Rankings as of: Dec 29, 1986

WTA 1986 Season Leaders & Rankings

Rankings, leaderboards, and performance stats by season.

Martina Navratilova finished 1986 at WTA No. 1 with 280 points.

Need custom historical filters? Search ranking weeks or search player seasons with the Advanced search tool.

Rankings Leaders

Ranking points, results, and season metrics for 1986.

291 players with >= 1 match

# Player Country Rank Points Wk +/− YTD Δ W L Win % Titles AORGWUSO Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD Set Win % Set Margin Pressure+ Schedule
1 Martina Navratilova USA 1 280 – ▶ 0 84 3 96.5% 14 — F W W 2,633 182.2 — — — 91.0% +3.03 107.4 -2.2
2 Chris Evert USA 2 231 – ▶ 0 56 6 90.3% 6 — W SF SF 2,422 177.3 — — — 83.6% +2.78 104.6 -3.5
3 Steffi Graf GER 3 201 – ▲ 3 63 6 91.3% 8 — QF — SF 2,322 176.8 — — — 80.5% +2.45 110.7 -5.9
4 Hana Mandlikova AUS 4 120 – ▼ 1 44 15 74.6% 0 — SF F R16 2,242 174.9 — — — 70.7% +1.50 98.7 -6.8
5 Helena Sukova CZE 5 105 – ▲ 4 69 21 76.7% 2 — SF QF F 2,151 173.6 — — — 73.5% +1.77 97.5 -7.6
6 Pam Shriver USA 6 105 – ▼ 2 47 15 75.8% 2 — — R128 QF 2,196 175.2 — — — 75.9% +2.04 95.5 -4.6
7 Claudia Kohde Kilsch GER 7 77 – ▼ 2 39 17 69.6% 0 — R16 R32 R16 2,051 166.8 — — — 69.2% +1.38 94.1 -3.8
8 Manuela Maleeva Fragniere SUI 8 60 – ▼ 1 42 21 66.7% 0 — R32 R16 QF 1,992 161.4 — — — 65.7% +1.31 90.2 -2.5
9 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel USA 9 — – — 34 16 68.0% 1 — QF R128 R128 1,974 157.9 — — — 63.6% +1.08 101.3 -3.0
10 Gabriela Sabatini ARG 10 62 – ▲ 2 49 21 70.0% 1 — R16 SF R16 2,023 163.4 — — — 66.7% +1.36 102.6 -4.5
11 Zina Garrison USA 11 56 – ▼ 3 48 22 68.6% 1 — R32 R64 R16 2,000 159.2 — — — 66.0% +1.22 98.3 -1.8
12 Bettina Bunge GER 12 46 – ▲ 11 34 20 63.0% 0 — R64 QF R64 2,015 163.2 — — — 59.2% +0.74 106.1 -6.5
13 Lori Mcneil USA 14 39 – ▲ 81 42 22 65.6% 2 — R128 QF R128 1,884 144.9 — — — 60.5% +0.68 109.2 +1.5
14 Kathy Jordan USA 15 37 – ▲ 4 25 15 62.5% 0 — R128 R16 R16 1,910 153.3 — — — 62.2% +1.00 96.2 -1.3
15 Robin White USA 16 37 – ▲ 16 23 19 54.8% 0 — R128 R16 R64 1,789 138.4 — — — 51.0% -0.15 105.9 -1.6
16 Wendy Turnbull AUS 18 32 – ▼ 4 17 15 53.1% 0 — — R128 QF 1,865 143.4 — — — 50.7% +0.15 100.2 -2.2
17 Stephanie Rehe USA 19 32 – ▼ 1 25 16 61.0% 0 — — R128 R16 1,823 143.8 — — — 59.8% +0.59 99.5 -0.4
18 Terry Phelps USA 21 29 – ▲ 8 33 26 55.9% 0 — R32 R32 R64 1,813 147.3 — — — 54.1% +0.18 98.8 -2.7
19 Melissa Gurney USA 23 28 – ▲ 58 31 16 66.0% 2 — R64 R32 R32 1,866 150.1 — — — 64.8% +1.29 101.5 +0.4
20 Jo Durie GBR 24 28 – ▲ 2 24 17 58.5% 0 — R128 R32 R32 1,841 140.0 — — — 55.7% +0.21 105.1 -3.6
21 Dianne Fromholtz AUS 25 28 – ▲ 5 19 14 57.6% 0 — — R16 — 1,836 143.2 — — — 55.6% +0.28 103.1 -2.3
22 Barbara Potter USA 26 26 – ▼ 9 14 10 58.3% 0 — — — — 1,881 145.2 — — — 56.1% +0.37 100.5 -2.1
23 Mary Joe Fernandez USA 27 26 – ▲ 73 18 14 56.2% 0 — QF R128 R32 1,765 147.3 — — — 54.2% +0.32 107.3 -4.5
24 Rosalyn Fairbank USA 28 24 – ▲ 10 23 20 53.5% 0 — R32 R64 R64 1,824 142.9 — — — 52.5% +0.05 102.0 -2.2
25 Katerina Maleeva BUL 29 24 – ▼ 1 24 20 54.5% 0 — R16 R32 R32 1,837 143.3 — — — 54.1% +0.50 97.8 -2.4
26 Sabrina Goles YUG 30 23 – ▲ 24 24 19 55.8% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,780 140.5 — — — 54.5% +0.39 100.8 -3.2
27 Marcella Mesker NED 31 22 – ▲ 38 16 11 59.3% 1 — R32 R64 — 1,760 129.1 — — — 58.7% +0.24 104.6 +0.7
28 Laura Arraya PER 33 21 – ▲ 30 23 24 48.9% 0 — R16 R128 R64 1,718 138.1 — — — 51.0% -0.04 100.4 -1.8
29 Alycia Moulton USA 34 21 – ▲ 2 24 24 50.0% 0 — R128 R64 R64 1,810 145.5 — — — 48.7% -0.01 102.4 -5.2
30 Kate Gompert USA 35 21 – ▼ 10 21 21 50.0% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,781 143.3 — — — 49.5% +0.03 100.8 -3.2
31 Larisa Savchenko URS 36 21 – ▲ 19 19 16 54.3% 0 — R64 R64 — 1,752 135.5 — — — 51.2% -0.16 103.9 -1.3
32 Catherine Tanvier FRA 37 21 – ▲ 2 19 17 52.8% 0 — R128 R64 R64 1,826 142.0 — — — 47.6% -0.15 108.6 -1.7
33 Laura Garrone ITA 38 21 – ▲ 66 22 14 61.1% 0 — R16 R128 R128 1,678 134.8 — — — 60.2% +0.82 98.8 +2.9
34 Helen Kelesi CAN 39 19 – ▲ 7 28 21 57.1% 1 — R128 R64 R32 1,745 135.4 — — — 54.6% +0.16 106.9 +0.1
35 Elise Burgin USA 40 19 – ▼ 13 25 22 53.2% 1 — R64 R32 R32 1,775 142.7 — — — 53.2% +0.25 98.8 -2.2
36 Pam Casale USA 41 18 – ▼ 7 16 17 48.5% 0 — R16 R64 R64 1,787 137.1 — — — 46.8% -0.18 103.7 -3.6
37 Nathalie Herreman FRA 42 18 – ▲ 86 16 11 59.3% 1 — R64 R64 R128 1,717 137.8 — — — 62.1% +0.93 100.4 +1.4
38 Andrea Temesvari HUN 43 18 – ▼ 27 11 12 47.8% 0 — R64 — R64 1,801 139.4 — — — 55.1% +0.29 94.1 -1.4
