Rankings as of: Dec 28, 1998

WTA 1998 Season Leaders & Rankings

Rankings, leaderboards, and performance stats by season.

Lindsay Davenport finished 1998 at WTA No. 1 with 5,654 points.

Need custom historical filters? Search ranking weeks or search player seasons with the Advanced search tool.

Rankings Leaders

Ranking points, results, and season metrics for 1998.

253 players with >= 1 match

# Player Country Rank Points Wk +/− YTD Δ W L Win % Titles AORGWUSO Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD Set Win % Set Margin Pressure+ Schedule
1 Lindsay Davenport USA 1 5,654 – ▲ 2 68 14 82.9% 6 SF SF QF W 2,286 180.4 — — — 75.7% +1.94 105.2 -2.5
2 Martina Hingis SUI 2 5,366 – ▼ 1 60 12 83.3% 5 W SF SF F 2,264 179.3 — — — 78.0% +2.11 99.7 -2.7
3 Jana Novotna CZE 3 3,734 – ▼ 1 50 14 78.1% 4 — QF W SF 2,131 164.1 — — — 75.2% +1.56 99.3 -0.5
4 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario ESP 4 3,417 – ▲ 5 47 17 73.4% 2 QF W QF QF 2,034 164.7 — — — 66.4% +1.25 100.2 +1.1
5 Venus Williams USA 5 3,262 – ▲ 16 51 13 79.7% 3 QF QF QF SF 2,099 174.0 — — — 75.6% +2.04 108.8 -0.8
6 Monica Seles USA 6 3,226 – ▼ 1 42 13 76.4% 2 — F QF QF 2,180 173.5 — — — 70.2% +1.77 95.0 -1.3
7 Mary Pierce FRA 7 2,414 – ▶ 0 35 12 74.5% 4 QF R64 R128 R16 2,124 173.3 — — — 66.0% +1.50 110.4 -2.6
8 Conchita Martínez ESP 8 2,331 – ▲ 4 38 16 70.4% 2 F R16 R32 R16 1,967 163.0 — — — 66.7% +1.41 97.0 +0.1
9 Steffi Graf GER 9 2,261 – ▲ 19 33 9 78.6% 3 — — R32 R16 2,305 172.9 — — — 74.5% +2.06 98.2 -1.1
10 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 10 2,259 – ▲ 1 41 23 64.1% 0 — R128 F R16 2,025 161.2 — — — 58.7% +0.74 101.5 +0.5
11 Patty Schnyder SUI 11 2,256 – ▲ 15 51 20 71.8% 5 R16 QF R64 QF 1,903 159.4 — — — 66.7% +1.21 109.2 -0.2
12 Dominique Monami BEL 12 2,073 – ▲ 6 45 24 65.2% 1 R32 R32 R16 R32 1,918 156.3 — — — 62.9% +0.87 104.2 +1.4
13 Anna Kournikova RUS 13 1,971 – ▲ 17 40 20 66.7% 0 R32 R16 — R16 1,979 169.2 — — — 63.7% +1.00 107.6 -3.2
14 Sandrine Testud FRA 14 1,898 – ▼ 1 51 26 66.2% 1 QF R16 R16 R32 1,945 158.8 — — — 63.6% +1.08 106.1 +1.8
15 Irina Spirlea ROU 15 1,830 – ▼ 7 37 25 59.7% 1 R128 R128 R16 R16 1,943 159.8 — — — 60.3% +0.63 94.0 -0.8
16 Natasha Zvereva BLR 16 1,770 – ▲ 9 35 21 62.5% 1 R32 R64 SF R64 1,934 156.7 — — — 60.5% +0.47 99.6 -3.3
17 Amanda Coetzer RSA 17 1,752 – ▼ 13 32 23 58.2% 1 R16 R128 R64 QF 1,888 157.3 — — — 56.7% +0.43 95.1 +0.8
18 Ai Sugiyama JPN 18 1,398 – ▲ 6 37 21 63.8% 2 R16 R64 R128 R64 1,862 153.1 — — — 60.3% +0.68 107.7 +0.4
19 Silvia Farina Elia ITA 19 1,389 – ▲ 23 38 26 59.4% 0 R128 R32 R128 R32 1,901 156.1 — — — 54.9% +0.30 107.1 -5.7
20 Serena Williams USA 20 1,301 – ▲ 77 26 11 70.3% 0 R64 R16 R32 R32 1,893 158.1 — — — 64.6% +1.29 106.2 -1.2
21 Anke Huber GER 21 1,294 – ▼ 7 25 18 58.1% 0 SF — — R128 1,900 158.7 — — — 55.0% +0.39 93.2 -0.9
22 Julie Halard-Decugis FRA 22 1,200 – ▲ 271 34 21 61.8% 2 — R64 R32 R128 1,916 157.6 — — — 60.5% +0.78 100.1 -3.4
23 Barbara Schett AUT 23 1,157 – ▲ 14 34 26 56.7% 0 R16 R128 R64 R32 1,822 150.4 — — — 58.2% +0.72 94.3 -1.2
24 Magui Serna ESP 24 1,154 – ▲ 19 26 24 52.0% 0 R64 R16 R16 R128 1,801 146.1 — — — 51.2% +0.12 103.6 -1.7
25 Iva Majoli CRO 25 1,135 – ▼ 19 23 20 53.5% 0 R32 QF R64 R64 1,828 148.6 — — — 52.7% 0.00 99.1 -0.2
26 Elena Likhovtseva RUS 26 1,123 – ▲ 12 35 29 54.7% 0 R32 R32 R32 R128 1,828 147.2 — — — 52.5% +0.22 102.2 -1.3
27 Lisa Raymond USA 27 1,054 – ▼ 11 29 21 58.0% 0 R32 R128 R128 R32 1,838 147.1 — — — 56.9% +0.45 98.2 +0.5
28 Henrieta Nagyova SVK 28 1,025 – ▲ 5 35 17 67.3% 2 R16 R16 R64 R32 1,834 145.4 — — — 62.7% +0.92 106.8 -1.2
29 Amélie Mauresmo FRA 29 923 – ▲ 69 20 18 52.6% 0 R32 R128 R64 R32 1,728 146.0 — — — 51.2% +0.12 107.0 -0.6
30 Joannette Kruger RSA 30 874 – ▼ 3 25 22 53.2% 0 R32 R64 R128 R64 1,713 137.8 — — — 50.0% -0.24 101.8 +0.7
31 Corina Morariu USA 31 793 – ▲ 26 25 21 54.4% 0 R64 R64 R32 R128 1,735 136.8 — — — 52.5% -0.03 106.9 +0.2
32 Virginia Ruano Pascual ESP 32 774 – ▲ 18 22 16 57.9% 1 R64 R32 R16 R32 1,776 128.0 — — — 52.5% +0.08 105.0 +0.5
33 Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor FRA 33 767 – ▲ 25 21 21 50.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 R32 1,723 142.2 — — — 51.5% -0.22 103.8 -2.2
