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,531 92.9 — — — 0.0% -2.67 — +0.3
292 Kathleen Schuurmans BEL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 99.1 — — — 0.0% -1.50 — +0.1
293 Kathrin Keil USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,587 98.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
294 Kathy Hofer USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 96.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
295 Kim Steinmetz USA — — – — 0 7 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,478 89.0 — — — 12.5% -2.56 — +0.9
296 Leigh Anne Eldredge USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,465 99.1 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
297 Lisa Pennington GBR — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,454 95.0 — — — 0.0% -2.75 — +0.2
298 Lone Vandborg DEN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 95.1 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.0
299 Lorrayne Gracie GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 97.2 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
300 Marie Pinterova HUN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,524 99.5 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.1
301 Marjorie Blackwood CAN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,600 97.2 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.3
302 Marlene De Wouters BEL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,465 97.5 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.0
303 Martina Reinhardt GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,501 96.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0.0
304 Mary Ann Colville USA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,348 81.1 — — — 0.0% -5.17 — +0.0
305 Michelle Garth ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 101.6 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — -0.0
306 Michelle Jaggard Lai AUS — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,459 99.1 — — — 11.1% -2.89 — -0.1
307 Michelle Turk AUS — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,463 93.3 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
308 Monica Reinach RSA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,473 98.5 — — — 0.0% -1.50 — +0.0
309 Monica Weber SUI — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 107.1 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — -0.2
310 Natasha Reva URS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,553 92.4 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.2
311 Nora Bajchikova CZE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 93.3 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — 0.0
312 Olga Tsarbopoulou GRE — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,459 91.6 — — — 0.0% -3.67 — +0.5
313 Pamela Baily AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 100.3 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.1
314 Pam Teeguarden USA — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,588 113.4 — — — 11.1% -2.78 — -0.5
315 Pascale Etchemendy FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,492 101.1 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.0
316 Regina Wieser GER — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,456 97.0 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.0
317 Rie Nakazaka JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 96.6 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
318 Shelby Torrance USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,407 92.9 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.0
319 Shelley Solomon USA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,486 104.8 — — — 25.0% -1.87 — -0.3
320 Sherri Norris USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 93.3 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
321 Silvana Campos BRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 97.9 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.1
322 Stacy Margolin USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,480 92.3 — — — 0.0% -3.25 — +0.2
323 Stina Almgren SWE — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,456 93.2 — — — 0.0% -3.75 — +0.1
324 Susan Leo AUS — — – — 0 6 0.0% 0 R64 — R128 — 1,504 94.8 — — — 7.7% -2.77 — +0.3
325 Susan Sloane Lundy USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,485 95.8 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.2
326 Tracey Morton Rodgers AUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 96.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
327 Trey Lewis USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,441 100.3 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — -0.0
328 Vicki Beggs USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,531 96.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0.0
329 Viktoria Milvidskaia RUS — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,500 97.6 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.0
330 Yukie Koizumi JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,473 98.8 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — +0.2
331 Yvona Brzakova TCH — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,539 94.0 — — — 0.0% -2.75 — +0.1

How to read these columns

Rank
For the current season, this is the latest ranking. For past seasons, this is the year-end ranking.
Points
Official ranking points from the selected ranking snapshot.
Wk +/−
Ranking change since the previous ranking snapshot.
YTD Δ
Ranking change since the start of the season.
Win %
Wins divided by total completed main-draw matches.
Elo
Latest TennisDB Elo for the current season; year-end Elo for past seasons. Its played-match pool includes qualifying, WTA 125, and official Olympic singles, so it differs from main-tour W-L.
P+
Scoreline performance adjusted for opponent strength on a 0-200 scale. 100 is average; a 10-point difference equals five expected-win percentage points.
Serve+
Estimated percentage points won on serve above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
Return+
Estimated percentage points won on return above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
PD
Return points won divided by opponents' return points won. 1.000 is even; above 1.000 is better.
Set Win %
Sets won divided by total completed sets in eligible scored matches.
Set Margin
Average per-set game margin from the player's perspective. Positive values mean winning sets by more games on average.
Pressure+
Opponent-adjusted deciding-set and tiebreak performance on a 0-200 scale; 100 is the pre-match surface-Elo expectation. Small samples are shrunk, at least three of each are required, and a deciding-set tiebreak counts only once.
Schedule
Expected wins added by opponent quality versus a typical player-season schedule. Positive means an easier schedule; negative means a tougher one. Career values are per 100 matches.

View the full tennis statistics glossary →

WTA Rankings Archive

Browse WTA rankings and season leader archives by year.