39 Wendy White USA 45 17 – ▲ 51 22 19 53.7% 1 — — R64 R128 1,701 130.2 — — — 52.0% +0.27 101.2 +1.7
40 Betsy Nagelsen USA 46 17 – ▼ 2 18 17 51.4% 0 — R128 R16 R64 1,699 131.1 — — — 51.8% +0.01 98.8 +1.7
41 Kathy Horvath USA 47 16 – ▲ 3 16 15 51.6% 0 — R128 R32 R32 1,739 130.3 — — — 48.6% -0.18 104.3 -1.6
42 Ann Henricksson USA 49 16 – ▲ 4 20 21 48.8% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,691 127.5 — — — 48.3% -0.36 106.1 +1.1
43 Sylvia Hanika GER 50 16 – ▼ 29 14 14 50.0% 1 — R128 R128 R64 1,803 136.2 — — — 51.6% -0.02 98.6 -0.6
44 Anne White USA 51 15 – ▼ 31 9 16 36.0% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,704 130.7 — — — 37.7% -0.83 97.0 -1.1
45 Beth Herr USA 52 15 – ▲ 34 22 15 59.5% 1 — R128 R128 R64 1,707 128.7 — — — 60.5% +0.78 95.2 +4.6
46 Michelle Torres USA 53 14 – ▲ 3 13 18 41.9% 0 — R32 R128 R32 1,669 122.6 — — — 40.3% -0.48 99.3 -0.4
47 Susan Mascarin USA 54 14 – ▼ 6 16 16 50.0% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,691 126.4 — — — 54.1% +0.09 94.1 -0.9
48 Elna Reinach RSA 56 14 – ▲ 154 14 12 53.9% 0 — R128 R128 R32 1,656 129.6 — — — 53.6% +0.25 99.2 +0.5
49 Gigi Fernandez USA 57 14 – ▲ 7 17 14 54.8% 1 — R64 R128 R128 1,728 123.4 — — — 55.4% +0.18 99.5 +2.5
50 Eva Pfaff GER 58 13 – ▼ 27 14 19 42.4% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,689 126.2 — — — 42.1% -0.32 101.8 -0.2
51 Sara Gomer GBR 59 13 – ▲ 18 13 14 48.1% 0 — R128 R64 R64 1,660 119.5 — — — 46.9% -0.28 103.7 +0.6
52 Mercedes Paz ARG 60 13 – ▲ 54 22 23 48.9% 0 — R16 R128 R128 1,577 119.8 — — — 50.5% +0.08 100.7 +3.4
53 Petra Huber AUT 63 13 – ▲ 11 14 14 50.0% 1 — R64 R128 R128 1,625 120.8 — — — 50.8% -0.03 99.5 +1.9
54 Isabelle Demongeot FRA 65 12 – ▲ 70 11 15 42.3% 0 — R128 R16 R128 1,608 129.8 — — — 45.8% -0.20 96.1 +0.4
55 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 66 11 – ▲ 44 12 17 41.4% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,643 133.1 — — — 46.4% -0.09 98.0 -0.7
56 Janine Tremelling AUS 67 11 – ▲ 20 13 18 41.9% 1 — R128 R128 — 1,601 125.1 — — — 45.1% -0.61 101.1 -0.1
57 Gretchen Magers USA 70 11 – ▲ 109 6 8 42.9% 0 — R64 R128 R64 1,666 123.6 — — — 40.6% -0.56 — -0.8
58 Sandra Cecchini ITA 73 10 – ▼ 24 15 19 44.1% 1 — R128 R128 R128 1,633 120.0 — — — 43.2% -0.53 96.0 +0.4
59 Anne Minter AUS 75 10 – ▼ 2 11 17 39.3% 0 — — R32 R128 1,639 120.6 — — — 39.3% -0.54 96.1 -0.1
60 Patricia Medrado BRA 76 9 – ▶ 0 12 14 46.1% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,561 123.2 — — — 49.2% +0.11 99.4 +1.1
61 Cammy Macgregor USA 77 9 – ▲ 142 5 9 35.7% 0 — — — R64 1,534 112.3 — — — 38.7% -0.81 98.3 +0.6
62 Camille Benjamin USA 79 9 – ▼ 17 19 26 42.2% 0 — R32 R64 R32 1,608 118.6 — — — 43.4% -0.36 96.1 +1.6
63 Etsuko Inoue JPN 80 9 – ▲ 19 9 14 39.1% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,635 124.5 — — — 42.6% -0.57 100.2 -0.5
64 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario ESP 81 9 – ▲ 74 15 10 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,620 109.9 — — — 57.1% +0.13 105.4 +3.8
65 Catherine Suire FRA 84 9 – ▲ 22 11 16 40.7% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,581 108.8 — — — 39.1% -0.69 98.7 +1.1
66 Silke Meier GER 85 9 – ▲ 82 10 10 50.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,594 114.1 — — — 49.0% +0.08 — +2.3
67 Elizabeth Minter AUS 90 8 – ▶ 0 11 14 44.0% 0 — R128 R32 R32 1,590 113.4 — — — 43.1% -0.72 106.1 +1.6
68 Caroline Kuhlman USA 92 — – ▼ 24 6 9 40.0% 0 — — R128 R64 1,620 116.2 — — — 42.4% -0.64 101.4 +0.9
69 Natasha Zvereva BLR 94 8 – ▲ 183 4 2 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,575 112.4 — — — 56.3% -0.12 — +0.8
70 Patty Fendick USA 95 8 – ▼ 11 8 6 57.1% 0 — — R32 R64 1,643 127.4 — — — 58.6% +1.00 — +0.4
71 Claudia Porwik GER 96 8 – ▲ 154 6 5 54.5% 0 — R32 — R128 1,577 117.2 — — — 50.0% -0.42 105.3 +0.7
72 Vicki Nelson USA 98 8 – ▼ 19 14 22 38.9% 1 — R64 R128 R128 1,590 109.0 — — — 39.5% -0.83 100.2 +2.9
73 Anne Hobbs GBR 99 7 – ▼ 59 6 14 30.0% 0 — R32 R32 R128 1,679 122.2 — — — 32.6% -1.09 — -1.4
74 Beverly Bowes USA 100 7 – ▲ 13 6 8 42.9% 0 — R128 R128 R32 1,585 113.1 — — — 44.8% -0.52 — +0.6
75 Isabel Cueto GER 101 7 – ▲ 6 12 16 42.9% 0 — R128 — R128 1,538 121.5 — — — 43.8% -0.06 99.0 +2.1
76 Terry Holladay USA 103 7 – ▶ 0 5 8 38.5% 0 — R128 — R128 1,627 114.8 — — — 40.7% -0.70 100.2 +0.2
77 Yvonne Vermaak RSA 104 7 – ▶ 0 6 11 35.3% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,565 105.1 — — — 36.8% -0.87 — 0.0
78 Csilla Cserepy SUI 105 7 – ▲ 47 6 5 54.5% 0 — — — R64 1,506 113.8 — — — 56.5% -0.04 — +1.3