34 Tara Snyder USA 34 761 – ▲ 86 20 14 58.8% 1 R64 R64 R64 R64 1,709 130.7 — — — 54.1% +0.35 108.3 +0.7
35 Chanda Rubin USA 35 756 – ▼ 4 20 19 51.3% 0 R128 R16 R32 R64 1,799 144.1 — — — 49.4% +0.27 100.7 -0.8
36 Tamarine Tanasugarn THA 37 692 – ▲ 11 20 21 48.8% 0 R16 R128 R16 R128 1,701 138.7 — — — 48.9% -0.10 99.1 +1.9
37 Alexandra Fusai FRA 39 657 – ▲ 8 15 21 41.7% 0 — R32 R64 R64 1,675 126.1 — — — 41.3% -0.82 103.4 -0.9
38 Fang Li CHN 40 656 – ▲ 26 23 24 48.9% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,676 134.1 — — — 49.0% -0.06 107.9 +1.1
39 Sylvia Plischke AUT 41 635 – ▲ 50 15 17 46.9% 0 R64 R64 R32 R64 1,608 129.3 — — — 48.7% -0.03 99.0 +0.1
40 Amy Frazier USA 42 630 – ▼ 6 12 13 48.0% 0 — — R128 R128 1,766 134.9 — — — 49.2% +0.03 96.6 +0.9
41 Maria Vento-Kabchi VEN 43 607 – ▲ 6 11 18 37.9% 0 R128 R128 R32 R64 1,652 129.3 — — — 41.8% -0.54 98.4 -0.8
42 Cara Black ZIM 44 581 – ▲ 148 10 10 50.0% 0 — R64 R32 R64 1,614 118.9 — — — 45.8% -0.23 — -0.3
43 Barbara Paulus AUT 45 578 – ▼ 22 17 19 47.2% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,751 136.5 — — — 46.3% -0.34 100.4 -0.8
44 Elena Tatarkova UKR 47 573 – ▲ 86 7 8 46.7% 0 R128 R32 R64 R128 1,588 136.7 — — — 48.6% +0.14 99.4 +0.0
45 Sabine Appelmans BEL 48 559 – ▼ 31 13 18 41.9% 0 R128 R128 R32 — 1,722 138.4 — — — 47.1% -0.26 89.5 -0.3
46 Anna Smashnova ISR 49 548 – ▲ 97 12 14 46.1% 0 — R16 R128 R128 1,583 118.4 — — — 50.0% -0.14 102.4 +0.6
47 Nathalie Dechy FRA 50 538 – ▲ 30 12 17 41.4% 0 R128 R32 R128 R16 1,606 125.9 — — — 42.2% -0.42 95.8 +0.6
48 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni CRO 51 535 – ▼ 5 15 11 57.7% 1 R64 — R64 R32 1,768 134.7 — — — 52.6% +0.37 101.1 +0.6
49 Magdalena Grzybowska POL 52 530 – ▼ 12 16 16 50.0% 0 R32 R128 R64 R64 1,707 140.8 — — — 52.2% +0.38 100.5 -1.9
50 Gala Leon Garcia ESP 53 523 – ▲ 2 19 18 51.4% 0 R128 R32 R128 R32 1,704 123.5 — — — 47.1% -0.32 106.4 -0.2
51 Anne-Gaelle Sidot FRA 54 500 – ▼ 20 10 21 32.3% 0 R32 R64 R128 R128 1,631 132.5 — — — 40.0% -0.72 96.0 -0.1
52 Naoko Sawamatsu JPN 55 497 – ▼ 23 12 18 40.0% 0 R128 R64 R32 R64 1,721 125.2 — — — 40.5% -0.62 — -0.9
53 Yayuk Basuki INA 56 479 – ▼ 36 11 16 40.7% 0 R16 R128 R32 R128 1,727 125.9 — — — 45.0% -0.42 96.0 +0.3
54 Miriam Oremans NED 57 473 – ▼ 12 13 16 44.8% 0 R64 R64 R16 R128 1,728 120.1 — — — 41.5% -0.65 102.7 -0.2
55 Shi-Ting Wang TPE 58 464 – ▲ 6 13 17 43.3% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,642 128.9 — — — 44.4% -0.51 — -0.8
56 Rita Grande ITA 59 463 – ▼ 15 12 23 34.3% 0 R64 R64 R64 R128 1,581 124.9 — — — 37.0% -1.12 103.0 -0.3
57 Kveta Peschke CZE 60 451 – ▲ 151 10 11 47.6% 1 — R64 R128 R64 1,568 122.5 — — — 48.1% -0.17 100.6 +0.8
58 Olga Barabanschikova BLR 61 442 – ▼ 5 16 18 47.1% 0 R32 R128 R128 R64 1,651 121.4 — — — 47.4% -0.26 101.1 +1.9
59 Adriana Rikl Gersi CZE 63 435 – ▲ 27 9 15 37.5% 0 R32 R64 R128 R128 1,543 116.8 — — — 37.7% -0.96 102.3 -0.3
60 Florencia Labat ARG 64 433 – ▼ 25 13 20 39.4% 0 R32 R128 R128 R128 1,655 126.6 — — — 40.8% -0.83 99.2 +0.1
61 Samantha Smith GBR 65 424 – ▲ 64 6 5 54.5% 0 — — R16 R128 1,590 120.6 — — — 50.0% -0.33 — 0.0
62 Barbara Rittner GER 66 418 – ▲ 8 13 14 48.1% 0 R64 R32 R64 R128 1,663 132.7 — — — 48.4% +0.21 99.2 -0.2
63 Catalina Cristea ROM 67 397 – ▲ 22 11 17 39.3% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,618 121.7 — — — 37.7% -1.02 103.9 -1.3
64 Meghann Shaughnessy USA 69 373 – ▲ 129 8 9 47.1% 0 R128 — — R128 1,544 115.4 — — — 46.2% -0.03 — +0.7
65 Karina Habsudova SVK 70 372 – ▼ 41 9 17 34.6% 0 R64 R32 R128 R128 1,685 132.5 — — — 40.0% -0.83 100.9 -2.0
66 Kristina Brandi PUR 71 371 – ▲ 14 4 10 28.6% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,518 107.5 — — — 32.3% -1.26 — +0.2
67 María Sánchez Lorenzo ESP 72 371 – ▼ 21 10 21 32.3% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,589 125.2 — — — 33.8% -1.01 101.8 -1.6
68 Larisa Savchenko URS 73 364 – ▲ 11 8 10 44.4% 0 R64 R128 R64 R32 1,652 111.5 — — — 48.8% -0.10 102.7 +0.1
69 Anne Kremer LUX 74 355 – ▲ 53 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — R64 1,552 126.8 — — — 36.4% -1.09 — -0.7