79 Nicole Jagerman NED 106 7 – ▲ 155 9 4 69.2% 0 — — — — 1,606 116.3 — — — 63.3% +0.73 106.5 +1.7
80 Jenny Byrne AUS 107 7 – ▲ 27 7 12 36.8% 0 — R32 R64 R64 1,527 113.0 — — — 43.2% -0.73 98.5 +0.8
81 Patricia Tarabini ARG 108 7 – ▲ 207 8 5 61.5% 0 — R64 — — 1,562 113.7 — — — 58.1% +0.45 — +2.1
82 Iva Budarova TCH 112 6 – ▼ 55 11 24 31.4% 0 — R64 R32 R64 1,587 118.4 — — — 39.2% -0.60 87.6 +0.1
83 Masako Yanagi JPN 113 6 – ▲ 6 6 13 31.6% 0 — R64 — R128 1,514 107.6 — — — 36.2% -0.77 98.8 +1.8
84 Liz Smylie AUS 114 6 – ▼ 71 6 13 31.6% 0 — R128 R32 R64 1,668 119.0 — — — 38.5% -0.67 96.1 -0.6
85 Jennifer Mundel RSA 115 6 – ▶ 0 7 13 35.0% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,527 107.7 — — — 38.3% -0.79 98.6 +1.1
86 Bettina Fulco ARG 116 6 – ▲ 136 10 7 58.8% 0 — — — — 1,565 108.7 — — — 54.1% +0.59 — +2.6
87 Elly Hakami USA 117 6 – ▲ 19 5 3 62.5% 0 — — — R64 1,556 105.9 — — — 60.0% +0.20 103.3 +1.2
88 Andrea Betzner GER 119 6 – ▶ 0 6 11 35.3% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,511 105.0 — — — 36.8% -1.39 101.8 +0.6
89 Kristin Kinney USA 120 5 – ▶ 0 8 20 28.6% 0 — R128 R32 R128 1,461 101.0 — — — 31.3% -1.33 103.6 +3.2
90 Federica Bonsignori ITA 122 5 – ▲ 68 6 6 50.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,522 112.0 — — — 53.8% +0.62 — +1.8
91 Nicole Bradtke AUS 123 5 – ▲ 26 6 5 54.5% 0 — — — — 1,548 101.9 — — — 53.8% 0.00 — +2.0
92 Akiko Kijimuta JPN 124 5 – ▲ 51 6 7 46.1% 0 — R128 — — 1,532 115.1 — — — 51.9% +0.37 — +2.1
93 Andrea Holikova TCH 126 5 – ▶ 0 6 17 26.1% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,571 127.2 — — — 34.0% -0.94 — +0.0
94 Candy Reynolds USA 127 5 – ▶ 0 6 16 27.3% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,547 124.1 — — — 35.4% -0.77 — +0.7
95 Eva Krapl SUI 129 4 – ▶ 0 4 9 30.8% 0 — R64 — R128 1,493 104.0 — — — 37.5% -0.66 — +1.7
96 Wiltrud Probst GER 135 4 – ▲ 254 4 5 44.4% 0 — — — — 1,510 104.4 — — — 42.1% -0.32 — +1.6
97 Amanda Tobin AUS 138 4 – ▶ 0 5 13 27.8% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,505 106.5 — — — 27.0% -2.03 101.6 +1.3
98 Manon Bollegraf NED 140 4 – ▲ 181 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,506 100.0 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +1.0
99 Judith Wiesner AUT 141 4 – ▲ 164 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,514 117.4 — — — 53.3% +0.60 — +0.8
100 Pascale Etchemendy FRA 142 4 – ▲ 157 2 5 28.6% 0 — R64 — — 1,461 102.7 — — — 38.9% -0.44 — +1.0
101 Halle Cioffi USA 147 4 – ▲ 35 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,532 100.6 — — — 40.0% -0.10 — +1.2
102 Pilar Vasquez PER 149 3 – ▲ 28 2 9 18.2% 0 — — — — 1,408 94.9 — — — 25.0% -2.33 — +0.4
103 Kaoru Okamoto JPN 151 3 – ▲ 58 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,479 106.1 — — — 57.1% +1.43 — +0.5
104 Rene Blount USA 153 3 – ▶ 0 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,474 99.6 — — — 40.0% -1.00 — +0.2
105 Louise Field AUS 157 3 – ▼ 49 4 10 28.6% 0 — R64 — — 1,479 96.1 — — — 26.7% -1.53 — +1.6
106 Ronni Reis USA 160 3 – ▲ 42 1 3 25.0% 0 — — R64 — 1,460 95.2 — — — 30.0% -1.50 — +0.1
107 Julie Richardson NZL 162 3 – ▼ 15 1 7 12.5% 0 — — R128 R128 1,456 96.3 — — — 11.8% -2.65 — +0.4
108 Christina Singer GER 163 3 – ▶ 0 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,506 99.7 — — — 40.0% -1.20 — +0.2
109 Nicole Arendt USA 164 3 – ▲ 132 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — R32 1,537 112.1 — — — 50.0% +0.34 — +0.1
110 Barbara Paulus AUT 165 3 – ▲ 227 4 3 57.1% 0 — — — — 1,528 102.3 — — — 52.9% -0.47 — +0.8
111 Laura Golarsa ITA 167 2 – ▲ 2 5 5 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,593 115.4 — — — 47.6% -0.29 — +0.5
112 Monique Javer GBR 168 2 – ▲ 213 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,502 98.5 — — — 40.0% -1.10 — +0.8
113 Jane Forman USA 169 2 – ▶ 0 2 8 20.0% 0 — — R64 — 1,505 109.0 — — — 27.3% -1.45 — +0.7
114 Jana Novotna CZE 171 2 – ▲ 145 0 4 0.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,466 99.1 — — — 20.0% -2.40 — +0.1
115 Sophie Amiach FRA 173 — – ▼ 51 1 4 20.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,514 102.1 — — — 33.3% -1.84 — +0.0
116 Ann Devries BEL 174 2 – ▶ 0 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,517 106.9 — — — 50.0% -0.67 — +0.1
117 Lea Antonoplis USA 176 2 – ▼ 91 2 14 12.5% 0 — — R128 R128 1,458 102.2 — — — 26.3% -1.26 90.9 +0.9
118 Amy Holton USA 179 2 – ▶ 0 2 13 13.3% 0 — R128 — — 1,464 93.6 — — — 15.6% -2.63 — +0.3
119 Mima Jausovec SLO 184 2 – ▶ 0 2 4 33.3% 0 — R32 R128 — 1,673 105.7 — — — 40.0% -1.80 — -0.2
120 Virginia Ruzici ROU 185 — – ▼ 144 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,734 90.3 — — — 20.0% -3.00 — +0.4
121 Jamie Golder USA 188 2 – ▶ 0 3 4 42.9% 0 — — — — 1,517 106.0 — — — 42.9% -0.29 — +0.9
122 Heather Ludloff USA 192 — – ▼ 50 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,473 99.0 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.2
123 Rosie Casals USA 207 — – ▼ 21 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,546 97.2 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0.0
124 Andrea Leand USA 214 — – ▲ 106 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,627 92.6 — — — 0.0% -2.83 — +0.2
125 Andrea Jaeger USA 225 — – ▼ 113 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,914 98.8 — — — 33.3% -2.33 — -0.0
126 Sabine Hack GER 262 — – ▼ 70 2 5 28.6% 0 — — — — 1,524 94.5 — — — 31.3% -1.56 — +0.5
127 Patty Oreilly USA 284 — – ▼ 14 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,516 99.2 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.1
128 Beate Reinstadler AUT 342 — – ▲ 66 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,474 93.9 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
129 Amanda Grunfeld GBR 374 — – ▼ 8 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,495 93.5 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.1
130 Jill Hetherington CAN 386 — – ▼ 39 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,536 105.8 — — — 50.0% -1.25 — +0.0
131 Raffaella Reggi Concato ITA — — – — 31 20 60.8% 2 — R64 R16 R16 1,896 151.8 — — — 57.6% +0.70 105.3 -1.9
132 Catarina Lindqvist Ryan SWE — — – — 28 22 56.0% 0 — R16 QF R16 1,881 146.6 — — — 53.9% +0.50 100.6 -0.5
133 Tine Scheuer Larsen DEN — — – — 22 19 53.7% 0 — R32 R64 R32 1,707 129.1 — — — 52.9% +0.21 97.0 +1.7
134 Neige Dias BRA — — – — 19 19 50.0% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,610 116.1 — — — 50.6% -0.05 100.1 +4.4
135 Carling Bassett Seguso CAN — — – — 18 12 60.0% 0 — QF R16 R128 1,847 143.9 — — — 56.9% +0.43 98.7 -1.6
136 Bonnie Gadusek USA — — – — 16 9 64.0% 0 — — — QF 2,017 152.4 — — — 59.6% +0.67 99.6 -2.2
137 Regina Marsikova CZE — — – — 15 19 44.1% 0 — R32 R128 R64 1,719 126.9 — — — 41.8% -0.58 103.4 -2.1
138 Adriana Villagran Reami ARG — — – — 13 25 34.2% 0 — R128 R64 R128 1,506 106.7 — — — 37.6% -0.92 101.0 +4.5
139 Angelika Kanellopoulou GRE — — – — 13 14 48.1% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,663 117.6 — — — 43.3% -0.58 105.6 -0.0
140 Debbie Spence Nasim USA — — – — 13 22 37.1% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,619 116.9 — — — 35.5% -1.12 105.9 +0.6
141 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer USA — — – — 13 10 56.5% 0 — — — R64 1,683 123.1 — — — 50.0% -0.34 — +1.3
142 Barbara Gerken USA — — – — 12 18 40.0% 0 — R128 R32 R128 1,564 106.0 — — — 42.9% -0.56 98.1 +4.3
143 Lisa Bonder Kreiss USA — — – — 12 13 48.0% 0 — R32 R64 R32 1,733 125.3 — — — 54.5% +0.16 96.8 +0.5
144 Mareen Louie Harper USA — — – — 12 17 41.4% 0 — — R128 R64 1,679 121.2 — — — 39.1% -0.55 97.5 +1.4
145 Hu Na USA — — – — 11 16 40.7% 0 — R128 R64 R64 1,575 112.6 — — — 42.2% -0.55 104.9 +2.4
146 Tina Mochizuki USA — — – — 11 19 36.7% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,521 112.2 — — — 36.4% -1.26 106.4 +1.6
147 Annabel Croft GBR — — – — 10 19 34.5% 0 — R64 R128 R32 1,653 120.6 — — — 38.2% -1.06 99.5 -0.9
148 Dianne Van Rensburg RSA — — – — 10 8 55.6% 0 — — R128 R128 1,642 122.2 — — — 51.1% -0.02 108.4 +0.2
149 Grace Kim USA — — – — 10 22 31.2% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,605 117.7 — — — 33.3% -1.54 99.0 +0.3
150 Lilian Drescher SUI — — – — 10 15 40.0% 0 — R64 — R128 1,621 114.8 — — — 42.6% -0.76 98.8 +1.4
151 Mariana Perez Roldan ARG — — – — 10 7 58.8% 0 — R128 — R128 1,574 115.2 — — — 55.0% +0.45 100.7 +3.2
152 Susan Sloane Lundy USA — — – — 9 12 42.9% 0 — R64 R64 R128 1,595 132.9 — — — 43.5% -0.37 99.3 -0.5
153 Anne Smith USA — — – — 8 13 38.1% 0 — R32 R128 R128 1,718 120.9 — — — 40.9% -0.36 — +1.0
154 Mary Lou Piatek USA — — – — 8 15 34.8% 0 — — R64 R128 1,618 111.0 — — — 38.5% -0.67 95.5 +1.6
155 Patricia Hy Boulais CAN — — – — 8 1 88.9% 1 — — — — 1,633 110.5 — — — 69.6% +1.65 — +2.6
156 Svetlana Cherneva RUS — — – — 8 14 36.4% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,593 112.0 — — — 36.0% -1.10 104.9 +0.7
157 Anna Ivan USA — — – — 7 7 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,653 123.9 — — — 44.4% -0.47 108.2 -1.7
158 Marie Christine Calleja FRA — — – — 7 9 43.8% 0 — R128 R32 R128 1,629 117.5 — — — 42.9% -0.97 — -1.1