70 Jana Nejedly CAN 75 353 – ▲ 64 4 9 30.8% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,556 109.7 — — — 31.0% -1.31 — -1.1
71 Andrea Glass GER 76 352 – ▲ 10 7 15 31.8% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,509 120.0 — — — 36.2% -1.28 103.6 -0.2
72 Mary Joe Fernandez USA 77 350 – ▼ 67 8 8 50.0% 0 — — — R32 1,935 150.6 — — — 50.0% -0.03 101.7 -1.8
73 Tatiana Panova RUS 78 349 – ▲ 18 7 18 28.0% 0 R64 R64 R64 R128 1,471 113.4 — — — 36.1% -1.28 96.6 -0.6
74 Paola Suarez ARG 80 345 – ▲ 37 10 9 52.6% 1 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,533 107.3 — — — 50.0% +0.29 101.3 +3.0
75 Amelie Cocheteux FRA 81 339 – ▲ 21 7 11 38.9% 0 R128 R128 R128 R64 1,529 115.1 — — — 41.0% -0.72 97.3 +0.4
76 Sandra Cacic USA 82 335 – ▼ 19 7 16 30.4% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,556 129.8 — — — 35.2% -1.04 96.6 -0.1
77 Kristie Boogert NED 83 329 – ▼ 6 10 15 40.0% 0 R64 — R64 R128 1,614 117.4 — — — 47.4% +0.19 94.5 -0.2
78 Jane Chi USA 84 322 – ▲ 164 3 1 75.0% 0 — — — — 1,539 118.1 — — — 77.8% +2.11 — +0.4
79 Silvija Talaja CRO 85 320 – ▲ 117 7 6 53.9% 0 — — R128 — 1,602 114.3 — — — 54.8% +0.32 — +0.5
80 Janet Lee TPE 86 312 – ▲ 28 4 14 22.2% 0 R128 R128 R64 R128 1,498 121.5 — — — 30.0% -1.10 92.7 -0.2
81 Fabiola Zuluaga COL 87 311 – ▲ 82 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — R64 1,504 114.3 — — — 63.6% +0.18 — +0.3
82 Radka Bobkova CZE 88 309 – ▲ 85 5 10 33.3% 0 R128 R128 R128 R64 1,538 114.2 — — — 41.2% -0.76 96.1 +0.1
83 Miho Saeki JPN 89 309 – ▼ 17 9 15 37.5% 0 R64 R32 R128 R64 1,512 115.8 — — — 39.3% -0.88 98.6 +1.0
84 Jana Kandarr GER 90 299 – ▲ 2 7 14 33.3% 0 R64 R128 R128 — 1,498 119.7 — — — 37.3% -1.14 — -0.0
85 Lori Mcneil USA 91 292 – ▲ 210 8 6 57.1% 0 — R128 R32 R64 1,718 129.4 — — — 51.4% +0.09 — -0.6
86 Asa Carlsson SWE 92 289 – ▼ 39 8 13 38.1% 0 R64 R32 R64 R64 1,603 112.8 — — — 41.3% -0.76 — +0.6
87 Pavlina Nola NZL 93 284 – ▲ 30 3 9 25.0% 0 — R128 R128 R64 1,500 106.4 — — — 23.1% -2.50 — -0.8
88 Laura Golarsa ITA 94 277 – ▼ 29 10 16 38.5% 0 R128 R128 R128 R32 1,570 108.1 — — — 40.0% -0.78 102.2 +0.6
89 Mariana Diaz-Oliva ARG 95 276 – ▲ 14 6 9 40.0% 0 R128 R32 R64 R128 1,470 104.3 — — — 43.3% -0.47 — +1.4
90 Emilie Loit FRA 96 274 – ▲ 146 3 5 37.5% 0 — R64 — — 1,512 121.9 — — — 44.4% -0.11 — +0.2
91 Cristina Torrens Valero ESP 97 274 – ▼ 14 11 20 35.5% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,525 114.3 — — — 38.6% -0.69 99.9 +0.6
92 Raluca Sandu ROM 98 270 – ▲ 54 4 7 36.4% 0 — — — R64 1,506 107.5 — — — 40.0% -1.12 — +0.1
93 Jennifer Capriati USA 99 267 – ▼ 38 8 12 40.0% 0 — — R64 R128 1,764 130.1 — — — 45.8% -0.23 — -0.4
94 Meike Babel GER 100 266 – ▲ 16 9 16 36.0% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,643 129.8 — — — 42.9% -0.63 — -1.6
95 Emmanuelle Gagliardi SUI 101 263 – ▼ 23 5 12 29.4% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,497 101.3 — — — 35.7% -1.26 99.3 +1.1
96 Els Callens BEL 102 259 – ▼ 9 2 8 20.0% 0 R128 R64 R128 — 1,525 102.8 — — — 34.8% -1.00 — +0.3
97 Helena Sukova CZE 102 268 – ▼ 27 0 2 0.0% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,632 97.8 — — — 33.3% -1.34 — -0.2
98 Yuka Yoshida JPN 103 257 – ▼ 33 9 16 36.0% 0 R64 R128 R128 R128 1,533 115.8 — — — 35.7% -0.75 100.2 +0.0
99 Marlene Weingartner GER 104 255 – ▲ 32 4 4 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,510 116.1 — — — 50.0% -0.06 — +0.3
100 Karin Miller USA 105 251 – ▲ 35 1 3 25.0% 0 — — R128 R128 1,500 96.1 — — — 30.0% -1.50 — -0.1
101 Katarina Studenikova SVK 106 249 – ▼ 37 5 13 27.8% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,577 105.6 — — — 31.7% -1.44 95.4 +0.3
102 Brie Rippner USA 107 248 – ▲ 47 2 3 40.0% 0 — — — R64 1,531 122.7 — — — 40.0% -0.60 — -0.3
103 Evgenia Kulikovskaya RUS 108 245 – ▲ 23 3 3 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,506 104.4 — — — 41.7% -1.17 — +0.3
104 Sonya Jeyaseelan CAN 109 244 – ▼ 14 8 7 53.3% 0 R64 R64 R128 — 1,549 115.3 — — — 48.4% -0.19 103.4 +1.8
105 Conchita Martínez Granados ESP 110 243 – ▲ 54 3 1 75.0% 0 — — — — 1,542 102.2 — — — 54.5% 0.00 — +0.5
106 Samantha Reeves USA 111 241 – ▲ 65 2 8 20.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,480 114.3 — — — 29.2% -1.17 — -0.2