159 Molly Van Nostrand USA — — – — 7 14 33.3% 0 — — R128 R64 1,631 119.0 — — — 31.9% -1.36 99.6 -1.0
160 Carina Karlsson SWE — — – — 6 19 24.0% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,536 107.0 — — — 29.6% -1.81 100.1 +0.6
161 Christiane Jolissaint SUI — — – — 6 16 27.3% 0 — R128 R128 R128 1,637 115.2 — — — 28.8% -1.44 98.2 -1.7
162 Jenny Klitch USA — — – — 6 10 37.5% 0 — — — — 1,552 95.5 — — — 36.1% -0.86 104.2 +2.6
163 Claudia Monteiro BRA — — – — 5 11 31.2% 0 — — — R128 1,540 106.9 — — — 31.3% -1.00 — +0.5
164 Gabriela Dinu FRG — — – — 5 7 41.7% 0 — R128 — — 1,607 108.1 — — — 50.0% -0.58 — +0.3
165 Hellas Ter Riet NED — — – — 5 6 45.5% 0 — — — — 1,503 107.2 — — — 45.5% +0.05 — +1.7
166 Ivanna Madruga ARG — — – — 5 5 50.0% 0 — R32 — — 1,775 112.3 — — — 45.5% -0.23 — +0.3
167 Leigh Anne Thompson USA — — – — 5 9 35.7% 0 — — — R128 1,555 101.1 — — — 43.8% -0.53 95.1 +1.9
168 Pascale Paradis Mangon FRA — — – — 5 16 23.8% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,591 109.2 — — — 35.2% -0.81 89.5 +0.8
169 Amy Schwartz USA — — – — 4 2 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,541 110.7 — — — 69.2% +1.00 — +1.1
170 Caterina Nozzoli ITA — — – — 4 6 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,506 105.9 — — — 45.8% -0.13 — +1.5
171 Kathrin Keil USA — — – — 4 2 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,605 111.2 — — — 69.2% +1.23 — +1.2
172 Lorenza Jachia ITA — — – — 4 4 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,509 108.2 — — — 55.0% +0.15 — +1.3
173 Maria Lindstrom SWE — — – — 4 11 26.7% 0 — R128 — — 1,527 105.1 — — — 33.3% -1.58 — +0.1
174 Silvia La Fratta ITA — — – — 4 3 57.1% 0 — — — — 1,534 118.2 — — — 62.5% +1.50 — +0.8
175 Emiko Okagawa JPN — — – — 3 5 37.5% 0 — — — — 1,458 103.7 — — — 45.0% -0.20 — +0.9
176 Monica Lundqvist SWE — — – — 3 6 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,524 99.6 — — — 40.9% -1.00 — +1.2
177 Myriam Schropp GER — — – — 3 9 25.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,482 94.4 — — — 25.0% -2.17 — +1.0
178 Penny Barg USA — — – — 3 5 37.5% 0 — — R128 R128 1,496 96.4 — — — 33.3% -1.61 — +0.4
179 Susan Leo AUS — — – — 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — R128 1,519 96.8 — — — 50.0% -0.93 — +1.3
180 Anna Maria Fernandez USA — — – — 2 7 22.2% 0 — — R64 R128 1,429 89.3 — — — 26.3% -1.53 — +1.5
181 Caryn Copeland Wilson USA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,479 98.9 — — — 45.5% -1.45 — +0.2
182 Cecilia Fernandez Parker USA — — – — 2 8 20.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,493 95.8 — — — 25.0% -1.46 — +0.9
183 Emilse Raponi Longo USA — — – — 2 7 22.2% 0 — — — — 1,471 93.5 — — — 23.8% -2.00 — +0.3
184 Ginny Purdy USA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,548 97.8 — — — 44.4% -1.33 — +0.4
185 Helena Dahlstrom SWE — — – — 2 6 25.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,511 93.6 — — — 23.5% -1.88 — +0.8
186 Helena Manset USA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,471 95.4 — — — 44.4% -1.33 — +0.5
187 Joanne Russell USA — — – — 2 10 16.7% 0 — R128 — R128 1,534 105.7 — — — 30.0% -1.47 95.4 -0.1
188 Karolina Karlsson SWE — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,556 100.9 — — — 46.2% -0.15 — +0.8
189 Kim Jones USA — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — R128 1,677 104.5 — — — 40.0% -0.47 — +0.7
190 Leslie Allen USA — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,524 100.2 — — — 37.5% -0.56 97.4 +0.8
191 Lisa Oneill AUS — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 102.5 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.6
192 Lisa Spain Short USA — — – — 2 6 25.0% 0 — — R64 — 1,509 103.6 — — — 27.8% -1.61 — +0.1
193 Luciana Corsato Owsianka BRA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,440 107.7 — — — 50.0% +0.75 — +0.4
194 Nanette Schutte NED — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 99.2 — — — 36.4% -1.09 — +0.5
195 Niurka Sodupe USA — — – — 2 7 22.2% 0 — R64 R128 R128 1,500 107.5 — — — 30.0% -1.10 — -0.0
196 Olga Votavova TCH — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,560 107.4 — — — 45.5% 0.00 — +0.5
197 Petra Keppeler GER — — – — 2 9 18.2% 0 — R128 — — 1,501 94.4 — — — 30.8% -1.58 — +1.5
198 Rona Daniels USA — — – — 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,499 100.7 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.7
199 Sharon Walsh Pete USA — — – — 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — R128 1,598 97.3 — — — 30.8% -1.38 — +0.4