107 Flora Perfetti ITA 112 240 – ▼ 12 6 12 33.3% 0 R32 R64 R64 R128 1,525 112.3 — — — 37.5% -1.25 — +0.8
108 Nicole Pratt AUS 113 239 – ▼ 3 4 13 23.5% 0 R128 R64 R128 R128 1,464 116.3 — — — 32.5% -0.78 — +0.1
109 Seda Noorlander NED 114 237 – ▲ 8 3 8 27.3% 0 — — R64 — 1,482 105.5 — — — 29.2% -1.21 — +0.2
110 Rita Kuti-Kis HUN 115 235 – ▲ 162 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,537 112.0 — — — 50.0% -0.38 — -0.1
111 Magdalena Maleeva BUL 116 235 – ▼ 81 5 7 41.7% 0 R128 — — — 1,721 124.2 — — — 39.3% -0.82 — +0.8
112 Nana Smith JPN 117 233 – ▼ 13 4 8 33.3% 0 R64 R128 R64 R128 1,538 116.7 — — — 40.0% -1.00 — -0.1
113 Barbara Schwartz AUT 118 229 – ▲ 56 3 6 33.3% 0 — R32 R128 R128 1,473 108.8 — — — 36.8% -0.74 — +0.2
114 Denisa Chladkova CZE 119 228 – ▼ 67 4 19 17.4% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,439 95.8 — — — 22.4% -1.92 100.1 +1.2
115 Lilia Osterloh USA 120 226 – ▲ 50 0 5 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,501 105.3 — — — 23.1% -1.85 — +0.1
116 Tathiana Garbin ITA 121 224 – ▲ 96 1 4 20.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 99.1 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — +0.1
117 Lea Ghirardi FRA 122 224 – ▲ 2 6 9 40.0% 0 R64 R128 — R128 1,504 113.7 — — — 44.4% -0.80 — +0.4
118 Adriana Serra Zanetti ITA 123 222 – ▲ 63 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — — 1,508 100.1 — — — 30.0% -1.60 — +0.3
119 Laurence Courtois BEL 125 221 – ▲ 57 4 9 30.8% 0 — — — R128 1,578 117.9 — — — 41.9% -0.13 — +0.0
120 Janette Husarova SVK 127 220 – ▲ 366 5 9 35.7% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,524 112.1 — — — 36.4% -1.00 103.2 +0.3
121 Jolene Watanabe USA 128 218 – ▼ 27 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,499 96.1 — — — 14.3% -2.72 — 0.0
122 Aleksandra Olsza POL 129 216 – ▲ 12 0 4 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,442 104.5 — — — 0.0% -3.63 — -0.2
123 Maureen Drake CAN 130 211 – ▲ 29 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,412 103.2 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.0
124 Miriam Schnitzer GER 131 210 – ▲ 19 1 2 33.3% 0 — — R128 R64 1,501 102.1 — — — 28.6% -2.00 — -0.1
125 Alexandra Stevenson USA 132 209 – ▲ 261 3 7 30.0% 0 — — — R128 1,477 103.0 — — — 36.4% -1.05 — +1.0
126 Sandra Nacuk SCG 133 207 – ▲ 79 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,482 100.4 — — — 20.0% -2.40 — -0.1
127 Ludmila Cervanova SVK 135 204 – ▲ 152 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,508 99.5 — — — 50.0% -0.25 — +0.0
128 Francesca Lubiani ITA 136 199 – ▼ 77 5 14 26.3% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,546 117.0 — — — 26.8% -1.41 96.8 -0.8
129 Patricia Wartusch AUT 137 199 – ▲ 79 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,488 98.8 — — — 44.4% -0.56 — +0.1
130 Annabel Ellwood AUS 138 197 – ▼ 35 3 5 37.5% 0 R32 R128 — — 1,456 109.8 — — — 36.8% -1.16 — +0.2
131 Karin Kschwendt AUT 139 193 – ▲ 33 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,534 104.9 — — — 37.5% -0.88 — +0.2
132 Tina Krizan SLO 141 187 – ▲ 44 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — R128 1,487 107.6 — — — 25.0% -1.25 — -0.1
133 Lenka Nemeckova CZE 142 186 – ▼ 61 6 13 31.6% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,475 102.6 — — — 32.6% -0.93 102.3 +0.9
134 Laurence Andretto FRA 143 182 – ▲ 67 1 1 50.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,500 100.2 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.2
135 Kerry-Anne Guse AUS 144 181 – ▼ 82 4 13 23.5% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,516 119.0 — — — 30.8% -1.23 — -0.5
136 Nadia Petrova RUS 145 177 – ▲ 448 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,536 108.3 — — — 40.0% -1.10 — -0.2
137 Haruka Inoue JPN 146 173 – ▼ 33 3 7 30.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,475 113.7 — — — 42.3% -0.58 — +0.6
138 Surina De Beer RSA 147 172 – ▲ 53 2 2 50.0% 0 — — R32 — 1,524 104.6 — — — 44.4% +0.11 — +0.3
139 Marion Maruska AUT 148 172 – ▼ 54 5 13 27.8% 0 R128 R64 R128 — 1,534 112.6 — — — 37.8% -1.00 97.0 -0.9
140 Julia Abe GER 149 170 – ▲ 87 3 2 60.0% 0 — — — — 1,549 114.0 — — — 60.0% +0.50 — +0.3