200 Shawn Foltz USA — — – — 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — — 1,557 104.4 — — — 36.4% -1.27 — -0.2
201 Alexia Dechaume Balleret FRA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,516 105.3 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.0
202 Anabella Radics ESP — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 99.1 — — — 50.0% -0.25 — +0.4
203 Barbara Pollet AUT — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,447 100.7 — — — 30.0% -0.80 — +0.5
204 Belinda Cordwell NZL — — – — 1 9 10.0% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,489 87.6 — — — 18.2% -2.68 — +0.7
205 Gabriela Mosca ARG — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,475 103.4 — — — 45.5% -1.09 — +0.4
206 Gisele Miro BRA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,484 93.3 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.5
207 Hana Fukarkova TCH — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,531 98.3 — — — 37.5% -1.62 — +0.4
208 Heliane Steden MEX — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 102.4 — — — 33.3% -1.22 — +0.6
209 Jane Young CAN — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,507 104.1 — — — 40.0% -0.60 — -0.1
210 Julie Salmon GBR — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,472 94.1 — — — 25.0% -2.13 — +0.4
211 Katerina Bohmova CZE — — – — 1 5 16.7% 0 — R128 R128 — 1,533 102.9 — — — 26.7% -1.87 — -0.1
212 Kim Sands USA — — – — 1 10 9.1% 0 — — R128 R128 1,479 109.1 — — — 20.0% -1.60 93.5 +0.2
213 Lisa Pennington GBR — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,445 91.4 — — — 28.6% -2.57 — +0.4
214 Luciana Tella BRA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,505 103.9 — — — 60.0% +0.20 — +0.2
215 Mahela Gartner Ockernahl GER — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,490 92.6 — — — 28.6% -2.00 — +0.3
216 Marcela Skuherska TCH — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — R128 — — 1,528 100.5 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.2
217 Michaela Pazderova TCH — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,551 101.2 — — — 50.0% -0.25 — +0.5
218 Patrizia Murgo ITA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,494 91.9 — — — 28.6% -2.28 — +0.4
219 Rebecca Bryant AUS — — – — 1 5 16.7% 0 — — R128 — 1,447 92.3 — — — 16.7% -1.67 — +1.1
220 Susan Rimes USA — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,427 98.2 — — — 33.3% -0.89 — +0.3
221 Virginie Paquet FRA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,517 105.1 — — — 40.0% -2.00 — -0.0
222 Akemi Nishiya JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,432 102.2 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.0
223 Amanda Brown GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,556 98.8 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.3
224 Andrea Tiezzi ARG — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,523 92.4 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.3
225 Andrea Vieira BRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 99.3 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — +0.2
226 Annelie Bjork SWE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 95.4 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
227 Belinda Borneo GBR — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,431 103.3 — — — 20.0% -1.60 — +0.1
228 Beth Norton USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 97.2 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.1
229 Bettina Diesner AUT — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 99.0 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0.0
230 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 102.0 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.1
231 Carin Bakkum NED — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 96.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
232 Cecille Calmette FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,542 112.8 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.3
233 Christine Oreilly USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 97.1 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — -0.1
234 Corinne Vanier FRA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,483 103.9 — — — 20.0% -2.00 — -0.2
235 Dee Ann Hansel USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,512 100.2 — — — 20.0% -1.60 — -0.1
236 Denise Parnell GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,440 104.5 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.2
237 Diane Farrell USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,464 97.0 — — — 33.3% -2.33 — +0.2
238 Emmanuelle Derly FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,489 98.4 — — — 0.0% -2.00 — +0.2
239 Florencia Labat ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 97.1 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.2
240 Gail Falkenberg USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,482 90.0 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.2
241 Gigi Gonzalez USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 97.7 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.0
242 Glynis Coles GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,472 102.0 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.2
243 Gretchen Doninger USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 100.1 — — — 33.3% -1.67 — +0.0
244 Immaculada Varas Caro ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 93.1 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.1
245 Jan Blackstad USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,378 95.1 — — — 20.0% -3.00 — +0.2
246 Jane Holdren USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,503 97.4 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.3
247 Jennifer Goodling USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,426 98.1 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
248 Jennifer Young USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 97.1 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.2
249 Jill Waldman USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 91.2 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
250 Jo Louis GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,443 93.0 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.1
251 Joy Tacon HKG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,525 103.1 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.3
252 Karen Huebner USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,474 98.0 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.2
253 Karin Oberleitner AUT — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,467 95.8 — — — 0.0% -2.75 — +0.3
254 Karin Stampfli SUI — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,478 94.6 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.2
255 Kathleen Cummings USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 98.0 — — — 0.0% -1.50 — +0.1
256 Kathy Hofer USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,469 94.0 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
257 Kay Mcdaniel USA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,453 95.8 — — — 14.3% -2.14 — +0.2
258 Kerri Reiter USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 94.9 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.3
259 Kim Steinmetz USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,467 91.9 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.1
260 Kylie Copeland USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,424 95.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
261 Laura Bernstein USA — — – — 0 5 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,441 93.4 — — — 9.1% -1.91 — +0.6
262 Leigh Anne Eldredge USA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,447 101.6 — — — 0.0% -1.75 — +0.1
263 Linda Gates USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,561 95.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
264 Linley Tanner USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 103.9 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — -0.0
265 Louise Allen USA — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,611 101.4 — — — 20.0% -1.50 — +0.4
266 Marianne Groat CAN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,456 102.6 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.1
267 Marilda Julia USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 96.4 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
268 Mary Norwood USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 99.1 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
269 Michelle Jaggard Lai AUS — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,442 96.6 — — — 20.0% -2.60 — +0.0
270 Micki Schillig USA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,473 88.3 — — — 0.0% -3.67 — +0.6
271 Natasha Marcucci ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 96.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.1
272 Noelle Porter USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,500 101.8 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.0