141 Liezel Huber USA 150 169 – ▲ 5 1 5 16.7% 0 — R64 — R128 1,450 96.4 — — — 21.4% -2.14 — +0.3
142 Karen Cross GBR 151 163 – ▼ 4 1 2 33.3% 0 — — R64 — 1,493 98.2 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.2
143 Ginger Helgeson USA 152 162 – ▲ 16 2 5 28.6% 0 R64 R128 R128 — 1,572 99.1 — — — 41.2% -0.71 94.9 +1.0
144 Sung-Hee Park KOR 153 161 – ▼ 42 1 5 16.7% 0 R128 — R128 R64 1,457 99.2 — — — 21.4% -2.29 — +0.4
145 Jill Craybas USA 154 160 – ▲ 455 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,473 98.9 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.2
146 Julie Pullin GBR 156 158 – ▲ 52 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,479 97.2 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — +0.2
147 Shinobu Asagoe JPN 157 155 – ▲ 1 0 3 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 97.8 — — — 14.3% -2.43 — +0.0
148 Larissa Schaerer PAR 159 155 – ▲ 6 3 1 75.0% 0 — — — — 1,510 102.8 — — — 60.0% +0.50 — +0.7
149 Louise Latimer GBR 160 151 – ▲ 122 1 1 50.0% 0 — — R64 — 1,514 102.1 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.1
150 Maria Paola Zavagli ITA 161 150 – ▲ 141 2 1 66.7% 0 — — — — 1,535 108.5 — — — 57.1% +0.86 — -0.1
151 Nirupama Vaidyanathan IND 162 150 – ▲ 35 1 2 33.3% 0 R64 — — — 1,477 96.2 — — — 28.6% -1.72 — +0.1
152 Sandra Kleinova CZE 163 149 – ▼ 122 3 20 13.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,443 104.2 — — — 24.5% -1.76 89.3 +0.2
153 Mashona Washington USA 165 147 – ▲ 72 1 3 25.0% 0 — — — R128 1,493 104.5 — — — 33.3% -1.11 — +0.1
154 Catherine Barclay AUS 166 147 – ▲ 65 1 2 33.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,494 105.3 — — — 33.3% -1.17 — -0.1
155 Rika Hiraki JPN 168 144 – ▼ 69 3 4 42.9% 0 R32 — — — 1,501 113.1 — — — 50.0% -0.25 — +0.6
156 Olga Lugina UKR 169 143 – ▼ 62 3 8 27.3% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,453 103.0 — — — 36.4% -0.95 — +0.7
157 Sandra Dopfer AUT 172 142 – ▼ 60 1 5 16.7% 0 R128 — — R128 1,443 92.8 — — — 16.7% -2.25 — +0.7
158 Eun-Ha Kim KOR 174 137 – ▼ 18 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,501 102.3 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — -0.1
159 Ana Alcazar ESP 176 134 – ▼ 32 2 3 40.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,494 101.6 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — +0.7
160 Sandra Kloesel GER 177 129 – ▼ 59 2 6 25.0% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,463 110.0 — — — 29.4% -1.59 — +0.3
161 Erika De Lone USA 178 128 – ▼ 29 2 4 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,443 103.8 — — — 35.7% -1.57 — +0.3
162 Antonella Serra Zanetti ITA 183 121 – ▲ 156 2 2 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,512 105.1 — — — 50.0% -0.10 — +0.0
163 Rachel Mcquillan AUS 185 118 – ▼ 131 3 15 16.7% 0 R128 R128 R128 R128 1,528 122.7 — — — 29.5% -0.93 — -0.7
164 Elena Dementieva RUS 186 117 – ▲ 163 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,478 106.2 — — — 20.0% -1.80 — -0.1
165 Irina Selyutina KAZ 187 117 – ▲ 140 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 101.9 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.2
166 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy NED 188 117 – ▼ 173 3 10 23.1% 0 R64 R128 — — 1,674 104.7 — — — 39.1% -1.04 96.5 +1.1
167 Svetlana Krivencheva BUL 190 114 – ▼ 23 1 4 20.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,460 97.2 — — — 18.2% -2.09 — +0.1
168 Jasmin Woehr GER 191 113 – ▲ 105 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 98.1 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.3
169 Wiltrud Probst GER 194 110 – ▼ 112 2 9 18.2% 0 R128 R128 — — 1,556 112.7 — — — 24.0% -2.32 — -0.5
170 Sandra Cecchini ITA 200 106 – ▲ 5 4 8 33.3% 0 — R128 — — 1,555 95.4 — — — 34.6% -1.00 — +0.3
171 Jacqueline Trail USA 204 103 – ▲ 136 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,516 110.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
172 Yoon Jeong Cho KOR 207 102 – ▲ 45 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,470 97.2 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.3
173 Meilen Tu USA 209 101 – ▼ 133 2 3 40.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,533 111.4 — — — 46.2% -0.61 — -0.1
174 Alice Canepa ITA 210 99 – ▲ 24 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 98.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.0
175 Lorna Woodroffe GBR 212 99 – ▼ 74 0 2 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,477 95.8 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
176 Radka Pelikanova CZE 215 97 – ▲ 11 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,453 99.1 — — — 33.3% +0.33 — +0.2
177 Saori Obata JPN 216 97 – ▲ 11 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,440 95.7 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.2
178 Evie Dominikovic AUS 217 96 – ▼ 37 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,481 103.3 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — +0.0
179 Vanessa Webb CAN 218 95 – ▲ 116 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,464 104.9 — — — 0.0% -3.25 — -0.1
180 Michaela Pastikova CZE 219 94 – ▲ 105 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,514 110.6 — — — 60.0% +1.00 — -0.1
181 Ludmila Richterova CZE 221 93 – ▼ 60 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — R128 1,568 96.9 — — — 28.6% -2.28 — -0.0
182 Karolina Jagieniak FRA 225 88 – ▲ 42 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 98.3 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
183 Evelyn Fauth AUT 226 86 – ▲ 54 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,476 99.0 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.2
184 Alena Vaskova CZE 228 85 – ▲ 34 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,454 99.6 — — — 0.0% -1.75 — -0.0
185 Rennae Stubbs AUS 230 84 – ▲ 193 1 3 25.0% 0 R128 — R128 — 1,529 107.9 — — — 30.0% -1.30 — -0.7
186 Ding Ding CHN 233 83 – ▲ 438 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,502 96.7 — — — 40.0% -1.00 — +0.2
187 Eva Martincova CZE 236 82 – ▼ 99 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,460 108.4 — — — 50.0% 0.00 — -0.2
188 Jelena Kostanic Tosic CRO 240 81 – ▲ 160 1 2 33.3% 0 — — — — 1,490 103.8 — — — 42.9% +0.43 — +0.2
189 Petra Langrova TCH 249 78 – ▼ 117 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,509 97.6 — — — 33.3% -3.33 — +0.0
190 Kristine Kunce AUS 260 72 – ▼ 139 1 5 16.7% 0 R128 — — — 1,540 98.7 — — — 21.4% -1.86 — +0.2
191 Jean Okada USA 261 71 – ▲ 121 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — R128 1,485 95.8 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.2
192 Emmanuelle Curutchet FRA 264 70 – ▼ 104 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,483 99.0 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — +0.0
193 Syna Schreiber GER 266 69 – ▼ 104 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 101.4 — — — 33.3% -1.50 — -0.1
194 Tzipora Obziler ISR 269 69 – ▲ 24 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 96.9 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
195 Ines Gorrochategui ARG 275 66 – ▼ 187 0 3 0.0% 0 R128 R128 R128 — 1,630 96.0 — — — 14.3% -2.72 — +0.4
196 Naoko Kijimuta JPN 279 64 – ▼ 208 1 6 14.3% 0 R128 R128 R64 — 1,595 103.6 — — — 27.8% -2.11 — +0.3
197 Caroline Dhenin FRA 281 63 – ▼ 130 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,521 97.5 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.3
198 Ann Grossman USA 283 62 – ▼ 204 2 4 33.3% 0 R128 R64 — — 1,595 103.2 — — — 33.3% -1.58 — +0.1
199 Adriana Barna GER 287 61 – ▲ 51 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,468 97.6 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.2
200 Trudi Musgrave AUS 309 52 – ▼ 63 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,479 97.8 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.1
201 Segolene Berger FRA 310 52 – ▼ 111 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,491 96.8 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — 0.0
202 Mana Endo JPN 316 51 – ▼ 201 1 3 25.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,562 95.6 — — — 30.0% -0.80 — +0.2
203 Zsofia Gubacsi HUN 317 51 – ▲ 232 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 100.5 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.1