273 Olga Tsarbopoulou GRE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,452 97.6 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.0
274 Pamela Jung USA — — – — 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,426 91.8 — — — 14.3% -2.14 — +0.4
275 Paula Smith USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,541 94.8 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
276 Renata Della BRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 93.4 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.1
277 Renata Tomanova GER — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,532 90.3 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.3
278 Sabina Simmonds ITA — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,558 98.2 — — — 20.0% -3.00 — -0.1
279 Sally Reeves GBR — — – — 0 4 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,394 96.5 — — — 20.0% -2.60 — +0.3
280 Sandy Collins USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,499 101.5 — — — 33.3% -2.33 — -0.0
281 Sasano Yoshiko JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 97.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
282 Shi Min Lin TPE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,487 95.4 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
283 Susan Hagey USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,538 99.0 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.0
284 Susanne Schmid SUI — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,462 96.6 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
285 Susan Russo USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 98.9 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.1
286 Sybille Niox Chateau FRA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,485 99.7 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.2
287 Tami Whitlinger Jones USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,493 100.7 — — — 0.0% -1.50 — -0.1
288 Veronica Platz ARG — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 97.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.2
289 Vicki Beggs USA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,515 98.5 — — — 33.3% -2.67 — +0.1
290 Xenia Anastasiados GRE — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,491 99.7 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.1
291 Xochitl Escobedo MEX — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,471 97.5 — — — 20.0% -2.80 — +0.2

How to read these columns

Rank
For the current season, this is the latest ranking. For past seasons, this is the year-end ranking.
Points
Official ranking points from the selected ranking snapshot.
Wk +/−
Ranking change since the previous ranking snapshot.
YTD Δ
Ranking change since the start of the season.
Win %
Wins divided by total completed main-draw matches.
Elo
For the current season, this is the latest TennisDB Elo rating. For past seasons, this is year-end Elo.
P+
Scoreline performance adjusted for opponent strength on a 0-200 scale. 100 is average; a 10-point difference equals five expected-win percentage points.
Serve+
Estimated percentage points won on serve above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
Return+
Estimated percentage points won on return above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
PD
Return points won divided by opponents' return points won. 1.000 is even; above 1.000 is better.
Set Win %
Sets won divided by total completed sets in eligible scored matches.
Set Margin
Average per-set game margin from the player's perspective. Positive values mean winning sets by more games on average.
Pressure+
Opponent-adjusted deciding-set and tiebreak performance on a 0-200 scale; 100 is the pre-match surface-Elo expectation. Small samples are shrunk, at least three of each are required, and a deciding-set tiebreak counts only once.
Schedule
Expected wins added by opponent quality versus a typical player-season schedule. Positive means an easier schedule; negative means a tougher one. Career values are per 100 matches.

View the full tennis statistics glossary →

WTA Rankings Archive

Browse WTA rankings and season leader archives by year.

2020s
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020
2010s
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
2000s
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
1990s
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
1980s
1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980
1970s
1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970
1960s
1969 1968