204 Meredith Mcgrath USA 318 51 – ▼ 14 1 2 33.3% 0 R128 — — — 1,895 99.5 — — — 40.0% -0.60 — +0.0
205 Mi-Ra Jeon KOR 326 50 – ▼ 178 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,460 97.5 — — — 0.0% -4.25 — +0.0
206 Sarah Taylor USA 330 48 – ▲ 162 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,485 94.9 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.1
207 Young-Ja Choi KOR 340 44 – ▼ 125 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,496 104.0 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — -0.2
208 Magalie Lamarre FRA 345 43 – ▼ 174 0 1 0.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,520 106.1 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — -0.3
209 Jelena Dokic AUS 349 40 – ▲ 222 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 107.3 — — — 33.3% -0.67 — -0.3
210 Shiho Hisamatsu JPN 355 40 – ▲ 236 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 95.6 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
211 Hana Sromova CZE 357 40 – ▲ 14 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,488 94.2 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.0
212 Ekaterina Sysoeva RUS 389 33 – ▼ 81 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,481 97.1 — — — 33.3% -2.00 — +0.2
213 Benjamas Sangaram THA 401 31 – ▼ 76 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,454 94.5 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
214 Marissa Irvin USA 412 29 – ▲ 281 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,495 101.1 — — — 33.3% -3.00 — -0.0
215 Tina Pisnik SLO 414 29 – ▲ 84 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,493 94.0 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.1
216 Jana Hlavackova CZE 448 24 – ▲ 560 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 94.6 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.1
217 Blanka Kumbarova CZE 464 23 – ▲ 142 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 98.9 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.1
218 Veronika Martinek GER 465 23 – ▼ 322 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,504 95.7 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — +0.1
219 Rene Simpson CAN 548 16 – ▼ 440 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,512 105.5 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.2
220 Katrina Adams USA 625 11 – ▼ 347 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,515 98.9 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.1
221 Renee Reid AUS 673 10 – ▼ 470 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,492 99.4 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.1
222 Marie-Ève Pelletier CAN 685 9 – ▲ 218 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 103.6 — — — 0.0% -4.00 — -0.1
223 Angelica Gavaldon MEX 697 8 – ▼ 591 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,521 — — — — — — — -0.1
224 Gloria Pizzichini ITA 732 8 – ▼ 645 0 1 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,596 98.1 — — — 33.3% -1.33 — +0.3
225 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie ROU — — – — 18 25 41.9% 0 R16 R32 R128 R128 1,696 144.6 — — — 46.9% -0.16 96.4 -0.9
226 Mariaan De Swardt RSA — — – — 17 10 63.0% 1 — R128 R32 R64 1,766 125.6 — — — 56.7% +0.07 110.8 0.0
227 Anne Miller USA — — – — 13 15 46.4% 0 R64 R128 R64 R32 1,646 131.4 — — — 44.3% -0.26 — -0.8
228 Kimberly Po Messerli USA — — – — 11 15 42.3% 0 — R128 R64 R16 1,743 135.6 — — — 44.8% -0.59 102.7 -0.8
229 Alexia Dechaume Balleret FRA — — – — 9 19 32.1% 0 R128 R32 R64 R64 1,592 121.9 — — — 36.8% -0.87 98.4 -1.1
230 Elena Pampoulova BUL — — – — 9 8 52.9% 0 R64 R64 R128 R128 1,648 116.6 — — — 52.4% -0.14 — +0.2
231 Elena Makarova RUS — — – — 5 9 35.7% 0 R64 R128 R64 — 1,645 110.4 — — — 41.9% -0.55 — -0.8
232 Maria Eugenia Vento VEN — — – — 4 1 80.0% 0 — — — — 1,584 117.4 — — — 75.0% +1.00 — -0.1
233 Eva Bes Ostariz ESP — — – — 1 3 25.0% 0 — R128 — — 1,473 105.8 — — — 33.3% -0.33 — -0.2
234 Germana Di Natale ITA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,498 101.4 — — — 50.0% +0.83 — +0.3
235 Laura Granville USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — R64 1,512 104.8 — — — 50.0% -0.50 — +0.1
236 Mariana Mesa COL — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,500 101.8 — — — 50.0% +0.25 — +0.3
237 Melissa Mazzotta USA — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,497 102.4 — — — 50.0% +0.25 — +0.1
238 Noelle Van Lottum FRA — — – — 1 2 33.3% 0 — R128 — — 1,428 97.9 — — — 44.4% -0.78 — +0.2
239 Patricia Hy Boulais CAN — — – — 1 8 11.1% 0 R128 R128 R64 — 1,573 92.9 — — — 26.1% -2.00 — -0.0
240 Rewa Harriman NZL — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — — — — 1,494 108.7 — — — 40.0% 0.00 — -0.1
241 Seon Young Park KOR — — – — 1 1 50.0% 0 — R64 — — 1,502 98.4 — — — 40.0% -0.20 — +0.4
242 Ana Salas Lozano ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,492 101.2 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — -0.1
243 Ceyda Keyman TUR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,480 91.9 — — — 0.0% -5.00 — +0.2
244 Ceylan Konuk TUR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,484 89.0 — — — 0.0% -6.00 — +0.1
245 Dora Krstulovic CRO — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 97.1 — — — 0.0% -3.00 — +0.1
246 Joanne Ward GBR — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — R128 — 1,452 96.8 — — — 0.0% -2.50 — +0.2
247 Juliana Garcia COL — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,483 91.5 — — — 0.0% -5.50 — +0.1
248 Kristina Triska SWE — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,473 98.9 — — — 33.3% -0.17 — +0.2
249 Nuria Montero ESP — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,490 99.9 — — — 0.0% -3.50 — -0.1
250 Orawan Wongkamalasai THA — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,489 99.6 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — -0.0
251 Riei Kawamata JPN — — – — 0 1 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,486 99.8 — — — 33.3% -1.00 — +0.1
252 Siobhan Drake Brockman AUS — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 R128 — — — 1,442 88.1 — — — 0.0% -4.50 — +0.3
253 Virag Csurgo HUN — — – — 0 2 0.0% 0 — — — — 1,477 94.7 — — — 20.0% -2.60 — -0.0

How to read these columns

Rank
For the current season, this is the latest ranking. For past seasons, this is the year-end ranking.
Points
Official ranking points from the selected ranking snapshot.
Wk +/−
Ranking change since the previous ranking snapshot.
YTD Δ
Ranking change since the start of the season.
Win %
Wins divided by total completed main-draw matches.
Elo
For the current season, this is the latest TennisDB Elo rating. For past seasons, this is year-end Elo.
P+
Scoreline performance adjusted for opponent strength on a 0-200 scale. 100 is average; a 10-point difference equals five expected-win percentage points.
Serve+
Estimated percentage points won on serve above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
Return+
Estimated percentage points won on return above or below expectation after opponent and era adjustment. Historical values are best-effort where point denominators are unavailable.
PD
Return points won divided by opponents' return points won. 1.000 is even; above 1.000 is better.
Set Win %
Sets won divided by total completed sets in eligible scored matches.
Set Margin
Average per-set game margin from the player's perspective. Positive values mean winning sets by more games on average.
Pressure+
Opponent-adjusted deciding-set and tiebreak performance on a 0-200 scale; 100 is the pre-match surface-Elo expectation. Small samples are shrunk, at least three of each are required, and a deciding-set tiebreak counts only once.
Schedule
Expected wins added by opponent quality versus a typical player-season schedule. Positive means an easier schedule; negative means a tougher one. Career values are per 100 matches.

View the full tennis statistics glossary →

WTA Rankings Archive

Browse WTA rankings and season leader archives by year.

2020s
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020
2010s
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
2000s
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
1990s
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
1980s
1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980
1970s
1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970
1960s
1969 1968